New Canyon Gravel/Trail bike to be released tomorrow...
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 781
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 479 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
156 Posts
My Grail - an XL CF SL 8.0 - feels very relaxed compared to my road bikes (which helps you guys - zero). When I was researching and trying to compare a handful of bikes, the Canyon seemed the odd-man-out - where Canyon's measuring is not where other manufacturers are. Admittedly, I gave up and took the "Well, they have a 30-day return policy" if I didn't like the fit, and bought one. I love it. It was definitely more upright and more relaxed than I thought it was going to be. I've grown to like that aspect.
#77
Reno/Seattle/NYC
My Grail - an XL CF SL 8.0 - feels very relaxed compared to my road bikes (which helps you guys - zero). When I was researching and trying to compare a handful of bikes, the Canyon seemed the odd-man-out - where Canyon's measuring is not where other manufacturers are. Admittedly, I gave up and took the "Well, they have a 30-day return policy" if I didn't like the fit, and bought one. I love it. It was definitely more upright and more relaxed than I thought it was going to be. I've grown to like that aspect.
#78
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
Yep, I spent a lot of time trying to make sense of the numbers given that the handlebar relationship to the frame is significantly different than most bikes.
I compared to Canyon's endurance bike and the ultimate and inflite to get some more datapoints for someone my size. The grail seemed to fit more like a traditional endurance bike, where the inflite was a bit more aggressive.
I compared to Canyon's endurance bike and the ultimate and inflite to get some more datapoints for someone my size. The grail seemed to fit more like a traditional endurance bike, where the inflite was a bit more aggressive.
#79
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
Gravel vs Cyclocross. Which is better.
Warning - includes paid promotion to evaluate which is better: Canyon Grail vs Inflite. ;-)
Hint- Grail is faster on this course.
Although they really need to do these things on the same tires. I get tired of people saying the 33mm tired bike is slower when it is rough. Duh!
Warning - includes paid promotion to evaluate which is better: Canyon Grail vs Inflite. ;-)
Hint- Grail is faster on this course.
Although they really need to do these things on the same tires. I get tired of people saying the 33mm tired bike is slower when it is rough. Duh!
Last edited by chas58; 11-13-18 at 02:38 PM.
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
Gravel vs Cyclocross. Which is better.
Warning - includes paid promotion to evaluate which is better: Canyon Grail vs Inflite. ;-)
Hint- Grail is faster on this course.
Although they really need to do these things on the same tires. I get tired of people saying the 33mm tired bike is slower when it is rough. Duh!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRe3rMyw5F8
Warning - includes paid promotion to evaluate which is better: Canyon Grail vs Inflite. ;-)
Hint- Grail is faster on this course.
Although they really need to do these things on the same tires. I get tired of people saying the 33mm tired bike is slower when it is rough. Duh!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRe3rMyw5F8
#81
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
That's kind of the point though. You can drop a cx tire on the gravel bike but you can't drop a gravel tire on the cx bike. I wonder if the inflite would be faster than the grail with same cx tires on a cross course. There are bikes out there though that have a geometry in between gravel and cx and can take whatever.
Tire size isn't an issue, unless you have a very old cross bike (limited to 35mm), or want to do 50mm x 650b. Either bike can take a 700x40mm though.
specifically, I run 40mm tires on my Inflite. If it is really rough or sandy, I'll go up to 50mm in the front (although I've put on a 60mm 650b on the front, that is a little big for my tastes. 54mm on the front allows me to rip on single track (obviously track where I don't need a suspension).
Going from 33mm to 40mm would easily drop my times by a minute on that rooty section.
I ride gingerly and really pick my lines on 33mm
I ride faster but still somewhat cautiously on the 40mm
I ride mountain bike speed on the 50 and 54mm tires (no holding back on that type of trail).
Last edited by chas58; 11-13-18 at 03:58 PM.
#83
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
Obviously they did it because it is an infomercial, and the 1x Inflite is yellow and looks good in infomercials (The 2x is boring grey).
I have a 2x Inflite. I can (and do) hammer hard with Cat 1-3 riders on top tier racing road bikes (when I am on similar tires). Typically, those rides top out around 40mph, but I don't run out of gears.
50-53T chainrings are silly. I doubt any of us can accelerate a 50x11 gear, unless we are riding of a cliff.
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SoCal USA
Posts: 188
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times
in
33 Posts
That was just dumb of them, comparing a 1x (Inflite) to a 2x (Grail).
Obviously they did it because it is an infomercial, and the 1x Inflite is yellow and looks good in infomercials (The 2x is boring grey).
I have a 2x Inflite. I can (and do) hammer hard with Cat 1-3 riders on top tier racing road bikes (when I am on similar tires). Typically, those rides top out around 40mph, but I don't run out of gears.
50-53T chainrings are silly. I doubt any of us can accelerate a 50x11 gear, unless we are riding of a cliff.
Obviously they did it because it is an infomercial, and the 1x Inflite is yellow and looks good in infomercials (The 2x is boring grey).
I have a 2x Inflite. I can (and do) hammer hard with Cat 1-3 riders on top tier racing road bikes (when I am on similar tires). Typically, those rides top out around 40mph, but I don't run out of gears.
50-53T chainrings are silly. I doubt any of us can accelerate a 50x11 gear, unless we are riding of a cliff.
#85
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
That gcn vid is getting ripped on by chas, but it seemed great to me.
it highlighted differences between the two styles.
- large open area of triangle for CX.
- lower bb for gravel.
- lot of mount points for gravel.
- 1x gearing for CX vs 2x for gravel.
they also highlight how significant tire size is and why.
pretty helpful for all those who ask what the difference between CX and gravel bikes are.
it highlighted differences between the two styles.
- large open area of triangle for CX.
- lower bb for gravel.
- lot of mount points for gravel.
- 1x gearing for CX vs 2x for gravel.
they also highlight how significant tire size is and why.
pretty helpful for all those who ask what the difference between CX and gravel bikes are.
#86
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
Aw, I love the video. But the gearing and tire size are non issues. My Inflite has basically the same gearing and tire size at the Grail. So yeah, gearing and tire size are critical to me, but They have absolutely nothing to do with comparison of the two bikes.
The basic differences I have found are
- CX can turn much more aggressively and tightly, Gravel is more stable at graceful high speed turns (downhill, loose gravel)
- CX can pedal hard through a tight turn while I have to coast on a gravel bike (pedal strike).
- Gravel is more upright “endurance” geometry – comfortable for rides of 3 hours or more, CX is more aero.
- Gravel can typically do backpacking (strength, weight, mount points).
Redbull - I think you and I "spin out" at different RPM.
The basic differences I have found are
- CX can turn much more aggressively and tightly, Gravel is more stable at graceful high speed turns (downhill, loose gravel)
- CX can pedal hard through a tight turn while I have to coast on a gravel bike (pedal strike).
- Gravel is more upright “endurance” geometry – comfortable for rides of 3 hours or more, CX is more aero.
- Gravel can typically do backpacking (strength, weight, mount points).
Redbull - I think you and I "spin out" at different RPM.
Last edited by chas58; 11-15-18 at 08:23 AM.
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
I think the problem with the video is that its presented as which is "better" but wasn't an apples to apples comparison. says more about appropriate tires and gearing as chas mentioned, rather than differences in frame geometry resulting in better performance
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Refreshing
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
12
12-27-18 11:50 PM
hayai_240
Pacific Northwest
4
05-25-15 12:22 AM