Beginner bike help
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 13
Bikes: Trek Madone 3.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Beginner bike help
Hi all, long time reader, first time poster...these forums have really helped me over the last couple of weeks!
I am rounding the corner on purchasing a new (better) road bike. GF has been riding for a while and finally convinced me so, now I have the obvious which bike is better question as most new riders seems to have. Any help would really be appreciated. Thank you!
Me:
32 year old guy
Live in Texas, (mostly flat)
Pretty active
6'2 195 lbs
Will be riding maybe 30-75 miles a week
Went to LBS and measured/rode a 58cm and 60cm, so assuming either would work
Bikes:
Have narrowed them down to 2. Both are used bikes and local to where I live.
Bike 1
2012 Trek Madone 3.1. Frame size is L, 57-58 cm. Bontrager Race carbon fork.10-speed Shimano 105 drivetrain with SRAM compact cranks and Bontrager controls and wheels. Specialized computer, Shimano clipless pedals, bottle cages, Bontrager saddle bag, and rear brake lights.
Bike 2
2008 Giant TCR C2 Formula One full carbon road bike. Shifters and derailleurs are Shimano Ultegra. Brake calipers are 105. Crankset is RaceFace. Mavic Aksium Race wheels w/ Michelin Pro Race tires. Bike has +/- 100 miles on it.
Size is Large. 55cm seat tube / 57cm top tube. Shimano SPD-SL pedals
Both bikes are within $65 of each other. The Trek being higher priced. Both look very well kept up. And as I learned already, the normal answer is to ride them both and see which feels better, which I have! Tbqh the Giant felt a little better, but I dont even know enough about them to make sure. I am somewhat worried about the age of the bike/components on the Giant wearing out quicker, which may be a silly thought, however it is what I have been thinking about. The other bike also comes with a lot of accessories which would seem to help with the price. I hope I provided enough info, and thank you to anyone who could help me with my first purchase!
I am rounding the corner on purchasing a new (better) road bike. GF has been riding for a while and finally convinced me so, now I have the obvious which bike is better question as most new riders seems to have. Any help would really be appreciated. Thank you!
Me:
32 year old guy
Live in Texas, (mostly flat)
Pretty active
6'2 195 lbs
Will be riding maybe 30-75 miles a week
Went to LBS and measured/rode a 58cm and 60cm, so assuming either would work
Bikes:
Have narrowed them down to 2. Both are used bikes and local to where I live.
Bike 1
2012 Trek Madone 3.1. Frame size is L, 57-58 cm. Bontrager Race carbon fork.10-speed Shimano 105 drivetrain with SRAM compact cranks and Bontrager controls and wheels. Specialized computer, Shimano clipless pedals, bottle cages, Bontrager saddle bag, and rear brake lights.
Bike 2
2008 Giant TCR C2 Formula One full carbon road bike. Shifters and derailleurs are Shimano Ultegra. Brake calipers are 105. Crankset is RaceFace. Mavic Aksium Race wheels w/ Michelin Pro Race tires. Bike has +/- 100 miles on it.
Size is Large. 55cm seat tube / 57cm top tube. Shimano SPD-SL pedals
Both bikes are within $65 of each other. The Trek being higher priced. Both look very well kept up. And as I learned already, the normal answer is to ride them both and see which feels better, which I have! Tbqh the Giant felt a little better, but I dont even know enough about them to make sure. I am somewhat worried about the age of the bike/components on the Giant wearing out quicker, which may be a silly thought, however it is what I have been thinking about. The other bike also comes with a lot of accessories which would seem to help with the price. I hope I provided enough info, and thank you to anyone who could help me with my first purchase!
Last edited by BHamm9318; 12-12-16 at 02:43 PM.
#4
Senior Member
which do you want to ride more?
specs are similar, so if they both fit, you can't lose - just go for the one that you like more.
specs are similar, so if they both fit, you can't lose - just go for the one that you like more.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
Buy them both and eventually sell the one you like less.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
@~200# drive train becomes more important. I'd focus on cranks, wheels, headset.
The 105 will stop you fine.
Go with the one with the widest BB bearings. If you can ride them mash on them a bit.
These are too close to make a Forum selection.
The 105 will stop you fine.
Go with the one with the widest BB bearings. If you can ride them mash on them a bit.
These are too close to make a Forum selection.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 515 Times
in
344 Posts
With regards to bike #2: if it really is + or - 100 miles that's nothing. Practically new.
With regards to bike #1: Even though newer it could conceivably have thousands of miles on it since you don't say.
If you like them both equally, I'd get the one that appears to have less miles and better cosmetics. The mileage you are predicting to ride is considered to be fairly casual around here so any bike you choose will most likely last a long time with normal maintenance until you decide to upgrade. Do it.
With regards to bike #1: Even though newer it could conceivably have thousands of miles on it since you don't say.
If you like them both equally, I'd get the one that appears to have less miles and better cosmetics. The mileage you are predicting to ride is considered to be fairly casual around here so any bike you choose will most likely last a long time with normal maintenance until you decide to upgrade. Do it.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 13
Bikes: Trek Madone 3.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the great replies! I am glad I came here first. Good to know I am not far off on either of my choices. I dug up some pictures just in case you guys see something I dont.
I am leaning towards the Trek. However, the wheels and seat seem to be what people upgrade/complain about the most from the reviews I've read. The Giant seems to solve those problems.
As for resale, I think the Trek would probably help with that cause a couple of years form now. A 10 year old bike vs a 5 year old one...
I have ran 2 half marathons before, so I could definitely see a tri in my future, would either of thee work for the simple transition into those? I know if I got interested in doing them a lot, I would need a tri bike...but just wondering if that's even a question worth asking.
Thank you for all you help!
I am leaning towards the Trek. However, the wheels and seat seem to be what people upgrade/complain about the most from the reviews I've read. The Giant seems to solve those problems.
As for resale, I think the Trek would probably help with that cause a couple of years form now. A 10 year old bike vs a 5 year old one...
I have ran 2 half marathons before, so I could definitely see a tri in my future, would either of thee work for the simple transition into those? I know if I got interested in doing them a lot, I would need a tri bike...but just wondering if that's even a question worth asking.
Thank you for all you help!
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 13
Bikes: Trek Madone 3.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you guys for all of your help! I am glad I came here for questions. Good to know I am not far off on my assessment of the 2.
For the record I am leaning towards the Trek for resale value a couple of years down the road. I have done 2 half marathons, and could see a tri in my future.
However, the Giant seems to have a more aero tri seat post design? Theres a small (large) chance I have no idea what im talking about. I am just wondering if that may help with the transition without having to buy a new bike from the initial switch?
Also, the treks wheels and seat seem to be a major concern/complaint on most review sites I read. Not so much on the Giant.
I guess the only thing I'm really hung up on is the year model for resale value, components, wearing out, etc.
I dug up some pictures, in case you guys see anything I dont. Thanks again for all of the great advice, I really appreciate it!
For the record I am leaning towards the Trek for resale value a couple of years down the road. I have done 2 half marathons, and could see a tri in my future.
However, the Giant seems to have a more aero tri seat post design? Theres a small (large) chance I have no idea what im talking about. I am just wondering if that may help with the transition without having to buy a new bike from the initial switch?
Also, the treks wheels and seat seem to be a major concern/complaint on most review sites I read. Not so much on the Giant.
I guess the only thing I'm really hung up on is the year model for resale value, components, wearing out, etc.
I dug up some pictures, in case you guys see anything I dont. Thanks again for all of the great advice, I really appreciate it!
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you guys for all of your help! I am glad I came here for questions. Good to know I am not far off on my assessment of the 2.
For the record I am leaning towards the Trek for resale value a couple of years down the road. I have done 2 half marathons, and could see a tri in my future.
However, the Giant seems to have a more aero tri seat post design? Theres a small (large) chance I have no idea what im talking about. I am just wondering if that may help with the transition without having to buy a new bike from the initial switch?
Also, the treks wheels and seat seem to be a major concern/complaint on most review sites I read. Not so much on the Giant.
I guess the only thing I'm really hung up on is the year model for resale value, components, wearing out, etc.
I dug up some pictures, in case you guys see anything I dont. Thanks again for all of the great advice, I really appreciate it!
For the record I am leaning towards the Trek for resale value a couple of years down the road. I have done 2 half marathons, and could see a tri in my future.
However, the Giant seems to have a more aero tri seat post design? Theres a small (large) chance I have no idea what im talking about. I am just wondering if that may help with the transition without having to buy a new bike from the initial switch?
Also, the treks wheels and seat seem to be a major concern/complaint on most review sites I read. Not so much on the Giant.
I guess the only thing I'm really hung up on is the year model for resale value, components, wearing out, etc.
I dug up some pictures, in case you guys see anything I dont. Thanks again for all of the great advice, I really appreciate it!
That being said, I think the trek is way hotter.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,204
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
234 Posts
I'd take the Trek. Hands down. It's a better looking bike. If you're concerned about the wheels, sell them and buy another set. Saddle? Hit and miss. If you find it comfortable, that's all that matters.
The Mavic wheels on the Giant are cheap 2kg wheels anyway. Nothing to write home about. You might end up upgrading those anyway.
Go with the Trek and don't look back.
The Mavic wheels on the Giant are cheap 2kg wheels anyway. Nothing to write home about. You might end up upgrading those anyway.
Go with the Trek and don't look back.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
How much are we talking for these two? When the MSRP on a Giant TCR Advanced is $1650 (and could probably go out the door for less this time of year), it makes a $1000-1200 5-year-old bike less attractive.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 13
Bikes: Trek Madone 3.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the replies. I do love the color of the Trek! but obv is not a decision maker.
Thanks also for the info on the wheels/seat. I wasnt sure if they were really good wheels or not. The first long ride I will probably do is the MS150 in April. Until then, i will just be getting seat time, around 75 miles a week max. So if I want to upgrade either Im sure I could.
To note: I have negotiated both of the bikes to <$1000
Probably sleep on it make a decision in the next 24 hours, excited!
Thanks also for the info on the wheels/seat. I wasnt sure if they were really good wheels or not. The first long ride I will probably do is the MS150 in April. Until then, i will just be getting seat time, around 75 miles a week max. So if I want to upgrade either Im sure I could.
To note: I have negotiated both of the bikes to <$1000
Probably sleep on it make a decision in the next 24 hours, excited!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,416
Bikes: 2019 Supersix Evo, 2002 Trek 2000
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times
in
32 Posts
I vote Trek, and use this: https://www.bicyclebluebook.com/Sear...50&model=64664 in negotiating the price...
Note that you're getting a 10-speed component set and the current standard is 11-speed. That means the stuff on that bike is a generation back -- which reduces the resale value a bit. It doesn't make it work any worse, it might be a good negotiation tactic, that's all.
Note that you're getting a 10-speed component set and the current standard is 11-speed. That means the stuff on that bike is a generation back -- which reduces the resale value a bit. It doesn't make it work any worse, it might be a good negotiation tactic, that's all.
#17
Senior Member
You mention the giant has only 100 miles on it, but how many does the Trek have on it? Assuming the trek was used for more than a week of riding, I would take the Giant based on that of course assuming the fit and feel is a toss up to you.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Real email from today...Black is better!
From me:
But I was told the Red one was alwaysfaster!
Black isfine. Sure a few Red beads are good. I have some black beadshere. The MASI in the picture is being rebuilt to win the NationalHill Climb.
...
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: Item #9349840
Hello David, thankyou for the order, we are sold out of the Red Brake cordz for a bit.
We would like tohave you use the new 1.5mm diameter black Brake which is our best cable todate.
We have fewred swift beads that are red that we can add into the order for you to get theRed color.
From me:
But I was told the Red one was alwaysfaster!
Black isfine. Sure a few Red beads are good. I have some black beadshere. The MASI in the picture is being rebuilt to win the NationalHill Climb.
...
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: Item #9349840
Hello David, thankyou for the order, we are sold out of the Red Brake cordz for a bit.
We would like tohave you use the new 1.5mm diameter black Brake which is our best cable todate.
We have fewred swift beads that are red that we can add into the order for you to get theRed color.
#20
Senior Member
The Trek looks cooler. As someone else mentioned, if you're close to a grand on that bike, and are planning on doing some serious riding, a new TCR Advanced might be something to think about.
#21
Senior Member
#22
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 13
Bikes: Trek Madone 3.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
BTW I bought the Trek last night! Excited! The guy was super easy to work with and even came down on the a litle more. Thanks again for all of the insight. It definitely helped. Ill be hanging around the boards more often now!
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Well, if you're going to hang around, you should know that it's pics or it didn't happen.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,204
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
234 Posts
I hate winter.