Fizik Arione K:1 Saddle - weight on Competitive Cyclist
#1
RustyTainte
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 28012
Posts: 12,340
Bikes: zilch
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fizik Arione K:1 Saddle - weight on Competitive Cyclist
"2008 Fizik Arione K:1 Saddle
view all
Item: FIZ117 Weight: 160.0g
$399.99
While Fizik has largely devoured the high-end saddle marketplace, they've done so without responding in kind to companies who try to garner attention for themselves by producing ever-lighter saddles. You know the saddles we mean -- the 99g thin-shell/thin-carbon cover models that cause you to laugh when you look at them because you know no one heavier than a certified KOM could ever possibly sit on one for longer than 5km.
While the Fizik Arione K:1 saddle doesn't break the 100g barrier, its design ensures a heck of a lot more in the way of comfort than what we've seen up to now in the super-light class. It's built with "Mobius" braided carbon fiber rails -- Fizik's lightest-ever thanks to their construction method by which a core of unidirectional fibers are inserted into a carbon "sock" to give it tremendous strength-to-weight. Further lightening things is a carbon shell overlaid with a soft "Technogel" cover. While this gel adds a wee bit of weight, it also makes the Arione K:1 the most rideable sub-150g saddle on the market. It's a full 50g (that's 33%) lighter than the Aliante Carbon, yet like all other Fizik saddles it's built to give you all-day-long comfort."
Am I missing something here?
view all
Item: FIZ117 Weight: 160.0g
$399.99
While Fizik has largely devoured the high-end saddle marketplace, they've done so without responding in kind to companies who try to garner attention for themselves by producing ever-lighter saddles. You know the saddles we mean -- the 99g thin-shell/thin-carbon cover models that cause you to laugh when you look at them because you know no one heavier than a certified KOM could ever possibly sit on one for longer than 5km.
While the Fizik Arione K:1 saddle doesn't break the 100g barrier, its design ensures a heck of a lot more in the way of comfort than what we've seen up to now in the super-light class. It's built with "Mobius" braided carbon fiber rails -- Fizik's lightest-ever thanks to their construction method by which a core of unidirectional fibers are inserted into a carbon "sock" to give it tremendous strength-to-weight. Further lightening things is a carbon shell overlaid with a soft "Technogel" cover. While this gel adds a wee bit of weight, it also makes the Arione K:1 the most rideable sub-150g saddle on the market. It's a full 50g (that's 33%) lighter than the Aliante Carbon, yet like all other Fizik saddles it's built to give you all-day-long comfort."
Am I missing something here?
#2
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,592
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 1,286 Times
in
710 Posts
fwiw I've noticed that various vendors (Excel Sports, Colorado Cyclist, Fairwheel Bikes, etc) can't seem to agree on the weights of any fizik saddles...they're often ±20g for the same model!
For all I know fizik can't even agree on what their saddles weigh! Or maybe their manufacturing tolerances are pathetic.
So perhaps the guy @ Competitive Cyclist responsible for the body text is a different guy than the one who gathers the product specifications...and they both just happened to be right?
Doesn't explain why no one's proofing their website before they publish it...
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 224
Bikes: Time
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fizik's website - https://www.fizik.it/catalog.aspx?subid=Arione_K1 149grams and tha'ts what the saddle weighs.
There are some other posts of people who did end up buying them. They seemed to have good things to say.
There are some other posts of people who did end up buying them. They seemed to have good things to say.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 415
Bikes: Specialized, Moots, Bridgestone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh crap, now we can't trust the posted weights on cycling compenents any more. What's next, somebody's going to say that carbon seat stays doesn't make Al ride like butter??
#6
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,592
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 1,286 Times
in
710 Posts
If you were only paying for weight I'd agree. In fact, until you get into the sub-100g asshatchets, if weight is your only criteria there's no point in riding anything other than a Selle Italia SLR. It's the lightest off-the-shelf saddle that still costs less than a Times Square Reacharound. (135g, ~$120.)
Except weight isn't the only criteria for a saddle. There's also that annoying issue of Comfort. And what wouldn't you pay for a comfortable saddle? Well, from the sound of it, whitemax wouldn't pay $399...but what if no other saddle was comfortable?
I've never ridden on a K:1 so I can't comment on its comfort. I have ridden on an SLR and I will state that cheap & light are WORTHLESS without comfort...which it doesn't really offer much of. So I'd definitely & happily pay more than $120 for a comfortable saddle.
Except weight isn't the only criteria for a saddle. There's also that annoying issue of Comfort. And what wouldn't you pay for a comfortable saddle? Well, from the sound of it, whitemax wouldn't pay $399...but what if no other saddle was comfortable?
I've never ridden on a K:1 so I can't comment on its comfort. I have ridden on an SLR and I will state that cheap & light are WORTHLESS without comfort...which it doesn't really offer much of. So I'd definitely & happily pay more than $120 for a comfortable saddle.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
If you were only paying for weight I'd agree. In fact, until you get into the sub-100g asshatchets, if weight is your only criteria there's no point in riding anything other than a Selle Italia SLR. It's the lightest off-the-shelf saddle that still costs less than a Times Square Reacharound. (135g, ~$120.)
Except weight isn't the only criteria for a saddle. There's also that annoying issue of Comfort. And what wouldn't you pay for a comfortable saddle? Well, from the sound of it, whitemax wouldn't pay $399...but what if no other saddle was comfortable?
I've never ridden on a K:1 so I can't comment on its comfort. I have ridden on an SLR and I will state that cheap & light are WORTHLESS without comfort...which it doesn't really offer much of. So I'd definitely & happily pay more than $120 for a comfortable saddle.
Except weight isn't the only criteria for a saddle. There's also that annoying issue of Comfort. And what wouldn't you pay for a comfortable saddle? Well, from the sound of it, whitemax wouldn't pay $399...but what if no other saddle was comfortable?
I've never ridden on a K:1 so I can't comment on its comfort. I have ridden on an SLR and I will state that cheap & light are WORTHLESS without comfort...which it doesn't really offer much of. So I'd definitely & happily pay more than $120 for a comfortable saddle.