Dura Ace 7700 was the best Shimano road group ever
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
398 Posts
Dura Ace 7700 was the best Shimano road group ever
I had that group on a Serotta Atlanta and it was the best ever.
I've always thought 9 cogs was the perfect number. A 10th just was not needed for me personally and fine tuning became more finicky. Also needs a narrower, IE weaker chain. The external shift cable routing has less friction and shifts crisper, and that style of brake hood was (is, I have an older Tiagra) more comfortable on my hands. All the modern internal routing Shimano STI's make my fingers numb. And the whole group was light as hell.
It was beautiful as well. The biggest drawback is the clear coating that peels off. Hard to find used components that still look good.
I've always thought 9 cogs was the perfect number. A 10th just was not needed for me personally and fine tuning became more finicky. Also needs a narrower, IE weaker chain. The external shift cable routing has less friction and shifts crisper, and that style of brake hood was (is, I have an older Tiagra) more comfortable on my hands. All the modern internal routing Shimano STI's make my fingers numb. And the whole group was light as hell.
It was beautiful as well. The biggest drawback is the clear coating that peels off. Hard to find used components that still look good.
#2
Full Member
What is this place ? 😁
i agree
7700 shifters are far superior to 7800 and 7900
positive mechanical click, bulletproof
7800, good but less reliable, need clean and lube and they fail
7900, not good, they fail
ask me how i know, got them all
i do prefer 7800 cranks, even if they are heavier
i agree
7700 shifters are far superior to 7800 and 7900
positive mechanical click, bulletproof
7800, good but less reliable, need clean and lube and they fail
7900, not good, they fail
ask me how i know, got them all
i do prefer 7800 cranks, even if they are heavier
Likes For reissue59:
#3
Senior Member
I just wish you could get new hoods.
Likes For natterberry:
Likes For CABELLOJO:
Likes For BFisher:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Reston VA
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Liked 74 Times
in
55 Posts
I had that group on a Serotta Atlanta and it was the best ever.
I've always thought 9 cogs was the perfect number. A 10th just was not needed for me personally and fine tuning became more finicky. Also needs a narrower, IE weaker chain. The external shift cable routing has less friction and shifts crisper, and that style of brake hood was (is, I have an older Tiagra) more comfortable on my hands. All the modern internal routing Shimano STI's make my fingers numb. And the whole group was light as hell.
It was beautiful as well. The biggest drawback is the clear coating that peels off. Hard to find used components that still look good.
I've always thought 9 cogs was the perfect number. A 10th just was not needed for me personally and fine tuning became more finicky. Also needs a narrower, IE weaker chain. The external shift cable routing has less friction and shifts crisper, and that style of brake hood was (is, I have an older Tiagra) more comfortable on my hands. All the modern internal routing Shimano STI's make my fingers numb. And the whole group was light as hell.
It was beautiful as well. The biggest drawback is the clear coating that peels off. Hard to find used components that still look good.
#8
Senior Member
The thing I never liked about Ultegra 6500 (6503 to be specific) was the lack of trim for the big ring of a triple. 6603 has it, and to me shifts just a bit cleaner and has more comfortable hoods.
The real deal-breaker with 6603 is the front derailleur shape which is incompatible with my preferred 52/42/30 triple. It’s designed for a larger tooth difference from the big to middle ring (52 -> 39) and the inner cage will hit the 42 tooth ring unless set so high that it won’t shift cleanly. A 105-level 5603 FD will give passable front shifting (designed for 50 -> 39) but it always annoyed me to have to compromise.
The real deal-breaker with 6603 is the front derailleur shape which is incompatible with my preferred 52/42/30 triple. It’s designed for a larger tooth difference from the big to middle ring (52 -> 39) and the inner cage will hit the 42 tooth ring unless set so high that it won’t shift cleanly. A 105-level 5603 FD will give passable front shifting (designed for 50 -> 39) but it always annoyed me to have to compromise.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
The thing I never liked about Ultegra 6500 (6503 to be specific) was the lack of trim for the big ring of a triple. 6603 has it, and to me shifts just a bit cleaner and has more comfortable hoods.
The real deal-breaker with 6603 is the front derailleur shape which is incompatible with my preferred 52/42/30 triple. It’s designed for a larger tooth difference from the big to middle ring (52 -> 39) and the inner cage will hit the 42 tooth ring unless set so high that it won’t shift cleanly. A 105-level 5603 FD will give passable front shifting (designed for 50 -> 39) but it always annoyed me to have to compromise.
The real deal-breaker with 6603 is the front derailleur shape which is incompatible with my preferred 52/42/30 triple. It’s designed for a larger tooth difference from the big to middle ring (52 -> 39) and the inner cage will hit the 42 tooth ring unless set so high that it won’t shift cleanly. A 105-level 5603 FD will give passable front shifting (designed for 50 -> 39) but it always annoyed me to have to compromise.
Although it's getting a bit academic, since you can't get the middle rings anymore...
#10
Senior Member
I have two nearly new Stronglight triples (a Pulsion and. Fission), both with 52/42/30 9/10 speed rings so I’m good there.
Worst case, I’ve been known to make parts to solve my problems
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
The 7700 crankset was beautiful, but the external BB 7800 was a breakthrough.
Likes For caloso:
Likes For Lazyass:
#13
Full Member
Likes For reissue59:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Except the 7700 triple crankset with it’s planned obsolescence spider.
Oh... and it would have been nice to have a titanium axle in the freehub like the XTR 950.
Other than that, probably one of the best groups.
John
Edit Added: And the double rebuildable/adjustable cartridge BB didn’t have a lot of fans. The triple cartridge was plug and play.
Oh... and it would have been nice to have a titanium axle in the freehub like the XTR 950.
Other than that, probably one of the best groups.
John
Edit Added: And the double rebuildable/adjustable cartridge BB didn’t have a lot of fans. The triple cartridge was plug and play.
Last edited by 70sSanO; 06-09-21 at 11:40 AM.
Likes For Wileyone:
#16
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,985
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26427 Post(s)
Liked 10,382 Times
in
7,210 Posts
I had that group on a Serotta Atlanta and it was the best ever.
I've always thought 9 cogs was the perfect number. A 10th just was not needed for me personally and fine tuning became more finicky. Also needs a narrower, IE weaker chain. The external shift cable routing has less friction and shifts crisper, and that style of brake hood was (is, I have an older Tiagra) more comfortable on my hands. All the modern internal routing Shimano STI's make my fingers numb. And the whole group was light as hell.
It was beautiful as well. The biggest drawback is the clear coating that peels off. Hard to find used components that still look good.
I've always thought 9 cogs was the perfect number. A 10th just was not needed for me personally and fine tuning became more finicky. Also needs a narrower, IE weaker chain. The external shift cable routing has less friction and shifts crisper, and that style of brake hood was (is, I have an older Tiagra) more comfortable on my hands. All the modern internal routing Shimano STI's make my fingers numb. And the whole group was light as hell.
It was beautiful as well. The biggest drawback is the clear coating that peels off. Hard to find used components that still look good.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
All this love for HT2, and not a word about scuffed cranks due to lack of heel clearance. I'm annoyed Shimano never offered a BB30 version of their cranks; pair that with a PF30, or better yet, T47 frame and it'd be almost pure win.
Although it'd be nice to have some delrin between the ally spindle and the steel bearings... wonder if there's room for that in T47?
Although it'd be nice to have some delrin between the ally spindle and the steel bearings... wonder if there's room for that in T47?
#20
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,985
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26427 Post(s)
Liked 10,382 Times
in
7,210 Posts
...I have always hated watches, and never wore one. If I had one on, it would just remind me I'm late for something. Watches are horrible things, and the ones you wear on your wrist are just a fashion statement that you are more organized than me.
Wait, I just remembered I wore a watch when diving. I don't know why, because I was gonna run out of air regardless of what time it was.
Wait, I just remembered I wore a watch when diving. I don't know why, because I was gonna run out of air regardless of what time it was.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Best watch I ever saw showed the time on its edge, so you could discretely peek down your sleeve without letting on that you're bored out of your mind.
Likes For Kimmo:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 606 Times
in
403 Posts
...I have always hated watches, and never wore one. If I had one on, it would just remind me I'm late for something. Watches are horrible things, and the ones you wear on your wrist are just a fashion statement that you are more organized than me.
Wait, I just remembered I wore a watch when diving. I don't know why, because I was gonna run out of air regardless of what time it was.
Wait, I just remembered I wore a watch when diving. I don't know why, because I was gonna run out of air regardless of what time it was.
#23
Keefusb
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Ashland, VA
Posts: 176
Bikes: 60cm 1992 Paramount, 60cm 1995 Cannondale R900 (son's bike), 1994 Cannondale H300 (mine), 1994 Cannondale H300 Killer V (wife's bike), 60 cm 1989 Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra SLX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times
in
36 Posts
Agree, my PDG Series Paramount has all 7700 except for the brakes which are 7800 (best brakes ever), and the outer chain ring which is a 7800 ring, I just like the way the 7800 outer ring looks, kind of like a meat slicer!
#24
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,985
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26427 Post(s)
Liked 10,382 Times
in
7,210 Posts