Same Gear Ratio - Bigger/Bigger or Smaller/ Smaller (chainring/cog)
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Same Gear Ratio - Bigger/Bigger or Smaller/ Smaller (chainring/cog)
44/16 (ratio of 2.75)
47/17 (ratio of 2.76)
50/18 (ratio of 2.78)
52/19 (ratio of 2.74)
So all are almost the exact same ratio. If one wants to maintain the same gear ratio (skid patches don't matter as the bike would be freewheeling, not fixed), what are the pro's and con's of going Bigger/Bigger vs Smaller/Smaller for street riding?
47/17 (ratio of 2.76)
50/18 (ratio of 2.78)
52/19 (ratio of 2.74)
So all are almost the exact same ratio. If one wants to maintain the same gear ratio (skid patches don't matter as the bike would be freewheeling, not fixed), what are the pro's and con's of going Bigger/Bigger vs Smaller/Smaller for street riding?
Last edited by sc007; 04-01-20 at 10:29 PM.
#2
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Tests have shown larger rings and cogs to be slightly more efficient. They also last longer because they don't wear as fast as smaller ones do. The only drawback, and it's a small one in my opinion, is they are slightly heavier.
#3
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
Other than the slight efficiency and wear advantages @AlmostTrick notes, if you do skid stops, a ring and/or sprocket with a prime number tooth count will give you the maximum possible number of skid patches, so 47/17 or 52/19 would be the preferred combinations of those you are considering.
#4
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
78 Posts
Small: slightly less weight. Slightly less frontal area for wind resistance. Slightly less chance of clonking the chain ring if you ride across badly broken ground. Slightly more wear, slightly less efficient.
Big: slightly heavier, slightly more wind resistance. Less wear, and slightly more efficient.
Most of us in every day riding would not notice the difference, but might make the choice on aesthetic grounds, or just on the basis of what's available.
Big: slightly heavier, slightly more wind resistance. Less wear, and slightly more efficient.
Most of us in every day riding would not notice the difference, but might make the choice on aesthetic grounds, or just on the basis of what's available.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Other than the slight efficiency and wear advantages @AlmostTrick notes, if you do skid stops, a ring and/or sprocket with a prime number tooth count will give you the maximum possible number of skid patches, so 47/17 or 52/19 would be the preferred combinations of those you are considering.
Small: slightly less weight. Slightly less frontal area for wind resistance. Slightly less chance of clonking the chain ring if you ride across badly broken ground. Slightly more wear, slightly less efficient.
Big: slightly heavier, slightly more wind resistance. Less wear, and slightly more efficient.
Most of us in every day riding would not notice the difference, but might make the choice on aesthetic grounds, or just on the basis of what's available.
Big: slightly heavier, slightly more wind resistance. Less wear, and slightly more efficient.
Most of us in every day riding would not notice the difference, but might make the choice on aesthetic grounds, or just on the basis of what's available.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
I run smaller. No real reason until I had my custom made. On it, I can run any cog between 12 and 24 teeth without messing with chain links. A 42 up front gives me the option of true mountain gearing; 42/24 = 47 gear inches and 42-12 gives 95". (At least this was true mountain gearing for my first 2/3s of a century. One century being one hundred years, not miles )
Ben
Ben
#8
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
44/16 (ratio of 2.75)
47/17 (ratio of 2.76)
50/18 (ratio of 2.78)
52/19 (ratio of 2.74)
So all are almost the exact same ratio. If one wants to maintain the same gear ratio (skid patches don't matter as the bike would be freewheeling, not fixed), what are the pro's and con's of going Bigger/Bigger vs Smaller/Smaller for street riding?
47/17 (ratio of 2.76)
50/18 (ratio of 2.78)
52/19 (ratio of 2.74)
So all are almost the exact same ratio. If one wants to maintain the same gear ratio (skid patches don't matter as the bike would be freewheeling, not fixed), what are the pro's and con's of going Bigger/Bigger vs Smaller/Smaller for street riding?
Last edited by ThermionicScott; 04-21-20 at 11:26 PM.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#9
Senior Member
I run 48t/16t on my Aventon Cordoba, and 46T/16t on my State Bicycle. I prefer he 48t because I spin out too easily on the 46t. Even thinking of going to a 50t.
#11
Senior Member
Started out in Florida then moved to a small town on the West Slope of Colorado, and it's mostly flat with some small inclines and hills. In either place I actually get higher top speeds and average speeds with the 48T/16T. State Bicycle by default gives 46T/16T on their 4130 Cromo's but I spin out those eventually.
#12
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 30
Bikes: Pure Cycles SS 48:16. w/ some mods
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I’m with you, VS3! I started out 46:16 and spun out too. Upped the chainring to 48 and find this to be ok for now. Average cadence is 80. Keeps me around 20mph. I would like to try 50T chainring or 14T freewheel gear to up my average speed. I ride in and around Bradenton/Sarasota Florida
#13
Senior Member
I’m with you, VS3! I started out 46:16 and spun out too. Upped the chainring to 48 and find this to be ok for now. Average cadence is 80. Keeps me around 20mph. I would like to try 50T chainring or 14T freewheel gear to up my average speed. I ride in and around Bradenton/Sarasota Florida
#14
It's the little things
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 781
Bikes: Too many, yet not enough
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 279 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
147 Posts
You guys are spinning out at 26+ MPH for more than a few minutes at a time? For how long? I picked up almost 2 MPH by lowering my gearing and actually spinning out. My Max mph is lower, but I am faster by spinning than by mashing. Even onp perfectly flat terrain.
#15
Senior Member
On certain descents yes, plus even on flats it's just too easy and I don't like my cadence that high. The 48T keeps me around 78 to 80.
Last edited by VS3; 04-20-20 at 11:20 AM.
#16
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 30
Bikes: Pure Cycles SS 48:16. w/ some mods
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
For me it’s not about spinning out, it’s about higher average speed My average cadence is much like VS3, 78-83. Im fairly certain that if I up the chainring I’ll increase my average speed , IF I can keep the average cadence above 80. I ride flat with the occasional drawbridge approach. Before the virus lockdown I was riding 20miles round trip to restaurant job 5-6 days a week. Now I’m riding 20mile workouts 3-4 days a week. Basically I would like to up my average speed.
#17
It's the little things
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 781
Bikes: Too many, yet not enough
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 279 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
147 Posts
Do you guys have Strava or tracking data showing that your average speed is higher with such a low cadence? Your top speed might be higher, but at 80-90 rpm, you're at 21 mph. I'm at about 68 gi and at 120 rpm where I would be at 25 MPH. I believe this to be a "feeling" rather than actual speed. I average that 21 without spinning out and also can mange hills and unpaved terrain. I'm a large man, and can mash with the best of them, but if I track a ride on Strava or mapmyride I am never faster at 80 gear inches than I am at 68 gear inches unless it's a short ride with me sprinting the entire time on a flat route. Average would be higher with lower gi and higher cadence than with higher hi and lower cadence.
Last edited by Senrab62; 04-21-20 at 07:41 AM. Reason: Can't spell
#18
Senior Member
Do you guys have Strava or tracking data showing that your average speed is higher with such a low cadence? Your top speed might be higher, but at 80-90 rpm, you're at 21 mph. I'm at about 68 gi and at 120 rpm where I average I would be at 25 MPH. I believe this to be a "feeling" rather than actual speed. I average that 21 without spinning out and also can mange hills and unpaved terrain. I'm a large man, and can mash with the best of them, but if I track a ride I am never faster at 80 gear inches than I am at 68 gear inches unless it's a short ride of about 5 miles with me sprinting the entire time.
Yet to make you feel better, the first image is 46T/16T with my State Bicycle Pardi Boi. The next two are 48T/16T on my Aventon Cordoba Polish:
#19
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
I've done a timed 45 minute event at an average speed of 18.6 mph, (twice) on my 46-18 (68 gear inches) with NO drafting. This meant an average 92 rpm cadence. A higher gear would have been slower for me. YMMV
I understand that everyone's preference differs, but I'm convinced that many, maybe even most SS/FG riders are over geared, and can often be found lugging that gear at relatively low cadence. (and speed) Most riders are not averaging 20+ mph.
I understand that everyone's preference differs, but I'm convinced that many, maybe even most SS/FG riders are over geared, and can often be found lugging that gear at relatively low cadence. (and speed) Most riders are not averaging 20+ mph.
#20
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 30
Bikes: Pure Cycles SS 48:16. w/ some mods
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Senrab62... full disclosure about me and my bike!
I am 65yrs young, 175lbs and 5’10” tall. I ride a Pure Cycles steel single speed with WTB 700-28c ThickSlick tires, front & rear Tektro rim brakes, levers mounted on 420mm bullhorn handlebars. Cranks are 170mm with Wellgo platform pedals driving a 48T chainring to a 16T freewheel gear, chain is 1/8” x 1/2” link.
I am not allowed to post photos just yet because I don't have enough posts on BF. So I will quote my info from my Wahoo as shown on my iPhone ...today I rode 7.86 miles, ave speed 20.8 mph, top speed 25.4mph, moving time is 22:42 min, ave cadence 86rpm max cadence 107rpm, wind was 14mph out of the NW. Half of my ride was into the wind.
Although I’m ok with the 48T chainring, I’m thinking 50T maybe a bit more comfortable. My goal is consistent cadence with best average speed. I use my bike for two purposes, transportation to and from work and quick simple workouts. I rarely ride for pleasure, unless my brother should visit once in a blue moon!
I’ll gladly post photos when I reach the 10 post mark.
H
I am 65yrs young, 175lbs and 5’10” tall. I ride a Pure Cycles steel single speed with WTB 700-28c ThickSlick tires, front & rear Tektro rim brakes, levers mounted on 420mm bullhorn handlebars. Cranks are 170mm with Wellgo platform pedals driving a 48T chainring to a 16T freewheel gear, chain is 1/8” x 1/2” link.
I am not allowed to post photos just yet because I don't have enough posts on BF. So I will quote my info from my Wahoo as shown on my iPhone ...today I rode 7.86 miles, ave speed 20.8 mph, top speed 25.4mph, moving time is 22:42 min, ave cadence 86rpm max cadence 107rpm, wind was 14mph out of the NW. Half of my ride was into the wind.
Although I’m ok with the 48T chainring, I’m thinking 50T maybe a bit more comfortable. My goal is consistent cadence with best average speed. I use my bike for two purposes, transportation to and from work and quick simple workouts. I rarely ride for pleasure, unless my brother should visit once in a blue moon!
I’ll gladly post photos when I reach the 10 post mark.
H
#21
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 30
Bikes: Pure Cycles SS 48:16. w/ some mods
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
BTW... I use BikeCalc.com for estimates only. However, I have found it to be fairly accurate. My 107rpm = 25.4mph. My average cadence of 86 = 20.8mph same as BikeCalc!
#22
Senior Member
Senrab62... full disclosure about me and my bike!
I am 65yrs young, 175lbs and 5’10” tall. I ride a Pure Cycles steel single speed with WTB 700-28c ThickSlick tires, front & rear Tektro rim brakes, levers mounted on 420mm bullhorn handlebars. Cranks are 170mm with Wellgo platform pedals driving a 48T chainring to a 16T freewheel gear, chain is 1/8” x 1/2” link.
I am not allowed to post photos just yet because I don't have enough posts on BF. So I will quote my info from my Wahoo as shown on my iPhone ...today I rode 7.86 miles, ave speed 20.8 mph, top speed 25.4mph, moving time is 22:42 min, ave cadence 86rpm max cadence 107rpm, wind was 14mph out of the NW. Half of my ride was into the wind.
Although I’m ok with the 48T chainring, I’m thinking 50T maybe a bit more comfortable. My goal is consistent cadence with best average speed. I use my bike for two purposes, transportation to and from work and quick simple workouts. I rarely ride for pleasure, unless my brother should visit once in a blue moon!
I’ll gladly post photos when I reach the 10 post mark.
H
I am 65yrs young, 175lbs and 5’10” tall. I ride a Pure Cycles steel single speed with WTB 700-28c ThickSlick tires, front & rear Tektro rim brakes, levers mounted on 420mm bullhorn handlebars. Cranks are 170mm with Wellgo platform pedals driving a 48T chainring to a 16T freewheel gear, chain is 1/8” x 1/2” link.
I am not allowed to post photos just yet because I don't have enough posts on BF. So I will quote my info from my Wahoo as shown on my iPhone ...today I rode 7.86 miles, ave speed 20.8 mph, top speed 25.4mph, moving time is 22:42 min, ave cadence 86rpm max cadence 107rpm, wind was 14mph out of the NW. Half of my ride was into the wind.
Although I’m ok with the 48T chainring, I’m thinking 50T maybe a bit more comfortable. My goal is consistent cadence with best average speed. I use my bike for two purposes, transportation to and from work and quick simple workouts. I rarely ride for pleasure, unless my brother should visit once in a blue moon!
I’ll gladly post photos when I reach the 10 post mark.
H
Here's shots of my Aventon Cordoba when I first got it, and now. Plus my State Bicycle Pardi Boi.
Likes For VS3:
#23
It's the little things
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 781
Bikes: Too many, yet not enough
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 279 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
147 Posts
Yes, I Strava and Samsung Health when I do turn them on. But why does it matter? What are you, the cadence and sprocket police? Each rider has their OWN comfort zone, regardless what some chart says about gearing size, cadence and MPH. I don't like 46T because it's too "easy" for me and gives me a higher cadence. Or a slower cadence and therefore slower speed. My comfort zone is my 48T. It also depends on what I feel like doing when I ride, and if my wife is with me, which means I am definitely going to be riding slower for the most part. You're size and who YOU can mash with is irrelevant to me.
Yet to make you feel better, the first image is 46T/16T with my State Bicycle Pardi Boi. The next two are 48T/16T on my Aventon Cordoba Polish:
Yet to make you feel better, the first image is 46T/16T with my State Bicycle Pardi Boi. The next two are 48T/16T on my Aventon Cordoba Polish:
Thank you. The lower gi is faster on that similar route if I am understanding correctly.
I am not trying to cause an argument here, just wanted to ensure that we are not relying on anecdotal evidence as facts. I understand top speed, but again, I have much more versatility with a moderate go versus a high gi. Add any hills, and moderate is faster every time. I have never seen any evidence of anything else, 3rd party nor personal experience so I just am trying to keep this fact based.
Ultimately, go ride your bike! I was not trying to be negative. 👍🏾💪🏾
#24
Senior Member
Thank you. The lower gi is faster on that similar route if I am understanding correctly.
I am not trying to cause an argument here, just wanted to ensure that we are not relying on anecdotal evidence as facts. I understand top speed, but again, I have much more versatility with a moderate go versus a high gi. Add any hills, and moderate is faster every time. I have never seen any evidence of anything else, 3rd party nor personal experience so I just am trying to keep this fact based.
Ultimately, go ride your bike! I was not trying to be negative. 👍🏾💪🏾
I am not trying to cause an argument here, just wanted to ensure that we are not relying on anecdotal evidence as facts. I understand top speed, but again, I have much more versatility with a moderate go versus a high gi. Add any hills, and moderate is faster every time. I have never seen any evidence of anything else, 3rd party nor personal experience so I just am trying to keep this fact based.
Ultimately, go ride your bike! I was not trying to be negative. 👍🏾💪🏾
Likes For VS3:
#25
It's the little things
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 781
Bikes: Too many, yet not enough
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 279 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
147 Posts
Spinning is not for everyone, and I am still trying to improve every time I ride. I am extra fat and slow so take my advise with a grain of kosher salt 🤣