Surly cross check: shifting COG forward?
10-20-14, 07:18 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: A Train
Posts: 88
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, set up for road use
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Surly cross check: shifting COG forward?
Hi all. I have a 58 cm Surly Cross Check, which seems to fit pretty well, generally. However, I'm hoping to shift my weight forward a bit more, and I'm thinking of moving my stem down to do it. The head tube angles is very slack, so it seems that taking the stem down a spacer or two will also shift it forward pretty dramatically. Will that accomplish shifting the COG forward as well? Any downsides? Thanks!
10-20-14, 09:27 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
Your torso will be closer to horizontal which will shift CG forward a little, not that much. No harm in trying.
10-21-14, 06:47 AM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: A Train
Posts: 88
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, set up for road use
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks! The reason I ask is that I appear to be putting too much weight on my saddle, causing the rails to bend. (While no delicate flower, I'm well under the weight limit for the saddle; the manufacturer has suggested it could be an issue with weight distribution.) Because the Surly is relatively slack in its head and seat tube angles, I thought shifting the stem down might address the issue.
10-21-14, 08:08 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd agree with jyl... there will be some forward shift of COG, but maybe not enough to help the saddle. You might end up with neck and shoulder issues, or you might not. It is not generally recommended to try to increase the weight that your shoulders and arms are supporting.
I'm curious, though: where is your seatpost attached to the saddle? Is the saddle all the way back? Centered? If the saddle is all the way back, that can certainly generate very large bending stresses on saddle rails. Especially if you stay firmly in the saddle for rougher parts of riding.
I'm curious, though: where is your seatpost attached to the saddle? Is the saddle all the way back? Centered? If the saddle is all the way back, that can certainly generate very large bending stresses on saddle rails. Especially if you stay firmly in the saddle for rougher parts of riding.
10-21-14, 10:34 AM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 546
Bikes: 2009 Surly Cross Check Frankenbike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Has anyone looked at your fit? Saddle could be too low or too far forward/back, handlebars could be high, maybe riding style is part of the problem. But, it will be easy to test the setup.
You may find you change several things. For example, you will probably have to change saddle tilt if handlebars come down. You might want to take measurements of saddle height, setback, saddle to handlebar reach, handlebar height and note changes as you experiment.
You may find you change several things. For example, you will probably have to change saddle tilt if handlebars come down. You might want to take measurements of saddle height, setback, saddle to handlebar reach, handlebar height and note changes as you experiment.
