PR to shame those who menace weaker users?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
PR to shame those who menace weaker users?
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
#2
Senior Member
Personally, I think those that would persecute weaker beings would consider it a badge of honor and make a game out of increasing their level of persecution. I admit I am cynical and jaded.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616
Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
My knee jerk reaction was no, but I do think it would help.
In the first place there are drivers who just don't know any better and such a PR campaign would not only inform them about safe passing but also drive it home that we are, in fact, road users. Eradicating ignorance is always worthy and should be the primary goal of any PR campaign in my opinion.
Secondly there is a small but real population who have no sense of empathy, no concern for the well-being of others, and who are only held in check by the known consequences of violating social constraints. I don't know if you can artificially create such a thing, or bring it to the surface of public awareness by analogy, but it's worth a try.
In the first place there are drivers who just don't know any better and such a PR campaign would not only inform them about safe passing but also drive it home that we are, in fact, road users. Eradicating ignorance is always worthy and should be the primary goal of any PR campaign in my opinion.
Secondly there is a small but real population who have no sense of empathy, no concern for the well-being of others, and who are only held in check by the known consequences of violating social constraints. I don't know if you can artificially create such a thing, or bring it to the surface of public awareness by analogy, but it's worth a try.
#5
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
I think that to emphasize "weaker beings" in any way would be a negative... already, in the minds of some, cyclists represent the "40 year old virgin." Of course, the real irony is that cyclists, exercising routinely, could probably kick butt on many motorists that are only "strong" due to the size of their SUV.
No, a better "crying indian" type campaign would be to remind people that cyclists are brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers, generally people you know... not just faceless cycling bots out there to create havoc on the road.
No, a better "crying indian" type campaign would be to remind people that cyclists are brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers, generally people you know... not just faceless cycling bots out there to create havoc on the road.
#7
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5 minutes ago i was almost run over and chased down only to almost get run over again, and then loony floored it and sped off, there's no reason to even report it, what do you plan on stopping these kind of people with this kind of mentality?
people on bikes are real people, sure, but not to the person in the car, then everything outside the car is there to annoy them, and only them
the moment they get out of the car they suddenly want to have safe roads, no cars around, cookies and rainbows..
people on bikes are real people, sure, but not to the person in the car, then everything outside the car is there to annoy them, and only them
the moment they get out of the car they suddenly want to have safe roads, no cars around, cookies and rainbows..
Last edited by italktocats; 06-18-16 at 11:54 AM.
#10
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
#11
Senior Member
While admitting I don't watch much TV, do we still have Public Service Announcements? I remember a few from the past. "Expect the Unexpected. Watch Out for the Other Guy". "Buckle up for Safety". "Keep America Beautiful, Don't Litter". "Just Say No".
I was thinking a PSA regarding Bicycles and how vulnerable they are. I think the thing that genec posted in #7 is perfect, and could be done on a rotating basis. I remember "Brought to You by the Ad Council". Or maybe the Department of Transportation or the National Transportation Safety Board.
I'm in favor of it and I think it would be somewhat effective.
I was thinking a PSA regarding Bicycles and how vulnerable they are. I think the thing that genec posted in #7 is perfect, and could be done on a rotating basis. I remember "Brought to You by the Ad Council". Or maybe the Department of Transportation or the National Transportation Safety Board.
I'm in favor of it and I think it would be somewhat effective.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Zinj
Posts: 1,826
Bikes: '93 911 Turbo 3.6
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
#17
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
While admitting I don't watch much TV, do we still have Public Service Announcements? I remember a few from the past. "Expect the Unexpected. Watch Out for the Other Guy". "Buckle up for Safety". "Keep America Beautiful, Don't Litter". "Just Say No".
I was thinking a PSA regarding Bicycles and how vulnerable they are. I think the thing that genec posted in #7 is perfect, and could be done on a rotating basis. I remember "Brought to You by the Ad Council". Or maybe the Department of Transportation or the National Transportation Safety Board.
I'm in favor of it and I think it would be somewhat effective.
I was thinking a PSA regarding Bicycles and how vulnerable they are. I think the thing that genec posted in #7 is perfect, and could be done on a rotating basis. I remember "Brought to You by the Ad Council". Or maybe the Department of Transportation or the National Transportation Safety Board.
I'm in favor of it and I think it would be somewhat effective.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,509
Bikes: 3 good used ones
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616
Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
I don't think it would reach the types that I first come to mind I read the OP but after seeing some of these ideas I have to think it would resonate with some drivers. Something like was the picture being posted would have to make some think about the "who" that's on the bike. Maybe a catchy phase like "click it or ticket" with safe passing distance might be worthwhile too. I had one come around my today no more than 6" from my bars, and that was on a straight road with 3 or 4 hundred yards of forward visibility ahead and not another car is sight. I don't have much hope of reaching people like that, they simply think bikes shouldn't be on the roads.
#20
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
I don't think it would reach the types that I first come to mind I read the OP but after seeing some of these ideas I have to think it would resonate with some drivers. Something like was the picture being posted would have to make some think about the "who" that's on the bike. Maybe a catchy phase like "click it or ticket" with safe passing distance might be worthwhile too. I had one come around my today no more than 6" from my bars, and that was on a straight road with 3 or 4 hundred yards of forward visibility ahead and not another car is sight. I don't have much hope of reaching people like that, they simply think bikes shouldn't be on the roads.
Of course in the situation like you mentioned, some AH could just say "yeah, inches... ha ha... " and really get close.
#21
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
I understand the need, for protection of those with sight impairment... but gosh, wouldn't be nicer to work toward a quieter environment?
Bit of irony... I just moved to a rural area... and thought it would be quiet. Turns out when it is quiet, all the sounds travel further... "you hear everything..." Of course the reality is that the total db level average is indeed lower.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616
Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
I always thought it was ironic that there was discussion of adding noise to electric vehicles.
I understand the need, for protection of those with sight impairment... but gosh, wouldn't be nicer to work toward a quieter environment?
Bit of irony... I just moved to a rural area... and thought it would be quiet. Turns out when it is quiet, all the sounds travel further... "you hear everything..." Of course the reality is that the total db level average is indeed lower.
I understand the need, for protection of those with sight impairment... but gosh, wouldn't be nicer to work toward a quieter environment?
Bit of irony... I just moved to a rural area... and thought it would be quiet. Turns out when it is quiet, all the sounds travel further... "you hear everything..." Of course the reality is that the total db level average is indeed lower.
I have a pet peeve about loud vehicles and have found the vehicles most always match the operators loud and obnoxious personalizes. Even when I kept fast cars I never had one that was loud, there is a huge difference between have a powerful tone and just being loud.
#23
Senior Member
The USA sense of macho has perhaps had some good aspects -- that advertisers appeal to -- but it has also always included "cowardly victimizing of the weaker."
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
It would be an easy national PR campaign to expose the cowardly evil of startling, squeezing, buzzing, honking, hassling road-users who are weaker. Maybe a bit like the old 'crying indian.'
Could that have a helpful effect? We're not used to that kind of embarrassing exposure of our values here in the USA. It would embarrass many. Could it change any? Or would there be a backlash to protect our "right to assault the weaker"?
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,509
Bikes: 3 good used ones
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I always thought it was ironic that there was discussion of adding noise to electric vehicles.
I understand the need, for protection of those with sight impairment... but gosh, wouldn't be nicer to work toward a quieter environment?
Bit of irony... I just moved to a rural area... and thought it would be quiet. Turns out when it is quiet, all the sounds travel further... "you hear everything..." Of course the reality is that the total db level average is indeed lower.
I understand the need, for protection of those with sight impairment... but gosh, wouldn't be nicer to work toward a quieter environment?
Bit of irony... I just moved to a rural area... and thought it would be quiet. Turns out when it is quiet, all the sounds travel further... "you hear everything..." Of course the reality is that the total db level average is indeed lower.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
171 Posts
PR to shame those who menace weaker users?
Well said, @WP. I have those exact thoughts whenever I am passed, even when not too close by motorist who does not slow down or move over slightly, just as an indication they notice me. I always think those self-absorbed cagers are only restrained by the thought of scratching their cars, or the hassle of filing police reports.
My only satisfactory retribution is to give them my previously-described Bicyclist Curse. (I repeatedly jab my pointed right index finger in their direction, while shouting an accusatory, ”You, you, you…”). The possibility of metaphysical retribution is more satisfying than the middle finger.
I do also bestow Bicyclist Blessings on drivers who show even a modicum of respect, with a wave of the hand. I estimate I give Blessings to Curses in a ratio of about at least 25 to 1.
My knee jerk reaction was no, but I do think it would help...
Secondly there is a small but real population who have no sense of empathy, no concern for the well-being of others, and who are only held in check by the known consequences of violating social constraints. I don't know if you can artificially create such a thing, or bring it to the surface of public awareness by analogy, but it's worth a try.
Secondly there is a small but real population who have no sense of empathy, no concern for the well-being of others, and who are only held in check by the known consequences of violating social constraints. I don't know if you can artificially create such a thing, or bring it to the surface of public awareness by analogy, but it's worth a try.
My only satisfactory retribution is to give them my previously-described Bicyclist Curse. (I repeatedly jab my pointed right index finger in their direction, while shouting an accusatory, ”You, you, you…”). The possibility of metaphysical retribution is more satisfying than the middle finger.
I do also bestow Bicyclist Blessings on drivers who show even a modicum of respect, with a wave of the hand. I estimate I give Blessings to Curses in a ratio of about at least 25 to 1.
Last edited by Jim from Boston; 06-19-16 at 05:27 AM.