Panic buy RD-6700-A GS for 12-30 ?
#1
LR÷P=HR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,135
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 848 Post(s)
Liked 1,161 Times
in
671 Posts
Panic buy RD-6700-A GS for 12-30 ?
Current Setup -I currently have 50/34 R8000 cranks, 11-28 Ultegra Cassette and the original RD-6700 SS rear derailleur (non "A" version).
Problem -Hills have been an issue, I live on a rather steep one, ~480W required to climb it.
Wanted - I'd like to try 12-30 I know the RD-6700-A SS has the larger capacity for 12-30 but I can't find a new/minty one.
There are countless posts telling of how you can "stretch the Shimano Spec", and almost as many saying "Don't do that".
Panic -A NIB RD-6700-A GS just came available on Ebay and in a panic, I purchased it.
Question -Will this do what I want?
Would I have been better off waiting to find the SS I was looking for?
Thanks
Barry
Problem -Hills have been an issue, I live on a rather steep one, ~480W required to climb it.
Wanted - I'd like to try 12-30 I know the RD-6700-A SS has the larger capacity for 12-30 but I can't find a new/minty one.
There are countless posts telling of how you can "stretch the Shimano Spec", and almost as many saying "Don't do that".
Panic -A NIB RD-6700-A GS just came available on Ebay and in a panic, I purchased it.
Question -Will this do what I want?
Would I have been better off waiting to find the SS I was looking for?
Thanks
Barry
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 489
Bikes: 2014 Bruce Gordon Rock&Road, 1995 Santana Visa Tandem, 1990 Trek 520, 2012 Surly LHT
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times
in
35 Posts
The RD-6700 is a short cage model (SS), the RD-6703 is the longer cage style (GS) designed for triples. The "A" you are referring to is only for interchangeability of specific parts; its not really a part number. As far as I know, Shimano spec for both these 2 RDs is 28T cog max. The total capacity is what varies; 33T for the 6700 (designed for 2 x 10) and 39T for the 6703 (designed for 3x10). Of course, you can probably get away with using a 30T cog with the RD-6700 but you may have to turn the B screw all the way in.
Now onto the RD-6800. This is for 11 speed, where your old RD-6700 was 10 speed. This wont matter one bit. For the 6800 series, Shimano elected to add the SS and GS to the part number, which essentially mirrored the old 6700 and 6703 designations. Long story short, both versions of the 6800 are rated for 28T max cog. But again you can probably get them to work with a 30 T cog by adjusting the B Screw all the way in. The SS is rated fro 33T total capacity, whereas the GS is rated for 37T total capacity.
In closing, what literature are you referring to that specified your current RD-6700 is rated for a 30T max cog. Glad I don;t have that hill to climb.
Now onto the RD-6800. This is for 11 speed, where your old RD-6700 was 10 speed. This wont matter one bit. For the 6800 series, Shimano elected to add the SS and GS to the part number, which essentially mirrored the old 6700 and 6703 designations. Long story short, both versions of the 6800 are rated for 28T max cog. But again you can probably get them to work with a 30 T cog by adjusting the B Screw all the way in. The SS is rated fro 33T total capacity, whereas the GS is rated for 37T total capacity.
In closing, what literature are you referring to that specified your current RD-6700 is rated for a 30T max cog. Glad I don;t have that hill to climb.
#3
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,852
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2151 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times
in
1,198 Posts
2) Of course. And a new one at a great price will show up...any moment now. Such is the price of bicycling.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#4
Really Old Senior Member
Here's a chart with Shimano's recommended cog sizes/chain wrap....
Likes For Bill Kapaun:
#5
LR÷P=HR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,135
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 848 Post(s)
Liked 1,161 Times
in
671 Posts
RD-6700 is the original and available in both SS (short) and GS (long)
Quickly replaced with the
RD-6700-A also in SS and GS
Both versions read RD-6700 on the rear ... but the "A" version has 30T stamped on the Cage of the SS version.
If confused as to how this relates to rear Cog size, and the other apparent calculation that take into consideration Crank teeth.
Barry
Quickly replaced with the
RD-6700-A also in SS and GS
Both versions read RD-6700 on the rear ... but the "A" version has 30T stamped on the Cage of the SS version.
If confused as to how this relates to rear Cog size, and the other apparent calculation that take into consideration Crank teeth.
Barry
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,651
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 424 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
303 Posts
Your original RD should be able to handle the new cassette in terms of cleaning the largest cog. Your total capacity only increased by 1t, so there's a chance it'll be fine. If you really wanted to be safe you could have gone with a 9sp Shimano mountain RD.
Likes For dsbrantjr:
#8
Licensed Bike Geek
I have 4 bikes, all running 34/50 cranks, 11/32 cassettes and all using Ultegra 6700 rear derailleurs.
Since you’re going to use a 30t cassette regardless of the rear derailleur, I’d tell you to try the new cassette with your existing derailleur. You’ll have to adjust the B-screw so the upper pulley doesn’t clash with the large cog when in the Little/big combo.
Since you’re going to use a 30t cassette regardless of the rear derailleur, I’d tell you to try the new cassette with your existing derailleur. You’ll have to adjust the B-screw so the upper pulley doesn’t clash with the large cog when in the Little/big combo.
#9
Senior Member
Your new derailleur will work better with slightly larger cogs than your old one, so yeah, sure, it makes sense. The GS model will shift slightly less well than the SS but you're likely to not notice much difference. 2t isn't a giant deal, although sometimes all you need is a little more. If you want a bunch more range for relatively cheap a common solution is to run a 9 speed MTB derailleur (I'd recommend Deore or Deore XT level) with an 11-34 or even 11-36 cassette. For a lot of riders some kind of subcompact makes a lot of sense in very hilly terrain, also, if you really need lower gearing and don't care much about your speed in a dead sprint in a paceline.
#10
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,852
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2151 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times
in
1,198 Posts
If it were me and the 6700 didn’t do the job, I’d switch to a Deore RD. Longer body geometry = easier to work with larger rear cogs.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
I have a RD-6700-GS on one bike and it is stamped "30T" on the outer cage plate so it will take a 30T cog with no problem. I also have a NIB 105 RD-5701-GS in my parts box that says a 30T maximum cog with a triple crank and 32T max with a double.
#12
LR÷P=HR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,135
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 848 Post(s)
Liked 1,161 Times
in
671 Posts
RD-6700 mystery solved.
OK between the Shimano Doc provided by Bill and some more research I've worked out what is going on here.
I going to state the obvious to most, but I've never seen this explained so here I go...
Shimano is rating their REAR Derailleurs in three ways
1. Max Front Difference
Example - my 50/34 crank setup has a difference if 16
2. Max Low Sprocket
This is the teeth on the largest Cassette cog. My current is 28T (I want 30T)
3. Total Capacity
this the Front difference + the rear difference. In my current setup 50-34 + 28-11 = 33 (I want 50-34 + 30-12 = 34)
Limit is 34 for the RD-6700-A SS
Here is clip from Bill's Doc.
As you can see the RD-6700-A will accept a 30T on the rear cassette and the Total Capacity (34) limit fits me need.
However what this does not tell you is that early versions of the RD-6700 were a non-"A" variant.
This non-"A" variant has a rear cog size limit of 28T and I suspect a capacity limit of 33. The non-"A" does not fit my needs.
To make matters worst, the RD-6700-A and RD-6700 are both marked on the rear as "RD-6700". There is NO "A" marking.
The way to tell them apart is the front of the cage is stamped 30T on the "A" version. The stamping is around the top pulley, you have to have the cage spring relaxed in order to see the marking.
I panic purchased a RD-6700 GS (long cage version) expecting it to offer a larger rear cog limit. Wrong - It offers a larger Max Front Limit. Rear cassette size is still limited at 30T.
I've since panicked another ebay 6700 and this time got a RD-6700 SS. Still not the RD-6700-A SS I was looking for.
I'm going to open up a business flipping RD-6700's for a living.
If you see a RD-6700-A SS NIB I'm in the market for one.
Until then, well I've got spares of everything else but !
I hope that seeing this spelt out with examples helps others untangle the mystery of Shimano spec's
EDIT: If you're wondering what version 6700 you have this post should clear that up.
All the best
Barry
PS - yes I know spec=rules and rules are meant to be broken.
I'm just attempting to remain within the rules in order not to stress the derailleur and to avoid the potential for catastrophic failure.
At 56 I don't heal so quick in the event of anything deemed catastrophic on a bike. 8-)
I going to state the obvious to most, but I've never seen this explained so here I go...
Shimano is rating their REAR Derailleurs in three ways
1. Max Front Difference
Example - my 50/34 crank setup has a difference if 16
2. Max Low Sprocket
This is the teeth on the largest Cassette cog. My current is 28T (I want 30T)
3. Total Capacity
this the Front difference + the rear difference. In my current setup 50-34 + 28-11 = 33 (I want 50-34 + 30-12 = 34)
Limit is 34 for the RD-6700-A SS
Here is clip from Bill's Doc.
As you can see the RD-6700-A will accept a 30T on the rear cassette and the Total Capacity (34) limit fits me need.
However what this does not tell you is that early versions of the RD-6700 were a non-"A" variant.
This non-"A" variant has a rear cog size limit of 28T and I suspect a capacity limit of 33. The non-"A" does not fit my needs.
To make matters worst, the RD-6700-A and RD-6700 are both marked on the rear as "RD-6700". There is NO "A" marking.
The way to tell them apart is the front of the cage is stamped 30T on the "A" version. The stamping is around the top pulley, you have to have the cage spring relaxed in order to see the marking.
I panic purchased a RD-6700 GS (long cage version) expecting it to offer a larger rear cog limit. Wrong - It offers a larger Max Front Limit. Rear cassette size is still limited at 30T.
I've since panicked another ebay 6700 and this time got a RD-6700 SS. Still not the RD-6700-A SS I was looking for.
I'm going to open up a business flipping RD-6700's for a living.
If you see a RD-6700-A SS NIB I'm in the market for one.
Until then, well I've got spares of everything else but !
I hope that seeing this spelt out with examples helps others untangle the mystery of Shimano spec's
EDIT: If you're wondering what version 6700 you have this post should clear that up.
All the best
Barry
PS - yes I know spec=rules and rules are meant to be broken.
I'm just attempting to remain within the rules in order not to stress the derailleur and to avoid the potential for catastrophic failure.
At 56 I don't heal so quick in the event of anything deemed catastrophic on a bike. 8-)
Last edited by Barry2; 05-06-20 at 12:25 PM. Reason: Added Link to Picture Post
Likes For Barry2:
#13
Licensed Bike Geek
Barry2, as I posted earlier; you have the 6700ss rear der already and you're going to use a 30T cassette. Why don't you try that combo as an easy experiment. Ride carefully and see if it will work to your satisfaction. If it does, it's a win for you. If not, change the rear derailleur.
I'm 78 and certainly don't want to be hurt on my bike. That said, I've been riding my bikes with a 32T cassette on my bikes with NO issues for over 5 years. Some of my bikes are off the rack, some are custom. They are made of steel or carbon or titanium. All are pretty modern, the oldest being a 2010 Look 585. All have a compact 34/50 crank. My point being that in multiple personal experiences, what I have works extremely well.
As another here has posted a Shimano 9-speed MTB derailleur is the best solution and will work with up to a 36T cassette with your existing components. This is a very common thing to do and used by many who tour and/or have many hills to climb.
I'm 78 and certainly don't want to be hurt on my bike. That said, I've been riding my bikes with a 32T cassette on my bikes with NO issues for over 5 years. Some of my bikes are off the rack, some are custom. They are made of steel or carbon or titanium. All are pretty modern, the oldest being a 2010 Look 585. All have a compact 34/50 crank. My point being that in multiple personal experiences, what I have works extremely well.
As another here has posted a Shimano 9-speed MTB derailleur is the best solution and will work with up to a 36T cassette with your existing components. This is a very common thing to do and used by many who tour and/or have many hills to climb.
#14
LR÷P=HR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,135
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 848 Post(s)
Liked 1,161 Times
in
671 Posts
I’ve seen Ultegra CS-6700 max at 12-30.
So, specifically what parts would you suggest for cassette and derailleur if I were to need beyond the 30T I’m planning for?
Thanks
Barry
#15
Licensed Bike Geek
Dave, seems weird, I understand the index is in the brifter, so a 9sp MTB rear derailleur could be convinced to jump 10sp. But only if the cassette were to be a 10sp.
I’ve seen Ultegra CS-6700 max at 12-30.
So, specifically what parts would you suggest for cassette and derailleur if I were to need beyond the 30T I’m planning for?
Thanks
Barry
I’ve seen Ultegra CS-6700 max at 12-30.
So, specifically what parts would you suggest for cassette and derailleur if I were to need beyond the 30T I’m planning for?
Thanks
Barry
My wife’s bike, with 10-speed Ultegra components, uses a Shimano RD-M592 rear derailleur and an 11-36 cassette. It’s been operating for years now.
The RD M592 derailleurs cost about $50~$60.
#16
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 489
Bikes: 2014 Bruce Gordon Rock&Road, 1995 Santana Visa Tandem, 1990 Trek 520, 2012 Surly LHT
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times
in
35 Posts
I am not going to quote your whole past. Just thanking you for the update/research. I am guilty of giving you bad advise in the very first response. I was not aware that Shimano had made what essentially was 2 versions of the RD-6700, the difference being the "A" indicating the 30T max cog versus what I saw in documentation (without the A) as max 28T cog. It seems I am hearing more and more about component manufacturers making running changes to components and not really telling anyone. Sometimes it doesn't matter, and sometimes it does.
I don't have a spare of the derailleur you are looking for, but can vouch that if you want to use a larger max cog (e.g., 32T) then a 9 speed MTB derailleur is one way to go. They wont shift quite as crisp as the Ultegra, but work just fine with 10 speed STI shifters. See a few old Shimano 9 speed Deore, LX, and XT MTB RDs on E-bay in new condition, so may be one path. Good luck.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,768
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1935 Post(s)
Liked 2,148 Times
in
1,312 Posts
I have found the XT-750 to be quite good, and quick, with a wide range cassette. Can’t say how it compares with your Ultegra.
Of course, the grail rear derailleur for me has been an XTR 900/910 as they seem as quick as Dura Ace. Then again, an exceptionally clean one will cost a bundle.
John
Of course, the grail rear derailleur for me has been an XTR 900/910 as they seem as quick as Dura Ace. Then again, an exceptionally clean one will cost a bundle.
John
#19
Senior Member
The difference in gearing between a 34/28nand a 34/30 is absolutly negligible. you will never feel the difference. 30 inch gear v 32 inch gear. For comparison, the difference between a 53 18 and a 53 17 is 5 gear inches and I can barely feel the difference.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Last edited by San Rensho; 04-26-20 at 06:38 PM.
#20
Really Old Senior Member
If the OP is barely making it up a hill with a 28, 2 more teeth will seem immense.
Likes For tFUnK:
#22
LR÷P=HR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,135
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 848 Post(s)
Liked 1,161 Times
in
671 Posts
"All I want for Christmas is my 2 front teeth"
UPDATE
I've every kind of RD-6700 that exists currently being shipped to me. So, no limitations there!
I've decided to use the RD-6700 GS (long Cage) and the Tiagra CS-HG500-10 11-32 Cassette.
This combination is well within the "Capacity" spec (40 is spec) and two teeth over the "Max Cog" spec (30 is spec).
By all accounts the RD-6700-A GS long cage will be fine with this. Plus I'm comfortable pushing the spec a little, now knowing exactly what/where I'm pushing it.
New Subject - what If I want even more T's.
I've also found a $20 device made by Wolf Tooth called a Roadlink.
The Roadlink does not increase the Capacity of a derailleur but does increase the Max Cog size.
My 50/34 cranks take a capacity of 16
The RD-6700-A GS has a capacity of 40
40-16= Leaving capacity available for the cassette not to exceed 24
With a Roadlink could actually run 11-34 (23 capacity) and still be under the Shimano capacity spec.
I've not purchased a Roadlink, but it is an option should my chicken legs require additional help.
BTW - their website makes great reading!
All the best
Barry
I've every kind of RD-6700 that exists currently being shipped to me. So, no limitations there!
I've decided to use the RD-6700 GS (long Cage) and the Tiagra CS-HG500-10 11-32 Cassette.
This combination is well within the "Capacity" spec (40 is spec) and two teeth over the "Max Cog" spec (30 is spec).
By all accounts the RD-6700-A GS long cage will be fine with this. Plus I'm comfortable pushing the spec a little, now knowing exactly what/where I'm pushing it.
New Subject - what If I want even more T's.
I've also found a $20 device made by Wolf Tooth called a Roadlink.
The Roadlink does not increase the Capacity of a derailleur but does increase the Max Cog size.
My 50/34 cranks take a capacity of 16
The RD-6700-A GS has a capacity of 40
40-16= Leaving capacity available for the cassette not to exceed 24
With a Roadlink could actually run 11-34 (23 capacity) and still be under the Shimano capacity spec.
I've not purchased a Roadlink, but it is an option should my chicken legs require additional help.
BTW - their website makes great reading!
All the best
Barry
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,768
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1935 Post(s)
Liked 2,148 Times
in
1,312 Posts
If you are even contemplating running over 30t, Davet has already given you the answer... get a 9 speed MTB rear derailleur. If the setup was good enough for cyclocross it is probably good enough for you.
John
John
#24
LR÷P=HR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,135
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 848 Post(s)
Liked 1,161 Times
in
671 Posts
The pull ratio of the Shimano 9-speed MTB rear derailleurs are the same as your 10-speed shifters so the der does exactly what the shifter tells it to do. You cannot use 10-speed MTB rear derailleurs with 10-speed road shifters, they’re not all compatible.
My wife’s bike, with 10-speed Ultegra components, uses a Shimano RD-M592 rear derailleur and an 11-36 cassette. It’s been operating for years now.
The RD M592 derailleurs cost about $50~$60.
My wife’s bike, with 10-speed Ultegra components, uses a Shimano RD-M592 rear derailleur and an 11-36 cassette. It’s been operating for years now.
The RD M592 derailleurs cost about $50~$60.
This is really about me learning understanding what is going on before I dive in. DaveT's post states 9sp MTB RD and 11-36 cassette but is that cassette 10SP or 9SP. I suspect 10sp but you know what happens when you "assume"!
I don't like to blindly take internet solutions. I read, digest, understand, and hopefully post a useful summary of any additional info I found along the way.
It is not my intention to ignore DaveT's solution, I just wish I understood it better. Sounds like a 9SP RD is being asked to deflect further in order to achieve 10SP, because there are 10 steps in the 6700 Brifter..... OK.
Also, I'd like to retain an Ultegra RD on the bike and found a way to do so while exceeding my original wish for 30T.
All the best
Barry
#25
Senior Member
I have been running a 12-30 10s cassette with my short cage Ultegra RD since 2014, probably 31,000 miles so far with this configuration. It works fine, have to screw in the B-screw. But I would definitely not exceed 30 with it.