Trek Checkpoint SL: Is there a way to reduce flex in the isospeed decoupler?
#1
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
Trek Checkpoint SL: Is there a way to reduce flex in the isospeed decoupler?
Bad news. I bought my Trek Checkpoint SL without riding the carbon version first. I rode the aluminum version and liked the geometry, so I pulled the trigger on the carbon version. Now that I've put a few hundred miles on the Checkpoint . . . I cannot STAND the flexy, boing-boing-boing of the isospeed decoupler. Does it provide a smooth ride? Of course, it does. But it's like riding a bike inside a bounce house. Inefficient pedaling -- nothing to brace against on climbs -- and a feeling that, if I were prone to sea sickness, would likely induce vomiting. Selling the bike and returning the bike are not options. But I very much dislike the inefficiency and the continuous bouncing. So, here's the question . . .
Is there a way to reduce or eliminate the flex in the un-adjustable Checkpoint SL isospeed decoupler? Any ideas?
Is there a way to reduce or eliminate the flex in the un-adjustable Checkpoint SL isospeed decoupler? Any ideas?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
The assembly is basically a bolt with 2 bearings. If it's flexing way too much maybe there's something wrong with the frame. Sadly there is no way to tune it. What did your shop say? Did they contact Trek?
#4
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
UPDATE: I heard back from my LBS. He also called Trek to verify. There is no way to stiffen the Isospeed decoupler in the Checkpoint SL. And any "excess" flex would be due to excess flex in the frame's seat tube. Not an easy fix.
On the plus side, he's offering to work out a frameset exchange for another brand/model. Any recommendations? (I wish the Warbird V4 frameset were out!)
On the plus side, he's offering to work out a frameset exchange for another brand/model. Any recommendations? (I wish the Warbird V4 frameset were out!)
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
UPDATE: I heard back from my LBS. He also called Trek to verify. There is no way to stiffen the Isospeed decoupler in the Checkpoint SL. And any "excess" flex would be due to excess flex in the frame's seat tube. Not an easy fix.
On the plus side, he's offering to work out a frameset exchange for another brand/model. Any recommendations? (I wish the Warbird V4 frameset were out!)
On the plus side, he's offering to work out a frameset exchange for another brand/model. Any recommendations? (I wish the Warbird V4 frameset were out!)
Another frame option you could check out the Giant Revolt. Can take up to a 45c tire which is nice.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita, KS.
Posts: 861
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
5 Posts
I've got a Domane and I can't imagine that much give in the coupler. Unless you are heavy or the bike is small and the seat post being extended is causing too much leverage.
I'd be checking for a defective frame.
I'd be checking for a defective frame.
#7
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
Is your Domane the one with the adjustable Isospeed? The Checkpoint Isospeed is equivalent to the flexiest Domane setting. Therein may be the problem. It's designed to be the flexiest version. (To dispose of the other issues . . . I weigh 175 and the seat cap is pretty much in the middle of its range.)
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita, KS.
Posts: 861
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
5 Posts
My Donane is an older one and not adjustable. I can honestly say that I've never felt bouncy while riding it.
Sounds like Trek tuned the Checkpoint to be more flexible. Not the most ideal situation.
I'm sure most riders wouldn't even notice the bounce or not care. However, it does create an issue for a rider more in tune with the bike performance such as yourself.
Sounds like Trek tuned the Checkpoint to be more flexible. Not the most ideal situation.
I'm sure most riders wouldn't even notice the bounce or not care. However, it does create an issue for a rider more in tune with the bike performance such as yourself.
#9
Senior Member
I have a Domane SLR 9 and keep the adjustment in the middle. Never experienced any flex/bounce at any setting. Does the LBS have another one in stock you can ride to see if that's the "rule" not the "exception".
#10
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
But bear in mind that I also dislike MTB rear suspensions. I don't like the bob. I don't want wasted effort going into flexing a "suspension." But lots of people prefer the flex. That's why they make bikes in more than one flavor.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
Word is that Trek has heard complaints about this issue, but most buyers seem to like the Isospeed. Some in the bike media mentioned the softness and bobbing in their intro articles. The one I found today mentioned the bobbing but then said that they found it acceptable. The flex is the point of the design. Not a defect.
But bear in mind that I also dislike MTB rear suspensions. I don't like the bob. I don't want wasted effort going into flexing a "suspension." But lots of people prefer the flex. That's why they make bikes in more than one flavor.
But bear in mind that I also dislike MTB rear suspensions. I don't like the bob. I don't want wasted effort going into flexing a "suspension." But lots of people prefer the flex. That's why they make bikes in more than one flavor.
#12
Senior Member
Regarding the super flexy feel, I'm closing in on 500 miles (across two SL5s) and I'm north of 250 and I don't notice any bouncing or bobbing. I put just shy of 5k on a Domane 5.2 from '16 and the flex is comparable. I don't own a new Domane with the adjustable rear but the few test rides I've been on (totaling about 100 miles), the setting with the most amount of flex is considerably more noticeable on smooth asphalt riding than my Checkpoint SL.
#13
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 50
Bikes: 2014 Trek Crockett 5, Crockett 7, 2016 Specialized Crux E5 Sport, 2016 Salsa Warbird 105, 2017 Trek Boone 5, 2019 Trek Checkpoint ALR5, 2019 Trek Checkpoint SL5, 2021 Trek Checkpoint ALR5, 2023 Trek Checkpoint SL5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
I also have a SL5, and I hadn't noticed any flex from the rear. Mine seems to do exactly what I would expect.
To the OP, why not get an aluminum Trek Checkpoint frame? You said you liked the geometry. I actually have recently purchased a ALR5 myself. I haven't had a chance to really compare the SL5 and ALR5, as my season here in Michigan has pretty much ended. I did get a short ride in on the ALR5, and it seems quite good, although lacking the ride quality of the SL5.
To the OP, why not get an aluminum Trek Checkpoint frame? You said you liked the geometry. I actually have recently purchased a ALR5 myself. I haven't had a chance to really compare the SL5 and ALR5, as my season here in Michigan has pretty much ended. I did get a short ride in on the ALR5, and it seems quite good, although lacking the ride quality of the SL5.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
Pure speculation but I think it's all about the Checkpoint SL 2.0 sales. Next year's model we'll see the same configuration as the Domane and Di2 models.
Regarding the super flexy feel, I'm closing in on 500 miles (across two SL5s) and I'm north of 250 and I don't notice any bouncing or bobbing. I put just shy of 5k on a Domane 5.2 from '16 and the flex is comparable. I don't own a new Domane with the adjustable rear but the few test rides I've been on (totaling about 100 miles), the setting with the most amount of flex is considerably more noticeable on smooth asphalt riding than my Checkpoint SL.
Regarding the super flexy feel, I'm closing in on 500 miles (across two SL5s) and I'm north of 250 and I don't notice any bouncing or bobbing. I put just shy of 5k on a Domane 5.2 from '16 and the flex is comparable. I don't own a new Domane with the adjustable rear but the few test rides I've been on (totaling about 100 miles), the setting with the most amount of flex is considerably more noticeable on smooth asphalt riding than my Checkpoint SL.
#15
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 257
Bikes: Space Horse Disc, Domane SL5 Disc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times
in
17 Posts
That's the only thing I can think of too. I have a Domane SL5 with front and rear isospeed, and I also don't notice any movement or bounce. It is a very comfortable and smooth riding frame compared to my old Madone.
#16
Senior Member
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: corpus christi,texas
Posts: 423
Bikes: canondale silk trail--92 schwinn criss cross--sun atlas x type--fugi odessa--2018 trek domane ALR5 disc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To the OP, Did the LBS check the torque on the bolt that runs through the bushing? Sounds like it's about to fall off. No way it should be moving around that much.
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a 2016 Boone, which has the IsoSpeed. It isn’t adjustable, but i would never describe it as bouncing and bobbing. I weigh 165, though. Original poster, what do you weigh?
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sorry. See you posted your weight at 175 with the seat cap in middle of range. Makes no sense to me that you would feel such dramatic movement from the IsoSpeed. I haven’t ridden a CheckPoint, so maybe it is tuned differently than the Boone and Domane.
#20
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
Thinking through the error of my ways . . . I definitely should have test ridden an Isospeed-equipped Checkpoint before buying one. (None were available.) But here are my thoughts on it:
Giving the Isospeed the maximum benefit of the doubt, I think it's an excellent design idea for those who ride on washboard roads. When you're going to be doing a consistently rough surface for more than 1/10 mile or so, the Isospeed shows real potential. You might get the bobbing "Green Acres on a tractor" effect, but you don't care. It's so much better than feeling the washboard that you're glad for the help! I've never ridden the Isospeed on washboard, so I'm guessing here -- but it seems like a reasonable guess. The Isospeed gives you a much smoother ride over rumbling and washboard-like textures.
Where I'm really looking for "help," though, is in the brief rougher stuff -- rocky patches in open range, stream crossings -- places where you receive a more severe shock. In those applications, I'm generally standing. And when you're standing, the rear Isospeed (or shock absorbing seatposts) does you no good. I should have thought this through ahead of time. If I had it to do over again, I would probably choose a frameset designed to flex in the rear triangle. Live and learn.
Giving the Isospeed the maximum benefit of the doubt, I think it's an excellent design idea for those who ride on washboard roads. When you're going to be doing a consistently rough surface for more than 1/10 mile or so, the Isospeed shows real potential. You might get the bobbing "Green Acres on a tractor" effect, but you don't care. It's so much better than feeling the washboard that you're glad for the help! I've never ridden the Isospeed on washboard, so I'm guessing here -- but it seems like a reasonable guess. The Isospeed gives you a much smoother ride over rumbling and washboard-like textures.
Where I'm really looking for "help," though, is in the brief rougher stuff -- rocky patches in open range, stream crossings -- places where you receive a more severe shock. In those applications, I'm generally standing. And when you're standing, the rear Isospeed (or shock absorbing seatposts) does you no good. I should have thought this through ahead of time. If I had it to do over again, I would probably choose a frameset designed to flex in the rear triangle. Live and learn.
#22
Senior Member
Well considering the fact that all of the Domane marketing material was solely focused on the constant (smaller) chatter of the cobbles, then it sounds like the Checkpoint is behaving exactly as expected.
It almost sounds like the suspension system that Pinarello developed is more what you're interested in, in addition to the rear triangle flex.
It almost sounds like the suspension system that Pinarello developed is more what you're interested in, in addition to the rear triangle flex.
#23
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
#24
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
Not really. I'm not a fan of any of the pseudo-suspension systems on the market. Unless they are tunable, they can't be perfect for everyone and, ultimately, they aren't necessary. More often than not, they just introduce something else that can go wrong. Just give me tubeless tires, a Cambium saddle, and thin seat stays. Call it good.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
So the LBS wouldn't order the bike unless you bought it first? My LBS will order whatever bike I want with a deposit but I am not forced to buy it until it comes in and I ride it and satisfied.