Are these parts legit? (Easton bars and stems)
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Providence
Posts: 732
Bikes: Specialized tarmac sl2 giant tcx zero
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 319 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Are these parts legit? (Easton bars and stems)
these cant be legit can they ???
https://www.dhgate.com/product/2017-...COSMNBL%7C2%7C
https://www.dhgate.com/product/2017-...COSMNBL%7C2%7C
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Given the fact that the ad doesn't even spell bicycle correctly:
".....2017 EASTON ec90 Carbon fiber cicycle handlebar and bike stem......"
I'd be suspicious of the claims.
".....2017 EASTON ec90 Carbon fiber cicycle handlebar and bike stem......"
I'd be suspicious of the claims.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mountain Brook. AL
Posts: 4,002
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 136 Times
in
104 Posts
Google Chinarello and the Specialized fake frames for some more insight into the likely origin of these "Easton" parts.
Or explore: https://www.google.com/search?ei=oYE....0.FDhHucKz6W4
Or explore: https://www.google.com/search?ei=oYE....0.FDhHucKz6W4
#8
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
I've heard this given as a reason about some counterfeits and knock offs but don't know if it is fact.
Companies that go to some parts of Asia and perhaps other continents and countries, for manufacturing of their product are not actually building and controlling their own operations there. They are simply contracting out the manufacture of their product. So they don't necessarily have full control of what happens to their products that didn't pass quality controls and were rejects or simply what happens with production overruns that are not given to them. I'm sure they try to address such stuff in their contracts, but perhaps the laws and cost of litigation in those countries makes it not worthwhile to pursue.
Companies that go to some parts of Asia and perhaps other continents and countries, for manufacturing of their product are not actually building and controlling their own operations there. They are simply contracting out the manufacture of their product. So they don't necessarily have full control of what happens to their products that didn't pass quality controls and were rejects or simply what happens with production overruns that are not given to them. I'm sure they try to address such stuff in their contracts, but perhaps the laws and cost of litigation in those countries makes it not worthwhile to pursue.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
4 Posts
A knockoff is a knockoff, not a factory over-run or a reject. (The first doesn't make sense, the second doesn't square with the new appearance or the degree of quality variance in these knockoff products.) It's not hard to reverse-engineer the shape of a bar, they could do it in an afternoon. They don't need leaked CAD drawings and they don't particularly care about the layup.
This bar is clearly a knockoff. The graphics alone give it away. It might still be decent, but it's not an Easton.
#10
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Counterfeit and outright stolen and rebranded parts from Asia are a fact.
It is not even debatable.
It is not even debatable.
#12
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
A knockoff is a knockoff, not a factory over-run or a reject. (The first doesn't make sense, the second doesn't square with the new appearance or the degree of quality variance in these knockoff products.) It's not hard to reverse-engineer the shape of a bar, they could do it in an afternoon. They don't need leaked CAD drawings and they don't particularly care about the layup.
This bar is clearly a knockoff. The graphics alone give it away. It might still be decent, but it's not an Easton.
What? I certainly am not saying or implying this for You've completely forgot the statement I made to keep this in context..... No where do I imply that overseas manufacturing itself is bad.
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
4 Posts
Sure you are. Here's what you said:
A) Brands don't have "full control" over manufacturers
B) So manufacturers might be reselling rejected parts
What brand would work with a manufacturer engaging in this practice (ignoring for a moment the assumption a rational manufacturer would endanger a lucrative, continuing relationship to make a few bucks on the side undermining the same products they're building)? None of them.
If you're proposing the practice is occurring anyway, despite these relationships and due diligence in vetting the manufacturer, then what implication for other brands who want to outsource? They can't trust anyone.
To me, this 'factory rejects' notion is the other side of the 'I'm getting a legit part that came out the back door' coin. They're both wrong.
A) Brands don't have "full control" over manufacturers
B) So manufacturers might be reselling rejected parts
What brand would work with a manufacturer engaging in this practice (ignoring for a moment the assumption a rational manufacturer would endanger a lucrative, continuing relationship to make a few bucks on the side undermining the same products they're building)? None of them.
If you're proposing the practice is occurring anyway, despite these relationships and due diligence in vetting the manufacturer, then what implication for other brands who want to outsource? They can't trust anyone.
To me, this 'factory rejects' notion is the other side of the 'I'm getting a legit part that came out the back door' coin. They're both wrong.
#14
Banned
Going thru a Known Bike Shop and a importer-distributor, you have those folks handling warranty claims.
Bypassing them and you are on your own.. but it may be cheaper ..
Bypassing them and you are on your own.. but it may be cheaper ..
#15
Poseur Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 341
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've got a friend who rides a "Chinarello". That's a risk I wouldn't take.
I've got a friend who likes to ride "blacked out" (black bike, black kit, no blinky lights, etc.). That's a risk I wouldn't take.
I've got family members who think I'm nuts to ride a bicycle on the roads, no matter how many safety precautions I take.
Everyone must decide their own level of risk.
P.S. I always wheel suck my blacked out friend with my (mostly) hi-vis jerseys and (always) blinky lights. It's safer that way
I've got a friend who likes to ride "blacked out" (black bike, black kit, no blinky lights, etc.). That's a risk I wouldn't take.
I've got family members who think I'm nuts to ride a bicycle on the roads, no matter how many safety precautions I take.
Everyone must decide their own level of risk.
P.S. I always wheel suck my blacked out friend with my (mostly) hi-vis jerseys and (always) blinky lights. It's safer that way
#16
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
Sure you are. Here's what you said:
A) Brands don't have "full control" over manufacturers
B) So manufacturers might be reselling rejected parts
What brand would work with a manufacturer engaging in this practice (ignoring for a moment the assumption a rational manufacturer would endanger a lucrative, continuing relationship to make a few bucks on the side undermining the same products they're building)? None of them.
If you're proposing the practice is occurring anyway, despite these relationships and due diligence in vetting the manufacturer, then what implication for other brands who want to outsource? They can't trust anyone.
To me, this 'factory rejects' notion is the other side of the 'I'm getting a legit part that came out the back door' coin. They're both wrong.
A) Brands don't have "full control" over manufacturers
B) So manufacturers might be reselling rejected parts
What brand would work with a manufacturer engaging in this practice (ignoring for a moment the assumption a rational manufacturer would endanger a lucrative, continuing relationship to make a few bucks on the side undermining the same products they're building)? None of them.
If you're proposing the practice is occurring anyway, despite these relationships and due diligence in vetting the manufacturer, then what implication for other brands who want to outsource? They can't trust anyone.
To me, this 'factory rejects' notion is the other side of the 'I'm getting a legit part that came out the back door' coin. They're both wrong.
Asked and answered. No they really can't trust anyone. Not all countries in the world share the USA's rather absurd notion of copyright/patent law.
Even in the USA, on US shores, people "walk away" with hardware and resell it all the time. Go on EBay you'll see "ES" branded CPUs from Intel....those are "Engineering Samples" sent to large OEMs (Dell, HP, etc) for system testing that are supposed to be destroyed by those OEMs---and enterprising underpaid employees raid the dump bin and sell them because almost always those ES chips sent-for-testing are viable. This practice is strictly forbidden by Intel, but it happens all the time anyway. EBay tries to crackdown on the practice--moving it to semi-private seller forums on computer boards like HardForum and Overclock.net
Last edited by Marcus_Ti; 06-08-18 at 01:51 PM.
#18
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Sure you are. Here's what you said:
A) Brands don't have "full control" over manufacturers
B) So manufacturers might be reselling rejected parts
What brand would work with a manufacturer engaging in this practice (ignoring for a moment the assumption a rational manufacturer would endanger a lucrative, continuing relationship to make a few bucks on the side undermining the same products they're building)? None of them.
If you're proposing the practice is occurring anyway, despite these relationships and due diligence in vetting the manufacturer, then what implication for other brands who want to outsource? They can't trust anyone.
To me, this 'factory rejects' notion is the other side of the 'I'm getting a legit part that came out the back door' coin. They're both wrong.
A) Brands don't have "full control" over manufacturers
B) So manufacturers might be reselling rejected parts
What brand would work with a manufacturer engaging in this practice (ignoring for a moment the assumption a rational manufacturer would endanger a lucrative, continuing relationship to make a few bucks on the side undermining the same products they're building)? None of them.
If you're proposing the practice is occurring anyway, despite these relationships and due diligence in vetting the manufacturer, then what implication for other brands who want to outsource? They can't trust anyone.
To me, this 'factory rejects' notion is the other side of the 'I'm getting a legit part that came out the back door' coin. They're both wrong.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,678
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 581 Times
in
409 Posts
I did vendor qualifications and QA/QC in China for several years and can tell you anything is possible. If closely watched by the US customer they can be excellent quality end runs, or runs made with a few corners cut to same $. We eventually employed Chinese QA/QC as they are better at the very subtle corners that get taken. I would be very careful.
That said, things like designer sox with little opportunity to fudge from the manufacturer I would buy on the street for $1 or at the Silk Street Market after it moved from behind the American Embassy rather than pay $5 in a shop or $4 to have them cleaned by the hotel.
That said, things like designer sox with little opportunity to fudge from the manufacturer I would buy on the street for $1 or at the Silk Street Market after it moved from behind the American Embassy rather than pay $5 in a shop or $4 to have them cleaned by the hotel.