Zero Length Stem
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,380
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
The one place where a zero length stem would have an issue, is trying to ride with no hands.
One of the self-steering mechanisms on the bicycle, is that when the bike starts falling to one side, the handlebar will also flop to the same side because of the weight of the bar at the end of the stem. This helps arrest the fall. (there are other effects to help self-steering too. Namely gyroscopic precession and tire camber). This effect is especially pronounced at low speed. If the stem is zero length, the weight of the handlebar will not cause the fork to turn, hence less self steering. If the stem is pointing backwards, it's even worse- it's working at cross purpose now.
If you are running a zero length stem, you could attach a lead weight to a stick that attaches to the bars or stem. A front reflector holder for example. This will help replace this self steering effect lost by going to zero length stem.
One of the self-steering mechanisms on the bicycle, is that when the bike starts falling to one side, the handlebar will also flop to the same side because of the weight of the bar at the end of the stem. This helps arrest the fall. (there are other effects to help self-steering too. Namely gyroscopic precession and tire camber). This effect is especially pronounced at low speed. If the stem is zero length, the weight of the handlebar will not cause the fork to turn, hence less self steering. If the stem is pointing backwards, it's even worse- it's working at cross purpose now.
If you are running a zero length stem, you could attach a lead weight to a stick that attaches to the bars or stem. A front reflector holder for example. This will help replace this self steering effect lost by going to zero length stem.
Likes For Trakhak:
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,380
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
One more.
#78
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Here’s a data point for you:
I have two similar bikes: a Cannondale F-1000 and a Klein Pinnacle, both aluminum frame, 26” wheel MTBs with ~700mm wide bars.
The Cannondale has a 140mm stem and is nearly impossible to ride no-hands; only if you’re going fast, straight, and you hold really still.
The Klein, OTOH, will go for blocks; you can pedal, get a drink, take pictures, go around curves; I’ve never had a bike that stable.
It has a 50mm BMX stem.
It’s not the stem length.
#79
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,538
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4359 Post(s)
Liked 4,000 Times
in
2,669 Posts
This thread is about stems and not about drivetrains. I am not sure why you would even bring up something so irrelevant. I just don't understand why there is so much butthurt because of OPs desire to try something different...and BTW zero length stems is nothing new, they have been around for as long as the bicycle itself.
There is no butthurt, My butt is quite unhurt, I am in one of those AeroChairs quite comfortable and has lasted a really long time and still looks kinda new. People are giving good advice and you and the OP are taking it like we are just attacking him and we are just a holes because we aren't just being an echo chamber for the OP.
#80
Live not by lies.
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 860 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times
in
582 Posts
Some interesting assertions. I can't square them with what I see here, with riders on bikes with zero-reach stems, etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB3qTVg3hhs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3AccKQYgZk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB3qTVg3hhs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3AccKQYgZk
Have a bike with just a coaster brake? You can even ride with the whole front end spun around.
It’s awkward, but no it’s not going to be incredibly unstable and make you magically fall over.
#81
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 775
Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 782 Times
in
378 Posts
I see a number of people want to disagree with me, without giving any reasons. It's an easy experiment to do for anyone who has a fixed gear bike. loosen the stem and turn the stem /bars around 180 degree. And then tilt the bike to the left or right. See if the fork steers into the turn or steers away from the turn.
BTW I''ve never done this experiment myself so I'd be interested in the outcome too.
BTW I''ve never done this experiment myself so I'd be interested in the outcome too.
In motorcycle class, you are taught that if you want to turn right, you push the right handlebar forward. That's counter steering, which precipitates a shift of the tire's contact patch from the centerline of the tire towards the edge and the familiar lean. In a way, it's kind of a controlled fall to the right counteracted by the forward momentum of the motorcycle. That's precession.
The same thing happens on a bicycle. When you push the right bar forward (you may not think of steering in those terms but that is what is happening) the bicycle begins to lean, countersteer, and precess. The force required to initiate the turn and the sensitivity and stability whilst turning depends upon a number of things, including rake, trail, tire circumference, etc...
Now imagine riding no hands and the bike starts to lean to the right. Without touching the handlebar (imagine flat bars for easier visualization), the right handlebar has pivoted forward (with the steering axis as the point of rotation). Since the head tube is not vertical but rather raked, the tip of the right handlebar is now vertically higher than the neutral position. Not a lot - millimeters perhaps - but is is higher. And the because of gravity, the tip of the right handlebar wants to return to it's lower position thanks to gravity, so it exerts a "corrective" force that helps bring the bike back to vertical.
To make this idea clearer, imagine a really relaxed head tube angle - say 45 degrees - and a comically long stem - say 1 foot. As the bike starts leaning and falling to the right, the tip of the right handlebar will rise considerably and gravity will pull it back towards center. Now imagine the same head tube ange but a 0 extension stem; the tip of the bar will rise but not nearly as high.
(to model it more precisely, you really need to be looking at the center of gravity of the handlebar plus stem and how that CoG relates to the steering axis. The CoG is likely near the juncture of the stem and bar, and it rises if the bike falls to the right.)
This kind of makes sense. A longer stem will push the CoG further away from the steering axis thus creating a greater "corrective" moment force upon that axis. Imagine, for example, 2 lb weights at the end of the handlebars. A longer stem will exert a stronger "corrective" moment upon the steering axis vs a smaller or 0 extension stem.
With all of this said, whether a bike with 0 stem extension can be ridden no hands or not likely depends upon front end geometry and tire profile as much as anything. Also note that a rearward facing stem will exhibit the same behavior as a forward facing stem in this no hands example.
Is this what you were suggesting?
#82
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,332
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,841 Times
in
2,232 Posts
I still maintain the type of bike and the type of fork and the type of handlebars and the use of the bicycle = best determine optimal placement of hands for a given handlebar/stem combo. Can it be ridden in any other configuration? = absolutely.. Is it worth trying? = why not for people so inclined?
Consider the differences: commuting within Amsterdam, maybe loaded. As opposed to motorpaced Stayer bike riding.
Love the paint with coordinated rims and the lock not my style of riding
nice patina, bit 'o history, not my style of riding
Consider the differences: commuting within Amsterdam, maybe loaded. As opposed to motorpaced Stayer bike riding.
Love the paint with coordinated rims and the lock not my style of riding
nice patina, bit 'o history, not my style of riding
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#83
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
I believe those bikes have different geometry as well, and trail is probably a key factor in the handling of the bike. But the more I read these responses, the more I realize that I was indeed (as someone here put it) only thinking of drop bar road bikes and not one of the many other types of bikes, some of which are designed to have shorter stems.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
Likes For phughes:
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,380
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
I believe those bikes have different geometry as well, and trail is probably a key factor in the handling of the bike. But the more I read these responses, the more I realize that I was indeed (as someone here put it) only thinking of drop bar road bikes and not one of the many other types of bikes, some of which are designed to have shorter stems.
The bikes used for artistic cycling violate all the rules that people in this thread have put forth. In fact, over many years of attempts to design an unrideable bike, the only version that seems to qualify is one where the wheel and handle bar move in opposite directions. Do a search for "unrideable bicycle," and you'll see a bike with sprockets between the handlebar and the headset to accomplish that.
Bicycles are astonishingly forgiving of variations in stem length, fork geometry, handlebar configuration, etc. If nothing else, people can learn from this thread that some of their fundamental beliefs concerning bike design were mistaken.
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,380
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
In motorcycle class, you are taught that if you want to turn right, you push the right handlebar forward. That's counter steering, which precipitates a shift of the tire's contact patch from the centerline of the tire towards the edge and the familiar lean. In a way, it's kind of a controlled fall to the right counteracted by the forward momentum of the motorcycle. That's precession.
The simple fact that a bicycle can be steered easily from the saddle while riding no hands, both in a straight line and around corners, would seem to obviate the assertion that bikes can't be steered without counter-steering as described in the quote above, and yet . . .
Yes, bicycles can be counter-steered, but doing so is not essential.
Likes For Trakhak:
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,453
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
One thing I've learned from reading Bike Forums threads over the years - every bicycle rider who has taken motorcycle classes believes fervently that bicycles cannot be ridden without counter-steering, whereas most bicycle riders who haven't taken motorcycle classes find that hard to believe.
The simple fact that a bicycle can be steered easily from the saddle while riding no hands, both in a straight line and around corners, would seem to obviate the assertion that bikes can't be steered without counter-steering as described in the quote above, and yet . . .
Yes, bicycles can be counter-steered, but doing so is not essential.
The simple fact that a bicycle can be steered easily from the saddle while riding no hands, both in a straight line and around corners, would seem to obviate the assertion that bikes can't be steered without counter-steering as described in the quote above, and yet . . .
Yes, bicycles can be counter-steered, but doing so is not essential.
When you ride no handed I think counter steering happens automatically. Try riding a bike with a very stiff headset no-handed. It makes it almost impossible.
The above video also addresses some of the other common misconceptions about bike stability and their interesting research into it.
Last edited by PeteHski; 08-25-23 at 06:52 AM.
#89
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 775
Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 782 Times
in
378 Posts
One thing I've learned from reading Bike Forums threads over the years - every bicycle rider who has taken motorcycle classes believes fervently that bicycles cannot be ridden without counter-steering, whereas most bicycle riders who haven't taken motorcycle classes find that hard to believe.
The simple fact that a bicycle can be steered easily from the saddle while riding no hands, both in a straight line and around corners, would seem to obviate the assertion that bikes can't be steered without counter-steering as described in the quote above, and yet . . .
Yes, bicycles can be counter-steered, but doing so is not essential.
The simple fact that a bicycle can be steered easily from the saddle while riding no hands, both in a straight line and around corners, would seem to obviate the assertion that bikes can't be steered without counter-steering as described in the quote above, and yet . . .
Yes, bicycles can be counter-steered, but doing so is not essential.
Bicycles behave similarly. When you're on a mountain bike picking the best line through a field of softball sized rocks, you're not countersteering. When you've taken that first half pedal stroke, you're not countersteering. When you're slowing to a stop and aiming the bike towards a bike rack, you're not countersteering. But once you've achieved a speed above walking pace, whether you realize it not, you're countersteering.
#90
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
Ah yes, I found that video a year or two ago and was amused and amazed. I would have thought one could train themselves to make their movements opposite, but that did not seem to be the case.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#93
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
I acknowledge that I’m not always right, and I don’t mind being corrected. However, disagreeing without providing some sort of information or support is weak and pointless. Then when you consider that multiple people have already corrected me with said information days before you joined in? Silly.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,816
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times
in
374 Posts
Ya'll right, I'm wrong. (for the young guys that need that sort of thing, I may even have some trophies here somewhere).
With all the talking over each other, pseudo science v. pixie dust arguments, we're missing the point. Length of stem does not change the steering characteristics of a bike, but it certainly appears to, because it magnifies or diminishes the lever, making an equal input (deliberate or inadvertent) have a different magnitude. And yes, one certainly counter steers when steering with one's butt, it;s a lean and pivot of the hips.
With all the talking over each other, pseudo science v. pixie dust arguments, we're missing the point. Length of stem does not change the steering characteristics of a bike, but it certainly appears to, because it magnifies or diminishes the lever, making an equal input (deliberate or inadvertent) have a different magnitude. And yes, one certainly counter steers when steering with one's butt, it;s a lean and pivot of the hips.
Likes For wheelreason:
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,095
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,292 Times
in
744 Posts
I acknowledge that I’m not always right, and I don’t mind being corrected. However, disagreeing without providing some sort of information or support is weak and pointless. Then when you consider that multiple people have already corrected me with said information days before you joined in? Silly.
Likes For phughes:
#96
Live not by lies.
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 860 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times
in
582 Posts
Motorcycles can be ridden without counter-steering too, at parking lot speeds or when navigating slowly through technical terrain. I once tested a three-wheeled leaning scooter. One of the features was a lockout of the leaning function at traffic lights so that you did not have to put your foot down when stopped. When the light turned green, if you accelerated very slowly, the scooter would crawl forward perfectly vertical, and if your wheel was pointed slightly to the right, the scooter would move in that direction. In other words, not countersteering. Once you hit 5mph or so, the lockout stopped and the bike was free to lean again and from that point on it was countersteering.
Bicycles behave similarly. When you're on a mountain bike picking the best line through a field of softball sized rocks, you're not countersteering. When you've taken that first half pedal stroke, you're not countersteering. When you're slowing to a stop and aiming the bike towards a bike rack, you're not countersteering. But once you've achieved a speed above walking pace, whether you realize it not, you're countersteering.
Bicycles behave similarly. When you're on a mountain bike picking the best line through a field of softball sized rocks, you're not countersteering. When you've taken that first half pedal stroke, you're not countersteering. When you're slowing to a stop and aiming the bike towards a bike rack, you're not countersteering. But once you've achieved a speed above walking pace, whether you realize it not, you're countersteering.
As soon as it was allowed to steer with lean, it did.
You know… bikes with training wheels don’t need to be counter steered. Bikes with training wheels don’t steer like bikes.
”I can make a 3 wheel vehicle steer like a car.”
Not applicable to bikes.
#97
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 775
Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 782 Times
in
378 Posts
IOW, a trike that was forced to steer as a car, steered as a car.
As soon as it was allowed to steer with lean, it did.
You know… bikes with training wheels don’t need to be counter steered. Bikes with training wheels don’t steer like bikes.
”I can make a 3 wheel vehicle steer like a car.”
Not applicable to bikes.
As soon as it was allowed to steer with lean, it did.
You know… bikes with training wheels don’t need to be counter steered. Bikes with training wheels don’t steer like bikes.
”I can make a 3 wheel vehicle steer like a car.”
Not applicable to bikes.
#98
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
I'm so sorry you are so bothered that I read a thread, without seeing the date of your post, then replied in a manner that is displeasing to you. Had I realized the thread was old, I would not have responded. Yeah, I responded to you before I read the entire thread. It happens.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#99
Live not by lies.
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 860 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times
in
582 Posts
A bike or motorcycle has one gyro in front and one in back. The one in front is roughly in line with the steering axis. These gyroscopes are also the wheels and tires that contact the ground.
Any machine that matches the above description for wheel arrangement will steer the same way, initiating a turn with counter steering.
The machine you posted has three three contact patches. In geometry how many points make a plane? How many points make a line? The machine you posted is irrelevant to bicycles.
^ The above motorcycle probably also does not lean or counter steer to turn at very low speeds. I’ll let you think about why.
#100
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 775
Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 782 Times
in
378 Posts
It doesn’t matter.
A bike or motorcycle has one gyro in front and one in back. The one in front is roughly in line with the steering axis. These gyroscopes are also the wheels and tires that contact the ground.
Any machine that matches the above description for wheel arrangement will steer the same way, initiating a turn with counter steering.
The machine you posted has three three contact patches. In geometry how many points make a plane? How many points make a line? The machine you posted is irrelevant to bicycles.
^ The above motorcycle probably also does not lean or counter steer to turn at very low speeds. I’ll let you think about why.
A bike or motorcycle has one gyro in front and one in back. The one in front is roughly in line with the steering axis. These gyroscopes are also the wheels and tires that contact the ground.
Any machine that matches the above description for wheel arrangement will steer the same way, initiating a turn with counter steering.
The machine you posted has three three contact patches. In geometry how many points make a plane? How many points make a line? The machine you posted is irrelevant to bicycles.
^ The above motorcycle probably also does not lean or counter steer to turn at very low speeds. I’ll let you think about why.
To be clear, I'll restate my position - at slow speeds, two wheeled vehicles can sometimes steer by turning in the direction of travel but beyond walking speeds steering is accomplished via counter steering.