Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Help: which components for a Raleigh Team Record 1978

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Help: which components for a Raleigh Team Record 1978

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-20, 09:30 AM
  #26  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,280

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Mar
Frank Berto of 'The Dancing Chain' fame and who was Bicycling magazine's technical editor, conducted scientific derailleur testing in the early 1980s. He actually measured the over and under shift of derailleurs and converted them to a score. The racing derailleurs were all tested with a maximum 24T cog, which was well within the claimed range of the NGS, NR and SR tested. Campagnolo did not fair well. The only derailleurs rated lower were models from Galli, Roto, Triplex and Zeus. All the Shimano and SunTour derailleurs scored significantly better than Campagnolo, including those which had been around since the late 1970s.
I vaguely remember that. It doesn't really square with my experience both in the stand and on the road, but I don't want to derail this thread. Let's discuss it some other time. Is there a write up of that experiment in The Dancing Chain? It's a book I should probably add to my shelf anyway.

It was after having to hobble home about 25 miles with most of a broken RD in my jersey pocket that I decided that reliability trumps most other things. Switched to campy after that and didn't go back for a very long time.
Salamandrine is offline  
Old 07-27-20, 01:29 PM
  #27  
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times in 1,874 Posts
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
I vaguely remember that. It doesn't really square with my experience both in the stand and on the road, but I don't want to derail this thread. Let's discuss it some other time. Is there a write up of that experiment in The Dancing Chain? It's a book I should probably add to my shelf anyway.

It was after having to hobble home about 25 miles with most of a broken RD in my jersey pocket that I decided that reliability trumps most other things. Switched to campy after that and didn't go back for a very long time.
It's not in my copy of 'The Dancing Chain' but then, mine is an early edition and it may be be in the revised editions but I can't make a definitive statement. Berto's findings echo my won experiences. As for Campagnolo's reliability, I broke more Campagnolo parts than I ever did with Shimano.
T-Mar is offline  
Old 07-27-20, 03:49 PM
  #28  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
3alarmer : thanks a lot, two great sites indeed!

Concerning the derailleur debate, well I don't feel guilty being confused anymore ;-) I guess the debate will go on forever without a final verdict, but everyone’s experience is very precious for the others, thanks for sharing!
JackJohn is offline  
Old 07-27-20, 08:33 PM
  #29  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,280

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
That debate gave people something to talk about on long rides. No internet then... Good luck and keep us posted on your progress.

T-Mar - I placed an order for Frank Berto's 'The Dancing Chain' book. Presumably the last edition. Maybe there will be some good stuff about his experiments in there.
Salamandrine is offline  
Old 07-28-20, 03:45 AM
  #30  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Frank Berto’s book “Complete guide to upgrading your bike” (1988) also looks like a must read to me, lots of information on bicycles upgrading process and technical analysis for each component, including a summary review for the main brands and its favorites.
JackJohn is offline  
Old 07-28-20, 09:01 AM
  #31  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Ok, after lots of thoughts and brain-smoking consequences, first decisions are made:

- I’ll give a try to derailleurs Nuovo Record, I really like them and have been dreaming of them for a while. If not suited, well... I’ll resell and say to my kids I was once an owner ;-)
- I won’t go full Campy, it’s not an Italian bike and there’s a lot of interesting material out there to discover.
- I will however try to stick to Italian-only components as long as nice and performing material is available, fits my needs and doesn’t explode my budget.

So I arbitrarily (and randomly) started with brakes. Technical discussions seem endless just like for derailleurs ;-) But I short-listed two producers with performing and good looking material: Galli and Modolo (there’s a well done Modolo review here: https://veloaficionado.com/blog/ben-...ake-collection). Within their respective range, I selected two candidates in the middle/high range: Galli Criterium and Modolo Equipe. However, literature and discussions are rather limited, so any thought or suggestion on these two producers or any other you think suitable is welcome!
JackJohn is offline  
Old 07-28-20, 09:49 AM
  #32  
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times in 1,874 Posts
Originally Posted by Wildwood
... Shimano expanded, innovated in all cycling disciplines and improved the industry. Campagnolo stayed small and Italian, focused on road racing and has become almost a non-entity in most retail market segments...

If Campagnolo stayed small and focused on road racing, it wasn't for lack of trying. Tullio was constantly trying to build his company into something very much bigger. He tried entering the entry level market in 1954 with the Sport derailleur and subsequent models that included the Sportsman, Velox, Valentino variants, 980, etc. Trouble was, the public and bicycle manufacturers weren't buying (literally). They tried cracking the touring market with the even less successful Gran Turismo and Rally variants. In the early 1990s, Campagnolo thought they could crack the ATB with a handful of groups. Public acceptance was virtually non-existent. So, while the company had great aspirations, their niche was thrust upon they by the consumer, who refused to warm to attempts to enter the entry level, touring and off-road markets. Looking at these products, it's easy to understand why. Companies like Shimano and SunTour offered better performance and value.
T-Mar is offline  
Old 07-29-20, 09:33 AM
  #33  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
I can post photos, so here is the frame of this project...

JackJohn is offline  
Old 07-30-20, 01:06 PM
  #34  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Hi all,
an update:
  • Transmission: Campy Nuovo Record
  • Crankset and pedals: tbd
  • Brakes and levers: Galli Criterium
  • Stem and Handlebar: tbd
  • Wheels and freewheel: tbd
now let’s go for the crankset. Campy? Gipiemme? Rino? Ofmega? Any feedback from your experience is welcome. Moreover, 3alarmer kindly suggested three options to increase rear derailleur capacity and help make my uphills easier. the first two are difficult to realize for me, the third one (going suntour) I put on hold as I decided to go full Italian. But if the triple crank is unrealistic, is to your knowledge a reduced 2nd chainring model a solution? something like 52-38? or is it just nonsense? Thanks...!
JackJohn is offline  
Old 07-30-20, 09:42 PM
  #35  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,280

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
I vote you leave that Sugino Mighty that's already on there. If you prefer a European crank, Campy or Gipiemme. I never saw a Rino crank, and Ofmega really only showed up as OEM gear on Italian bikes, because Avocet had some kind of licensing deal.

Sugino would be most typical crank if you're going for a period correct bike that isn't full campy. Yes, people mixed and matched Japanese and Italian. If you want a smaller chainring, try to find an old Sugino Mighty Tour. The Mighty Tour is the originator of the modern 110 compact BCD. Other than that, TA would have been most common for a triple or compact double crank. Circa 1978 a Stronglight 105 bis would have been another possibility. Min chainring is 37. Oddball extractor and BCD.
Salamandrine is offline  
Likes For Salamandrine:
Old 07-30-20, 10:12 PM
  #36  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,038

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4511 Post(s)
Liked 6,378 Times in 3,667 Posts
Originally Posted by JackJohn
Hi all,
an update:
  • Transmission: Campy Nuovo Record
  • Crankset and pedals: tbd
  • Brakes and levers: Galli Criterium
  • Stem and Handlebar: tbd
  • Wheels and freewheel: tbd
now let’s go for the crankset. Campy? Gipiemme? Rino? Ofmega? Any feedback from your experience is welcome. Moreover, 3alarmer kindly suggested three options to increase rear derailleur capacity and help make my uphills easier. the first two are difficult to realize for me, the third one (going suntour) I put on hold as I decided to go full Italian. But if the triple crank is unrealistic, is to your knowledge a reduced 2nd chainring model a solution? something like 52-38? or is it just nonsense? Thanks...!
Another vote to leave the "Mighty" Sugino Competition, easily one of if not the best in the business, every bit as strong, tough and beautiful as any.
merziac is offline  
Old 07-30-20, 10:53 PM
  #37  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times in 7,208 Posts
Originally Posted by JackJohn
But if the triple crank is unrealistic, is to your knowledge a reduced 2nd chainring model a solution? something like 52-38? or is it just nonsense? Thanks...!
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
I vote you leave that Sugino Mighty that's already on there.

Sugino would be most typical crank if you're going for a period correct bike that isn't full campy. Yes, people mixed and matched Japanese and Italian. If you want a smaller chainring, try to find an old Sugino Mighty Tour. The Mighty Tour is the originator of the modern 110 compact BCD. Other than that, TA would have been most common for a triple or compact double crank. Circa 1978 a Stronglight 105 bis would have been another possibility. Min chainring is 37. Oddball extractor and BCD.
Originally Posted by merziac
Another vote to leave the "Mighty" Sugino Competition, easily one of if not the best in the business, every bit as strong, tough and beautiful as any.
...as stated, it's pretty hard to find anything in a New Record crank that goes smaller then a 44, although occasionally you can run into a 42 . It's the bolt center diameter that prevents anything smaller. I have a couple of MIghty Tour cranks that I'm saving here for when my legs go. You can go pretty wide range with a double chain ring setup, although you might need to find some derailleurs that will handle the range. Which is not New Record. If you are absolutely stuck on New Record derailleurs (and they work fine), stick with the range they were designed to shift, which is 52/44 (or 42) in the front and 14 -24 (or 26 maybe) in the rear.

Here's what a Stella looks like that I modified for a little more range with a Campy Rally rear. I bought it from the Mountain Bike Museum guys in Fairfax, who got it as a donation from some guy who obviously had set it up new for steep climbs, with one of those Huret/Sachs Ecotour derailleurs that were very popular for a while. I never liked them, because I could never get them to shift dependably....no matter what Frank Berto thought of them.

Somehow or another, if you want a wider range, you need enough cage to pull the chain slack out of it. That's a Nervar crank, also a solid performer, but subject to the same limitations on chain rings as New Record.



3alarmer is online now  
Old 07-30-20, 11:02 PM
  #38  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times in 7,208 Posts
Shimano had some great stuff for wider range gearing from this time period.





...and you can usually find it at accessible prices
3alarmer is online now  
Old 08-01-20, 01:02 AM
  #39  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times in 7,208 Posts
.
...I am currently building up two bikes from frames I've done some paint repairs on. I will be building new wheels for both of them, and using hubs and other components from stuff I have, mostly. It occurred to me today that as part of the process, I always run a gearing chart using this gear calculator.

So take a bike you already have and ride around there, and calculate what you use on it (lowest and highest.) Then do a similar comparison calculation using 52/44 and 14-26, which is what you'll probably end up with using New Record. Plug in your tyre and wheel size. Select the results in gear inches, because they are easy to compare. It might very well turn out that this setup will work out fine for you, and it helps to know that before you spend money on parts and then have to fiddle around afterward fitting the thing to your needs.

Anyway, that's how I approach it.
3alarmer is online now  
Likes For 3alarmer:
Old 08-01-20, 03:06 AM
  #40  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Salamandrine and merziac, many thanks for the good advice and your vote, I take note

3alarmer thanks a lot for the clear analysis and suggestions, much appreciated, I will definitely go through those tests. Btw, the Stella is beautiful!
JackJohn is offline  
Old 08-06-20, 10:50 AM
  #41  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Hi all, a quick update. I thought about all the advices given here and now am not so sure anymore about the all-Italian components. I just bought a Shimano Arabesque groupset and it would be nice and useful on the Raleigh. As I also bought a mid-range mid-80s Atala frame (quality mid-range but aesthetically very nice), I could transfer the Sugino there and keep the Nuovo Record derailleurs and Galli brakes for a new Italian high-level frame I’m still searching.
I also read a few posts about Shimano Arabesque, unsurprisingly there are those on the pro camp and those against... just like the Campy vs Shimano/Suntour above, think maybe I’ll start a « vote » thread for fun :-)
JackJohn is offline  
Old 08-08-20, 09:31 AM
  #42  
steve sumner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 331

Bikes: '68 Masi Special road, Grail bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 70 Times in 58 Posts
since your frame is a 1978 I would opt for all Super Record parts, if you want larger then a 28
rear cog the Rally cage plates bolt right on to the SR mech and look really nice
steve sumner is offline  
Old 08-08-20, 04:31 PM
  #43  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by steve sumner
since your frame is a 1978 I would opt for all Super Record parts, if you want larger then a 28
rear cog the Rally cage plates bolt right on to the SR mech and look really nice
thanks steve sumner, good point, I take note...
JackJohn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.