Why are modern bikes still built with traditional geometry?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 72
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Why are modern bikes still built with traditional geometry?
Hi folks
So around 2000, Giant discovered the advantages of compact geometry. They could produce a bike with the "same" fit as a trad bike, using less tubing (saving weight) and increasing stiffness (smaller triangle reduces lateral torsion). The only difference is that the rider would have to use a longer seatpost.
Why then, do manufacturers today produce carbon frames with horizontal top tubes? I'm not getting it, given that they are trying to keep frame weight to a minimum.
So around 2000, Giant discovered the advantages of compact geometry. They could produce a bike with the "same" fit as a trad bike, using less tubing (saving weight) and increasing stiffness (smaller triangle reduces lateral torsion). The only difference is that the rider would have to use a longer seatpost.
Why then, do manufacturers today produce carbon frames with horizontal top tubes? I'm not getting it, given that they are trying to keep frame weight to a minimum.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,055
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,804 Times
in
1,408 Posts
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
While sloping top tubes have advantages for more casual riders who benefit from the relatively higher head to seat height, this doesn't benefit racers who prefer lower heads. So a sloping top tube would mean a longer seatpost, and greater stresses because of the increased cantilever. Weight isn't a consideration since bikes are already below the UCI mandated minimum.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
Banned
Tradition, and UCI constraints.. You can find many pictures of bikes other than that one that look different..
you found one to confirm your bias.
you found one to confirm your bias.
#5
~>~
#6
on by
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 957
Bikes: Waterford RS-33, Salsa Vaya, Bacchetta Giro 20 ATT
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 927 Post(s)
Liked 690 Times
in
437 Posts
Perhaps that certain accessories would be rendered unusable, or at least less user-friendly. For example, would a standard large water bottle fit on the seat tube? I know that's a problem for smaller size traditional frames. Also, transporting a bike with a smaller opening to hang on a trunk-mount rack could be rendered impossible. Just speculating.
People like the familiar...especially cyclists.
People like the familiar...especially cyclists.
#8
Banned
Recumbents dont, but they're illegal for UCI, the high profile pro racers every one emulates, and expects to own , are like the pro's ride..
there are carbon fiber recumbents , the fastest human powered bikes are carbon and shaped like a fish.
there are carbon fiber recumbents , the fastest human powered bikes are carbon and shaped like a fish.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
398 Posts
What Giant didn't say is that compact geometry saves them money because they don't have to make as many different frame sizes. I don't think you'll find many, if any, compact frames that come in 2cm increments. I don't like them.
#10
~>~
#11
Banned
unless they look like they were old school diamond frame, posting on C&V would be a waste of time..
time wasters... Go !
time wasters... Go !
#12
Senior Member
Who cares about "modern" bikes anyway?
#13
Senior Member
My nickel Mongoose had compact geometry back in the late 70s...
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,071
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4412 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times
in
1,028 Posts
Maybe you don't get something for nothing, and the weight required to make a long post as stiff as a normal post is not actually less than the weight saved by angling the frame tubes?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Upper Left, USA
Posts: 1,915
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
298 Posts
I don't think your premise is accurate. The first page of google image search for "carbon fiber bicycle" is all bikes with sloping top tubes. That's not a scientific survey of all carbon frames, but go look at the frames from Trek, Spec, and even Colnagos. But, yes, @FBinNY is right too. Frames have gotten so far under the UCI minimum that designers can do what they want visually (and with aero) and still need to add lead weight to a complete bike to make it legal to race.
#17
All Campy All The Time
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 1,417
Bikes: Listed in my signature.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times
in
63 Posts
The only material saved by slanting the top tube is about 2" of seat tube and 2" from each seat stay. That much carbon (or aluminum, or steel) tube would weigh next to nothing. All the same lugs, seat tube clamp, etc., are still there. Plus the slanted top tube will be slightly longer. So even before the seat post is figured in, very little weight is saved from the slanted-tube frame.
__________________
My C&V Bikes:
1972 Bottecchia Professional, 1972 Legnano Olympiade Record,
1982 Colnago Super, 1987 Bottecchia Team C-Record,
1988 Pinarello Montello, 1990 Masi Nuova Strada Super Record,
1995 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, 1995 DeBernardi Thron
My C&V Bikes:
1972 Bottecchia Professional, 1972 Legnano Olympiade Record,
1982 Colnago Super, 1987 Bottecchia Team C-Record,
1988 Pinarello Montello, 1990 Masi Nuova Strada Super Record,
1995 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, 1995 DeBernardi Thron
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 72
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Why are SOME modern bikes still built with traditional geometry?
Why are SOME modern bikes still built with traditional geometry?
I didn't occur to me that I had to use the qualifier "some". The question itself implies that the modern bike uses the "modern" design, and that it is more prevalent than the "traditional" (i.e. non-modern) design. Modern "means" sloped TT, traditional "means" horizontal TT. Obviously we all know that. The question I had was why are there "any" modern bikes with traditional geometry "given" the (possibly faulty) reasoning that sloping results in lesser weight and increased torsional resistance (i.e. it is a better design).
Anyways thanks for all those who gave adult replies.
I didn't occur to me that I had to use the qualifier "some". The question itself implies that the modern bike uses the "modern" design, and that it is more prevalent than the "traditional" (i.e. non-modern) design. Modern "means" sloped TT, traditional "means" horizontal TT. Obviously we all know that. The question I had was why are there "any" modern bikes with traditional geometry "given" the (possibly faulty) reasoning that sloping results in lesser weight and increased torsional resistance (i.e. it is a better design).
Anyways thanks for all those who gave adult replies.
Last edited by CampioneDItalia; 01-27-18 at 01:55 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
The sloping top tube, S/M/L was fantastic for inventory control, at the distributor and shop level.
When I read geometry, I was thinking about the factors that really matter. A sloping top tube is often not relevant.
Later is has allowed some to have a frame that appears less goofy with lots of spacers below the stem.
Extended head tubes have their place.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,055
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,804 Times
in
1,408 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Why are modern bikes still built with traditional geometry?
If it ain't broke don't fix it.
If it ain't broke don't fix it.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
Whether the seat tube is level or sloping, the numbers have been close to the same for decades--
The really haven't been any radical geometry changes with the exception of triathlon bikes getting much steeper
The geometry of Big Mig's Pinarello likely isnt much different than Froome's, although there are cosmetic design differences -----
The really haven't been any radical geometry changes with the exception of triathlon bikes getting much steeper
The geometry of Big Mig's Pinarello likely isnt much different than Froome's, although there are cosmetic design differences -----
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Slanted top tubes allow fewer sizes to fit more people so it's a cost saving design, also more crotch clearance for off-road bikes.
edit: and a slanted top tube with a longer seatpost with some flex can provide a little more cushioning.
Last edited by tyrion; 01-27-18 at 03:17 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
#25
~>~
Race bike geometry changed with the road surfaces.
The dirt, pave' and gravel of rural roads, the brick and paving stones of the town centers and the goat tracks of the high mountains in Europe & the UK gave way to tarmac in the post WWII reconstruction. Cross bike geometry and mud clearance were no longer necessary for road racing or time trials on pavement so "new" designs evolved for the new racing environments with the ability retained for racing on the pave' of the Spring classic. By the late 70's the evolution was complete with the dedicated Criterium bike evolved for the unique racing conditions here in the US tightening things up a bit more worldwide. All done & dusted in the C&V time frame w/ changes in materials not design geometry that matter to come, with the exception of the dedicated TT machines. And who really cares about "modern" bikes anyway?
-Bandera
The dirt, pave' and gravel of rural roads, the brick and paving stones of the town centers and the goat tracks of the high mountains in Europe & the UK gave way to tarmac in the post WWII reconstruction. Cross bike geometry and mud clearance were no longer necessary for road racing or time trials on pavement so "new" designs evolved for the new racing environments with the ability retained for racing on the pave' of the Spring classic. By the late 70's the evolution was complete with the dedicated Criterium bike evolved for the unique racing conditions here in the US tightening things up a bit more worldwide. All done & dusted in the C&V time frame w/ changes in materials not design geometry that matter to come, with the exception of the dedicated TT machines. And who really cares about "modern" bikes anyway?
-Bandera
Last edited by Bandera; 01-27-18 at 03:23 PM.