Police warn cyclists of IPOD usage.
#76
Every day a winding road
And if you want to take on the risk of not hearing that truck behind you then what do I care? That's right for ME the benefit of music is not worth the risk. At least you got that right.
#77
Urban Biker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 731
Bikes: Trek 720 hybrid; 2007 Specialized Tricross Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It really all depends on how you use it. Someone consistently traveling at 20 MPH is going to encounter significantly more wind noise than me going 12 or 13. I could probably listen to music and have the same or less noise than the fast cyclist whose chances of an accident are probably increased too because s/he has less time to react to problems ahead. Some people can use Ipods responsibly. Those who cannot think that nobody can. I don't use headphones because it feels like a hassle to me, but I don't begrudge anyone else using them if they derive enjoyment from them and use them responsibly.
#78
RacingBear
Originally Posted by spinnaker
And if you want to take on the risk of not hearing that truck behind you then what do I care? That's right for ME the benefit of music is not worth the risk. At least you got that right.
As for not hearing with IPOD. I can't hear anything with the wind. Still alive.
As for that article. It's usual BS. It doesn't give any specific details about an accident. Just usual crap that plays on pepole fears and prejudices.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^ what he said
#80
Every day a winding road
Originally Posted by UmneyDurak
So you hear that truck behind you. What are you going to do about it?
So you always hear wind even when stopped or moving slowly through intersections?
Go ahead keep plugging up your ears, I just hope you are right and will be able to see that truck.
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spinnaker
Ahhhh........ Move to the side of the road? Just a guess.
.
.
#82
LMCM wannabe
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 62
Bikes: Peugot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sure is an emotional thread. I think I'd rather take my chances with the traffic than you guys.
The problem is simple. Riding a bike carries an aggregate risk - the sum of all the little seemingly insignificant risks that you take. It's the aggregate risk that matters!!! There are circumstances where I can ride without a helmet and I am at lower risk of injury than in some other, more risky environment. I make this choice when I ride.
The scientific approach is to conduct a study and statistically analyse the results. Normally we try not to kill and maim the test subjects, so we use subjects that are already killed and maimed. From this we may be able to determine the incremental risk associated with each particular action or behaviour. This may lead to helmet laws, lighting laws, etc.
I am perfectly happy to NOT be the crash test dummy in my own ad-hoc experiment. Does using xyz-gizmo add to my risk on the road - well I can try it - if it doesn't I live, if it does then I die!!!
You choose.
The problem is simple. Riding a bike carries an aggregate risk - the sum of all the little seemingly insignificant risks that you take. It's the aggregate risk that matters!!! There are circumstances where I can ride without a helmet and I am at lower risk of injury than in some other, more risky environment. I make this choice when I ride.
The scientific approach is to conduct a study and statistically analyse the results. Normally we try not to kill and maim the test subjects, so we use subjects that are already killed and maimed. From this we may be able to determine the incremental risk associated with each particular action or behaviour. This may lead to helmet laws, lighting laws, etc.
I am perfectly happy to NOT be the crash test dummy in my own ad-hoc experiment. Does using xyz-gizmo add to my risk on the road - well I can try it - if it doesn't I live, if it does then I die!!!
You choose.
#83
部門ニ/自転車オタク
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 3,173
Bikes: 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, 2012 Blue Norcross CX, 2016 Blue Axino SL, 2016 Scott Scale, Fixie, Fetish Cycles Road Bike (on the trainer)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by timmhaan
have you had a hearing test recently? you might actually have limited hearing. i, for one, can hear automobiles coming up behind me a couple thousand feet away even in heavy wind.
If you're riding in the road where traffic is a problem, then stop doing that. If you hit bad road on the non-traffic side of the white line and you need to go around it, I hope you're looking back before you veer into the car's lane.
I figure for those that are stuck on the mortal sin of riding headphones, you might as well turn your car radio off, and drive with your windows down. Then you can hear my music and know you're approaching a cyclist.
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
Envision, Energize, Enable
#84
RacingBear
Originally Posted by spinnaker
Ahhhh........ Move to the side of the road? Just a guess.
So you always hear wind even when stopped or moving slowly through intersections?
Go ahead keep plugging up your ears, I just hope you are right and will be able to see that truck.
Seriously think through some of your statements before posting.
Name one specific cituation where hearing actually helps? Don't just do what that article did, make vague generalized statements that play on people fears.
#85
Great guy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have been involved in a serious car/bikecrash 4 years ago that nearly took my life. It is a miracle that I am still alive today. I was struck from behind by a drunk driver in a pick up, with a wide trailer towing behind it. I had no chance avoiding this accident, since I am not equipped with rear facing eyes, or for that matter ears. My point you ask? Diminshed hearing through iPOD use, or not, some accidents just are unavoidable sometimes. Even if I could hear something happening behind me on the road, I am still very limited in what I can do about it. I sometimes ride with my iPOD (on cycle paths only) At least here there is very little chance of drunk drivers hitting me.
#86
Mettle to the Pedals
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 710
Bikes: Giant Cypress hyrbrid, Giant OCR2, Giant OCRc2, Giant Suede (wife's)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Huh? What? Oh....I'm sorry, I didn't hear this thread. Busy jammin' to my mp3 tunes......
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Belvidere, IL
Posts: 66
Bikes: 2009 Felt F95 Team, 2005 North Face Yavapai
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Driving a car in high traffic on the freeway, I listen to hard music. Why? Because it gets my adrenaline pumping and I'm more alert. I have never listened to music while riding a bike so far. I will probably try it, but I like the fact that I can hear a car coming up behind me and able to move to the side of the road to ride. If I had music on, I would have to look behind me quite often to make sure there are no cars coming. Music affects some people differently than others. Some it takes them into their own world, thus will probably be a distraction from riding, others its just something to go along with the ride. I really do not think it is for anyone to say whether or not this is wrong or right. Go by your own experience and comfort level. Remember there are bad drivers and being in the middle of the road when they come around isn't a wise idea.
#88
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
I'm a bit surprised so many riders actually have time to move to the side of the road, or would even want to. That kind of defeats the point of "taking the lane."
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ryleeryno
The lesson here is that you should not turn up ANY audio device on ANY vehicle to the point where you cannot hear traffic alerts.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 387
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm using rear-view mirror to *see* what's happening behind me. I cannot think of a situation where hearing is very useful.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Belvidere, IL
Posts: 66
Bikes: 2009 Felt F95 Team, 2005 North Face Yavapai
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would rather get to the side of the road rather than putting my trust in someone driving a car and hoping they know I am "taking the lane."
#92
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by rockindude24
I would rather get to the side of the road rather than putting my trust in someone driving a car and hoping they know I am "taking the lane."
#93
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Belvidere, IL
Posts: 66
Bikes: 2009 Felt F95 Team, 2005 North Face Yavapai
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MMACH 5
Well, then I hope you enjoy being crowded by cars and the occasional sideview mirror cracking you in the elbow.
#94
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by rockindude24
??? So its better to stay in the middle and be run over???
They can see that there is a cyclist taking up their lane. There is not room for them to squeeze by within the same lane. They will have to move over to go around.
Visibility is key. If you ride with no lights or reflectors, then there's probably not a safe way to ride amongst traffic.
#95
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The iPod has nothing to do with it. This is another negligent homicide, compounded by a careless presumption on the part of the victim's friend, and turned into a morass by a sensationalist journalist.
The story has spread like a virus, no doubt to the considerable satisfaction of the journalist. Instead of addressing the dangers of inattentive truck drivers, the police are warning cyclists about the dangers of iPods.
When you see this story pop up - in print, online, wherever - please squash it with the following information:
https://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/...679557464.html
Thank you.
The story has spread like a virus, no doubt to the considerable satisfaction of the journalist. Instead of addressing the dangers of inattentive truck drivers, the police are warning cyclists about the dangers of iPods.
When you see this story pop up - in print, online, wherever - please squash it with the following information:
* Video footage had Patricia stationary on her bicycle alongside the stationary truck with trailer, waiting for a red light to change to green. It was not possible for her not to know of the presence of the truck
* Her direction of travel was assumed to be straight ahead; that of the truck was to turn left
* It appears that once the lights changed, whilst making the left turn, the trailer clipped Patricia's bicycle throwing her under the wheels of the trailer
* Subject to further investigation the police seem to be of the opinion that Patricia could have been out of sight of the truck driver's side view mirror(s) and that he might not known of her presence
*An iPOD was amongst Patricia's effects handed to the family after her death but there was no statement by the police to the effect that she was wearing it at the time of the accident
* Her direction of travel was assumed to be straight ahead; that of the truck was to turn left
* It appears that once the lights changed, whilst making the left turn, the trailer clipped Patricia's bicycle throwing her under the wheels of the trailer
* Subject to further investigation the police seem to be of the opinion that Patricia could have been out of sight of the truck driver's side view mirror(s) and that he might not known of her presence
*An iPOD was amongst Patricia's effects handed to the family after her death but there was no statement by the police to the effect that she was wearing it at the time of the accident
Thank you.
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Continue your discussions here: https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=173617
Thanks!
Koffee
Mod
Thanks!
Koffee
Mod