Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > Mountain Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

32 front or 28 front

Notices
Mountain Bike Racing Discuss pro racing, the big races, and even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

32 front or 28 front

Old 02-18-18, 10:23 AM
  #1  
Doge
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
32 front or 28 front

I didn't do so well on my tire thread. Maybe there is some advice on this.
Given the same ratios, so with a 32T front we'd have larger cassette teeth in the rear than with a 28T front - which is preferred 32T or 28T?

I know 28 we have about 200g less mass and 32/28% of the stress from chain tension to compression on the chain-stays etc.

This is for a hard tail (and does it matter?), 150# rider.
Doge is offline  
Old 02-18-18, 12:56 PM
  #2  
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
More teeth for greater durability vs. fewer teeth for less weight. Not sure why you put the per cent sign in there (it doesn't belong).
prathmann is offline  
Old 04-24-18, 11:21 AM
  #3  
Reynolds 531 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Reno nevada
Posts: 784

Bikes: a few that I can't recall

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 339 Post(s)
Liked 287 Times in 142 Posts
The problem is in the rear. Any reduced friction from lower tooth count in the front, will be MORE than offset negatively by the smaller rear.

A smaller rear sprocket causes the chain to articulate more as it tries to wrap around the smaller sprocket, which creates more friction from the chain pivots.

The negative of this (9 tooth is particularly bad) more than outweighs any friction advantage from wrapping "14" front teeth compared to "16".

disclaimer: I know there are studies. I know there are watts. I also know that this is infinitesimal, but the guy asked a question.

Final analysis: A racer will be better served by putting an extra hour per week into interval training instead of spending an hour calculating frictional losses.

Last edited by Reynolds 531; 04-24-18 at 11:26 AM.
Reynolds 531 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IslandTimePE
Bicycle Mechanics
7
04-14-18 05:31 AM
sdmc530
Bicycle Mechanics
20
07-08-16 04:43 PM
kenshireen
Bicycle Mechanics
13
02-09-16 02:55 PM
novahistics
Bicycle Mechanics
10
06-16-13 10:28 PM
wallymann
Classic & Vintage
6
05-13-11 08:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.