Anyone riding a frame smaller than "recommended" for them?
10-15-14, 12:18 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Anyone riding a frame smaller than "recommended" for them?
I've picked up a road frame with an interesting (to me) geometry. I'm trying to decide whether to build it up for myself. I mocked up the dimensions in AutoCAD so you can see. I'm a little over 5'9" with a 32.5" cycling inseam. Is a 51cm top tube too small for me, or can I make it work? I used 170mm cranks and a 120mm stem with 17 degree rise in the drawing. The stem height is 3cm, and the seat to handlebar drop is also 3cm.
I currently ride a 56cm with 90mm stem, that fits me reasonably. The handlebars and seat are the same height, and I ride primarily in the drops with no reach issues.
Thanks!
I currently ride a 56cm with 90mm stem, that fits me reasonably. The handlebars and seat are the same height, and I ride primarily in the drops with no reach issues.
Thanks!
10-15-14, 02:39 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most conventional recommendations would have you on a bigger frame than that. The seat tube looks steeper than on larger bikes, so you might need to set back the saddle a fair ways, depending on what works for you.
I suggest you take the CAD system and replicate the distances (vertical and horizontal) on your 56cm bike from the bottom bracket to some point on the saddle and to the handlebar tube centre. If you can replicate these on the new frame, what length of stem and how much saddle setback will you need. If you need unusually large saddle setback and a really long stem, that might be a warning sign.
I suggest you take the CAD system and replicate the distances (vertical and horizontal) on your 56cm bike from the bottom bracket to some point on the saddle and to the handlebar tube centre. If you can replicate these on the new frame, what length of stem and how much saddle setback will you need. If you need unusually large saddle setback and a really long stem, that might be a warning sign.
10-15-14, 02:46 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Good idea, I'll try to overlay those dimensions and see where I end up.
10-15-14, 03:55 PM
#4
Banned
assume you are talking Road bikes .. Once I figured out what was right for me I dont own anything else ..
10-15-14, 05:18 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
For my leg length, 56 cm frames are best. For my torso length, 58 cm frames are typically best. I ride bikes from 52 mm to 59.5 mm. The 52 cm is too small but with saddle all the way back and a long stem, it is okay for shorter rides, typically my rides on that bike are 25-50 miles, and it feels racy and quick handling. The 58 cm and 59.5 cm frames are comfortable for any distance ride. I think most of us can more or less comfortably ride a pretty wide range of frame sizes, as long as the saddle to pedal distance is right. But I wouldn't take the 52 cm on a century.
10-16-14, 01:05 AM
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
For my leg length, 56 cm frames are best. For my torso length, 58 cm frames are typically best. I ride bikes from 52 mm to 59.5 mm. The 52 cm is too small but with saddle all the way back and a long stem, it is okay for shorter rides, typically my rides on that bike are 25-50 miles, and it feels racy and quick handling. The 58 cm and 59.5 cm frames are comfortable for any distance ride. I think most of us can more or less comfortably ride a pretty wide range of frame sizes, as long as the saddle to pedal distance is right. But I wouldn't take the 52 cm on a century.
10-16-14, 08:33 AM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
5' 11"
Bike inseam in bare feet 33"
Preferred distance from top of pedal surface to top of saddle surface at the center of the saddle is 34.5"
On Brooks saddles, a bit higher because they sag a bit
On bikes I ride in cycling shorts, a bit lower because of the pad's thickness
I use SPD pedals on most bikes, and bike shoes with recessed SPD cleats. If riding with casual shoes, like Vans, then the saddle feels too high.
I have large feet (size 45 euro/10.5 US) and tend to pedal toe-down
Bike inseam in bare feet 33"
Preferred distance from top of pedal surface to top of saddle surface at the center of the saddle is 34.5"
On Brooks saddles, a bit higher because they sag a bit
On bikes I ride in cycling shorts, a bit lower because of the pad's thickness
I use SPD pedals on most bikes, and bike shoes with recessed SPD cleats. If riding with casual shoes, like Vans, then the saddle feels too high.
I have large feet (size 45 euro/10.5 US) and tend to pedal toe-down
Last edited by jyl; 10-18-14 at 04:32 PM.
