Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Considering a Cyclocross bike... Sizing question!

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Considering a Cyclocross bike... Sizing question!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-19, 01:48 PM
  #1  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Considering a Cyclocross bike... Sizing question!

As mentioend, I am considering the purchase of a cyclocross bike, a Nashbar aluminum, and not sure of the year of the bike or components. I do know it is 54cm frame for size. Beyond that I have to wait for the guy to get back in town and a time for us to get together to check it out.

My question. Do most people ride the same size cyclocross as their road bikes? I prefer 58 or 60, depending on the frame and stretch. But feel a little extra standover height might be good for off pavement riding.

I have a 29er that is large, has a suspension fork and gave some thought to skinnier tires. But admittedly, it's standover height is pretty tall thanks to that suspension fork.

I have no intention of racing, but maybe some gravel rides in the future. Maybe even a bike to take on trips that is more versatile than either of my road bikes, or my oversized 29er.
zjrog is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 01:57 PM
  #2  
tdilf
Full Member
 
tdilf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 294

Bikes: Niner RLT RDO, Trek Remedy 9.8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 70 Posts
Cyclocross frame sizes are fairly close to road frames (but really depends on the geo). Going from 58/60 down to a 54 is a big jump though.
tdilf is offline  
Old 06-04-19, 07:05 PM
  #3  
shoota 
Senior Member
 
shoota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times in 468 Posts
54cm is too small for you. Old school CX geo means you go one size down from your road bike, new school CX geo means you get the same size.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
shoota is offline  
Old 06-05-19, 07:40 AM
  #4  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
I appreciate the input. I knew the older thinking. Been out of the loops a few years.

Going to look anyway, to see what components are on the bike for a later project.

I tried a smaller hybrid a few years ago that just didn't work out, so a too small cyclocross bike won't cut it...
zjrog is offline  
Old 06-05-19, 10:06 AM
  #5  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
I don't need the extra standover heigh for Gravel (like I do for mountain bike riding). You might be able to get an extra 20mm out of the stem, but it sounds as if the top tube is 40-60cm too small for you.
chas58 is offline  
Old 06-06-19, 10:36 AM
  #6  
Caliper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 990

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 43 Posts
A lot depends on what "gravel" means to you.

If you are like the guys out west and it means a drop bar mountain bike ridden on techy terrain then you may want something with more standover clearance, but probably with a sloping top tube so that there isn't too much drop to the bars. If you ride 58/60 on a road bike, I think you will have a painful amount of drop on a 54cm frame.
OTOH, if you are more on midwest gravel which means a fat tire road bike on dirt/gravel roads then I'd go with similar or slightly larger sizing to your road bike.

Personally, one of my gravel bikes is an older touring frame with zero standover height. Yes, standing astride the frame means I am "just touching" the top tube. No issues with it because I'm not doing MTB things with the bike. Heck, for some time I ran road pedals (Look brand) on the bike with no troubles. Aside from the rare occasion of cross traffic at an intersection, I rarely unclip over the course of a ride under maybe three hours. The more upright position can be more comfortable for longer rides on bumpier roads though and helps with seeing the scenery if you want to be a bit more touristy.
Caliper is offline  
Likes For Caliper:
Old 06-06-19, 08:58 PM
  #7  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by Caliper
A lot depends on what "gravel" means to you.

If you are like the guys out west and it means a drop bar mountain bike ridden on techy terrain then you may want something with more standover clearance, but probably with a sloping top tube so that there isn't too much drop to the bars. If you ride 58/60 on a road bike, I think you will have a painful amount of drop on a 54cm frame.
OTOH, if you are more on midwest gravel which means a fat tire road bike on dirt/gravel roads then I'd go with similar or slightly larger sizing to your road bike.

Personally, one of my gravel bikes is an older touring frame with zero standover height. Yes, standing astride the frame means I am "just touching" the top tube. No issues with it because I'm not doing MTB things with the bike. Heck, for some time I ran road pedals (Look brand) on the bike with no troubles. Aside from the rare occasion of cross traffic at an intersection, I rarely unclip over the course of a ride under maybe three hours. The more upright position can be more comfortable for longer rides on bumpier roads though and helps with seeing the scenery if you want to be a bit more touristy.

I am out west, Utah, west of Salt Lake City. Due to a bicycle crash nearly 8 years ago, I have no intent to be super gonzo ever again. Super technical offroad is just not going to happen. My 29er is almost too big for me to ride off road anyway. It has the same stand over as my 58cm road bikes. Now, I grew up in Kansas, just north of the Dirty Kanza race. Rode a Sears Free Spirit 10 speed on gravel roads and cow trails because I didn't know any better in the late 70s...

So. I thought about a second set of wheels with 38 to 45c tires for the 29er. Still an option. I have ridden it on some desert trails, and I think that is where this bike shines for me. Do I need a cyclocross bike? Probably not. But the 29er is overkill, and heavy. And none of my road bikes can fit over 28c. Well. 32c fits the rear of my KHS which was originally a 27" wheel bike, but 28 is the biggest the fork fits, it was off a 85 or 86 Nishiki Prestige. I agree then, the 54 cm bike might be too small. But still worth looking at for the group, maybe I can fnd a proper fit frame.
zjrog is offline  
Old 06-07-19, 11:31 AM
  #8  
86az135i
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 154

Bikes: 1996 Cannondale R900, 2016 Trek Boone, 2005 Giant Yukon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
I ride a 56 on road and 56 cyclocross. The cyclocross fit wasn't perfect, so I sized down 10mm on the stem. Good to go. There's always a little flexibility. But a 4-6cm drop is a lot and minor adjustments will not get you the fit you want.
86az135i is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Metis
Cyclocross Racing
5
04-18-18 03:17 PM
Nishantrivedi
Northeast
0
12-19-15 07:51 PM
tiras25
Road Cycling
11
02-04-15 05:14 PM
teddyhomer
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
7
01-20-12 12:44 PM
bobthib
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
6
02-27-10 01:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.