Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Legality of car turning right on red while cyclist is on shoulder?

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Legality of car turning right on red while cyclist is on shoulder?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-19, 12:13 PM
  #26  
Paul Barnard
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,851

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,646 Times in 828 Posts
Originally Posted by mrodgers
The question to that thought is, how does a stopped vehicle have the right of way over another vehicle that can legally make a move? It's an issue of a bicycle stopped and not moving at a red light vs another vehicle who can otherwise legally move from their lane and proceed at the same red light (the right on red).
I don't know how the law would play out when they both have a legal right to be there. I do know that most states have laws that prohibit passing on the right of a line of stopped vehicles unless there is a marked lane. The laws may not address the situation you have laid out. I suppose it could be treated as a 4 way stop is treated in that the first vehicle that arrives has the right of way. The topic is an interesting mental exercise. I will say this. I won't ever be the bicyclist in that situation!
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 01-06-19, 02:49 PM
  #27  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
I don't know how the law would play out when they both have a legal right to be there. I do know that most states have laws that prohibit passing on the right of a line of stopped vehicles unless there is a marked lane. The laws may not address the situation you have laid out. I suppose it could be treated as a 4 way stop is treated in that the first vehicle that arrives has the right of way. The topic is an interesting mental exercise. I will say this. I won't ever be the bicyclist in that situation!
if the bike is next
to the car and not taking advantage or right-on-red, the car can go because the bike is held by the red light. if the light turns green the car would have to wait to see what the bike was going to do--traffic proceeding forward has the right of way. Pretty easy call.

If the state law prohibits bikes passing cars stopped in traffic, even easier call. The bike would have no right to be there. if the bike was there first, the bike would have right of way---when the light turned green. Until the light turned green the car would have the option of turning if the bike did not.

As you say ... most cyclists simply won't let it happen.
Maelochs is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgvg
Advocacy & Safety
69
12-01-17 12:57 PM
AstroEng
Living Car Free
23
07-18-13 05:32 PM
asmac
Advocacy & Safety
10
04-23-13 09:50 AM
jaredcasper
Northern California
5
09-01-11 09:56 AM
mattotoole
Advocacy & Safety
3
07-03-11 03:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.