Century times
#3
I am an incurable.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 993
Bikes: IRO Mark V pro (RIP), Bianchi Giro, Giant Xtc1, Redline Conquest Pro, Kelly Deluxe singlespeed.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
between 5-6 hours is decent. 5 is something to shoot for, 6 is lesiurely but not really slouching.
__________________
www.oldsylebeer.com
www.oldsylebeer.com
#5
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I think it depends on the specific route, or at least some characteristics of it. Averages start to go way down when you throw in a lot of hills and/or long climbs.
Recent personal stories: I rode a 100 mile with about 5,000' of climbing in April in just under 7 hours. I was not in such great shape, just coming off an injury, and hadn't trained too much for it. It's not that great of a time. Contrast with last weekend's 100 mile with about 10,000' of climbing, which I did in . . . 7 hours (these are ride times, BTW; total times were similar too). Roughly same amount of time, but I consider the latter a much better result because of all the climbing. If I had the April one to do over again now I'm sure I could shave off a great deal of time because I'm much better conditioned now than I was then.
Recent personal stories: I rode a 100 mile with about 5,000' of climbing in April in just under 7 hours. I was not in such great shape, just coming off an injury, and hadn't trained too much for it. It's not that great of a time. Contrast with last weekend's 100 mile with about 10,000' of climbing, which I did in . . . 7 hours (these are ride times, BTW; total times were similar too). Roughly same amount of time, but I consider the latter a much better result because of all the climbing. If I had the April one to do over again now I'm sure I could shave off a great deal of time because I'm much better conditioned now than I was then.
#6
CAT6 UTP 568B
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham / Vancouver
Posts: 2,548
Bikes: 2005 Allez Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by ed073
160km?
Anything under 5 hours is decent for a training ride.
Anything under 5 hours is decent for a training ride.
#7
Senior Member
Interesting.
I this months Bicycling magazine there is an article about a century ride.
The author did a century ride in 7 hours. Which I thought isn't bad for a first time. She mentioned she came in last and everyone was gone by the time she got
to the end.
I this months Bicycling magazine there is an article about a century ride.
The author did a century ride in 7 hours. Which I thought isn't bad for a first time. She mentioned she came in last and everyone was gone by the time she got
to the end.
#8
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't think 7 hours is bad for a first (or a fourth ) either, depending on the terrain. Maybe she started late. Any chance it was it a race, as opposed to a ride?
#9
cycle-dog spot
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,538
Bikes: Look, Niner, Ellsworth, Norco, Litespeed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It depends.
For me the biggest variables are the other riders and the course
If I can get in a big group of hammer-dogs on a fast course, 4 hours is no problem.
Conversely, if one is riding mostly solo or have to do most of the pulling, the time will expand quickly.
-Z
For me the biggest variables are the other riders and the course
If I can get in a big group of hammer-dogs on a fast course, 4 hours is no problem.
Conversely, if one is riding mostly solo or have to do most of the pulling, the time will expand quickly.
-Z
#10
Senior Member
Originally Posted by 'nother
I don't think 7 hours is bad for a first (or a fourth ) either, depending on the terrain. Maybe she started late. Any chance it was it a race, as opposed to a ride?
"After seven hours, we crossed the finish line, dead last. The naked-leggers had vanished. The barbecue pit had shut down, but I had not.”
Does everyone that does these things average better than 20 mph?
#11
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Univega
'nother, Thanks for that. I didn't think it was too bad either. But from page 70 of the Sept issue:
"After seven hours, we crossed the finish line, dead last. The naked-leggers had vanished. The barbecue pit had shut down, but I had not.”
Does everyone that does these things average better than 20 mph?
"After seven hours, we crossed the finish line, dead last. The naked-leggers had vanished. The barbecue pit had shut down, but I had not.”
Does everyone that does these things average better than 20 mph?
So I would have to guess that this person's "bad" 7 hr time must've been on a fairly flat course and/or with lots of big, fast packs to latch onto and keep up speed. I've never been on such a ride out here; one of these days maybe but I like the climbing
#13
cellblock 5150
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Norman, NC
Posts: 457
Bikes: 05 Scott CR1 CF Team 05 Trek 1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Univega
Does everyone that does these things average better than 20 mph?
Alot of that depended on the route and terrain. Long rolling hills vs. climbing vs. flat.... makes a big difference. I personally prefer anything other than flats bec/ there are no breaks on the flats.
__________________
KWITCHER*****IN!
KWITCHER*****IN!
#14
Cause you only live once.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newark Delaware
Posts: 157
Bikes: 2005 Cannondale R900 (Campy) 1989 Peugeot Team Pro (Campy) 1969 Atala chrome Pista
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My personal best is five hours, nine minutes & fifty-eight seconds, this gave me an average of 19.4 mph. It was on the Santa Ana river path, which means good tail wind out and a strong headwind on return; I like to think they cancel each other out but the head wind really sucks when your over 80 miles. This was done solo without anyone to draft behind. I want to break that magical five hour mark before christmas.
#15
Senior Member
Originally Posted by 'nother
So I would have to guess that this person's "bad" 7 hr time must've been on a fairly flat course and/or with lots of big, fast packs to latch onto and keep up speed. I've never been on such a ride out here; one of these days maybe but I like the climbing
“And the hills got steeper! As the inclines battered us and I peppered Ray with questions, he admitted he had never encountered a tougher century”
I have a metric century planned in Sept. I may have to do a Century ride a few weeks after.
I haven't done one in years. If I do it in 7 hours, I will be happy.
#16
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Heh, guess I'll have to get a copy and read it myself
Just seems hard to believe. Even the flatter centuries I've done (5,000' of climbing), there were plenty of people finishing in 8, 9, even 10 hours, maybe longer.
Help me out before I go pick up a copy: which Century ride was it? Got me curious about the stats on it now . . .
Just seems hard to believe. Even the flatter centuries I've done (5,000' of climbing), there were plenty of people finishing in 8, 9, even 10 hours, maybe longer.
Help me out before I go pick up a copy: which Century ride was it? Got me curious about the stats on it now . . .
#17
Guinea Hood
Join Date: May 2005
Location: East of Shelbyville
Posts: 2,791
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by simplyred
Hmm... 100 km for me... around 4 1/2, 5 hrs...
So..
A 100 mile ride would be 10 hours...
HAHAHAHA...
So..
A 100 mile ride would be 10 hours...
HAHAHAHA...
100k
4:20:33
__________________
Tom Hagen: 'Thank you for the dinner and a very pleasant evening. If your car could take me to the airport - Mr. Corleone is a man who insists on hearing bad news immediately.'
Tom Hagen: 'Thank you for the dinner and a very pleasant evening. If your car could take me to the airport - Mr. Corleone is a man who insists on hearing bad news immediately.'
Last edited by Ostuni; 08-13-05 at 12:58 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 365
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
6 Posts
When you guys talk time, do you count time in saddle, or total ride time including breaks and stops? Im assuming you are not riding 100miles without ever stopping for a short rest. When I was doing my metric century the other week I still stopped about every 15 miles for ten minutes or so to relax and take a break, get some drinks, eat a bit.
#19
Senior Member
Originally Posted by 'nother
Help me out before I go pick up a copy: which Century ride was it? Got me curious about the stats on it now . . .
#20
Senior Member
Originally Posted by ac29593
When you guys talk time, do you count time in saddle, or total ride time including breaks and stops? Im assuming you are not riding 100miles without ever stopping for a short rest. When I was doing my metric century the other week I still stopped about every 15 miles for ten minutes or so to relax and take a break, get some drinks, eat a bit.
#21
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by ac29593
When you guys talk time, do you count time in saddle, or total ride time including breaks and stops? Im assuming you are not riding 100miles without ever stopping for a short rest. When I was doing my metric century the other week I still stopped about every 15 miles for ten minutes or so to relax and take a break, get some drinks, eat a bit.
#22
Senior Member
Our UCSB TTT group decided to practice on the Solvang Century one year since it was mostly wide-open rolling hills. Figured we'd hardly ever get the chance to do a long, policed course with feed zones, so we got out the TT bikes, took the disc wheels off and went at it. Got in at around 3:48. Thought we were hot sh*t, hah! The next month at the S.B. Stage Race, Ekimov and his Russian Olympic team schooled us on the 20-mile TTT with a time 5 minutes faster!
#23
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
Our UCSB TTT group decided to practice on the Solvang Century one year since it was mostly wide-open rolling hills. Figured we'd hardly ever get the chance to do a long, policed course with feed zones, so we got out the TT bikes, took the disc wheels off and went at it. Got in at around 3:48. Thought we were hot sh*t, hah! The next month at the S.B. Stage Race, Ekimov and his Russian Olympic team schooled us on the 20-mile TTT with a time 5 minutes faster!
#24
Senior Member
I bet it was one of the guys wearing pink socks that slowed us down! Don't wear PINK! Not only does it make you slow, it'll make you STERILE as well!!!