Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

UN-55 bottom bracket driveside spindle length

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

UN-55 bottom bracket driveside spindle length

Old 02-07-17, 11:05 AM
  #1  
due ruote 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
UN-55 bottom bracket driveside spindle length

I am installing a 600 crankset from an Arabesque group. The original BB spec is, I believe, 116mm. I'm not sure that's pertinent, but I know someone will ask.

I had a 118mm UN-55 BB laying around so I did a test installation. I didn't measure the chainline, but I can tell you it's too far outboard. I have 7mm between the inner ring and the stay, and, given the gearing and the combinations that will get the most riding time, I would like to have a clearance of 3 or 4 mm.

The 118mm unit has 21.5mm of spindle on the driveside, measured from the outer edge of the mounting flange. So my question is, does someone know which UN-55 length would have a drive side length of around 18mm?
due ruote is offline  
Old 02-07-17, 11:44 AM
  #2  
trailangel
Senior Member
 
trailangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times in 422 Posts
110mm
trailangel is offline  
Old 02-07-17, 12:04 PM
  #3  
dsbrantjr
Senior Member
 
dsbrantjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319

Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times in 723 Posts
Going to 110mm, as suggested, from 118mm will move both sides in half the difference or 4mm.
dsbrantjr is offline  
Old 02-07-17, 12:28 PM
  #4  
due ruote 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Thanks. Makes logical sense but I saw one post where someone said he sized up but all the additional length was on the NDS. Which makes zero sense to me.
due ruote is offline  
Old 02-07-17, 12:59 PM
  #5  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
Thanks. Makes logical sense but I saw one post where someone said he sized up but all the additional length was on the NDS. Which makes zero sense to me.
Not all bottom brackets are symmetrical. I just measured a 115 mm BB-UN72 and the DS flange to spindle distance was also 21.5 mm.
HillRider is offline  
Old 02-07-17, 02:05 PM
  #6  
grizzly59
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 712
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 283 Post(s)
Liked 262 Times in 164 Posts
Try this old thread:

https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-me...bracket-4.html


#82 has a chart from Tange, good BB's

Last edited by grizzly59; 02-07-17 at 02:18 PM.
grizzly59 is offline  
Old 02-07-17, 08:02 PM
  #7  
due ruote 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Well, I ordered the 110mm UN-55, so I hope it's right. Will report back in a few days.
due ruote is offline  
Old 02-07-17, 11:12 PM
  #8  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,056

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4195 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times in 2,295 Posts
If one plans to work on their (and friend's/other's) bikes over the years it isn't wrong to have on hand a few parts that were thought to be the "correct" size but turned out not to be so. Some repair in the future and you'll be using that part for either sizing or for actual service. Andy
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 02-08-17, 08:56 AM
  #9  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
If one plans to work on their (and friend's/other's) bikes over the years it isn't wrong to have on hand a few parts that were thought to be the "correct" size but turned out not to be so. Some repair in the future and you'll be using that part for either sizing or for actual service. Andy
+1 That's why I still have that 115 mm UN72 in my parts box although I haven't had the crank it was specified for (8-speed Ultegra double) for many years. Who knows when one of those or something else it fits will come along.
HillRider is offline  
Old 02-08-17, 06:21 PM
  #10  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
... I didn't measure the chainline...
That's the single most important measurement on your bicycle. Do you know what it's supposed to be? You always go by that, not the distance to your chainstays or anything else. Chainline is everything.
Jeff Neese is offline  
Old 02-08-17, 06:36 PM
  #11  
due ruote 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Neese
That's the single most important measurement on your bicycle. Do you know what it's supposed to be? You always go by that, not the distance to your chainstays or anything else. Chainline is everything.
I live where it's quite flat and tend to do 90% of my riding in a couple gear combinations. I try to set up the drivetrain so that I have an optimal chainline in those gears. To me that makes more sense than going by what's dictated in a manual, although in practice I doubt I am very far from spec.

I am intrigued though by your statement that chainline is the most important measurement on the bike. Can you elaborate? Are you including fit measurements?

Last edited by due ruote; 02-08-17 at 06:46 PM.
due ruote is offline  
Old 02-08-17, 06:38 PM
  #12  
due ruote 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
If one plans to work on their (and friend's/other's) bikes over the years it isn't wrong to have on hand a few parts that were thought to be the "correct" size but turned out not to be so. Some repair in the future and you'll be using that part for either sizing or for actual service. Andy
I agree and I have a number of options on hand, just not the one I need. A common plight.
due ruote is offline  
Old 02-08-17, 09:37 PM
  #13  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
I live where it's quite flat and tend to do 90% of my riding in a couple gear combinations. I try to set up the drivetrain so that I have an optimal chainline in those gears. To me that makes more sense than going by what's dictated in a manual, although in practice I doubt I am very far from spec.

I am intrigued though by your statement that chainline is the most important measurement on the bike. Can you elaborate? Are you including fit measurements?
Read this: All About Bicycle Chainline

There is nothing about "fit measurements" when you are talking about chainline. It's a spec, not a "preference".

Chainline determines everything else, from your wheel dish and cassette combination to your crankset and front derailleur. Get that wrong from the start and you will be fighting drivetrain issues. Staying within your preferred narrow gear range to compensate is hardly correct.

Chainline basically sets the measurements for the rest of the drivetrain. Get as close to that as you can, and build the rest of the drivetrain from there.
Jeff Neese is offline  
Old 02-08-17, 10:02 PM
  #14  
SquidPuppet
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
 
SquidPuppet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Coeur d' Alene
Posts: 7,861

Bikes: 3 Chinese Gas Pipe Nerdcycles and 2 Chicago Electroforged Boat Anchors

Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2358 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
Thanks. Makes logical sense but I saw one post where someone said he sized up but all the additional length was on the NDS. Which makes zero sense to me.

Does this help?

Notice the 110 is a real oddball?

Code:
Bottom Bracket/Spec   Actual   NDS    DS     Symmetrical?
Sugino/Tange 68-103   103mm    17mm   18mm   Y (+1mm on DS)
Shimano UN54 68-107   108      20     20     Y
Shimano UN54 68-110   111.5    23.5   20     N (+3.5mm on NDS)
Shimano UN54 68-113   114      23.5   22.5   Y (+1mm on NDS)
Shimano UN54 68-115   115.5    24     23.5   Y (+0.5mm on NDS)
Shimano UN54 68-118   118.5    25.5   25     Y (+0.5mm on NDS)
Shimano UN54 68-122   123      27     28     Y (+1mm on DS)
Shimano UN54 68-127   128      30     30     Y
SquidPuppet is offline  
Old 02-08-17, 10:04 PM
  #15  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,857

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1787 Post(s)
Liked 1,259 Times in 868 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Neese
Read this: All About Bicycle Chainline

There is nothing about "fit measurements" when you are talking about chainline. It's a spec, not a "preference".

Chainline determines everything else, from your wheel dish and cassette combination to your crankset and front derailleur. Get that wrong from the start and you will be fighting drivetrain issues. Staying within your preferred narrow gear range to compensate is hardly correct.

Chainline basically sets the measurements for the rest of the drivetrain. Get as close to that as you can, and build the rest of the drivetrain from there.
OP isn't BUILDING A BIKE!
The OP is changing a crank/BB and wants their chain to run as straight as possible for the rings/cogs they use the most.
I do exactly the same thing! I use the longest BB that the FDER will span.
Both my bikes are 3X9 that I use as a 1X9 about 98% the time on the middle ring.
Even then, we're talking about the thickness of about 1.5 cogs.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 02-09-17, 12:48 AM
  #16  
Bike Gremlin
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times in 130 Posts
I wrote in general about chainline here:
Bicycle chainline - Cycle Gremlin

What the risk of putting crankset too close (and too far) from the frame might be. Could be useful info.
Having said all that, it often is trial and error.
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 02-09-17, 08:04 AM
  #17  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
OP isn't BUILDING A BIKE!
The OP is changing a crank/BB and wants their chain to run as straight as possible for the rings/cogs they use the most.
I do exactly the same thing! I use the longest BB that the FDER will span.
Both my bikes are 3X9 that I use as a 1X9 about 98% the time on the middle ring.
Even then, we're talking about the thickness of about 1.5 cogs.
I cannot count the bikes I've seen where somebody just couldn't seem to get their shifting quite right, no matter what they did. It's fine in the lower gears but something rubs or doesn't shift in the higher gears, or vice versa, or somethings just not quite working perfectly as it was designed to do from the factory.

Assuming no damage (bent derailleur hanger, etc.) first thing to check is chainline and many times someone has installed the wrong bottom bracket. Shimano BB sizes are spaced closely enough that you can always come within a millimeter of spec. But, you have to know what it should be for your bike, and actually measure.

If you start with a good chainline and everything else is also within spec, your bike will shift properly and smoothly as it did when it came from the factory. You won't have to keep it in any certain gear range.
Jeff Neese is offline  
Old 02-09-17, 08:11 AM
  #18  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,857

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1787 Post(s)
Liked 1,259 Times in 868 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Neese
I cannot count the bikes I've seen where somebody just couldn't seem to get their shifting quite right, no matter what they did. It's fine in the lower gears but something rubs or doesn't shift in the higher gears, or vice versa, or somethings just not quite working perfectly as it was designed to do from the factory.

Assuming no damage (bent derailleur hanger, etc.) first thing to check is chainline and many times someone has installed the wrong bottom bracket. Shimano BB sizes are spaced closely enough that you can always come within a millimeter of spec. But, you have to know what it should be for your bike, and actually measure.

If you start with a good chainline and everything else is also within spec, your bike will shift properly and smoothly as it did when it came from the factory. You won't have to keep it in any certain gear range.
Apparently, you missed the entire point.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 02-09-17, 08:25 AM
  #19  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
Apparently, you missed the entire point.
Well, maybe I did. The OP is trying to figure out what size bottom bracket to install in his bike.

He is going about it wrong, using the wrong measurements. You don't use the measurement from the inner chainring to the stays. I believe the Barnett manual specifies a minimum of 2mm clearance there, but that's not your primary measurement.

So I thought the point was "How can I tell what size bottom bracket is right for my bike?" and I provided some direction along with links to further reading on the topic. Not what he's looking for?
Jeff Neese is offline  
Old 02-09-17, 09:14 AM
  #20  
due ruote 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Neese
Well, maybe I did. The OP is trying to figure out what size bottom bracket to install in his bike.

He is going about it wrong, using the wrong measurements. You don't use the measurement from the inner chainring to the stays. I believe the Barnett manual specifies a minimum of 2mm clearance there, but that's not your primary measurement.

So I thought the point was "How can I tell what size bottom bracket is right for my bike?" and I provided some direction along with links to further reading on the topic. Not what he's looking for?
I wouldn't take issue with anything you have said, if I was setting up a bike to sell, or for an unknown rider on unknown terrain, who might use the full gear range. But that's not me. I have been riding for over 40 years, I don't have major hills to deal with, I keep a pretty even cadence and know which gear combinations I use the most. On most rides I only use two or three combinations and am almost never outside the 65-80 gear inch range. I am most definitely not limiting my shifting to compensate for an improper drivetrain setup. My drivetrain will shift well into any gear combination on the bike, so like I said previously, I am probably not far out of spec. I am simply trying to achieve the best (i.e. straightest) line in the gears I ride in.

Btw I understand that chainline has nothing to do with fit. I was simply responding to your statement that chainline is the single most important measurement on the bike, and wondering what other measurements you were considering.
due ruote is offline  
Old 02-10-17, 09:20 AM
  #21  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by SquidPuppet
Does this help?

Notice the 110 is a real oddball?

Code:
Bottom Bracket/Spec   Actual   NDS    DS     Symmetrical?
Sugino/Tange 68-103   103mm    17mm   18mm   Y (+1mm on DS)
Shimano UN54 68-107   108      20     20     Y
Shimano UN54 68-110   111.5    23.5   20     N (+3.5mm on NDS)
Shimano UN54 68-113   114      23.5   22.5   Y (+1mm on NDS)
Shimano UN54 68-115   115.5    24     23.5   Y (+0.5mm on NDS)
Shimano UN54 68-118   118.5    25.5   25     Y (+0.5mm on NDS)
Shimano UN54 68-122   123      27     28     Y (+1mm on DS)
Shimano UN54 68-127   128      30     30     Y

That's helpful and yes, the 110 is the odd asymmetrical length. I wonder if that was produced just for a certain type of crankset that would compensate for the offset somehow.

One measurement that I've started taking is the distance from the pedal crankarm to the downtube, when you have those lined up. There is variation there. Even if you have a good chainline on the right side, the left arm may not be symmetrical to the bicycle body.
Jeff Neese is offline  
Old 02-10-17, 08:00 PM
  #22  
due ruote 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Now that I see that chart (assuming UN-54 and UN-55 have the same specs) I might have been better off with the 114. Hopefully the 110 will work; maybe with a spacer.

(Edit) Looking at that chart again, I am not sure how to interpret the numbers. As I said in the initial post, my 118mm by measures 20.5mm on the drive side, not 25mm like it says on the chart. So either the specs have changed or they aren't measuring the same way I am. Perhaps their measurement is the exposed end of the spindle, rather than the distance from the flange.

Last edited by due ruote; 02-10-17 at 08:20 PM.
due ruote is offline  
Old 02-11-17, 12:42 AM
  #23  
Bike Gremlin
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times in 130 Posts
You probably didn't measure from the frame (end of BB shell in the frame), but just measure the spindle length protruding on the side measured.

mmm did I explain that well? :/
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 02-11-17, 02:29 AM
  #24  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,857

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1787 Post(s)
Liked 1,259 Times in 868 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
Now that I see that chart (assuming UN-54 and UN-55 have the same specs) I might have been better off with the 114. Hopefully the 110 will work; maybe with a spacer.

(Edit) Looking at that chart again, I am not sure how to interpret the numbers. As I said in the initial post, my 118mm by measures 20.5mm on the drive side, not 25mm like it says on the chart. So either the specs have changed or they aren't measuring the same way I am. Perhaps their measurement is the exposed end of the spindle, rather than the distance from the flange.
I think there is a reference point on the square where it is a certain dimension. Thus the "stub" could be longer or shorter (to some degree) but the crank doesn't know better.

Maybe you can figure something out from this. look at page 9-
https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/....1131.2006.pdf

Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 02-11-17 at 02:47 AM.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 02-11-17, 05:49 AM
  #25  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
I am installing a 600 crankset from an Arabesque group. The original BB spec is, I believe, 116mm. I'm not sure that's pertinent, but I know someone will ask.

I had a 118mm UN-55 BB laying around so I did a test installation. I didn't measure the chainline, but I can tell you it's too far outboard. I have 7mm between the inner ring and the stay, and, given the gearing and the combinations that will get the most riding time, I would like to have a clearance of 3 or 4 mm.

The 118mm unit has 21.5mm of spindle on the driveside, measured from the outer edge of the mounting flange. So my question is, does someone know which UN-55 length would have a drive side length of around 18mm?
This is a very long thread for such a simple problem to solve.

You started with a 118 but did not measure chainline so we don't have a true measure of how far off you are. If you had, it would be very straightforward to do the math and buy the right size. So let's extrapolate and use your "clearance" measure. You say it's 7mm and you want to bring it in by 4mm, which will give you 3mm of clearance to your chainstay. The Barnett manual says a minimum of 2mm so we'll say the 3mm clearance you want is good.

So the 118 is 4mm too long on one side, which is 8mm too long total. The math says you need a 110, but that is the oddball that is asymmetrical. Look at the chart and take a look at the measurements for a 113mm. That's most likely the one you need.

For what it's worth, my LBS stocks a variety of UN55s and if they don't have one they get it overnight. So when I am changing a crankset and BB, I let them do it. If the first one they try doesn't give a good chainline, they can measure from there and put the right one in. Plus they have a torque wrench and I don't. That's the only thing I pay someone else to do and it's so rare that I don't mind.

There is generally one and only one Shimano size that is correct for your bike and crankset combination. Notice the increments - there is one for your bike that will get you very close to the correct chainline.

All this talk about optimizing it for a certain gear range is silly. If you're optimizing for a certain gear range, and that's NOT approximately within the center of your chainline, I would take a look at your gearing. Maybe you need higher ranges. Your gearing should be set up so that your most-used range is mostly in the middle of the chainline. I make sure that for my riding, I'm using the "middle" of my rear cluster most. Since it's optimized for the center of the chainline, it works smoothly up and down, since everything is within spec. Look at your cassette and your chainring size if you find that your most-used range is anywhere but in the middle.

I understand the OP is not building a bike but when you do build one, you start with this very thing - the BB and crankset, and getting a proper chainline. Then you build from there. Rear wheel dishing and cassette combinations and even front derailleurs have a chainline spec.
Jeff Neese is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.