Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Shimano 105 r5700 vs 2010 105 STIs

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Shimano 105 r5700 vs 2010 105 STIs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-19, 08:05 PM
  #1  
horatio 
Hump, what hump?
Thread Starter
 
horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,934

Bikes: See signature

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times in 145 Posts
Shimano 105 r5700 vs 2010 105 STIs

So, I'm regularly riding my 2010 Cannondale SIX-5, and wondering if an upgrade to the latest 10-speed model shifters would be worth it. Other than aero cable routing, are the 5700 STIs much better? If so, how?
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports


horatio is offline  
Old 07-08-19, 10:07 PM
  #2  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,537

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1523 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Are you posting from a time warp?

It's a lot easier to remove a frayed-off cable head from the aero levers. IIRC, the 11s ones are better again. As for actual shifting, meh... 10s aero STIs can sometimes defy all efforts to minimise cable friction enough to perform well. There's a reason they ran the gear cables that way in the first place.

11s are much more reliable due to revised cable pull. I'm not sure, but they might have done something with the cable pull midway through 10s; I seem to recall having to get in a new matching RD when a customer upgraded his 10s levers.

If it was me I'd go straight to 11s and employ one of the methods for using it on a 10s wheel. I actually have a 10s billet cassette modified to fit on a 7s cassette body, retrofit to reduce dish on my 10s wheel that already has an off-centre rim, because I hate dish. So not a fan of 11s wheels.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 03:50 AM
  #3  
horatio 
Hump, what hump?
Thread Starter
 
horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,934

Bikes: See signature

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times in 145 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
Are you posting from a time warp?

It's a lot easier to remove a frayed-off cable head from the aero levers. IIRC, the 11s ones are better again. As for actual shifting, meh... 10s aero STIs can sometimes defy all efforts to minimise cable friction enough to perform well. There's a reason they ran the gear cables that way in the first place.

11s are much more reliable due to revised cable pull. I'm not sure, but they might have done something with the cable pull midway through 10s; I seem to recall having to get in a new matching RD when a customer upgraded his 10s levers.

If it was me I'd go straight to 11s and employ one of the methods for using it on a 10s wheel. I actually have a 10s billet cassette modified to fit on a 7s cassette body, retrofit to reduce dish on my 10s wheel that already has an off-centre rim, because I hate dish. So not a fan of 11s wheels.
Dude, I spend most of my time in the C&V! I’ve not really kept up with newer products. From what I’ve learned so far (which is not a lot!) the 5700 series replaced my 5600 series shifters in 2011, so they’ve been around awhile. If they’re not much better, I won’t bother.

I’m not ready to invest in 11-speed drivetrain, but it’s good to know the 11s will work with 10s. I’ll look into that.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports


horatio is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 04:31 AM
  #4  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,537

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1523 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Not will work with; can work with... It can take some finagling, unless you're happy with the one 11s Shimano cassette that fits, an 11-34, IIRC
Kimmo is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 04:40 AM
  #5  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,029

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22573 Post(s)
Liked 8,918 Times in 4,152 Posts
I would not bother unless you really hate the exposed cables on current shifters.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 06:37 AM
  #6  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
I made this exact move about 7 years ago. Cleaner look, poorer shifting on the RD in particular - slightly higher effort and a little less crisp feedback. The other potential negative is that the x700-series shifters have a reputation for eating cables (I never had a problem with that, but @datlas can attest to it). Prolly safe to blame the new (at the time), tighter cable routing for both of these niggles.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 10:05 AM
  #7  
horatio 
Hump, what hump?
Thread Starter
 
horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,934

Bikes: See signature

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times in 145 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
I would not bother unless you really hate the exposed cables on current shifters.
The exposed cables don't really bother me.

Originally Posted by WhyFi
I made this exact move about 7 years ago. Cleaner look, poorer shifting on the RD in particular - slightly higher effort and a little less crisp feedback. The other potential negative is that the x700-series shifters have a reputation for eating cables (I never had a problem with that, but @datlas can attest to it). Prolly safe to blame the new (at the time), tighter cable routing for both of these niggles.
Good to know. Thanks.

How about last generation Ultegra 10s?
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports


horatio is offline  
Old 07-09-19, 10:16 AM
  #8  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by horatio
Good to know. Thanks.

How about last generation Ultegra 10s?
Same story between 5700 and 6700 (hence "x700-series")
WhyFi is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 07:12 AM
  #9  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,537

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1523 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
I think there's a 10s version of the 11s generation shifters, isn't there? That would be the one to think about if you don't mind going below 105...
Kimmo is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 07:36 AM
  #10  
rjones28 
Mostly Harmless
 
rjones28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chittenango, NY
Posts: 56,564

Bikes: Have two wheels

Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13694 Post(s)
Liked 4,520 Times in 2,499 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
I think there's a 10s version of the 11s generation shifters, isn't there? That would be the one to think about if you don't mind going below 105...
Tiagra is Shimano's current 10spd group.
__________________
Originally Posted by patentcad
If this thread doesn't go 10 pages I'm quitting BF.
rjones28 is online now  
Old 07-10-19, 08:14 AM
  #11  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Oh, one other thing - brake pull changed the generation after 5600, so braking will be a little higher effort/less effective for the same effort. It didn't bother me that much, but I can see how it could bother some, 'specially if braking is only so-so to begin with.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 12:25 PM
  #12  
Dave Mayer
Senior Member
 
Dave Mayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,499
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1369 Post(s)
Liked 475 Times in 277 Posts
I have several bikes with STI shifters, going back to the dawn of brifters: circa early 90’s. When you are the 'bike guy' at work, bikes and components tend to fall into your lap.

I actually far prefer Campagnolo Ergopower ergonomics, but leave this aside.

The best shifting (fast, trouble-free and precise) out of all the STI shifters: the ones with the shift cables on the outside. The recent move to under the bar shift cables introduced tight bends, and extra friction. Plus the propensity to eat cables.

I have some mid-90s Shimano 600 shifters: pure shifting bliss. Flawless. Shimano got brifters right - right out of the gate.

You'll get some howls of protest... how can 25-year led shifters be any good... the reason why most folks give up on old shifters is because a cable end is jammed in a shifter body. Or their cables and housings are worn, and should have been replaced (yearly). Or their old shifters could have been revived with a 5 second spritz of WD40.

All simple and cheap fixes.
Dave Mayer is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 12:28 PM
  #13  
ksryder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 329 Posts
Shimano 5700 series 105 shifters are absolute crap. Poorly designed cable routing means the shifting is finicky and they're prone to having shifter cable heads break off in the shifter.

I hated mine for the 3 years I had them.

The current 10-speed Tiagra won't work with the older generation Shimano 10-speed stuff because they changed the cable pull--I think so the RD would be cross-compatible with 11sp shifters.
ksryder is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 12:42 PM
  #14  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Mayer
I have several bikes with STI shifters, going back to the dawn of brifters: circa early 90’s. When you are the 'bike guy' at work, bikes and components tend to fall into your lap.

I actually far prefer Campagnolo Ergopower ergonomics, but leave this aside.

The best shifting (fast, trouble-free and precise) out of all the STI shifters: the ones with the shift cables on the outside. The recent move to under the bar shift cables introduced tight bends, and extra friction. Plus the propensity to eat cables.

I have some mid-90s Shimano 600 shifters: pure shifting bliss. Flawless. Shimano got brifters right - right out of the gate.

You'll get some howls of protest... how can 25-year led shifters be any good... the reason why most folks give up on old shifters is because a cable end is jammed in a shifter body. Or their cables and housings are worn, and should have been replaced (yearly). Or their old shifters could have been revived with a 5 second spritz of WD40.

All simple and cheap fixes.
Have you actually ridden any of the new 6800/8000 shifters? They are way better than peak 10 speed STI 7800 with external cables.
redlude97 is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 01:18 PM
  #15  
MyTi
6-4 Titanium
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 330
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times in 31 Posts
My 6500 shifters which have exposed cables seem to shift as good as the new Ultegra r8000 shifters I tried. In fact I liked the way mike bike shifted versus the brand new bike I tested but I really dialed my bike in though. Those mechanics probably are not very good even though it seems like it's a reputable shop. So grain of salt.
MyTi is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 01:28 PM
  #16  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi
My 6500 shifters which have exposed cables seem to shift as good as the new Ultegra r8000 shifters I tried. In fact I liked the way mike bike shifted versus the brand new bike I tested but I really dialed my bike in though. Those mechanics probably are not very good even though it seems like it's a reputable shop. So grain of salt.
The lever throw on 5500/6500 was excessive for the brake lever to get 3 shifts, especially from the drops IME, my last set finally died 2 years ago when the hoods disintegrated
redlude97 is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 02:41 PM
  #17  
Dave Mayer
Senior Member
 
Dave Mayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,499
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1369 Post(s)
Liked 475 Times in 277 Posts
Originally Posted by redlude97
Have you actually ridden any of the new 6800/8000 shifters? They are way better than peak 10 speed STI 7800 with external cables.
I own two bikes with 5800 11-speed. Shifting is pretty good. Still not as good as brand new 7800, or 7700, or 7400 or 6400.

Keep in mind that in order to overcome the extra cable friction of under the bar wrap routing, Shimano has resorted to premium extra slick cable housing. No reason why you couldn't use this on your 7800 shifters, to produce even better shifting.

All of these systems have poor shifting relative to a 8 and 11-speed Alfine internal gear hub. That is impressive shifting.
Dave Mayer is offline  
Old 07-10-19, 05:18 PM
  #18  
road292
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ksryder
Shimano 5700 series 105 shifters are absolute crap. Poorly designed cable routing means the shifting is finicky and they're prone to having shifter cable heads break off in the shifter.
I have a 2012-ish Trek with 5700 shifters (and brakes). Once I got past the initial cable stretch and adjustments, I've had zero problems with either the FD or RD. I will admit that I've had the rear derailleur cable break on me twice out on the road, this in about 12K miles of riding. Both times the cable head sheared off in the brifter.
road292 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkyWave
Bicycle Mechanics
5
03-12-19 02:11 PM
Engineer
Bicycle Mechanics
6
12-14-16 10:51 AM
Barchettaman
Bicycle Mechanics
21
12-14-16 08:50 AM
dtrain
Bicycle Mechanics
5
04-12-12 09:34 AM
redlude97
Bicycle Mechanics
3
09-08-11 03:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.