Brooks vintage saddle vs new
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Costa Mesa, CA.... next up Argentina 2011, and finally Portland 2012
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Brooks vintage saddle vs new
I've been reading comments here and there about new Brooks saddles being of lesser quality than the older ones. Thinner material, shorter life, not necessarily sub-par construction, but perhaps. I've found this critique of modern craftsmanship to hold true with other classics, like my Blundies (Blundstone boots), so I'm ready to believe the theory. But what do you all think? And, if that's the case, can you get a vintage Brooks saddle and expect any more life than a "thin" new one? And what about the re-shaping that occurs while the leather conforms to the original owners shape, is that a problem for the buyer? Actually, my Blundies are known to do the same, and I don't think I'd buy them used, for that reason.
And what's with all the honey colored saddles at Brooks. Why can't you get a standard B-17 in good ole fashioned brown.
cheers,
-Michael
And what's with all the honey colored saddles at Brooks. Why can't you get a standard B-17 in good ole fashioned brown.
cheers,
-Michael
#2
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
Well, I am probably responsible for some of the comments that say the new Brooks are inferior to the old ones, and I stand by that assessment. But to be fair I have to point out one thing: I'm comparing a 2007 B17, and a 2008 Flyer (both of which were thin and flimsy and have stretched far too much) to a 1980 Pro, a late 70's Pro, and early 70's Pro (all of which have held up very well). Very possibly these are apples-to-oranges comparisons and should be ignored entirely.
I would like to try a NOS B17, like one from the 60's to early 80's, just for the sake of comparison.
I would like to try a NOS B17, like one from the 60's to early 80's, just for the sake of comparison.
#3
Senior Member
Having owned 5 or 6 Brooks saddles of different models and different ages, I think it's impossible to say.
I have a Brooks Pro from the early 80's that is great. I had a Brooks from the mid-80's that was crap. I had a Brooks Swift from ?? that was well built but I never liked it. I have a Brooks B17 I bought in 2008 that is going strong after 3,500 of year-round riding, with lots of miles in the (gasp!) rain.
Also, my experience is that Brooks saddle don't deform *that* much to the rider's weight.
All things being equal I'd buy a used Brooks on eBay if I could find one in great condition and save some $$.
I have a Brooks Pro from the early 80's that is great. I had a Brooks from the mid-80's that was crap. I had a Brooks Swift from ?? that was well built but I never liked it. I have a Brooks B17 I bought in 2008 that is going strong after 3,500 of year-round riding, with lots of miles in the (gasp!) rain.
Also, my experience is that Brooks saddle don't deform *that* much to the rider's weight.
All things being equal I'd buy a used Brooks on eBay if I could find one in great condition and save some $$.
#4
Freewheel Medic
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: An Island on the Coast of GA!
Posts: 12,885
Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales & a Super Pro Aero Lotus (* Ed.)
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1453 Post(s)
Liked 2,196 Times
in
963 Posts
IMO, the couple of new Professionals and couple of new B-17 I have and ride (all 2-3 years old at most), are of the same quality as the used and NOS Brooks I've acquired from the '60s & '70s. I have seen a couple of late '80s early '90s Brooks that did not appear to be as durable. One was marked "Pre Softened."
__________________
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!
Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!
Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com
#5
Wood
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 2,293
Bikes: Raleigh Sports: hers. Vianelli Professional & Bridgestone 300: mine
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
It's because of the cows. The parents are coddling the youth, making the calfs 'thin skinned' now-days.
I know, it is a broad generalization.
I know, it is a broad generalization.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've been poring over the Brooks saddles on eBay--I can't speak to the quality but the prices stagger me. I ride enough in the city that I don't want a shiny new $125 saddle on my bike so that I worry every time I go into the grocery store. I also just prefer the patina and look of an old saddle--a better fit for most of my bikes.
There are a couple of nice vintage saddles on eBay right now, including a Wrights that looks like a B17--doesn't look very worn but nice patina.
There are a couple of nice vintage saddles on eBay right now, including a Wrights that looks like a B17--doesn't look very worn but nice patina.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
Maybe it's more of "different cows/different leather quality" kicking in here. as I have heard of problem saddles from Brooks back in the 80's as well (My firend had one with a stretching problem). As leather is an organic material and cannot be entirely controlled quality-wise as much as machine/chemical made synthetic materials can be, a few leather saddle covers with questionable (but not evident to the eye) internal characteristics can slip through the Brooks production lines once in a while.
Maybe it's just like choosing and buying a baseball mitts, no two are exactly alike, some feel better than others, despite being of the same mode,l so you got through a bunch of them at the sporting goods store before you find the one that feels right.
Chombi
Maybe it's just like choosing and buying a baseball mitts, no two are exactly alike, some feel better than others, despite being of the same mode,l so you got through a bunch of them at the sporting goods store before you find the one that feels right.
Chombi
#9
car dodger
Clearly climate change is causing the decline in quality, directly linked to the evil Bush environmental policy initiatives! Actually I can't break in any of my brooks saddles (3) no matter how much I ride. Though my brooks swallow shows the most signs of breaking in, even though it hasn't seen as many miles as my still rock-hard swift. Thinner leather I guess.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#11
I drank the Kool-Aid!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 562
Bikes: Rivendell Roadini, Rivendell Charlie Gallop Protovelo, Rivendell Clem L
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
The leather is not as thick as it used to be but the quality is still good. Personally I prefer the less thick leather. Sure it "could" end it's life sooner but it breaks in a little faster. I am not a fan of old used Brooks saddles as I prefer to break them in myself.
#12
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
Someone just posted a Brooks podcast this week. They said there were problems with the leather due to mad cow disease. They were slaughtering cows at a young age and apparently the hide is not as thick.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#14
You gonna eat that?
The one that's up on Ebay right now looks pretty good; it will probably go for about $50 including shipping.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.
Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.
Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Last edited by Doohickie; 08-12-10 at 10:13 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
On the topic of brooks-style saddles. Will a used broken in saddle purchased 2nd hand work for another person? Or will the broken in leather be all screwy with another persons rear end?
#16
Senior Member
It will work fine from my experience. However, I agree with BengeBoy that I don't notice deformation in my 37 yr. old Pro that I have had since the bike was new. I threw another old one on my bike and haven't noticed any difference when I was riding it.
#17
You gonna eat that?
Yep. I have the one pictured above and the one on my 1966 DL-1 which has the original seat (got the bike two years ago) and they both fit fine.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
IMO, the couple of new Professionals and couple of new B-17 I have and ride (all 2-3 years old at most), are of the same quality as the used and NOS Brooks I've acquired from the '60s & '70s. I have seen a couple of late '80s early '90s Brooks that did not appear to be as durable. One was marked "Pre Softened."
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 221
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
8 Posts
BIM (off-topic)
I have a BIM as well (see pics).
What I found out is that BIM was a brandname of the french Tron & Berthet (TB) saddlecompany, apparently from the last years of its existence. The same company which built the IDEALE saddles.
This is obvious when you look at the pictures. The company logo of BIM is nearly identical to IDEALE (by the way: your BIM seems to be the same like mine and that's an IDEALE 39 clone).
I got mine for free from a dealer.
brooks vintage saddle vs new:
can't compare, I only got old ones
What I found out is that BIM was a brandname of the french Tron & Berthet (TB) saddlecompany, apparently from the last years of its existence. The same company which built the IDEALE saddles.
This is obvious when you look at the pictures. The company logo of BIM is nearly identical to IDEALE (by the way: your BIM seems to be the same like mine and that's an IDEALE 39 clone).
... ... I paid $20 for it on eBay...
brooks vintage saddle vs new:
can't compare, I only got old ones
Last edited by qd-s; 08-13-10 at 05:24 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Purchased a very used Brooks B-17 on ebay. When it arrived it was dry, hard, and tearing somewhat from the rivets. A application of mink oil on top and bottom of the saddle did little to improve it. Put it on my bike and road it last summer and the more i rode the better it felt, and the better it looked. Now after two summers the saddle is super comfortable and the leather is supple and shiney. The leather hasnt broken away from the rivets any more either. The old ones last for ever.
Also won a Wrights on e-bay. Another very dry, cracking saddle. Its pretty far gone, but its still functional. The more I ride it, the better its getting.
Also won a Wrights on e-bay. Another very dry, cracking saddle. Its pretty far gone, but its still functional. The more I ride it, the better its getting.
#21
Senior Member
buying vintage Brooks saddles on eBay has its pitfalls too. i got one B-17 that was dry but had no visible tears. I applied proofide to it every night or so for two weeks and then started riding it. five days later this happened while riding:
__________________
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
#22
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
Um.... I think you applied to much proofide. I think once a year is the most that is recommended.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#23
Disraeli Gears
I've bought several vintage Brooks saddles from the 70s (B17N, Pro, Competition), and I can tell you that they're like rocks compared to a new Brooks. I think that this is mainly because they have been disused for years, yea decades; and I may end up like poor Catnap too. But they are beautiful. I don't really think there's that much difference in leather thickness, maybe a little. I don't have a new Pro to compare to the venerable one.
I seriously doubt that Catnap's failure had anything to do with how much Proofide was applied. I've looked at a lot of leather maintenance/restoration stuff on the internet (including bike- and saddle-focused), and I've found very little that I think isn't hoodoo: faith-based rather than science-based. Old unused leather probably dries out and changes internally, in a way that's not good for picking it up and riding it again. I plan on treating my hard saddles with a good leather conditioner, before I start riding them -- but that's just what I believe at the current time.
And, if a vintage Brooks isn't stiff enough for you, then get a vintage Idéale!
I seriously doubt that Catnap's failure had anything to do with how much Proofide was applied. I've looked at a lot of leather maintenance/restoration stuff on the internet (including bike- and saddle-focused), and I've found very little that I think isn't hoodoo: faith-based rather than science-based. Old unused leather probably dries out and changes internally, in a way that's not good for picking it up and riding it again. I plan on treating my hard saddles with a good leather conditioner, before I start riding them -- but that's just what I believe at the current time.
And, if a vintage Brooks isn't stiff enough for you, then get a vintage Idéale!
Last edited by Charles Wahl; 08-13-10 at 06:08 PM.
#24
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
I've bought several vintage Brooks saddles from the 70s (B17N, Pro, Competition), and I can tell you that they're like rocks compared to a new Brooks. I think that this is mainly because they have been disused for years, yea decades; and I may end up like poor Catnap too. But they are beautiful. I don't really think there's that much difference in leather thickness, maybe a little. I don't have a new Pro to compare to the venerable one.
And if a vintage Brooks isn't stiff enough for you, then get a vintage Idéale!
And if a vintage Brooks isn't stiff enough for you, then get a vintage Idéale!
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)