Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Shimano R601/603 vs. DaVinci crankset?

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Shimano R601/603 vs. DaVinci crankset?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-12, 11:22 AM
  #1  
Sprout97 
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 188

Bikes: 2004 Co-Motion Speedster

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Shimano R601/603 vs. DaVinci crankset?

As I continue with my long range plans for our Speedster, I'm reviewing the crankset issue. At present, we're still running the original Shimano 6503 triple crankset (Octalink V1). I realize that both the new Shimano & the DaVinci should be lighter --static & rotational -- than our 6503. Our non-tandem riding LBS feels that 601/603 should be a better route (he readily admits that he knows nothing of DaVinci). (On a side note, I really do like the bling of polished crank arrms/spiders, but form needs to follow function here, I think.)

So, my question is which crankset would you choose, and why?
__________________
Jeff

Learn from other people's mistakes. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself.

2004 Co-Motion Speedster
2010 (Specialized) Carmel comfort (my neighborhood bike)
2008 Raleigh comfort (wife's neighborhood bike)
Sprout97 is offline  
Old 07-15-12, 11:37 AM
  #2  
waynesulak
Senior Member
 
waynesulak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971

Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Choice is good. Shimano looks modern but is one size fits all in bottom bracket width which means one chainline and one Q-factor. I think it allows two crank lengths. daVinci allows BB widths from 109mm - 129mm (separately for each captain and stoker ) and many cranks lengths. Chainrings: I hope you like the few that Shimano makes for that crank because other brands will look funny.

If you keep things a long time keep in mind that Shimano abandoned their previous tandem crank has went years without making one. You can still buy the same daVinci crank as in the late 1990s (not sure of exact date). Downside of course is that the daVinci hasn't changed in a long time.

Bottom line Shimano is a good crank and the current style while daVinci provides many more options and classic (old fashion) style.

Last edited by waynesulak; 07-15-12 at 11:43 AM.
waynesulak is offline  
Old 07-15-12, 06:09 PM
  #3  
TandemGeek
hors category
 
TandemGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,231
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Sprout97
So, my question is which crankset would you choose, and why?
daVinci...

Because I've already made that decision five times since 1998 and haven't found any cranks that are truly "better", noting I've never felt square tape bottom brackets were lacking in any way.

As Wayne notes, while you are limited to using square taper bottom brackets, that ain't such a bad thing. With davinci you can pick your:
1. crank length (160mm - 200mm),
2. your drive-side configuration (double, triple),
3. your BCD (104, 110, 130),
4. you can opt to use the steel or Ti bottom brackets they offer in a wide range of spindle widths to suit your preference (103mm, 107mm, 110mm, 113mm, 118mm) or any of the other fine square taper BB's from SKF, Shimano, Phil Wood, etc., noting Phil Wood has just about every size you could ever want.
5. you can use the FSA rings that they offer in several different size, or again source others that suit your preference.

You can even opt to have the crank arms anodized (at additional cost) if that is appealing and/or if you don't think you will be diligent enough in washing sweat and sports drink spillage off the polished aluminum arms and spider after rides, as the acids in sweat and sports drinks will mar the finish.

Oh yeah, and if you're not doing the belt thing, you can't beat daVinci's spiderless CNC'd 34t timing rings for simplicity and perfect concentricity (is that a word?). If you are doing the belt, no worries: you can use them with daVinci cranks too.

However, if you're a fan of other BB systems and find square taper too retro / not stiff enough.... look elsewhere.
TandemGeek is offline  
Old 07-16-12, 02:50 AM
  #4  
Dean V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times in 153 Posts
From a performance point of view I can't see how either of these will be any better than what you have. Just get them polished to make then shiny. Maybe some new chainrings too.
As TandemGeek said the DaVinci is very versatile but this is only relevant if you are unhappy with the lengths and offsets you already have.
The new Shimano will have Hollowtech, outboard bearings, more rigidity, blah, blah but I haven't noticed going any faster on my bikes that have all that stuff.

Last edited by Dean V; 07-16-12 at 02:56 AM.
Dean V is offline  
Old 07-16-12, 02:12 PM
  #5  
DubT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,180

Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 9 Posts
We choose the Shimano, I got a really good deal on them, now that we have them I am extremely pleased with them. They ar stiff, lighter than our FSA cranks that they replaced and the triple rings shift exceptionally well. I like the hollow tech design and the outboard bearings.
DubT is offline  
Old 07-16-12, 07:30 PM
  #6  
Monoborracho
Senior Member
 
Monoborracho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Small town America with lots of good roads
Posts: 2,710

Bikes: More than I really should own.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 18 Posts
We are going with the Shimano cranks on our new Seven Ti. Several people have related to me that the Shimano triple shifts flawlessly with the 6703 shifters. We shall see.
Monoborracho is offline  
Old 07-17-12, 05:18 PM
  #7  
ReedCycle
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Williamsburg VA
Posts: 38

Bikes: 2010 Calfee Tetra Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
We have the DaVinci cranks on our Calfee - 5,000+ miles and no problems. 170 for both Captain and Stoker, Ti bottom brackets. We use FSA chainrings, 53/39/26, with Ultegra 6703 front derailleur. Shifts great. A little bit of work to keep them polished, but they look great with our translucent Cobalt Blue frame.
ReedCycle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarKris
General Cycling Discussion
18
05-20-16 05:46 AM
FarHorizon
Bicycle Mechanics
21
12-06-14 06:25 AM
jberenyi
Tandem Cycling
35
08-21-13 01:04 PM
wheels78
Bicycle Mechanics
3
11-27-11 09:03 AM
shooter5635
Bicycle Mechanics
7
06-09-11 12:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.