Down to 2 bike - thru axle is the big difference- is it important???
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Down to 2 bike - thru axle is the big difference- is it important???
Hi all,
Narrowed my search to the Felt V85 and the Ridley X Trail Performance Bike special version - both aluminum, both 105 (Felt - full 105, PB Ridley, partial 105)
Main difference for me is the Ridley is thru axle and the Felt standard QR skewer. I ride mainly rail trails and dirt roads thru state forest areas. How important is the thru axle for these applications?
If the industry changes to thru axle for disc brakes as standard will this impact future sale of the Felt?
V85 - Felt Bicycles
Ridley X-Trail AL30 105 Gravel Bike - 2016 Performance Exclusive
thanks
Narrowed my search to the Felt V85 and the Ridley X Trail Performance Bike special version - both aluminum, both 105 (Felt - full 105, PB Ridley, partial 105)
Main difference for me is the Ridley is thru axle and the Felt standard QR skewer. I ride mainly rail trails and dirt roads thru state forest areas. How important is the thru axle for these applications?
If the industry changes to thru axle for disc brakes as standard will this impact future sale of the Felt?
V85 - Felt Bicycles
Ridley X-Trail AL30 105 Gravel Bike - 2016 Performance Exclusive
thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If the industry changes to thru axle for disc brakes as standard will this impact future sale of the Felt?
There are plenty of used bikes out there that have obsolete technology on them. Does it impact the resale value? Usually no.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Been using QR for 24 years - never had a wheel come off but also never had disc brakes - looking to draw from the experience of people who actually use disc brakes for real world applications. Does the thru axle/QR issue make a difference in real life or is it only a big deal for lawyers and bike blog writers?
#4
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,853
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2136 Post(s)
Liked 1,649 Times
in
830 Posts
Disc brakes existed and functioned exceptionally long before through axles hit the scene.
#5
Senior Member
I still hit the trails with my 1989 Rockhopper. 7 speeds, cantilever brakes and standard QR's never presented a problem. Tech is nice. But is it really necessary?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Here's an interesting explanation. It addresses frame design and its use of thru axle
ThruThread dropouts
Most thru-axle frames are heavier than quick-release frames. Extra carbon for the dropouts, heavy hangers, and the axle itself. But they are stiffer, So what do you want most? The answer for most people is “both”, and so we introduce the first frames that combine a thru-axle with a lower weight. How?
The ThruThread design uses the same threads that hold the thru-axle to lock the derailleur hanger into the frame. Simple, light, effective.
We didn’t just redesign the dropout, the entire seatstay and chainstay design is optimized with the added stiffness of the thru-axle in mind. For the thru-axle itself, we recommend the stiffest design available, the Syntace X-12, but you are free to use a different 12mm thru-axle if you want.
ThruThread dropouts
Most thru-axle frames are heavier than quick-release frames. Extra carbon for the dropouts, heavy hangers, and the axle itself. But they are stiffer, So what do you want most? The answer for most people is “both”, and so we introduce the first frames that combine a thru-axle with a lower weight. How?
The ThruThread design uses the same threads that hold the thru-axle to lock the derailleur hanger into the frame. Simple, light, effective.
We didn’t just redesign the dropout, the entire seatstay and chainstay design is optimized with the added stiffness of the thru-axle in mind. For the thru-axle itself, we recommend the stiffest design available, the Syntace X-12, but you are free to use a different 12mm thru-axle if you want.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Further North than U
Posts: 2,000
Bikes: Spec Roubaix, three Fisher Montare, two Pugs
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I think it's a huge difference and I would never buy another mtn bike without thru axles. The reason I like them is they lock the wheel in place MUCH more accurately and perfectly than the thin qr axle so you can expect your wheel to be in perfect alignment all the time. With a qr axle, properly tightned and all, I can stand on one pedal and shift my weight and often get a brake pad to touch. I like my brakes setup close and with disc brakes the thru axles allow more perfect alignment, repeatable each time the wheel is removed. It's simply superior. Higher end bikes have them for a reason. They aren't such a big deal with rim brakes but for disc brakes they are the bomb and like I said, I'll never buy another mt bike without them.
#8
Senior Member
and yet the bike I have the most issues with my rotors rubbing is the one with thru-axles front and rear. I put more blame on the avid/sram brakes than the thru-axles though . I don't remove my wheels constantly and even when I do I've never experience all the issues people claim they have getting the rotor back in the same spot with my QR mtn or cross bikes. That being said I'd still rather have thru-axles if both bikes are basically equal other wise for the extra stiffness.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Detroit, Michigan USA
Posts: 61
Bikes: 1988 Schwinn Prologue Frankin-Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thru axles are some protection against wheel thievery when you just lock the frame to a post.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
You're looking at gravel-grinders. The disadvantage of QR is less there than on a mountain bike. Personally, I would see the thru-axle as a BIG plus. The lack of it wouldn't be a deal breaker, but it would move the needle a long way toward the thru-axle bike. It would take an awful lot to swing that needle back toward a QR bike.
Thru-axles are the future. QR is dead in mountain-bikes, and it'll eventually die in the other disciplines. At least, I hope that it will.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 339
Bikes: Motobecane Century Pro Ti Disc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have disc brakes (hydraulic) on 2 bicycles (road/touring/commuter) with QR with no issues.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From what I've read and seen, I'm wondering if there is empirical evidence as well and anecdotal to support the "feeling" that TA's make the front wheel stiffer/better steering, or if that feeling is a placebo effect. IMO, if the wheel is locked in place between the forks, any flexing is about the forks or the wheel, not how the wheel is attached to it. Thicker axle means thicker hubs, thicker fork dropouts, mean thicker forks. Make a TA as slender as a QR, or a QR as thick as a TA, probably no difference. On MTB's with suspension, yes, one can bounce the bike on the forks to align the axle/forks, but on a road bike, if the axle holes aren't perfectly aligned, the wheel will always be misaligned, whereas with an open drop out, one has some wiggle room to align the wheel.
Last edited by Gweedo1; 05-01-16 at 07:55 AM.
#13
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,459
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3130 Post(s)
Liked 2,111 Times
in
1,374 Posts
Your bike is 27 years old. When you bought it did anyone try to tell you a bike from 1962 was good enough?
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 05-01-16 at 09:12 AM.
#14
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,459
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3130 Post(s)
Liked 2,111 Times
in
1,374 Posts
The proliferation continues, too. This model year Marin has two Pine Mountain models... The lower one is rigid with QR's and 100/135 spacing, and the higher is Boost thru axles plus a suspension fork and dropper. At Sea Otter they introduced a middle model for 2017, with QR's on Boost spacing. It does not match the widespread pre existing tandem standard.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#15
Senior Member
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 15
Bikes: KTM Revelator
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have been riding bikes with QR for years, but just recently (two weeks ago) purchase a new KTM Revelator with disc brakes and thru axles. I must say that the thru axles are far superior to QR in both ease of use and strength. I will not miss the QR at all.
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OK - so what to do if the QR bike fits better and has better value/components for the same $? The felt is full 105 and the Ridley is partial 105 with some mixed components. I'm thinking for riding rail trail an dirt roads the QR should be fine but...I've never owned disc brakes before.
thanks
thanks
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 339
Bikes: Motobecane Century Pro Ti Disc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You will be OK either way. Get the one that feels the best and that you like. If the bicycle you like does not fit just right, there are some fairly cheap changes (stem and seat post) that can be made to give a better fit.
I prefer disc over rim brakes, but either will probably work just as well for you.
I prefer disc over rim brakes, but either will probably work just as well for you.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
QR will never go away. Sure, it's older technology at this point for mountain biking, but it will never go away because of how prevalent it is.
I've had a QR bike with disks for a long time now. I have NEVER had a problem.
I've had a QR bike with disks for a long time now. I have NEVER had a problem.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,719
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OK - so what to do if the QR bike fits better and has better value/components for the same $? The felt is full 105 and the Ridley is partial 105 with some mixed components. I'm thinking for riding rail trail an dirt roads the QR should be fine but...I've never owned disc brakes before.
thanks
thanks
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 54
Bikes: 2017 Giant Quick-E, 2015 Trek Domane 4.0 Disc, 2014 Trek 7.2FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Using a thru axle on a trainer set for QR can be a pain, I've yet to find an adapter for my Domane.