Would you kindly sign my petition? [Campagnolo 12 speed cassettes]
#26
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
50/12 is going to be a pretty low top end for a time trial bike. That’s 30 mph at 90 rpm. And if you’re preferred cadence is closer to 80 rpm it’s even slower While most of us aren’t time trailing at 30 mph plus, there are definitely occasions where the course has down wind and down grade sections where an 11 tooth got is useful.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
Likes For colnago62:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
that’s why Rohan Dennis uses a 56/11. Any lack of efficiency doesn’t seem to be holding him back.
50/12 is going to be a pretty low top end for a time trial bike. That’s 30 mph at 90 rpm. And if you’re preferred cadence is closer to 80 rpm it’s even slower While most of us aren’t time trailing at 30 mph plus, there are definitely occasions where the course has down wind and down grade sections where an 11 tooth got is useful.
50/12 is going to be a pretty low top end for a time trial bike. That’s 30 mph at 90 rpm. And if you’re preferred cadence is closer to 80 rpm it’s even slower While most of us aren’t time trailing at 30 mph plus, there are definitely occasions where the course has down wind and down grade sections where an 11 tooth got is useful.
#29
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
I do wonder why everyone seems so invested in the gearing other people run. Who cares if other people like taller or shorter gears than you, or are fussier about gaps? Who cares if you or I or anyone else uses the same gearing as the pros?
I just like options, and the narrowing of options as speeds increase mean that if those fewer options aren't appealing, upgrading to it isn't appealing either.
I just like options, and the narrowing of options as speeds increase mean that if those fewer options aren't appealing, upgrading to it isn't appealing either.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
that’s why Rohan Dennis uses a 56/11. Any lack of efficiency doesn’t seem to be holding him back.
50/12 is going to be a pretty low top end for a time trial bike. That’s 30 mph at 90 rpm. And if you’re preferred cadence is closer to 80 rpm it’s even slower While most of us aren’t time trailing at 30 mph plus, there are definitely occasions where the course has down wind and down grade sections where an 11 tooth got is useful.
50/12 is going to be a pretty low top end for a time trial bike. That’s 30 mph at 90 rpm. And if you’re preferred cadence is closer to 80 rpm it’s even slower While most of us aren’t time trailing at 30 mph plus, there are definitely occasions where the course has down wind and down grade sections where an 11 tooth got is useful.
50x12 is great for a road bike because I'm usually coasting once up over 35mph anyway.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,297 Times
in
2,947 Posts
Yep, so many cyclists think the setup they prefer is the only one that makes sense, and everything else is stupid.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Surely everyone can agree that as speeds increase, you want a smaller percentage jump, to deal with exponential aero drag. Hence 3t, 2t, 2t, 1t, 1t, 1t jumps, right?
Yet I'm still waiting for someone to look at the numbers on my 38/50/52 idea, and go, hey yeah, that would make sense for electronic shifting. As far as I can see, it's the last of the significant efficiency gains to be had.
Yet I'm still waiting for someone to look at the numbers on my 38/50/52 idea, and go, hey yeah, that would make sense for electronic shifting. As far as I can see, it's the last of the significant efficiency gains to be had.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
But all this close ratio stuff is dependent on if you really need it?
Personally I have found that with appropriate training and if you get over any psychological barriers that you think you need "x" cadence the body is very adaptable.
It can operate over a reasonably wide cadence range with very minimal performance variation.
Personally I have found that with appropriate training and if you get over any psychological barriers that you think you need "x" cadence the body is very adaptable.
It can operate over a reasonably wide cadence range with very minimal performance variation.
#34
Hear myself getting fat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Inland Northwest
Posts: 754
Bikes: Sir Velo A Sparrow
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Liked 265 Times
in
134 Posts
Seems like a lack of options in Campy stuff is more than made up for in the fact that you’re no commoner on ugly gear from some oriental fishing product manufacturer.
Get a quill stem and use the same bar tape for a decade.
Smugness overload! You’ll be so amazing the need for additional gearing choices will melt away like the Italian Army in WWII.
Get a quill stem and use the same bar tape for a decade.
Smugness overload! You’ll be so amazing the need for additional gearing choices will melt away like the Italian Army in WWII.
#35
Senior Member
Id much rather sign a petition to get a 105 level 11s 12-28. Why must Shimano limit that particular option to DA. Boggles my mind.
Likes For Racing Dan:
Likes For noodle soup:
#37
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,635
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Unfortunate, but can you do something by mixing an 11-32 with a 12-25 (would still be a good amount less than a single DA cassette I think)? Not sure how the cogs are grouped on shimano cassettes, but in theory you could get a 12-13-14-15-16-17-18-20-22-25-28 I think
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
It's dependent on whether you want it.
I don't need more than 52-42 x 14-16-18-21-24-28 six cogs. My power files show the same output and heart rate grinding up mountains at 55 RPM or spinning along flat ground at 95.
I want one tooth jumps through my 19 cog because that feels good, no one is paying me to put up with less, nice bikes are a significant expense costing more than cheap used cars, and I should derive maximum enjoyment from that
I'd spend $1000 more for 10 speed with 17-18-19 cogs over 12 speed without because the gearing makes daily flat rides before work more enjoyable than an extra pair of cogs.
If settling for what I needed was good enough I'd have never upgraded beyond my 1986 Univega.
I don't like it when manufacturers' current model year lineups don't include anything I'd prefer over spares from my shed or used parts bought off ebay.
I don't need more than 52-42 x 14-16-18-21-24-28 six cogs. My power files show the same output and heart rate grinding up mountains at 55 RPM or spinning along flat ground at 95.
I want one tooth jumps through my 19 cog because that feels good, no one is paying me to put up with less, nice bikes are a significant expense costing more than cheap used cars, and I should derive maximum enjoyment from that
I'd spend $1000 more for 10 speed with 17-18-19 cogs over 12 speed without because the gearing makes daily flat rides before work more enjoyable than an extra pair of cogs.
If settling for what I needed was good enough I'd have never upgraded beyond my 1986 Univega.
I don't like it when manufacturers' current model year lineups don't include anything I'd prefer over spares from my shed or used parts bought off ebay.
Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 02-01-20 at 03:00 PM.
Likes For Drew Eckhardt:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
It's dependent on whether you want it.
I don't need more than 52-42 x 14-16-18-21-24-28 six cogs. My power files show the same output and heart rate grinding up mountains at 55 RPM or spinning along flat ground at 95.
I want one tooth jumps through my 19 cog because that feels good, no one is paying me to put up with less, nice bikes are a significant expense costing more than cheap used cars, and I should derive maximum enjoyment from that
I'd spend $1000 more for 10 speed with 17-18-19 cogs over 12 speed without because the gearing makes daily flat rides before work more enjoyable than an extra pair of cogs.
If settling for what I needed was good enough I'd have never upgraded beyond my 1986 Univega.
I don't like it when manufacturers' current model year lineups don't include anything I'd prefer over spares from my shed or used parts bought off ebay.
I don't need more than 52-42 x 14-16-18-21-24-28 six cogs. My power files show the same output and heart rate grinding up mountains at 55 RPM or spinning along flat ground at 95.
I want one tooth jumps through my 19 cog because that feels good, no one is paying me to put up with less, nice bikes are a significant expense costing more than cheap used cars, and I should derive maximum enjoyment from that
I'd spend $1000 more for 10 speed with 17-18-19 cogs over 12 speed without because the gearing makes daily flat rides before work more enjoyable than an extra pair of cogs.
If settling for what I needed was good enough I'd have never upgraded beyond my 1986 Univega.
I don't like it when manufacturers' current model year lineups don't include anything I'd prefer over spares from my shed or used parts bought off ebay.
#40
Jedi Master
That reminds me. Miche makes 11 speed campagnolo cassettes. I have a Miche Jr. cassette that I like with a compact crank if it's flat. Wonder if they'll start making 12 speed campy cassettes too or if campagnolo has some kind of patent.