New chain for old Trek?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Greater Chicago Area
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Mirada, 1989 Trek 420, 1995 GT Timberline, 1979 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Co-Op DRT 1.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
49 Posts
New chain for old Trek?
Howdy folks
So, after reading here that a chain is a wear item (something I never knew) I thought a new chain for my '89 Trek would be an easy affordable upgrade. Got an appointment at my local Trek dealer (sadly, the only game in town when it comes to LBSs) and rode over. The tech took a look and said putting a new chain on what was otherwise an old stock drivetrain would actually hurt performance, as a new chain would constantly slip off the worn teeth of the original crank and cassette gears. He said either replace the whole drivetrain, or just keep riding as is. So I'm curious, is this true and did he save me some money? Or did he sell me a bill of goods in hope I'd consider buying a new bike (he did recommend that over continuing to upgrade my old bike). Thoughts?
So, after reading here that a chain is a wear item (something I never knew) I thought a new chain for my '89 Trek would be an easy affordable upgrade. Got an appointment at my local Trek dealer (sadly, the only game in town when it comes to LBSs) and rode over. The tech took a look and said putting a new chain on what was otherwise an old stock drivetrain would actually hurt performance, as a new chain would constantly slip off the worn teeth of the original crank and cassette gears. He said either replace the whole drivetrain, or just keep riding as is. So I'm curious, is this true and did he save me some money? Or did he sell me a bill of goods in hope I'd consider buying a new bike (he did recommend that over continuing to upgrade my old bike). Thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,864 Times
in
2,312 Posts
It depends. If the chain were just old but not worn out he is misguided. If the chain is worn beyond about 1% (as in measured length) then he's got a good point, although the chainrings tend to outlast the rear cogs by a factor or three. Did he measure the chain wear? Did he test the rear cog wear (we use a Rolhloff device)? Did he show you, on your bike, the worn shapes of the teeth?
As to his suggestion of a new bike I have missed feelings. A new bike is new all over, not just the links and teeth of the proposed repair. This newness will show in both a smoother running bike but as well as allow you to enjoy 30 years of product/feature/function development. One aspect that many don't initially understand is that the dealer wants a happy customer many months later. They will make more money on the repair in the short term but the customer will generally be happier months later with that new bike. That happy customer will enjoy riding more and return for both service and possibly service over the years.
So pick your poison. Andy
As to his suggestion of a new bike I have missed feelings. A new bike is new all over, not just the links and teeth of the proposed repair. This newness will show in both a smoother running bike but as well as allow you to enjoy 30 years of product/feature/function development. One aspect that many don't initially understand is that the dealer wants a happy customer many months later. They will make more money on the repair in the short term but the customer will generally be happier months later with that new bike. That happy customer will enjoy riding more and return for both service and possibly service over the years.
So pick your poison. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#3
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
The drivetrain wears as a unit, but the smaller sprockets on the rear cassette tend to wear more because the wear is concentrated on fewer teeth. Putting a new chain on a worn cassette can result in the new chain failing to engage securely with those smaller sprockets, so standard practice is to replace both chain and cassette at the same time. The large chainrings on the crank can last a very long time compared to chains and sprockets, but if you do a lot of riding in abrasive/corrosive conditions and neglect routine maintenance you may eventually need to replace them as well.
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#4
Very Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 1,211
Bikes: Giant Quasar & Fuji Roubaix
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Liked 343 Times
in
244 Posts
I've replaced several chains without replacing gears, front or back, and haven't experienced any problems directly related to one being more worn over the other. My chains seem to wear out pretty fast but then I might not be cleaning them often enough for the conditions I ride in..
Likes For Bigbus:
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Greater Chicago Area
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Mirada, 1989 Trek 420, 1995 GT Timberline, 1979 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Co-Op DRT 1.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
49 Posts
It depends. If the chain were just old but not worn out he is misguided. If the chain is worn beyond about 1% (as in measured length) then he's got a good point, although the chainrings tend to outlast the rear cogs by a factor or three. Did he measure the chain wear? Did he test the rear cog wear (we use a Rolhloff device)? Did he show you, on your bike, the worn shapes of the teeth?
As to his suggestion of a new bike I have missed feelings. A new bike is new all over, not just the links and teeth of the proposed repair. This newness will show in both a smoother running bike but as well as allow you to enjoy 30 years of product/feature/function development. One aspect that many don't initially understand is that the dealer wants a happy customer many months later. They will make more money on the repair in the short term but the customer will generally be happier months later with that new bike. That happy customer will enjoy riding more and return for both service and possibly service over the years.
So pick your poison. Andy
As to his suggestion of a new bike I have missed feelings. A new bike is new all over, not just the links and teeth of the proposed repair. This newness will show in both a smoother running bike but as well as allow you to enjoy 30 years of product/feature/function development. One aspect that many don't initially understand is that the dealer wants a happy customer many months later. They will make more money on the repair in the short term but the customer will generally be happier months later with that new bike. That happy customer will enjoy riding more and return for both service and possibly service over the years.
So pick your poison. Andy
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
92 Posts
There are many tools offered to measure chain wear and this is one of them. https://www.parktool.com/product/cha...dicator-cc-3-2 You can also use a tape measure. Chains don’t really “stretch” but will elongate with wear. Ideally the chain link measures 1” exactly. As the pins wear away, the measurement becomes greater than an inch, and when you add up this wear for each of ~114 links, it adds up. As the chain elongates, it starts wearing the rear cogs to match the elongated chain length, thus altering the cog teeth profile. This happens without you knowing it. Now, if you install a new chain, the new chain links are at 1” exactly. But unfortunately, the old worn cogs no longer match the chain. This mismatch causes the chain to slip on the cogs because the chain and cogs don’t mesh properly. So the wrench does have a good point about leaving it alone.
One way to minimize this is to replace your chain before it reaches a certain amount of elongation, and avoiding excessive wear on the cogs. I can usually get 3 chains for each cassette.
One way to minimize this is to replace your chain before it reaches a certain amount of elongation, and avoiding excessive wear on the cogs. I can usually get 3 chains for each cassette.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,864 Times
in
2,312 Posts
MudPie says the common understanding. But there's more then this. Cog/ring teeth don't change their pitch as they wear, unlike the chain. They do change their shape and thus where in the "valley of the tooth" the chain seeks it's point of engagement. The more tooth wear there is the less the verticalness of the valley wall and the more the chain will want to ride up that wall, till it can no longer pull the tooth without slipping over it's top. This is the skip and grab we seek to avoid. As the chain wears and it's pitch does lengthen the more the last tooth on the cog will bare the forces we apply when pedaling. The more that tooth will wear at it's upper part of it's "wall".
This is why a partially worn cog can agree with a new chain, to a degree. But too much cog tooth wear and the tooth is more like a ramp then a wall. With too much pedaling pressure the chain will want to climb up that ramp shaped wall. Thus on the stand all seems well but in real life the chain skips over the cog with each pedal stroke. This point is the often misunderstood one. Cog teeth don't change their pitch, chains do.
Another aspect not well understood by some is that chain wear tends to be fairly linear referenced to miles (of similar conditions) but the tooth wear tends to be more geometrical with miles. So if , say, a chain and cog have a 2000 mile life and the chain is measured to have 75% of wear the cog will not have the same amount of wear. But in that last 25% of chain life the cog will see the rest of it's wear. Thus many chain checkers have a .75 and a 1 gage. Replace your chain before that 75% point and the cog will last for a few chains, extending it's life.
What some also miss is that chain performance is not solely restricted to cog skip as it wears. the chain's lateral flex increases too. This affects shifting, especially on the crankset. But this is much harder to measure and thus is not talked about much. With no number to post why bring it up Why is because improved shifting is had with less worn chains. Since front shifting is more technique dependent this loss of performance dur to side to side flex increasing is, again, lost in the "shadows". Andy
This is why a partially worn cog can agree with a new chain, to a degree. But too much cog tooth wear and the tooth is more like a ramp then a wall. With too much pedaling pressure the chain will want to climb up that ramp shaped wall. Thus on the stand all seems well but in real life the chain skips over the cog with each pedal stroke. This point is the often misunderstood one. Cog teeth don't change their pitch, chains do.
Another aspect not well understood by some is that chain wear tends to be fairly linear referenced to miles (of similar conditions) but the tooth wear tends to be more geometrical with miles. So if , say, a chain and cog have a 2000 mile life and the chain is measured to have 75% of wear the cog will not have the same amount of wear. But in that last 25% of chain life the cog will see the rest of it's wear. Thus many chain checkers have a .75 and a 1 gage. Replace your chain before that 75% point and the cog will last for a few chains, extending it's life.
What some also miss is that chain performance is not solely restricted to cog skip as it wears. the chain's lateral flex increases too. This affects shifting, especially on the crankset. But this is much harder to measure and thus is not talked about much. With no number to post why bring it up Why is because improved shifting is had with less worn chains. Since front shifting is more technique dependent this loss of performance dur to side to side flex increasing is, again, lost in the "shadows". Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#8
Senior Member
TLDR: The mechanic is almost certainly right in this case. Wear it into the ground, or be prepared to replace the chainrings, freewheel, and chain together at this point. That's an insanely long period of time to go without a chain replacement assuming the bike has been ridden at all regularly.
He's probably making a fair suggestion regarding a new bike, particularly given the amount of labor required at a common shop rate. Still, many of those older Treks are fine bicycles, and while I might explore the idea of a new bike with a customer, I would definitely also lay out clearly a plan for repair. I'd repair it if it were mine--I like most Treks of that approximate vintage.
He's probably making a fair suggestion regarding a new bike, particularly given the amount of labor required at a common shop rate. Still, many of those older Treks are fine bicycles, and while I might explore the idea of a new bike with a customer, I would definitely also lay out clearly a plan for repair. I'd repair it if it were mine--I like most Treks of that approximate vintage.
#9
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
2,056 Posts
My rule of thumb for things like this.
Put on the new chain see what happens.
89 Trek - rear is likely a freewheel costs $15-25 to replace. Chainrings are very likely just fine. For under $50 you should be able to replace all the "needed" drivetrain (chain & freewheel) even at LBS prices.
Put on the new chain see what happens.
89 Trek - rear is likely a freewheel costs $15-25 to replace. Chainrings are very likely just fine. For under $50 you should be able to replace all the "needed" drivetrain (chain & freewheel) even at LBS prices.
Likes For dedhed:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
There is a whole spectrum of bike users here, from casuals and commuters to very serious bikers. Those discussions that would lead you into thinking you should do something about your chain pretty much weekly and change it altogether every season (or whatever) are pertaining to those serious bikers.
Those people have fancy bikes bikes with many gears and so correspondingly thin chains and they put serious miles on them and those folks tend to be in very good shape too (riding hills and sprinting on their bikes like you probably are not even remotely capable of). Couple that with the trend to lighter chains, even with hollow rivets and what not (like intricately machined side plates) and the result is, the chain (really the whole drivetrain) is like a baby that needs care if you want it to last.
Likes For vane171:
#11
Senior Member
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/chain-care.html
Don't bother with a chain checker unless it is the Pedro's or the new Park. All of the others are not accurate and have you replace a chain before it's worn out. https://www.parktool.com/product/chain-checker-cc-4.
https://pedros.com/products/tools/ca...ecker-plus-ii/
Don't bother with a chain checker unless it is the Pedro's or the new Park. All of the others are not accurate and have you replace a chain before it's worn out. https://www.parktool.com/product/chain-checker-cc-4.
https://pedros.com/products/tools/ca...ecker-plus-ii/
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Greater Chicago Area
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Mirada, 1989 Trek 420, 1995 GT Timberline, 1979 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Co-Op DRT 1.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
49 Posts
TLDR: The mechanic is almost certainly right in this case. Wear it into the ground, or be prepared to replace the chainrings, freewheel, and chain together at this point. That's an insanely long period of time to go without a chain replacement assuming the bike has been ridden at all regularly.
He's probably making a fair suggestion regarding a new bike, particularly given the amount of labor required at a common shop rate. Still, many of those older Treks are fine bicycles, and while I might explore the idea of a new bike with a customer, I would definitely also lay out clearly a plan for repair. I'd repair it if it were mine--I like most Treks of that approximate vintage.
He's probably making a fair suggestion regarding a new bike, particularly given the amount of labor required at a common shop rate. Still, many of those older Treks are fine bicycles, and while I might explore the idea of a new bike with a customer, I would definitely also lay out clearly a plan for repair. I'd repair it if it were mine--I like most Treks of that approximate vintage.
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Greater Chicago Area
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Mirada, 1989 Trek 420, 1995 GT Timberline, 1979 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Co-Op DRT 1.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
49 Posts
I gather your chain is not skipping cogs and so, why change it. You won't notice any upgrade with new chain, only upgrade will be in looks and the good feeling you got new chain, that you done something about your bike.
There is a whole spectrum of bike users here, from casuals and commuters to very serious bikers. Those discussions that would lead you into thinking you should do something about your chain pretty much weekly and change it altogether every season (or whatever) are pertaining to those serious bikers.
Those people have fancy bikes bikes with many gears and so correspondingly thin chains and they put serious miles on them and those folks tend to be in very good shape too (riding hills and sprinting on their bikes like you probably are not even remotely capable of). Couple that with the trend to lighter chains, even with hollow rivets and what not (like intricately machined side plates) and the result is, the chain (really the whole drivetrain) is like a baby that needs care if you want it to last.
There is a whole spectrum of bike users here, from casuals and commuters to very serious bikers. Those discussions that would lead you into thinking you should do something about your chain pretty much weekly and change it altogether every season (or whatever) are pertaining to those serious bikers.
Those people have fancy bikes bikes with many gears and so correspondingly thin chains and they put serious miles on them and those folks tend to be in very good shape too (riding hills and sprinting on their bikes like you probably are not even remotely capable of). Couple that with the trend to lighter chains, even with hollow rivets and what not (like intricately machined side plates) and the result is, the chain (really the whole drivetrain) is like a baby that needs care if you want it to last.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
You got here some definitive info regarding chain wear, very worthwhile reading, but like with everything, one's own context is what determines how it applies to you. Myself I always like to know a bit more than what I really need to know because only then I know what I am doing, if that makes sense.
Likes For vane171:
#15
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
I usually use a spray, pointed at the rear cogs, while pedaling backwards with the other hand.
Wipe off the extra with a rag, while pedaling backwards.
Be careful not to get it on the rim, or your rear brake won't work.
If you do, you'll need to clean it off.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Likes For Homebrew01:
#16
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 39
Bikes: TREK 1200 SL (2006?), 1996 Trek 750 Multitrack (sold, great bike), many incomplete projects in the basement
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would like to add the very basic information that the lube is *not* needed for the chain-cog interaction, but to lubricate the inner roller/bush of the chain
NipponBill / CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)
(I say this for sake of completeness, since you explained already the very basic of lube, one may wonder why you need to clean the chain)
NipponBill / CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)
(I say this for sake of completeness, since you explained already the very basic of lube, one may wonder why you need to clean the chain)