Spindle Length Size
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Spindle Length Size
Hi Everyone,
I'm building up a bike for the first time. I'm looking to find the bottom bracket spindle length. I have a used Suntour XC LTD Triple Crankset. I'm putting it on a Surly Cross Check.
Any suggestions? - I can't seem to find it. I asked in a bike shop today and they told me it would be best to bring it in and have them install it. (Which kind of defeats the purpose of doing it myself... I really want to learn more than anything!). I imagine there is a way to measure or calculate the spindle length... If nothing else, I could just roll the dice with a 68x122.5 and see how it goes... (that seems to be the length of other cranksets that may be similar to mine.)
Go ahead and school me! Your help is appreciated...
I'm building up a bike for the first time. I'm looking to find the bottom bracket spindle length. I have a used Suntour XC LTD Triple Crankset. I'm putting it on a Surly Cross Check.
Any suggestions? - I can't seem to find it. I asked in a bike shop today and they told me it would be best to bring it in and have them install it. (Which kind of defeats the purpose of doing it myself... I really want to learn more than anything!). I imagine there is a way to measure or calculate the spindle length... If nothing else, I could just roll the dice with a 68x122.5 and see how it goes... (that seems to be the length of other cranksets that may be similar to mine.)
Go ahead and school me! Your help is appreciated...
#2
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,379 Times
in
7,207 Posts
...try a 126 to start. I think that's correct, but I'm going off their earlier triples in the VX series. I think those were all made for them by Sugino, but again I'm not familiar with that particular crank.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
The crankset is the single most significant factor in determining spindle length.
My method is to test fit the crank with the widest bottom bracket I happen to have on hand. Once you do that, it's a simple process to measure the chainline figure out how far you'd like to move it in, and subtract twice that amount from the BB spindle length.
My method is to test fit the crank with the widest bottom bracket I happen to have on hand. Once you do that, it's a simple process to measure the chainline figure out how far you'd like to move it in, and subtract twice that amount from the BB spindle length.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ok - Great! So it sounds like I'll have to just try one out, hope I get it right, and possibly order a second if I get it wrong... I don't have any on hand since I'm pretty new to this. I'm ok with that. For the purposes of learning, it's a small price to pay.
@3alarmer - the only ones I can find are either 122.5 or 127.5... Sooo... What would you go with between those two???
@3alarmer - the only ones I can find are either 122.5 or 127.5... Sooo... What would you go with between those two???
#5
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,511
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2746 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
2,053 Posts
VeloBase.com - Component: SunTour XC LTD
Says D-3TS spindle which according to this is 128mm but I don't know if that is symmetrical.
Pictures don't look symmetrical.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/SR-JAPAN-D-...-/202142334619
Says D-3TS spindle which according to this is 128mm but I don't know if that is symmetrical.
Pictures don't look symmetrical.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/SR-JAPAN-D-...-/202142334619
#6
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,379 Times
in
7,207 Posts
Ok - Great! So it sounds like I'll have to just try one out, hope I get it right, and possibly order a second if I get it wrong... I don't have any on hand since I'm pretty new to this. I'm ok with that. For the purposes of learning, it's a small price to pay.
@3alarmer - the only ones I can find are either 122.5 or 127.5... Sooo... What would you go with between those two???
@3alarmer - the only ones I can find are either 122.5 or 127.5... Sooo... What would you go with between those two???
VeloBase.com - Component: SunTour XC LTD
Says D-3TS spindle which according to this is 128mm but I don't know if that is symmetrical.
Pictures don't look symmetrical.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/SR-JAPAN-D-...-/202142334619
Says D-3TS spindle which according to this is 128mm but I don't know if that is symmetrical.
Pictures don't look symmetrical.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/SR-JAPAN-D-...-/202142334619
The spacers come in different thicknesses, and you only need a couple, if you need one at all.
You might be able to pick those up locally, and not buy a whole package of them, if yoiu're not planning on doing this again soon.
#7
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,511
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2746 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
2,053 Posts
Looking further at the ebay ad, in the description they state 40mm - 49mm - 39mm as the dimensions so almost symmetrical.
#8
Really Old Senior Member
Looking at my charts, anything with a T? has a 39mm offset on the DS.
The symmetrical equivalent would then be 130mm.(2*39+52)
Get the longest you can find and hope it's long enough.
The symmetrical equivalent would then be 130mm.(2*39+52)
Get the longest you can find and hope it's long enough.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ideally, I was looking for a double - perhaps even a 1x. So getting a Triple that I'm going to run as a double seems like it might not have been a good move.
Any thoughts? As I said - I'm trying to learn as much as possible. Thanks!
#10
Really Old Senior Member
If you are going to drop the inner ring, then you "might" be able to use a shorter spindle.
It'd depend on crank arm to chain stay clearance.
Sometimes "too short" simply means the FDER can't move IN far enough to reach the inner ring.
Sometimes a good deal has a root cause.
It'd depend on crank arm to chain stay clearance.
Sometimes "too short" simply means the FDER can't move IN far enough to reach the inner ring.
Sometimes a good deal has a root cause.
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 05-29-19 at 09:22 AM.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you are going to drop the inner ring, then you "might" be able to use a shorter spindle.
It'd depend on crank arm to chain stay clearance.
Sometimes "too short" simply means the FDER can't move IN far enough to reach the inner ring.
Sometimes a good deal has a root cause.
It'd depend on crank arm to chain stay clearance.
Sometimes "too short" simply means the FDER can't move IN far enough to reach the inner ring.
Sometimes a good deal has a root cause.
Well - I went ahead and ordered the 127.5 UN55 - per 3alarmers recommendation - we'll see how it works. If I can't get it going, I'm sure I'll learn something in the process... I'm not dead set on sticking with this crankset... And I'm open to recommendations if anyone has any...
#12
Really Old Senior Member
I would give odds you'll be "good enough" to function.
Another alternative is reverting to cup & cone and using a 3T spindle from here-
https://www.huskybicycles.com/mm5/me...y_Code=BBPARTS
I can't attest to quality though. I've used a few on flip bikes, but have no clue how well they held up.
The races had a "rust brown" finish, not polished. I kind of expect an x-mart quality level from appearance alone.
Another alternative is reverting to cup & cone and using a 3T spindle from here-
https://www.huskybicycles.com/mm5/me...y_Code=BBPARTS
I can't attest to quality though. I've used a few on flip bikes, but have no clue how well they held up.
The races had a "rust brown" finish, not polished. I kind of expect an x-mart quality level from appearance alone.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would give odds you'll be "good enough" to function.
Another alternative is reverting to cup & cone and using a 3T spindle from here-
https://www.huskybicycles.com/mm5/me...y_Code=BBPARTS
I can't attest to quality though. I've used a few on flip bikes, but have no clue how well they held up.
The races had a "rust brown" finish, not polished. I kind of expect an x-mart quality level from appearance alone.
Another alternative is reverting to cup & cone and using a 3T spindle from here-
https://www.huskybicycles.com/mm5/me...y_Code=BBPARTS
I can't attest to quality though. I've used a few on flip bikes, but have no clue how well they held up.
The races had a "rust brown" finish, not polished. I kind of expect an x-mart quality level from appearance alone.
I wonder if I'd be better off just buying a more modern crankset - something like this:
https://smile.amazon.com/FSA-330-647...145&th=1&psc=1
Or this:
https://smile.amazon.com/Origin8-Pro...&sr=8-46-spell
What do you think?
#14
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,379 Times
in
7,207 Posts
...you already have this crank. While compact cranks have their place in this modern world, the one you now possess was a pretty solid product, and with the triple, you can get a wider range of gearing without going to extremes on the rear cluster in terms of sizing. It really depends on your vision, and the availability of various components you intend to use in your project.
But any forged crank is a pretty good product.
But any forged crank is a pretty good product.
#15
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,379 Times
in
7,207 Posts
...I should probably explain a little further. Whenever I build up a project bike now, I have already figured out the gearing I intend for it (which depends a lot of projected use...go fast, touring, all around city bike, etc).
For any particular bicycle I use here, because the terrain is often pretty flat and the hills are mostly short ones, I can usually get by with the older standards of 52/53 large chainrings. This still allows me, even on something pretty old, to squeak by with a 14-25 or maybe a 13-26 cluster on the back. If I went with compact cranks, I'd spend my life looking for stuff with 11 cog small rings.
Anyway, good luck with it. And if you have some success or other issues with the fitting of it, check back. I think maybe your original instincts of trying to go with used stuff that is cheaper in this first project were sound. There is a lot of used componentry lying around looking for another use cycle. But again, it depends a lot on your own unique wants and needs.
For any particular bicycle I use here, because the terrain is often pretty flat and the hills are mostly short ones, I can usually get by with the older standards of 52/53 large chainrings. This still allows me, even on something pretty old, to squeak by with a 14-25 or maybe a 13-26 cluster on the back. If I went with compact cranks, I'd spend my life looking for stuff with 11 cog small rings.
Anyway, good luck with it. And if you have some success or other issues with the fitting of it, check back. I think maybe your original instincts of trying to go with used stuff that is cheaper in this first project were sound. There is a lot of used componentry lying around looking for another use cycle. But again, it depends a lot on your own unique wants and needs.
#16
Senior Member
127.5 mm bb is what is use with this crank .
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
...I should probably explain a little further. Whenever I build up a project bike now, I have already figured out the gearing I intend for it (which depends a lot of projected use...go fast, touring, all around city bike, etc).
For any particular bicycle I use here, because the terrain is often pretty flat and the hills are mostly short ones, I can usually get by with the older standards of 52/53 large chainrings. This still allows me, even on something pretty old, to squeak by with a 14-25 or maybe a 13-26 cluster on the back. If I went with compact cranks, I'd spend my life looking for stuff with 11 cog small rings.
Anyway, good luck with it. And if you have some success or other issues with the fitting of it, check back. I think maybe your original instincts of trying to go with used stuff that is cheaper in this first project were sound. There is a lot of used componentry lying around looking for another use cycle. But again, it depends a lot on your own unique wants and needs.
For any particular bicycle I use here, because the terrain is often pretty flat and the hills are mostly short ones, I can usually get by with the older standards of 52/53 large chainrings. This still allows me, even on something pretty old, to squeak by with a 14-25 or maybe a 13-26 cluster on the back. If I went with compact cranks, I'd spend my life looking for stuff with 11 cog small rings.
Anyway, good luck with it. And if you have some success or other issues with the fitting of it, check back. I think maybe your original instincts of trying to go with used stuff that is cheaper in this first project were sound. There is a lot of used componentry lying around looking for another use cycle. But again, it depends a lot on your own unique wants and needs.
#19
Senior Member
The reason the LBS wanted you to bring it in and let them do it is that the fastest and most dependable way to determine spindle length is often test assembly. Even when it is a well known model of crank and everything looks normal there are quirks and quiddities and out of spec product. Putting the bike on the stand and trying spindles is way easier and more reliable than consulting references. Presuming of course you have some inventory.