Trek's New Gravel Bike , 520 Grando
#26
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Commentary is, well, yes commentary.
You can agree with it, question it, disagree with it, have your own opinions, ignore it and that all is welcome as well.
Unbranded chromoly tubing is, well who knows the quality... Reynolds, Columbus, Tange, etc. assures specific fabrication methods, PSI strength, precise metalurgical content wall thickness, tempering, butting quality etc. and assueres the buyer of the quality of the product. I have in fact seen a Trek steel frame bike (generic chromoly as a matter of fact) where the down tube failed with a fatigue crack all the way around about 1/4 of the way up from the bottom bracket at the internal butting. The frame looked like someone cut through it nice and neatly with a hacksaw. From experience it is my opinion that the quality of the tubing does in fact matter and name brand bicycle tubing is likely to be of better quality than generic tubing.
You are of course entitled to the opinion that generic tubing is just as good. Heck, Schwinn uses unbranded chrome moly so in must be pretty high performance stuff right?
You can agree with it, question it, disagree with it, have your own opinions, ignore it and that all is welcome as well.
Unbranded chromoly tubing is, well who knows the quality... Reynolds, Columbus, Tange, etc. assures specific fabrication methods, PSI strength, precise metalurgical content wall thickness, tempering, butting quality etc. and assueres the buyer of the quality of the product. I have in fact seen a Trek steel frame bike (generic chromoly as a matter of fact) where the down tube failed with a fatigue crack all the way around about 1/4 of the way up from the bottom bracket at the internal butting. The frame looked like someone cut through it nice and neatly with a hacksaw. From experience it is my opinion that the quality of the tubing does in fact matter and name brand bicycle tubing is likely to be of better quality than generic tubing.
You are of course entitled to the opinion that generic tubing is just as good. Heck, Schwinn uses unbranded chrome moly so in must be pretty high performance stuff right?
You showing a generic Schwinn sticker and takong a dig at the brand name doesnt prove that unbranded/generic/private label tubing is worse than branded tubing. Such thinking is lazy.
What matters is the tube's details- diameter and butting profile, basically.
You claiming 520 tubing is somehow better is just laughable because you don't know the details of each. They are the same material and the difference will be in something none of us knows- the butting profile. Even then, i doubt you would speak competently on which is 'better'.
As for your ramble about generic tubing breaking, surely you understand that such a limited example set is pointless to use for drawing a conclusion. Otherwise, any OPEN frames that fail would, by your reasoning, make OPEN frame utter crap and unreliable.
I fully agree with you that the quality of tubing matters. 100% agree. You have no idea what the specs are for the Reynolds 520 tubing though. Its just butter cromoly for all we know.
Black Mountain Cycles spec's their frames with 8/5/8 heat treated tubing. Its generic. Heck, its not just generic, but its seamed too(eek!) since thst hasn't mattered for over 30 years. Heat treated, 8/5/8, and generic. Whats not to like? Why would that be worse than 520/525 8/5/8 or 8/6/8 tubing?...it wouldn't be. Its heat treated unlike the 5 series too.
You made fun of the pannier setup, only to have multiple posters respond that its a legit setup.
You made fun of the tubing, only to be told both bikes have the same effective tubing for all we know.
You claimed a failed generic tube is reason to not use it, yet you defend other 1 off failures.
You tried to support your point by making fun of a company that actually did use significantly nicer tubing than what you cited, on models that were appropriately priced.
The Trek bike can be made fun of for so many better reasons than you cite. The tubing claim was a funny one at least.
#27
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
Looks like an interesting bike. They should probably list the weight without the rack. Steel disc forks are heavy.
A lot of people are going with just front panniers nowadays.
A lot of people are going with just front panniers nowadays.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848
Bikes: Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times
in
422 Posts
Somebody mentioned disc brakes without thru-axel..... today I would not buy a bike like this... no reason to.
All blacked out for touring are ya? I prefer white frames and forks. Visually safer on the road, as well as colored panniers or seat bag... stainless spokes instead of black please.... so people can see you coming.
And the alloy fork... ugh
Looks like the popular blackout bike from 20 years ago.....
Black bike photographed on a black backdrop...... that's a no-no
All blacked out for touring are ya? I prefer white frames and forks. Visually safer on the road, as well as colored panniers or seat bag... stainless spokes instead of black please.... so people can see you coming.
And the alloy fork... ugh
Looks like the popular blackout bike from 20 years ago.....
Black bike photographed on a black backdrop...... that's a no-no
#30
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I'm not sure what's wrong with an aluminum fork. Are there forks with these kinds of attachment points that are carbon and cheap? And a steel fork with a tapered headtube is a real boat anchor. I think a tapered steerer makes sense and they are trying to hit a price point with a lot of attachment points, so aluminum is the best choice.
#31
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
I'm not sure what's wrong with an aluminum fork. Are there forks with these kinds of attachment points that are carbon and cheap? And a steel fork with a tapered headtube is a real boat anchor. I think a tapered steerer makes sense and they are trying to hit a price point with a lot of attachment points, so aluminum is the best choice.
#32
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: California
Posts: 211
Bikes: 2020 Lynskey GR300, 1987 Diamondback Ascent, 1991 Skykomish Marble Point, 1994 Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, 1996 Specialized Stumpjumper M2 FS, 1992 GT Karakoram
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
84 Posts
Schwinn spec'd their bikes with double butted OS Tange tubing, Columbus SL and SP tubing, Columbus private label tubing, unbranded cromoly, and more. This is in just a 10 year period of the 80s and early 90s and doesn't even get into the 853 tubing used in the late 90s or other tubing thru the decades.
You showing a generic Schwinn sticker and takong a dig at the brand name doesnt prove that unbranded/generic/private label tubing is worse than branded tubing. Such thinking is lazy.
What matters is the tube's details- diameter and butting profile, basically.
You claiming 520 tubing is somehow better is just laughable because you don't know the details of each. They are the same material and the difference will be in something none of us knows- the butting profile. Even then, i doubt you would speak competently on which is 'better'.
As for your ramble about generic tubing breaking, surely you understand that such a limited example set is pointless to use for drawing a conclusion. Otherwise, any OPEN frames that fail would, by your reasoning, make OPEN frame utter crap and unreliable.
I fully agree with you that the quality of tubing matters. 100% agree. You have no idea what the specs are for the Reynolds 520 tubing though. Its just butter cromoly for all we know.
Black Mountain Cycles spec's their frames with 8/5/8 heat treated tubing. Its generic. Heck, its not just generic, but its seamed too(eek!) since thst hasn't mattered for over 30 years. Heat treated, 8/5/8, and generic. Whats not to like? Why would that be worse than 520/525 8/5/8 or 8/6/8 tubing?...it wouldn't be. Its heat treated unlike the 5 series too.
You made fun of the pannier setup, only to have multiple posters respond that its a legit setup.
You made fun of the tubing, only to be told both bikes have the same effective tubing for all we know.
You claimed a failed generic tube is reason to not use it, yet you defend other 1 off failures.
You tried to support your point by making fun of a company that actually did use significantly nicer tubing than what you cited, on models that were appropriately priced.
The Trek bike can be made fun of for so many better reasons than you cite. The tubing claim was a funny one at least.
You showing a generic Schwinn sticker and takong a dig at the brand name doesnt prove that unbranded/generic/private label tubing is worse than branded tubing. Such thinking is lazy.
What matters is the tube's details- diameter and butting profile, basically.
You claiming 520 tubing is somehow better is just laughable because you don't know the details of each. They are the same material and the difference will be in something none of us knows- the butting profile. Even then, i doubt you would speak competently on which is 'better'.
As for your ramble about generic tubing breaking, surely you understand that such a limited example set is pointless to use for drawing a conclusion. Otherwise, any OPEN frames that fail would, by your reasoning, make OPEN frame utter crap and unreliable.
I fully agree with you that the quality of tubing matters. 100% agree. You have no idea what the specs are for the Reynolds 520 tubing though. Its just butter cromoly for all we know.
Black Mountain Cycles spec's their frames with 8/5/8 heat treated tubing. Its generic. Heck, its not just generic, but its seamed too(eek!) since thst hasn't mattered for over 30 years. Heat treated, 8/5/8, and generic. Whats not to like? Why would that be worse than 520/525 8/5/8 or 8/6/8 tubing?...it wouldn't be. Its heat treated unlike the 5 series too.
You made fun of the pannier setup, only to have multiple posters respond that its a legit setup.
You made fun of the tubing, only to be told both bikes have the same effective tubing for all we know.
You claimed a failed generic tube is reason to not use it, yet you defend other 1 off failures.
You tried to support your point by making fun of a company that actually did use significantly nicer tubing than what you cited, on models that were appropriately priced.
The Trek bike can be made fun of for so many better reasons than you cite. The tubing claim was a funny one at least.
#33
Full Member
I'm not sure what's wrong with an aluminum fork. Are there forks with these kinds of attachment points that are carbon and cheap? And a steel fork with a tapered headtube is a real boat anchor. I think a tapered steerer makes sense and they are trying to hit a price point with a lot of attachment points, so aluminum is the best choice.
I think the AL fork is for surface area and stiffness to support bags.If you've got big tires and a steel frame, why worry about a stiff AL fork?
#34
Senior Member
First ride with my new 520 Grando. It's was very cold outside so it was just a short ride but the bike was soooo confortable. I love it !
#35
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
^ good looking from afar.
#37
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Follow up
Hi sweet photo. Just wondered how you are liking your 520 Grando after more than a year of riding? I am searching through the forums on various threads and stumbled across this one. Apologies in advance if I should ask somewhere else (I’m sorta new to the forum). I am on my second week of commuting on my 520 Grando and I am pleased so far. First and second mod so far was to add the Trek 520 rear rack SPD pedals.