Reaming from 27 to 27.2?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Reaming from 27 to 27.2?
I bought a vintage frame that I thought was Columbus SL. It won't easily take a 27.2 post so I'm thinking it may be the beefier SP. Now, it's only a 55cm frame and I'm barely 160lbs. Knowing that SP is just a slightly thicker walled.version of SL, would.it be terribly unwise to try and hone/ream it larger?
My eyes think maybe it's a bit pinched. Cheap calipers show it a bit over 27 but not 27.2. A 27 seatpost feels sloppy. I figure on a 40 year old I should probably run a flex hone down there anyway just to make sure it's clean.
So, if it were SP and I decided to ream it out .2mm wouldn't that just bring to the safe thickness of SL? Crazy?
My eyes think maybe it's a bit pinched. Cheap calipers show it a bit over 27 but not 27.2. A 27 seatpost feels sloppy. I figure on a 40 year old I should probably run a flex hone down there anyway just to make sure it's clean.
So, if it were SP and I decided to ream it out .2mm wouldn't that just bring to the safe thickness of SL? Crazy?
#2
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
It's most likely SL, with the tube pinched in at the top. I'd use a reamer to clean it up. Not a dingoball hone. And if it is SP, a reamer will easily open it up to 27.2. The metal is pretty soft.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,095
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4210 Post(s)
Liked 3,875 Times
in
2,315 Posts
The concern is where is the seat tube/lug deformed (presumably where will the reamer take material off at) and how thick a wall is there at that spot. What I might do is to run an adjustable reamer in the seat tube expanding it till it just begins to nick off some tube. See where this first contact is WRT the tube's walls below the lug and make a judgement of post fit size against wall thickness.
I suggest chamfering the binder slot's interior edges to reduce their catching on a reamer blade. Flex honing won't remove much material compared to a reamer. An interesting data point can be found sometimes with this adjustable reamer set to just touch method as one can slide the reamer deeper into the seat tube and past the seat binder/lug area. Then one really begins to see what their seat tube might be ID wise before the brazing.
I agree with Nessism in the tube likely being SL. Andy
I suggest chamfering the binder slot's interior edges to reduce their catching on a reamer blade. Flex honing won't remove much material compared to a reamer. An interesting data point can be found sometimes with this adjustable reamer set to just touch method as one can slide the reamer deeper into the seat tube and past the seat binder/lug area. Then one really begins to see what their seat tube might be ID wise before the brazing.
I agree with Nessism in the tube likely being SL. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#5
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,699 Times
in
2,519 Posts
You can get a telescoping gauge and check the dimension at various radial directions. It could well be pinched. I would try to fix that first. Can't fix it without measuring.
I suggest finding a Starrett 579C used somewhere. I bought a cheap set on amazon and regret it.
I suggest finding a Starrett 579C used somewhere. I bought a cheap set on amazon and regret it.
Likes For unterhausen:
#6
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,994
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,076 Posts
I strongly suggest trying to remove as little metal as possible. On a frame where the ears have been bent in from mounting a too-small post, you need to gently bend the ears outward befor reaming. I like to bend them just enough that the reamer isn't touching there, or touches barely. After doing that, you may find that the reamer has very little metal to remove elsewhere.
Another advantage of bending the ears out is it can prevent the known issue of the reamer blade catching in the slit. That problem can also be avoided by using a spiral aka helical reamer, but those are more expensive and hard to find in an adjustable reamer. Most bike shops and home-mechanics, if they have a reamer, it'll be a straight-blade style, that tends to hang up in the slit unless you deal with it one way or another.
Another advantage of bending the ears out is it can prevent the known issue of the reamer blade catching in the slit. That problem can also be avoided by using a spiral aka helical reamer, but those are more expensive and hard to find in an adjustable reamer. Most bike shops and home-mechanics, if they have a reamer, it'll be a straight-blade style, that tends to hang up in the slit unless you deal with it one way or another.
Likes For bulgie:
#7
semi-retired framebuilder
I’ve had pretty good luck spreading the ears of a seat lug that’s been compressed by folks using a too-small seatpost; by using a 1 1/8” ie 25.4 diameter quill stem, strategically locating it where the metal needs to be bent out, tighten stem, relocate slightly, repeat repeat. Works well if you’re careful.
Mark Beaver
Halifax, NS, Canada
Mark Beaver
Halifax, NS, Canada
Likes For Mark Beaver:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
I purchased a 51 year old Colnago in a 49 cm size and it had a 27.0 post, I really doubted it was SP. measured below the joinery and corrected it with a reamer. I did have to open up the lug ears a wee bit.
in 1975 I ordered a track bike with PS tubing, bought all the parts I would require including a 27.0 seatpost… “we reamed it out to 27.2 for you” Grumble.
in 1975 I ordered a track bike with PS tubing, bought all the parts I would require including a 27.0 seatpost… “we reamed it out to 27.2 for you” Grumble.
#10
Senior Member
Rather than ream out the frame, I would machine the 27.2 seat post down until it fits properly. Seat posts are more easily replaceable than frames.
Likes For 50PlusCycling:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,098
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1400 Post(s)
Liked 1,885 Times
in
1,084 Posts
the seat tube on this frame was reamed from 26.6 to 26.8 (to accommodate greater selection of seat posts)
frame builder did this - been a while but I believe he did first check / determine there would be little / no chance of increased failure due to the change … the bike had a number of years use after this (no issues)
this frame 26.6 seat tube id - the next year the similar frame seat tube id was 26.8
have a road bike with Columbus SL / SP (seat) tube mix - can’t recall seat tube id - and if was reamed to 27.2 if it was 27.0 … (curious - will need to check)
Last edited by t2p; 01-01-24 at 10:03 AM.
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
Either way, I was able to open the ears a bit and run a quick cylinder hone to clean up some gunk. 27.2 fits perfectly now.
Likes For The_Joe: