Not what the book says.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Rolesville NC
Posts: 816
Bikes: Had an old Columbia in the 80's, here a used Schwinn hybrid, now a Cannondale Quick 3 and a Topstone 105..
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 249 Post(s)
Liked 306 Times
in
139 Posts
Not what the book says.
I have read through some of the descriptions here and on the internet about what is the proper size bike is for my height, reach, inseam and so forth and on paper I should have a medium sized frame on a Cannondale Quick. Standover is fair as I have short legs but the reach is crowded as I am long in the troso. The second bike, another Quick, I decided to try the large frame as I can still stand flatfooted on the standover, with no real clearance, but the reach and body angle are much more comfortable for me. I have and am keeping both as there are days when the three chainring bike is just easier to ride than the two and the more compact, upright bike is what I want to ride. I guess I am between the two sizes and could probably be a candidate for a custom made frame but the large frame is so good right now that I am not in the market for another bike at the moment. Not trying to say anything profound, just that the tables don't always tell the perfect story and the common refrain I here on the forum that the best advise is to take it for a test ride. Truth be told I could put a longer stem on the medium and have a similar feel as I have on the large but the other dimensions are just different enough that I can not replicate the entire sizing. I am sure I will be told that I am mistaken but the rides I have taken on the large have been very enjoyable.
Be safe all, Frank.
Be safe all, Frank.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Kalifornia Kollective
Posts: 350
Bikes: K2 (Marzocchi/Fox), Trek 6000 (red) MARS Elite up front, Specialized Hardrock Sport -> eBike (R7 Elite up front), lastly TREK 820 loaner. Recently sold Peugeot du Monde Record and 1956 Schwinn (owned since new).
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
On the smaller bike, you might consider a longer stem and moving the saddle back a bit
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Rolesville NC
Posts: 816
Bikes: Had an old Columbia in the 80's, here a used Schwinn hybrid, now a Cannondale Quick 3 and a Topstone 105..
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 249 Post(s)
Liked 306 Times
in
139 Posts
I was thinking that might be a good thing to try. I will start with the seat in relation to the center line to the pedal. I will make that change first today and try it out when the rain stops.
Thanks for your response, Frank.
Thanks for your response, Frank.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Kalifornia Kollective
Posts: 350
Bikes: K2 (Marzocchi/Fox), Trek 6000 (red) MARS Elite up front, Specialized Hardrock Sport -> eBike (R7 Elite up front), lastly TREK 820 loaner. Recently sold Peugeot du Monde Record and 1956 Schwinn (owned since new).
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I have a plastic bin of spare parts off bikes that are now gone. Usually from changes made when they were family loaners, etc. So no big deal for me to swap stuff until I get the fit I want. But making notes as you ride the Big Bike will help. Moving bars forward changes seat position some, so go slow and incrementally forward ...
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Rolesville NC
Posts: 816
Bikes: Had an old Columbia in the 80's, here a used Schwinn hybrid, now a Cannondale Quick 3 and a Topstone 105..
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 249 Post(s)
Liked 306 Times
in
139 Posts
I have a plastic bin of spare parts off bikes that are now gone. Usually from changes made when they were family loaners, etc. So no big deal for me to swap stuff until I get the fit I want. But making notes as you ride the Big Bike will help. Moving bars forward changes seat position some, so go slow and incrementally forward ...
Thanks for the insight, Frank.
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I have read through some of the descriptions here and on the internet about what is the proper size bike is for my height, reach, inseam and so forth and on paper I should have a medium sized frame on a Cannondale Quick. Standover is fair as I have short legs but the reach is crowded as I am long in the troso. The second bike, another Quick, I decided to try the large frame as I can still stand flatfooted on the standover, with no real clearance, but the reach and body angle are much more comfortable for me. I have and am keeping both as there are days when the three chainring bike is just easier to ride than the two and the more compact, upright bike is what I want to ride. I guess I am between the two sizes and could probably be a candidate for a custom made frame but the large frame is so good right now that I am not in the market for another bike at the moment. Not trying to say anything profound, just that the tables don't always tell the perfect story and the common refrain I here on the forum that the best advise is to take it for a test ride. Truth be told I could put a longer stem on the medium and have a similar feel as I have on the large but the other dimensions are just different enough that I can not replicate the entire sizing. I am sure I will be told that I am mistaken but the rides I have taken on the large have been very enjoyable.
Be safe all, Frank.
Be safe all, Frank.
Update: If I were buying a new one, I think I would make the same decision.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,830
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4745 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times
in
2,510 Posts
I look at bike fit as being the single most important feature of any bike; far and away more important than, say, frame material, weight or equipment. I bring a tape measure to any bike purchase and take those measurements home on put them on a CAD drawing. From there I can see the required stem and seatpost to get a good fit. (I even wrote a program years ago where I could enter the numbers from brochures to get that info.)
Now, I got a lucky break 40 years ago. The mechanic at the shop I worked in convinced me to buy last year's Fuji Pro as my racing bike, I did. It fit like a dream and I saw radical improvement from the very first ride. That has been the basis of all my rides since. But what I quickly learned when i started addressing good fit was that nearly all production bikes require (for me) enormously long stems and often have poor weight balance between the wheels. (I wrote that program to whittle down the titanium bikes to ones that might be worth a test ride. It opened my eyes. I found no production ti bikes that wouldn't require custom stems. $4000 for a "class B" fit? No thinks. The ti bike went on hold until I landed "the job". Ordered a custom as soon as I knew it was going to pan out.
To your plight - I"d consider the Cannondales both "class B" fits. I'd look at another bike. (The smaller one with new stem and maybe seatpost might be a keeper. And since you are relatively new to this fit game, a smaller bike has the advantage that there are fewer restraints to the key parts of the fit - saddle and handlebar location - since larger stems and posts can always be obtained. Even custom posts and stems are far cheaper than new bikes.)
Don't settle for less. A bike to get it figured out is OK, but don't stop until you have the bike that really fits.
Ben
Now, I got a lucky break 40 years ago. The mechanic at the shop I worked in convinced me to buy last year's Fuji Pro as my racing bike, I did. It fit like a dream and I saw radical improvement from the very first ride. That has been the basis of all my rides since. But what I quickly learned when i started addressing good fit was that nearly all production bikes require (for me) enormously long stems and often have poor weight balance between the wheels. (I wrote that program to whittle down the titanium bikes to ones that might be worth a test ride. It opened my eyes. I found no production ti bikes that wouldn't require custom stems. $4000 for a "class B" fit? No thinks. The ti bike went on hold until I landed "the job". Ordered a custom as soon as I knew it was going to pan out.
To your plight - I"d consider the Cannondales both "class B" fits. I'd look at another bike. (The smaller one with new stem and maybe seatpost might be a keeper. And since you are relatively new to this fit game, a smaller bike has the advantage that there are fewer restraints to the key parts of the fit - saddle and handlebar location - since larger stems and posts can always be obtained. Even custom posts and stems are far cheaper than new bikes.)
Don't settle for less. A bike to get it figured out is OK, but don't stop until you have the bike that really fits.
Ben
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Rolesville NC
Posts: 816
Bikes: Had an old Columbia in the 80's, here a used Schwinn hybrid, now a Cannondale Quick 3 and a Topstone 105..
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 249 Post(s)
Liked 306 Times
in
139 Posts
I look at bike fit as being the single most important feature of any bike; far and away more important than, say, frame material, weight or equipment. I bring a tape measure to any bike purchase and take those measurements home on put them on a CAD drawing. From there I can see the required stem and seatpost to get a good fit. (I even wrote a program years ago where I could enter the numbers from brochures to get that info.)
Now, I got a lucky break 40 years ago. The mechanic at the shop I worked in convinced me to buy last year's Fuji Pro as my racing bike, I did. It fit like a dream and I saw radical improvement from the very first ride. That has been the basis of all my rides since. But what I quickly learned when i started addressing good fit was that nearly all production bikes require (for me) enormously long stems and often have poor weight balance between the wheels. (I wrote that program to whittle down the titanium bikes to ones that might be worth a test ride. It opened my eyes. I found no production ti bikes that wouldn't require custom stems. $4000 for a "class B" fit? No thinks. The ti bike went on hold until I landed "the job". Ordered a custom as soon as I knew it was going to pan out.
To your plight - I"d consider the Cannondales both "class B" fits. I'd look at another bike. (The smaller one with new stem and maybe seatpost might be a keeper. And since you are relatively new to this fit game, a smaller bike has the advantage that there are fewer restraints to the key parts of the fit - saddle and handlebar location - since larger stems and posts can always be obtained. Even custom posts and stems are far cheaper than new bikes.)
Don't settle for less. A bike to get it figured out is OK, but don't stop until you have the bike that really fits.
Ben
Now, I got a lucky break 40 years ago. The mechanic at the shop I worked in convinced me to buy last year's Fuji Pro as my racing bike, I did. It fit like a dream and I saw radical improvement from the very first ride. That has been the basis of all my rides since. But what I quickly learned when i started addressing good fit was that nearly all production bikes require (for me) enormously long stems and often have poor weight balance between the wheels. (I wrote that program to whittle down the titanium bikes to ones that might be worth a test ride. It opened my eyes. I found no production ti bikes that wouldn't require custom stems. $4000 for a "class B" fit? No thinks. The ti bike went on hold until I landed "the job". Ordered a custom as soon as I knew it was going to pan out.
To your plight - I"d consider the Cannondales both "class B" fits. I'd look at another bike. (The smaller one with new stem and maybe seatpost might be a keeper. And since you are relatively new to this fit game, a smaller bike has the advantage that there are fewer restraints to the key parts of the fit - saddle and handlebar location - since larger stems and posts can always be obtained. Even custom posts and stems are far cheaper than new bikes.)
Don't settle for less. A bike to get it figured out is OK, but don't stop until you have the bike that really fits.
Ben
Be safe, Frank.