Search
Notices
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling Do you enjoy centuries, double centuries, brevets, randonnees, and 24-hour time trials? Share ride reports, and exchange training, equipment, and nutrition information specific to long distance cycling. This isn't for tours, this is for endurance events cycling

Which bike for a double?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-18, 09:17 AM
  #1  
waterbugg
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Which bike for a double?

I'm planning to ride my first double century next year: the VT 100/200. I've done a bunch of centuries and touring, so I'm not worried about the distance, but am wondering what bike to use. I have a touring bike and a road bike. Both fit well for their intended purposes. Road bike is ~10lbs lighter and has a more aggressive fit. It's also a compact double and has a short cage derailleur so I'm concerned about gearing on the low end. (34-27 would be the lowest.) The touring bike is more comfortable on long rides and has low gears to spare, but is a bit slower.


So, comfort or speed? Which has priority for a double? How would you modify the bike to make it more appropriate for the ride?
waterbugg is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 09:59 AM
  #2  
StephenH
Uber Goober
 
StephenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Posts: 11,758
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Is lighting the same either way?
Is the road bike comfortable after 100 miles?
How does the route you're looking at compare to what you normally ride?
Based on the information given, I'd go with road bike. Potentially raise the handlebars a bit if desired. You can put a longer derailleur and bigger gears on if that's really an issue.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
StephenH is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 10:08 AM
  #3  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Assuming both bikes allow you to carry whatever you need to finish the ride, I don't think it really matters. You should decide based on how you want to ride.

looking at it another way: Why is the touring bike slower?

That's partly a rhetorical question, of course. I have found I go considerably faster when I ride a fixed gear bike. It's not that the bike is faster, but that it's unforgiving. It won't let me gear down and spin up the hills, so I attack them and get over them faster. It's not more comfortable, and it's not easier. The bike isn't faster, but it definitely forces me to ride faster.
rhm is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 10:09 AM
  #4  
waterbugg
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My touring bike has a dyno light, my road bike doesn't have anything permanent but has an ok battery powered light.
It's been a few years (I've done more touring lately) but I used the road bike for a bunch of organized centuries and it's fairly comfortable.
The route has longer climbs than I'm used to and more of them (green mountains vs coastal Maine), but I have enough time to train for that.
My road bars are already at the top of my steerer tube, but I hadn't considered getting another derailleur ... good idea. Thanks.
waterbugg is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 10:15 AM
  #5  
waterbugg
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
The bike isn't faster, but it definitely forces me to ride faster.
Exactly right. I stand more with the road bike and spin more with the touring. That being said, an all out effort with the touring bike is still a few mph slower than with the road. The two bikes are fit a little differently, so that would be muscle recruitment.
waterbugg is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 11:57 AM
  #6  
kingston 
Jedi Master
 
kingston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lake Forest, IL
Posts: 3,724

Bikes: https://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1759 Post(s)
Liked 488 Times in 313 Posts
For me it would depend on who I was riding with and how fast they are.
kingston is offline  
Old 11-23-18, 04:15 PM
  #7  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Road bike.
Put a Roadlink & bigger cassette on if needed,
but faster allows potentially more drafting,
& fewer hours on the bike equals more comfort overall.
I've grudgingly added a small top tube bag for DCs for easier eating on the go.
Put an extra light in your pocket if there's much in-the-dark riding.
woodcraft is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kertrek
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
36
04-04-16 10:14 PM
gadgetadam
Touring
30
09-11-15 10:35 AM
George
Touring
34
04-02-12 05:39 AM
StinkyJeff
Touring
26
02-03-12 04:58 PM
dooodstevenn
Touring
26
01-12-10 08:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.