Boost QR 141mm hubs for old tandems?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Boost QR 141mm hubs for old tandems?
As I was going through the mental gymnastics of how to upgrade an old tandem, I came across "boost QR" hubs, which are used on some new mountain bikes. They are regular skewer quick release axles with a hub spacing of 141mm. I don't know what the axle diameter is, so I'm not 100% sure they'd work on older tandems. Has anyone here tried it? They seem like the answer to the prayers of all owners of pre-2000 tandems.
Last edited by quemazon; 05-07-19 at 02:32 PM.
#2
Senior Member
As I was going through the mental gymnastics of how to upgrade an old tandem, I came across "boost QR" hubs, which are used on some new mountain bikes. They are regular skewer quick release axles with a hub spacing of 141mm. I don't know what the axle diameter is, so I'm not 100% sure they'd work on older tandems. Has anyone here tried it? They seem like the answer to prayers of the all owners of pre-2000 tandems.
Another option is replacing the axle on a relatively modern QR hub. We're using a Shimano SLX rear hub with Wheels MFG axle (and 10mm of spacers) on our 145mm QR tandem. I built a wheel with than hub three years ago as a low-cost way to try out 650b wheels and tires on our 1997 Trek tandem. That frame is gone, but the wheels are still going strong.
#3
Full Member
I would think that if the hub was 1 or 2 mm wider than the dropouts, mounting the wheel in the shop will be possible, though will require some elbow grease, and roadside maintenance requiring removal of the wheel would be a real pain.
A better option might be a standard 130mm TA hub with a custom QR adapter that provides 140mm dropout spacing. Such an adapter could offset the hub to more closely match hub spacing for maintaining the chainline and could be a single or 2 piece affair. Machining would be relatively straight forward on a lathe.
A better option might be a standard 130mm TA hub with a custom QR adapter that provides 140mm dropout spacing. Such an adapter could offset the hub to more closely match hub spacing for maintaining the chainline and could be a single or 2 piece affair. Machining would be relatively straight forward on a lathe.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would think just the opposite. I doubt the spacing is held to better than +/- 1mm on the frame. Basically 141mm is likely well within tolerance. If anything it should create very minor interference. And you get the benefits of the increased stiffness of the wider hub. Using a 135mm hub with spacers may require weird dishing and be weaker.
#5
Full Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 262
Bikes: 2010 Bob Brown Cycles tandem, 2019 Co-Mo Carrera tandem, 1980 Richardson tandem, 2014 Cervelo R3, 2018 Specialized Roubaix, 1985 Bianchi Campione, 1983 Trek 720, 2020 Trek Fuel EX8, 2021 Salsa Mukluk
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
70 Posts
I would think just the opposite. I doubt the spacing is held to better than +/- 1mm on the frame. Basically 141mm is likely well within tolerance. If anything it should create very minor interference. And you get the benefits of the increased stiffness of the wider hub. Using a 135mm hub with spacers may require weird dishing and be weaker.
#6
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Fitment? Mmmmaybe. We are talking tandems, they are usually not very wimpy in the rear triangle. But people cram 130 hubs into 126 Cannondale single frames without too much worry.
The funny thing about that DT Swiss 350 Hybrid hub is that they apparently no longer sell a 36h rim to build it with. I couldn't easily find anyone stocking them for mail order, maybe you have to go through a shop to get access to the distributor. Edit - Universal has them. But $276, ouch. Hard to look at that when CRC has complete 240-hubbed 142TA wheels on clearance for less.
The funny thing about that DT Swiss 350 Hybrid hub is that they apparently no longer sell a 36h rim to build it with. I couldn't easily find anyone stocking them for mail order, maybe you have to go through a shop to get access to the distributor. Edit - Universal has them. But $276, ouch. Hard to look at that when CRC has complete 240-hubbed 142TA wheels on clearance for less.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 05-08-19 at 01:46 PM.
#7
Full Member
I would think just the opposite. I doubt the spacing is held to better than +/- 1mm on the frame. Basically 141mm is likely well within tolerance. If anything it should create very minor interference. And you get the benefits of the increased stiffness of the wider hub. Using a 135mm hub with spacers may require weird dishing and be weaker.
Your comment about the 135mm spacing is the issue. Frames that support the 141 or 142 Boost are in fact 135mm spacing so the dishing issues are the same as using 135mm hubs.
If I understand it correctly, TA hubs can be configured as QR with end caps as i described. Using custom QR end caps opens up pretty much the entire market of available hubs and gives better spacing. All other issues are the same.
Last edited by Alcanbrad; 05-08-19 at 02:40 PM.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If your frame's dropouts fall to the wide side of tolerance it shouldn't be an issue. If if falls on the narrow side, it won't be fun.
Your comment about the 135mm spacing is the issue. Frames that support the 141 or 142 Boost are in fact 135mm spacing so the dishing issues are the same as using 135mm hubs.
If I understand it correctly, TA hubs can be configured as QR with end caps as i described. Using custom QR end caps opens up pretty much the entire market of available hubs and gives better spacing. All other issues are the same.
Your comment about the 135mm spacing is the issue. Frames that support the 141 or 142 Boost are in fact 135mm spacing so the dishing issues are the same as using 135mm hubs.
If I understand it correctly, TA hubs can be configured as QR with end caps as i described. Using custom QR end caps opens up pretty much the entire market of available hubs and gives better spacing. All other issues are the same.
Last edited by quemazon; 05-08-19 at 03:23 PM.
#9
Full Member
Standard rear boost spacing with the through axle is 148mm. When you change out the end caps to QR, it goes to 141mm. So, it is truly a 141mm hub, which is better than, essentially a 135mm hub. I have a marin pine mountain which has boost QR. The dropout spacing is 141, not 135.
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was was considering an old santana but ended up with a newer burley, so I won't be doing this upgrade. (I kind of wish I had an old Santana to fix up now, just for fun.) I measured my pine mountain (new 27.5+ mountain bike) and the spacing is indeed 141mm.
There are a few bikes that have gone to this hub recently--most commonly the Trek Roscoe. People are really hating on it because they consider it yet another hub standard. But as far as I can tell, most TA boost hubs (148mm) should be ok for conversion to 141 QR. This is explicitly the case for the higher end Hope, Chris King, DT Swiss, etc. They sell end cap conversion kits.
If you want something less expensive I'm sure they are out there. The hub on my pine mountain isn't anything special. But I've had a hard time finding them. I have a feeling that you could convert pretty much any TA boost hub, but I don't have any to play with.
There are a few bikes that have gone to this hub recently--most commonly the Trek Roscoe. People are really hating on it because they consider it yet another hub standard. But as far as I can tell, most TA boost hubs (148mm) should be ok for conversion to 141 QR. This is explicitly the case for the higher end Hope, Chris King, DT Swiss, etc. They sell end cap conversion kits.
If you want something less expensive I'm sure they are out there. The hub on my pine mountain isn't anything special. But I've had a hard time finding them. I have a feeling that you could convert pretty much any TA boost hub, but I don't have any to play with.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 743
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 279 Post(s)
Liked 207 Times
in
129 Posts
If by "old Santana," you mean steel, then this should be an optimal solution. A 6mm difference in dropout spacing is a mere 3mm change at each dropout. Steel stays and dropouts will accommodate this change without much problem. Assuming crank and heel clearance isn't already at the limit. Dropout tools, muscle and a long piece of string is all that's needed to respace an old steel frame and maintain frame alignment. Newer (air-hardening) steel takes a LOT MORE MUSCLE to respace, but can also be done. Aluminum shouldn't be cold worked or respaced.