Fooled by tire diameter
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Low Country, SC, USA
Posts: 99
Bikes: Trek Madone 2.5, single speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
13 Posts
Fooled by tire diameter
I had the bright idea of changing my worn 700c 25mm Conti Grand Prix 4000 tires to new 32mm Conti Grand Prix 5000 tires on my road bike. I checked width clearances at the chain stays and the fork, etc., and it looked like with a little adjustment of chain stay clearance, it would work.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
#2
Senior Member
I had the bright idea of changing my worn 700c 25mm Conti Grand Prix 4000 tires to new 32mm Conti Grand Prix 5000 tires on my road bike. I checked width clearances at the chain stays and the fork, etc., and it looked like with a little adjustment of chain stay clearance, it would work.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
Likes For Mulberry20:
#3
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3091 Post(s)
Liked 6,599 Times
in
3,785 Posts
Outside diameter?
__________________
#4
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
I had the bright idea of changing my worn 700c 25mm Conti Grand Prix 4000 tires to new 32mm Conti Grand Prix 5000 tires on my road bike. I checked width clearances at the chain stays and the fork, etc., and it looked like with a little adjustment of chain stay clearance, it would work.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
This is why some cyclocross riders go to a 650b wheels when running very "wide" tires.
#5
Senior Member
Bike tires are essentially a circle when mounted and inflated so if they are wider they must also be taller. Has nothing to do with Continental.
Likes For Mulberry20:
#6
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
I had the bright idea of changing my worn 700c 25mm Conti Grand Prix 4000 tires to new 32mm Conti Grand Prix 5000 tires on my road bike. I checked width clearances at the chain stays and the fork, etc., and it looked like with a little adjustment of chain stay clearance, it would work.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
Other things are not exactly equal as the ETRTO (European tire standards association) recently updated its specs for the rim size that tire makers should use to specify tire widths, and shifted to wider rims to reflect riders shifting to wider rims.
This happened between the introduction of 4000s and 5000s and should actually mean the 5000 series 32s should run slightly narrower than older Conti 32s (on the same rim). Still it sounds like more than what your frame can handle.
Also, I’m curious, what do you mean by adjustment of chain stay clearance? That’s pretty much fixed for a given frame and tire diameter.
Otto
Last edited by ofajen; 09-22-20 at 07:04 PM.
#7
seńor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,626
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 6,485 Times
in
3,209 Posts
"You've fooled me this time, 32mm tires! But next time, I shall have the last laugh! Hahahahaha!"
Likes For SurferRosa:
Likes For ofajen:
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Low Country, SC, USA
Posts: 99
Bikes: Trek Madone 2.5, single speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
13 Posts
Yes, outside diameter. Guess this is part of my education. In the auto world, wider does not necessarily mean a larger outer diameter. Not so in bikes, I now know.
Likes For zeeway:
#10
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
Likes For GlennR:
Likes For zeeway:
#12
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
Also a bicycle tire does not have the same profile as a car. If you compared it to a motorcycle tire you would of been better off.
Likes For GlennR:
#13
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Unloaded bike tire profile tends to be roughly circular, so you can estimate resultant outer diameter by taking bead seat diameter (BSD) plus two times tire width.
In this case, BSD for 700C is actually 622mm, so outer diameter is roughly = 622 + 2 * 32 = 686 mm, or a radius of 343mm.
Otto
Last edited by ofajen; 09-23-20 at 08:27 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,276
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4258 Post(s)
Liked 1,359 Times
in
943 Posts
Narrower bicycle rims make the diameter larger.
#15
Senior Member
What everyone else. said. It's generally a Bad Idea to change tire sizes (widths) by a lot, at least on a road bike. There, a 23mm might fit fine but a 25mm won't. Mountain bikes tend to be a little more forgiving...
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
I had the bright idea of changing my worn 700c 25mm Conti Grand Prix 4000 tires to new 32mm Conti Grand Prix 5000 tires on my road bike. I checked width clearances at the chain stays and the fork, etc., and it looked like with a little adjustment of chain stay clearance, it would work.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
But the idea failed because the new tires were significantly bigger in diameter, even though both were Conti and both were 700c tires. Big disappointment...not to mention surprise that diameters on 700c tires from same manufacturer were different. Oh well.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Just like you can look up the diameter/circumference of a 195/60-15 and a 225/60-15 and find out they are different, so too can you look up the diameter/circumference of a 25-622 and a 32-622 and find out they are different.
(To a first approximation, a 32-622 is a 32/100-622, metric/aspect-metric instead of the auto metric/aspect-U.S.)
-mr. bill
(To a first approximation, a 32-622 is a 32/100-622, metric/aspect-metric instead of the auto metric/aspect-U.S.)
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 09-26-20 at 01:49 PM.
#20
Senior Member
I'm interested to see the answer to this question too!
I don't know what they are called but some bikes have inserts placed in the dropouts that prevent the axle from seating completely into the dropout. Removing this insert would allow a bit more rearward movement (with horizontal dropouts) of the wheel and potentially allowing additional clearance at the front end of the chainstays.
I don't know what they are called but some bikes have inserts placed in the dropouts that prevent the axle from seating completely into the dropout. Removing this insert would allow a bit more rearward movement (with horizontal dropouts) of the wheel and potentially allowing additional clearance at the front end of the chainstays.
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Low Country, SC, USA
Posts: 99
Bikes: Trek Madone 2.5, single speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
13 Posts
You ‘adjust’ chain stay clearance by ‘dimpling’ the chain stay. Works well on steel frames...but risky on aluminum...and not possible on carbon frames.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
Likes For branko_76:
Likes For FiftySix:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,380
Bikes: 1982 Bianchi Sport SX, Rayleigh Tamland 1, Rans V-Rex recumbent, Fuji MTB, 80's Cannondale MTB with BBSHD ebike motor
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 668 Post(s)
Liked 529 Times
in
355 Posts
Here is a good reference for the circumference (hence diameter) of bike tires by size.
https://www.cateye.com/data/resource...ENG_151106.pdf
A 700x25c tire has a diameter of 2105/3.14 mm while a 700x32c is 2155/3.14 mm
#25
Senior Member
That is why car tires are specified by profile as well as width. 245x60 tires do have a larger diameter than 225x60 series tires. To keep the same height you need a lower profile.
Here is a good reference for the circumference (hence diameter) of bike tires by size.
https://www.cateye.com/data/resource...ENG_151106.pdf
A 700x25c tire has a diameter of 2105/3.14 mm while a 700x32c is 2155/3.14 mm
Here is a good reference for the circumference (hence diameter) of bike tires by size.
https://www.cateye.com/data/resource...ENG_151106.pdf
A 700x25c tire has a diameter of 2105/3.14 mm while a 700x32c is 2155/3.14 mm