Aluminum vs. Steel - Comfort
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 946
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
129 Posts
Aluminum vs. Steel - Comfort
I'm looking at two bikes, each with the same reg price, for light-duty (pea size, fairly smooth) gravel riding (80% of my riding would be road). Each has the same 37mm tires (both frames/forks can go up to 42mm). The aluminum bike has Apex 1x and is on sale for $300 less. The chromo-steel bike has Tiagra but with FSA crank. Both have hydro's. I realize a number of factors play into riding comfort, but I'm wondering how much stiffer/rigid is the aluminum over the steel? I've ridden both over the years, and even the aluminum I had wasn't that stiff. I'm sure this varies frame to frame for the same materials. I'm thinking of going with the aluminum (after I try it out for fit), and if I want more 'plush' I can add 42mm tires later, but if it's fine as is then I'll leave it be for now. I'm setting it up tubeless in any case. This is a second bike for occasional use, so I'm not going to over-think it, but it's really down to these two options (supply during Covid a problem) and I unfortunately can't give each a full outdoor test ride in the winter.
#2
Junior Member
Based on the info in your post, I think there is zero way for any of us to know anything about the comparative ride qualities of these two bikes.
Likes For scubaman:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Iowa
Posts: 682
Bikes: 2021 Salsa Fargo 1x12, 2019 Jamis Renegade Exploit 1x11. Motobacne NX Fat Tire
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 198 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times
in
170 Posts
I'm looking at two bikes, each with the same reg price, for light-duty (pea size, fairly smooth) gravel riding (80% of my riding would be road). Each has the same 37mm tires (both frames/forks can go up to 42mm). The aluminum bike has Apex 1x and is on sale for $300 less. The chromo-steel bike has Tiagra but with FSA crank. Both have hydro's. I realize a number of factors play into riding comfort, but I'm wondering how much stiffer/rigid is the aluminum over the steel? I've ridden both over the years, and even the aluminum I had wasn't that stiff. I'm sure this varies frame to frame for the same materials. I'm thinking of going with the aluminum (after I try it out for fit), and if I want more 'plush' I can add 42mm tires later, but if it's fine as is then I'll leave it be for now. I'm setting it up tubeless in any case. This is a second bike for occasional use, so I'm not going to over-think it, but it's really down to these two options (supply during Covid a problem) and I unfortunately can't give each a full outdoor test ride in the winter.
It’s almost like your asking what’s heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of bricks? Not enough info.
#4
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Finally after I explained it for 8th time, my 10yo said 'ok yes I know they weigh the same, but they are different and the bricks will feel heavier when they hit me.'
Couldn't really argue with that.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#5
Newbie
Bike frames are basically trusses thus inherently stiff. According to some (I have CyclingAbout and PeakTorque in mind) the whole frame material stiffness/compliance topic is greatly exaggerated. In all likelihood components such as tyres, saddle, seatpost have a much bigger influence.
So go with whatever looks cooler and put some suspension seatpost/stem on it.
So go with whatever looks cooler and put some suspension seatpost/stem on it.
Likes For Igor_M:
#6
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,385
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,686 Times
in
2,509 Posts
The industry has decided that steel should be more expensive, so my bias is to go with aluminum if everything else is equal.
I definitely agree that feathers are lighter if throwing is involved. I once found an item in the McMaster Carr catalog that had, "weight per pound" in the description table. I have always been curious where that came from.
At one time aluminum had the reputation of being too stiff. I think they have it worked out so that isn't really a concern any more. It was probably overblown in the first place.
At one time aluminum had the reputation of being too stiff. I think they have it worked out so that isn't really a concern any more. It was probably overblown in the first place.
Last edited by unterhausen; 01-05-21 at 08:45 AM.
Likes For unterhausen:
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 309
Bikes: nothing to brag about
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked 206 Times
in
116 Posts
After 60 years of skinny steel tubes and skinny tires, about three weeks ago I switched to fat aluminum tubes and wider tires against my will because that was what was available and I needed a new bike. I think the biggest difference was from the tires and the lower inflation I can use on them. And I no longer notice the bottom bracket moving laterally, which I don't miss. Love the wider tires; never going back to skinny, and now I'm agnostic on frames.
Likes For mdarnton:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468
Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times
in
229 Posts
Higher quality aluminum frames are fine but the inexpensive aluminum frames err to the rigid side. The higher quality aluminum frames start to get up to the price of good steel or low-end carbon however so you just see aluminum mainly in the inexpensive (<$1200) gravel bikes.
Likes For tinkerbike:
#11
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Steel in my opinion has a nicer feel and ride quality to it while still being quite stiff and often, fairly light. That's not to say that an aluminum can't be comfortable provided that the frame is a good fit for you.,
#12
Senior Member
Of the two bikes in the original post, I'd pick the steel bike, mostly because of the drivetrain. I like/need wide range gearing (sub-1:1 low) and close ratios. Mutually exclusive with only one chainring. YMMV.
#13
Senior Member
As someone who rode a late 80s Cannondale crit bike I would agree, particularly when you're talking about smaller frames. I couldn't tell a difference between any of the frame materials used back then on my small framed bikes.
#14
Senior Member
Tire size & psi combined with geometry are far more significant than choice of frame material when it comes to creating comfort on any modern bicycle,.
Likes For bOsscO:
#16
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Other than geometry, it's mostly dependent on how well the bike fits you.
#17
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
While large tires aren't required for comfort, there is a direct connection between supple large volume tires at lower pressure and comfort.
Furthermore, you missed the point that both of the posters were making. They were saying that they view tire volume and pressure will play a larger role in comfort than frame material doesnt mean fitment isnt important, so why you felt it necessary to bring that into the equation is odd.
Bike fit being equal, they view tire volume and psi as more vital than frame material for comfort.
You tracking now?
#18
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
While large tires aren't required for comfort, there is a direct connection between supple large volume tires at lower pressure and comfort.
Furthermore, you missed the point that both of the posters were making. They were saying that they view tire volume and pressure will play a larger role in comfort than frame material doesnt mean fitment isnt important, so why you felt it necessary to bring that into the equation is odd.
Bike fit being equal, they view tire volume and psi as more vital than frame material for comfort.
You tracking now?
Slapping thick tires onto an otherwise poorly fitting frame and expecting the ride to be cushy is silly.
Likes For Moisture:
#19
Senior Member
Your second statement is silly and just plain ignorant. Have a nice day.
#20
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
#21
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
A good fitting frame, at least from my perspective, would be something which ensures that you do not have too much bodyweight leaning fore and aft over either axle of the bike during any given time of your ride. Eg a frame which is too small, or simply has a stem too long for your needs would cause you to lean forward too much, ruining ride comfort over uneven surfaces.
In short, my idea of ride comfort is mostly associated with:
Stack, stem length and top tube length ensures you are not stretched over the frame and riding front heavy
Reach ensures your weight is properly distributed between the two axles when riding over obstacles which subconsciously motivate you to take some weight off the saddle.
The end result is an extremely smooth ride regardless of which frame material or tires you are using.
It really can't be any more simple.
#22
Senior Member
Likes For Cpn_Dunsel:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,785
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Liked 1,017 Times
in
719 Posts
I'd also lean towards the double, its probably an FSA omega which seems to turn up with Tiagra. In my experience its a passable crank, nothing impressive and sometimes comes with an annoying 19mm spindle that only FSA makes a BB for but still reliable. Tiagra is a good groupset in my experience, for my money I'm happier with Tiagra vs. 105 and don't feel its a group you can go wrong with. 1x is nice but for a bike that can see a wide range of terrain and elevation I'd prefer 2x. Aluminum vs. steel; I have a 4130 cromoly road frame, a columbus genius road frame and a custom steel cross and like the ride of all of them, opposite that I have an aluminum c-dale mtb and an aluminum gravel and have no real preference between them, except the custom cross, that's a dream to ride but its more then a basic bike.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,358
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2474 Post(s)
Liked 2,947 Times
in
1,673 Posts
Likes For Trakhak:
#25
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
I'd also lean towards the double, its probably an FSA omega which seems to turn up with Tiagra. In my experience its a passable crank, nothing impressive and sometimes comes with an annoying 19mm spindle that only FSA makes a BB for but still reliable. Tiagra is a good groupset in my experience, for my money I'm happier with Tiagra vs. 105 and don't feel its a group you can go wrong with. 1x is nice but for a bike that can see a wide range of terrain and elevation I'd prefer 2x. Aluminum vs. steel; I have a 4130 cromoly road frame, a columbus genius road frame and a custom steel cross and like the ride of all of them, opposite that I have an aluminum c-dale mtb and an aluminum gravel and have no real preference between them, except the custom cross, that's a dream to ride but its more then a basic bike.
You guys are the biggest trolls