"Gravel Bike" is just the newest term for "Sports Touring Bike" of the C&V era
05-17-20, 12:34 PM
#76
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
A gravel bike is a bike like that old "sport touring" bike but I can buy it today brand new in a bike store. It has the benefit of another 40 years of refinement in fit and ease of use and it's absolutely barnacled with braze-ons, which for some reason were out of style even for bottles in the mid 70's
My '76 P-10/9 Paramount really struggled with a 630-32 Paselas. It might do ok with 622-32 but any bigger, nope, definitely not with fenders of any kind. The brakes were at a level that allowed tubulars and 27" clinchers so it will take either without a problem. It has eyelets for fenders and an RD cable stop but nothing for shifters, racks or bottles.
My '76 P-10/9 Paramount really struggled with a 630-32 Paselas. It might do ok with 622-32 but any bigger, nope, definitely not with fenders of any kind. The brakes were at a level that allowed tubulars and 27" clinchers so it will take either without a problem. It has eyelets for fenders and an RD cable stop but nothing for shifters, racks or bottles.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 05-17-20 at 12:42 PM.
Likes For Darth Lefty:
05-17-20, 03:05 PM
#77
Senior Member
These rides were a big but little known influence on the development of mountain bikes, and by extension, gravel bikes. I don't think you can talk gravel bikes without a mention of this. Some nice pics here.
https://us.ritcheylogic.com/us_en/bl...ibute-to-jobst
Likes For Salamandrine:
05-17-20, 04:10 PM
#78
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,626
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
One of the riders is a good friend of mine from work, aggiegrads . Like many of us, he's got several bikes. He also races cyclocross, so he's no stranger to imperfect trails and roads. After riding over the hump to Tillamook, he decided he needed to up his gravel game.
Now that's definitely a gravel bike. I don't think anyone would confuse it with a "sports tourer"
Now that's definitely a gravel bike. I don't think anyone would confuse it with a "sports tourer"
05-17-20, 04:26 PM
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,431
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5885 Post(s)
Liked 3,468 Times
in
2,078 Posts
Yeah, he rode Avocet 28 slicks. I guess early on, before my time, everyone was on sew ups. He was a very skilled bike handler. It took a lot of effort to just stay on his wheel on single track, fire roads, whatever. For that matter any roads. Jobst was a very strong rider, which most people that haven't been on these crazy epic all day mostly off road rides don't know. I was fortunate enough to go an a handful of them. In retrospect, I wish I had gone on more, but I had other priorities at the time.
These rides were a big but little known influence on the development of mountain bikes, and by extension, gravel bikes. I don't think you can talk gravel bikes without a mention of this. Some nice pics here.
https://us.ritcheylogic.com/us_en/bl...ibute-to-jobst
These rides were a big but little known influence on the development of mountain bikes, and by extension, gravel bikes. I don't think you can talk gravel bikes without a mention of this. Some nice pics here.
https://us.ritcheylogic.com/us_en/bl...ibute-to-jobst
Likes For bikemig:
05-17-20, 08:36 PM
#80
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
Yesterday I took my latest plaything...
which is a classic Dutch racing bike Gugifacazione with 26" wheels and a Suntour S1 derailleur (and one of these days maybe a thread of its own on this forum) out on some trails near here.
Mostly crushed stone, very smooth, but in places it gets interesting.
And one of the trails is unfinished, still a rough doubletrack farm road with occasional sprinkling of gravel, Anyway, yesterday I rode it on 26" tires around 50 mm, which was great fun, and it was the first time I'd ever ridden back there.
So today I took out a sports tourer (specifically an Armstrong Moth from about 1950).
It has 30 or 32 mm tires, and I wasn't running them at very high pressure. I took the same paths, but I went the other way around so I wouldn't recognize much. Well, both bikes were fun. Neither one let me down. The 50 mm tires were a lot more comfortable than the 30's! There was nowhere I could go on 50's that I couldn't go on 30's. I felt faster on 30's, but probably wasn't. I felt in better control on 50's and probably was. Today I noticed a couple sandy turns where I was a little concerned... which I did not notice yesterday. Not a big deal.
Either bike, I could feel every bump. On the fat tires, you feel the bumps, you know the bumps are down there... but on skinny tires, they actually try to hurt you.
A bike with skinny tires feels more nimble. It feels lighter. You have to ride it lighter, which means a more aggressive ride where most of your weight is on your arms and legs most of the time. That's a good thing when that's what you want. Well, I find that after enough hours in the saddle, that's not what I want.
which is a classic Dutch racing bike Gugifacazione with 26" wheels and a Suntour S1 derailleur (and one of these days maybe a thread of its own on this forum) out on some trails near here.
Mostly crushed stone, very smooth, but in places it gets interesting.
And one of the trails is unfinished, still a rough doubletrack farm road with occasional sprinkling of gravel, Anyway, yesterday I rode it on 26" tires around 50 mm, which was great fun, and it was the first time I'd ever ridden back there.
So today I took out a sports tourer (specifically an Armstrong Moth from about 1950).
It has 30 or 32 mm tires, and I wasn't running them at very high pressure. I took the same paths, but I went the other way around so I wouldn't recognize much. Well, both bikes were fun. Neither one let me down. The 50 mm tires were a lot more comfortable than the 30's! There was nowhere I could go on 50's that I couldn't go on 30's. I felt faster on 30's, but probably wasn't. I felt in better control on 50's and probably was. Today I noticed a couple sandy turns where I was a little concerned... which I did not notice yesterday. Not a big deal.
Either bike, I could feel every bump. On the fat tires, you feel the bumps, you know the bumps are down there... but on skinny tires, they actually try to hurt you.
A bike with skinny tires feels more nimble. It feels lighter. You have to ride it lighter, which means a more aggressive ride where most of your weight is on your arms and legs most of the time. That's a good thing when that's what you want. Well, I find that after enough hours in the saddle, that's not what I want.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
Last edited by rhm; 05-17-20 at 08:41 PM.
Likes For rhm:
05-17-20, 08:49 PM
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,450
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 791 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
406 Posts
I think you owe us a clearer picture of that suntour drivetrain after the teaser pic. Does it shift no different than a regular derailleur?
Likes For Piff:
