Fork rake recommendation?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Fork rake recommendation?
All my current road bikes have 73 degree heat tube angles and 43 mm offset forks (23 mm tires). That gives a pretty standard 58 mm trail which works well for me. I am looking at a frame (only) that has a 73.5 mm head tube angle. It is out of production and information about what fork rake was originally recommended for this frame is not available. At least I am having trouble finding it. To get the same trail with this frame I would need a 40 mm offset fork. They are available but not nearly so common as 43 mm, especially at discount online sources and ebay. What would you guys recommend? Is the 40 mm offset fork the safe bet?
Just in case anyone might know the recommended fork, the frame is a Merlin Works CR in size M.
Just in case anyone might know the recommended fork, the frame is a Merlin Works CR in size M.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
I just know that the 58 mm I get with 73 degrees /43 mm offset/23 mm tires works well for me in general. So sure I have answered my own question. 40 mm fork it is! I dunno. I guess I was just hoping to get some discussion and maybe some info about what the factory recommended fork for this frame was. Especially since 40 mm rake forks are nearly impossible to find. (Prove me wrong...please.)
Last edited by rpenmanparker; 11-05-14 at 09:19 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I think a 43 mm rake fork will work fine on this frame and you will never notice any difference. Trail can vary over a fair range and the bikes still handle well. My bike was recommended to have 45 mm of rake but came with a 43 mm fork and handles just fine.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Good to know. Thanks.
#6
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
A half degree of head angle is a very small change. You may feel it when you first get on the bike if you have recently been riding one of your others, but the change is so small that you will forget about it within a block or two. In short, you are over thinking this. 43 or 40 will work just fine, use whichever one you have.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,071
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4200 Post(s)
Liked 3,853 Times
in
2,303 Posts
This is why some builders will make their own forks. Andy.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
A half degree of head angle is a very small change. You may feel it when you first get on the bike if you have recently been riding one of your others, but the change is so small that you will forget about it within a block or two. In short, you are over thinking this. 43 or 40 will work just fine, use whichever one you have.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I've had 43 and 40 mm offset otherwise identical forks on the same bike, 73.5 HTA, 700 X 23 tires. I could definitely feel the difference but could easily adjust to either. I elected to go with the 40 for slightly more high speed stability but I was fine with the original 43 as well.
Last edited by Al1943; 11-05-14 at 05:33 PM.
#10
Banned
And ... small radius bend towards the Tip will be more resilient , as opposed to a longer radius bend taking up more length of the blade.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
When I first got involved with bike mechanics in the mid-'80's it seemed most road replacement forks came in both 40 and 45 mm rakes. A bit later 43 mm seemed to replace both of them. i expect that was to reduce inventory requirements and it was concluded the the small differences were inconsequential.
#14
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
These days, you need to go out of your way to find replacement forks with any curvature in the blades. Cheapness reigns supreme, and straight blade forks with offset crowns are most commonly available.
#15
Banned
saves the cost of the blade bending step too . weld paint and ship.
(SJS Thorne is saying they wont sell a Disc fork that is not straight blade)
(SJS Thorne is saying they wont sell a Disc fork that is not straight blade)
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
When I first got involved with bike mechanics in the mid-'80's it seemed most road replacement forks came in both 40 and 45 mm rakes. A bit later 43 mm seemed to replace both of them. i expect that was to reduce inventory requirements and it was concluded the the small differences were inconsequential.
#17
Senior Member
Robert, I have bikes with trail in the low 50s to the upper 50s. Stability at speed is mostly the same, stability in a tight turn is better with less trail. Head tube angle effects initial turn-in more than anything else if the fork is offset to produce the same amount of trail.
Brad
Brad
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
There is a bit more to it than just lower manufacturing cost. Making straight blade forks required accurate alignment from the beginning and that required modern jigs and welding/molding fixtures. Older curved blade forks could be aligned after brazing by bending the fork blades as needed. You can't do that with straight blade forks.
#19
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
#21
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,463 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I just learned a lot from this thread.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.