Ask your small, random, track-related questions here
#3751
No matches
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
250 Posts
Unless you're on something steeper than 45* or so (shorter than 250m) I wouldn't worry about it. Yes, people strike pedals, but usually only because they're going too slow on the roll out lap. Sprinters drop to the band in the corners when going slow, so it isn't even really a problem for them, although they're the only ones who tactically it makes any difference at all.
#3752
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
Thanks Koogar and Flatballer.
I'm 6'2" and have been spinning 175 & 177.5 on the road at 120+ sustained with no problem, so was considering building up my bike with a 172.5. Will probably experiment with shorter cranks and higher rpm soon, but I'm currently having better times and more competitive with that 172.5 and a slightly taller gear (50-15).
It's a GT Pulse, and I found one source (admittedly unconfirmed internet scuttlebutt) that said the bottom bracket has only a 40mm bottom bracket drop, and I'm using Shimano SPD pedals, and riding on San Diego's 333m concrete track.
We'll see what the Pulse's actual BB drop is when I get it this weekend.
Currently riding a Leader 735 loaner, which has about 55mm BB drop and 172.5 cranks. Had the whole drome to myself yesterday and wasn't able to get the left pedal to hit despite several stupid attempts, even nudging steeper while riding in the blue at full squirt.
I'm 6'2" and have been spinning 175 & 177.5 on the road at 120+ sustained with no problem, so was considering building up my bike with a 172.5. Will probably experiment with shorter cranks and higher rpm soon, but I'm currently having better times and more competitive with that 172.5 and a slightly taller gear (50-15).
It's a GT Pulse, and I found one source (admittedly unconfirmed internet scuttlebutt) that said the bottom bracket has only a 40mm bottom bracket drop, and I'm using Shimano SPD pedals, and riding on San Diego's 333m concrete track.
We'll see what the Pulse's actual BB drop is when I get it this weekend.
Currently riding a Leader 735 loaner, which has about 55mm BB drop and 172.5 cranks. Had the whole drome to myself yesterday and wasn't able to get the left pedal to hit despite several stupid attempts, even nudging steeper while riding in the blue at full squirt.
Last edited by calamarichris; 08-29-16 at 03:49 PM.
#3753
Senior Member
Some tracks specify crank length and BB height. For example see the Manchester Velodrome requirements here:
Track bike specification - National Cycling Centre
I do not know if any US tracks have similar requirements.
I have the feeling top riders are not held to these requirements at Manchester.
#3754
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
I can see how indoor 250 wood tracks would want to protect their boards.
I don't foresee actually getting good/serious enough to travel up to Carson (my nearest indoor drome), and San Diego makes no mention of crank length (or any other bike requirements at all), so I might experiment with 172.5 & 175 cranks.
Next question: not advisable to adjust the bottom bracket cups to tune the chainline and reduce the chain noise?
Using Phil Tenacious on the chain quieted it a little, but that aluminum Leader frame is like a megaphone for any chain noise. I prefer not to broadcast my moves.
I don't foresee actually getting good/serious enough to travel up to Carson (my nearest indoor drome), and San Diego makes no mention of crank length (or any other bike requirements at all), so I might experiment with 172.5 & 175 cranks.
Next question: not advisable to adjust the bottom bracket cups to tune the chainline and reduce the chain noise?
Using Phil Tenacious on the chain quieted it a little, but that aluminum Leader frame is like a megaphone for any chain noise. I prefer not to broadcast my moves.
#3755
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know anyone who does this. Track bikes are often noisy. First it bugs you, then you ignore it, then you start wanting to get a disc wheel in part because of the woo-woo sound, even though you'll tell everyone it's because it's worth 0.1s in the 200 or something like that....
#3756
Full Member
I can see how indoor 250 wood tracks would want to protect their boards.
I don't foresee actually getting good/serious enough to travel up to Carson (my nearest indoor drome), and San Diego makes no mention of crank length (or any other bike requirements at all), so I might experiment with 172.5 & 175 cranks.
Next question: not advisable to adjust the bottom bracket cups to tune the chainline and reduce the chain noise?
Using Phil Tenacious on the chain quieted it a little, but that aluminum Leader frame is like a megaphone for any chain noise. I prefer not to broadcast my moves.
I don't foresee actually getting good/serious enough to travel up to Carson (my nearest indoor drome), and San Diego makes no mention of crank length (or any other bike requirements at all), so I might experiment with 172.5 & 175 cranks.
Next question: not advisable to adjust the bottom bracket cups to tune the chainline and reduce the chain noise?
Using Phil Tenacious on the chain quieted it a little, but that aluminum Leader frame is like a megaphone for any chain noise. I prefer not to broadcast my moves.
A tight chain is a noisy chain, so bit of play helps.
It may not matter since in track racing, surprises are rare - we're a vocal bunch.
#3758
Senior Member
By the way there is a world cup scheduled for Carson Feb 25 & 26 next year. I plan to attend then get some warm (hopefully) weather training in either San Diego or Palm Desert.
#3759
Lapped 3x
You are right about large diameter aluminum magnifying your bike's noises. Also, tight chain will be noisy, as well as a new one (along with new cogs and rings). If your set-up has less than 100 miles on it, then you will get some more noise than normal. A little bit of synchronous wear will really quiet your set up.
How is your chainline? What sort of gear makes up your driveline? How much slack do you have in your chain?
How is your chainline? What sort of gear makes up your driveline? How much slack do you have in your chain?
#3760
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 789
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 6'2" also, and I rode on the road for years using 175mm cranks, and loved them. Also had 175mm on my MTB and CX bikes.
Then I got into track, and learned that trackies used shorter cranks, and arbitrarily chose 170mm for the track bike. Around the same time, I got a second road bike, and, due to a temporary injury, was recommended a shorter crank on that, too...and went 172.5mm.
Now, I switch back and forth between road bikes...but I can hardly stand the longer 175mm cranks; they feel awkward and slow. Also, my max cadence is hugely higher on the 172.5mm.
All this for 2.5mm...it's surprising when one considers just how tiny 2.5mm is...
#3761
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
Lots of beginners ride Carson. Take a class or certification. It is so neat to ride on an indoor track. The first thing I noticed riding there was the noise my helmet straps made.
By the way there is a world cup scheduled for Carson Feb 25 & 26 next year. I plan to attend then get some warm (hopefully) weather training in either San Diego or Palm Desert.
By the way there is a world cup scheduled for Carson Feb 25 & 26 next year. I plan to attend then get some warm (hopefully) weather training in either San Diego or Palm Desert.
We've got some pretty spectacular roads here in North San Diego County, if you want to meet for a spin while you're here. (Most of our microbreweries are regrettably still on this overhopped IPA fad.) I've got a few spare road bikes laying around if you aren't another of these chocolate factory employees.
Do these indoor tracks have a fast-track to certification if we've already gotten certified on another track? I'm nearly done with my classes at San Diego. They're going to close it next month for resurfacing, and I'm looking forward to a nice smooth track in October.
#3762
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
Crank Length Anecdote:
I'm 6'2" also, and I rode on the road for years using 175mm cranks, and loved them. Also had 175mm on my MTB and CX bikes.
Then I got into track, and learned that trackies used shorter cranks, and arbitrarily chose 170mm for the track bike. Around the same time, I got a second road bike, and, due to a temporary injury, was recommended a shorter crank on that, too...and went 172.5mm.
Now, I switch back and forth between road bikes...but I can hardly stand the longer 175mm cranks; they feel awkward and slow. Also, my max cadence is hugely higher on the 172.5mm.
All this for 2.5mm...it's surprising when one considers just how tiny 2.5mm is...
I'm 6'2" also, and I rode on the road for years using 175mm cranks, and loved them. Also had 175mm on my MTB and CX bikes.
Then I got into track, and learned that trackies used shorter cranks, and arbitrarily chose 170mm for the track bike. Around the same time, I got a second road bike, and, due to a temporary injury, was recommended a shorter crank on that, too...and went 172.5mm.
Now, I switch back and forth between road bikes...but I can hardly stand the longer 175mm cranks; they feel awkward and slow. Also, my max cadence is hugely higher on the 172.5mm.
All this for 2.5mm...it's surprising when one considers just how tiny 2.5mm is...
Funny how much easier 175 seems to spool up after trying to do it on the 177.5's.
#3763
aka mattio
Do these indoor tracks have a fast-track to certification if we've already gotten certified on another track? I'm nearly done with my classes at San Diego. They're going to close it next month for resurfacing, and I'm looking forward to a nice smooth track in October.
#3764
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
There are usually two things to certification. One is, knowing how to ride your bike on a track: knowing what the lines are for, how to move, etc. The other is understanding how to ride on a steep 250. Some indoor tracks can do away with the latter but will still ask new riders to go through a class on the former before racing or training.
Further, the surface of the ADT/Home Depot/Carson/whatever it's called track is similar to a wooden basketball court. Any dust on the tires will allow them to slip.
if you slide out on a concrete track, you only damage your bike and maybe your skinsuit. If you slide out on a wooden track, you also damage the track. Which may gouge the wood which could make splinters and/or be expensive to repair. So, you'll see track director of nicer wooden tracks be real hard-asses about that kind of stuff...for good reason.
Also, riding a 250 will give you the willies. I came from DLV (37 degrees) which is really steep, but not 44 degrees. Riding on my first 250 (Frisco Superdrome) gave me the willies for the first few laps. It just does.
This is why you can't just say, "I'm good." and hop on a 250. They want to make sure you are good. The $10-20 entry fee you pay that day won't be enough to cover damage you do to the track if you slide out.
#3765
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
Good poop, thanks trackies!
I know you guys've probably been answering these annoying noob questions for years, but I appreciate your taking the time to teach me new stuff.
I know you guys've probably been answering these annoying noob questions for years, but I appreciate your taking the time to teach me new stuff.
#3766
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
You are right about large diameter aluminum magnifying your bike's noises. Also, tight chain will be noisy, as well as a new one (along with new cogs and rings). If your set-up has less than 100 miles on it, then you will get some more noise than normal. A little bit of synchronous wear will really quiet your set up.
How is your chainline? What sort of gear makes up your driveline? How much slack do you have in your chain?
How is your chainline? What sort of gear makes up your driveline? How much slack do you have in your chain?
I'm not sure how to check or to tune the chainline, (short of ensuring that rear wheel is absolutely centered when tightening down the axle nuts), but most people chuckle and blow their bangs off their hipster foreheads when I ask; (I suspect they don't know either.)
I'm also not sure how much slack in the chain is enough. Anyone have any specific guidelines or links?
Thank you very much for sharing your guidance about the new drivetrains Taras.
#3767
aka mattio
It's easier to show than to tell how much chain slack is right. You should be able to touch the chain where it's halfway between the ring and the cog, and it should have I'd say about an inch of vertical play.
Another way to test to see if your slack is too much is to push on the chain where it meets your chainring. Try to push it up and over a tooth - ie, try to derail it. If you can't, then, it ain't coming off. If you think you maaaaaybe can, then, well, it's probably not coming off.
Another way to test to see if your slack is too much is to push on the chain where it meets your chainring. Try to push it up and over a tooth - ie, try to derail it. If you can't, then, it ain't coming off. If you think you maaaaaybe can, then, well, it's probably not coming off.
#3768
aka mattio
Oh, and, how to check the chainline is to measure from the center of the seat tube to the center of the chainring teeth. it should be 42.5 - almost every track hub in the world puts a cog at 42.5mm.
There's not a lot of finetuning a chainline - for the most part, people buy the BB that matches their cranks, and just set it up - and the ring goes where it ought to.
There's not a lot of finetuning a chainline - for the most part, people buy the BB that matches their cranks, and just set it up - and the ring goes where it ought to.
#3769
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Track Chain Tension Primer - Pearce Coaching and Fitting
(Ignore the silly carbon frame in the picture)
#3770
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
It's probably starting to sound stale at this point, but THANK YOU again!
What do you think about using a straight edge/level to check the chainline? Holding a 6-foot level flush against the chainring and seeing where it lines up in relation to the cog? I've been doing this with motorcycles for years to good effect--my chains typically last twice as long as anyone I know, and still have some life left when I replace them compared to many of the neglected chains I see still in use.
Some folks call it OCD, I prefer to call it Mechanical Empathy.
As a wise man once said, "A clean, well adjusted, well-lubed bike goes faster, lasts longer, and looks nicer."
What do you think about using a straight edge/level to check the chainline? Holding a 6-foot level flush against the chainring and seeing where it lines up in relation to the cog? I've been doing this with motorcycles for years to good effect--my chains typically last twice as long as anyone I know, and still have some life left when I replace them compared to many of the neglected chains I see still in use.
Some folks call it OCD, I prefer to call it Mechanical Empathy.
As a wise man once said, "A clean, well adjusted, well-lubed bike goes faster, lasts longer, and looks nicer."
#3771
~>~
1) Face BB shell
2) Check frame alignment (we used a flat table being really old school in our shop).
3) Check track end alignment/parallel w/ proper "dropout" tool (pic)
4) Position the straight edge on the chainring center and cog center of the race wheel
5) Listen for that sweet-spot "whirr" w/ chain installed & tensioned
6) Race
-Bandera
#3772
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
Sorry running a little late with the Noob Question of the Day: Any reason not to cut a link out of the chain to bring the rear wheel up closer to the seat tube for improved aerodynamics?
And is it safe to assume that doing so would bring the wheel about one linkplate's length forward?
And is it safe to assume that doing so would bring the wheel about one linkplate's length forward?
#3773
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 398 Times
in
194 Posts
Seems like it would limit your options for easily changing gearing, and I doubt any potential aero benefit would really be worth it.
#3774
Senior Member
Sorry running a little late with the Noob Question of the Day: Any reason not to cut a link out of the chain to bring the rear wheel up closer to the seat tube for improved aerodynamics?
And is it safe to assume that doing so would bring the wheel about one linkplate's length forward?
And is it safe to assume that doing so would bring the wheel about one linkplate's length forward?
Another way to decrease wheel/seat tube clearance is to use a different chain ring/sprocket combination.
There are much better ways to reduce aerodynamic drag.
#3775
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Sorry running a little late with the Noob Question of the Day: Any reason not to cut a link out of the chain to bring the rear wheel up closer to the seat tube for improved aerodynamics?
And is it safe to assume that doing so would bring the wheel about one linkplate's length forward?
And is it safe to assume that doing so would bring the wheel about one linkplate's length forward?
Ever watch a rear derailleur on a road bike? Ever notice how it takes and gives chain based on what chainring/cog is chosen?
Now imagine if you had no rear derailleur and a single track chain from your big front chainring to your small rear cog. What happens when you want to put the chain on a different chainring or cog? You either have too much chain or not enough. So, you'd need a chain for each gear combination.
This is why track ends (aka: track dropouts) are horizontal. To give or take slack to optimize the chain length...if the chain is long enough. If you cut your chain to the shortest length usable you just shot your self in the foot and undermined the entire system.
The shorter answer is: Go ahead and try your idea. You'll find out soon enough why it's a bad idea
The only people that can get away with it are single speed / fixed gear riders who never change their chainring/cog combination.