Pick one... weight or aero
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Pick one... weight or aero
Interesting read from Road.cc. I live in pan flat south Florida and get 1 week of climbing in Virginia in the summer, this article makes me feel better about going with an alloy/aero wheel as opposed ot paying almost twice for full carbon. Once the daughter graduates college then maybe I'll go full carbon then, but for now it was a good tradeoff
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 878
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
"alloy aero" is not going to be as "aero" as carbon aero
I have an alloy "aero" wheel 24mm wide and 31 deep. much better than old box section rims
my carbon aero is 29mm wide 55mm deep, and lighter too
So yes, save up for carbon aero... or make your daughter get a scholarship or a part time job and get yourself better wheels
I have an alloy "aero" wheel 24mm wide and 31 deep. much better than old box section rims
my carbon aero is 29mm wide 55mm deep, and lighter too
So yes, save up for carbon aero... or make your daughter get a scholarship or a part time job and get yourself better wheels
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I have the Bontrager Aura 5 which is alloy wheel but has a non-structural carbon fairing. I can tell a difference when I get up to about 20. Nice compromise.
#4
wears long socks
Interesting read from Road.cc. I live in pan flat south Florida and get 1 week of climbing in Virginia in the summer, this article makes me feel better about going with an alloy/aero wheel as opposed ot paying almost twice for full carbon. Once the daughter graduates college then maybe I'll go full carbon then, but for now it was a good tradeoff
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
Most have the bars as high as the seat and make no attempts to actually get in a more aero position.
Don't be fooled in to thinking they buy ultralight stuff to go faster, they buy it because it's cool and they like high end gear.
Case in point. "world's most aero road bike"....
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
"alloy aero" is not going to be as "aero" as carbon aero
I have an alloy "aero" wheel 24mm wide and 31 deep. much better than old box section rims
my carbon aero is 29mm wide 55mm deep, and lighter too
So yes, save up for carbon aero... or make your daughter get a scholarship or a part time job and get yourself better wheels
I have an alloy "aero" wheel 24mm wide and 31 deep. much better than old box section rims
my carbon aero is 29mm wide 55mm deep, and lighter too
So yes, save up for carbon aero... or make your daughter get a scholarship or a part time job and get yourself better wheels
Have you seen the bikes posted on this site?
Most have the bars as high as the seat and make no attempts to actually get in a more aero position.
Don't be fooled in to thinking they buy ultralight stuff to go faster, they buy it because it's cool and they like high end gear.
Case in point. "world's most aero road bike"....
Most have the bars as high as the seat and make no attempts to actually get in a more aero position.
Don't be fooled in to thinking they buy ultralight stuff to go faster, they buy it because it's cool and they like high end gear.
Case in point. "world's most aero road bike"....
#6
Senior Member
Interesting read from Road.cc. I live in pan flat south Florida and get 1 week of climbing in Virginia in the summer, this article makes me feel better about going with an alloy/aero wheel as opposed ot paying almost twice for full carbon. Once the daughter graduates college then maybe I'll go full carbon then, but for now it was a good tradeoff
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
"We've measured a 16% increase in wheel drag between a disc-braked wheelset and a standard wheelset"
"The best tyre we've found is the Continental GP4000S"
"The slower you are, the more important aero is."
"Weight is a secondary issue almost all the time."
#7
Senior Member
Worth noting that their models on weight vs. aerodynamics all consider steady state cases. When cycling we are accelerating all the time. The weight penalty is paid during accelerations, not so much during steady riding. Not saying their models are useless, but it is always important to consider the constraints and assumptions used in a model. Also, just because they found a particular tire to be 'the best' (without talking about widths, pressures, etc.) for their wheels does not necessarily mean that they will be the best for your own wheels.
#8
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
The article is absolute garbage. Nothing but an advertisement for Swiss Side wheels and Continental tires.
Swiss Side sell alloy wheels with non structural aero carbon farings. Their wheels are heavier than full carbon aero wheels and that is why the play up aero over weight - because their wheels weigh more.
I rest my case.
-Tim-
Swiss Side sell alloy wheels with non structural aero carbon farings. Their wheels are heavier than full carbon aero wheels and that is why the play up aero over weight - because their wheels weigh more.
So how will you know whether your tyre is a good one, or a bad one? Well, you won't. Except if you're running GP4000S tyres, in which case you're in luck.
-Tim-
#9
Senior Member
*Though it might be more accurate to say they're very, very, very, very small.
#10
Senior Member
And occurring all the time. Not making a statement on 'weight vs. aero,' merely pointing out that their models do not account for accelerations.
#11
Senior Member
As far as I can tell, they also didn't consider the effect of fastener type (allen, flat, phillips) on aero.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Well, the 'aero' was determined experimentally, so the fastener type is included in the drag data they are using. The relevance of what was 'missed' is up to the individual using the model to decide.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting read from Road.cc. I live in pan flat south Florida and get 1 week of climbing in Virginia in the summer, this article makes me feel better about going with an alloy/aero wheel as opposed ot paying almost twice for full carbon. Once the daughter graduates college then maybe I'll go full carbon then, but for now it was a good tradeoff
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
My standard is that aero is good but not to the point of adding weight to be more aero.
Edit- I also found the tire information to be biased and useless!
Last edited by shafter; 12-13-16 at 11:39 AM.
#17
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 914 Post(s)
Liked 1,131 Times
in
487 Posts
I've used models that account for acceleration, and investigated keeping a database of moments of inertia for different wheels to improve the estimates of drag and predictions of sprint performance that the models produce. After a medium amount of effort, we stopped bothering.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times
in
249 Posts
Why would anyone pick only one?
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18350 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
Interesting read from Road.cc. I live in pan flat south Florida and get 1 week of climbing in Virginia in the summer, this article makes me feel better about going with an alloy/aero wheel as opposed ot paying almost twice for full carbon. Once the daughter graduates college then maybe I'll go full carbon then, but for now it was a good tradeoff
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
Why riders like you need to go aero, and wheel weight doesn't matter ? and how the wind tunnel proves it | road.cc
Buy a house in Fort Collins (which is quite flat, but at 5000 feet).
You should be able to pay for your daughter's college, buy the bike... and get better AERO.
There is a reason why Mexico City (even higher elevation) is popular for Hour Record trials.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times
in
249 Posts
Why would anyone pick only one?
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
It's interesting they're testing a Cervelo R5 and not an S5. The R series are the light weight bikes, the S series are the aero (road) ones.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Light weight is more fun to show off than aero ("Here, pick it up").
None of the test bikes was completely red; that would have made a big difference...
None of the test bikes was completely red; that would have made a big difference...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
The article says
"We've measured a 16% increase in wheel drag between a disc-braked wheelset and a standard wheelset", Jean-Paul told us. "We performed a direct back to back test of the Zipp 303FC in standard version and disc brake version, for our own competitor comparison purposes. That 16% is a constant offset in the performance curve across the entire cross wind angle range."
I find this pretty surprising. It looks like Zipp's 303 Disc is a different rim from their 303. I would expect most of the loss from the rotor to be made up for by a better rim shape.
#25
Has a magic bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,590
Bikes: 2018 Scott Spark, 2015 Fuji Norcom Straight, 2014 BMC GF01, 2013 Trek Madone
Mentioned: 699 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4456 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
157 Posts
I have heavy-ish aero wheels for TTing- front and rear 60 mm deep wheels and a rear disc. I'm all for buying free speed whenever possible. My fitter is a purist and does not like compromises.
Every now and then I try to get him to tell me to buy lighter wheels.
He tells me not to. Weight hardly matters as long as my wheels are not ridiculously heavy (which they're not).
However he does tell me he could get me into faster tires. (I resist, because I don't want tubes.)
The best way to test this stuff is going to be road aero testing. Which is coming, it will be the next thing in aero testing.
Of course I have wheels for climbing too. They are only lightish wheels because I prefer an alloy braking surface. No deep profile on my climbing wheels because I don't want to get hit by the crazy canyon crosswinds while on a high speed descent.
And of course if I was doing mass start races, I'd consider a set of wheels for that. Maybe full carbon but maybe not. There's an argument to be made for race wheels that aren't too expensive to replace, at least until you get to pretty advanced levels.
Hmm. Maybe the real answer is that there are pros and cons to different wheel types? And those pros and cons apply differently to each of us, based on whether we're riding recreationally vs racing, our weight, terrain, budget, and personal preferences? And that therefore it makes little difference to second guess or judge the other guys wheel choices? Cause maybe his decisions were made based on factors that are not immediately evident to you, looking at his situation from the outside?
Every now and then I try to get him to tell me to buy lighter wheels.
He tells me not to. Weight hardly matters as long as my wheels are not ridiculously heavy (which they're not).
However he does tell me he could get me into faster tires. (I resist, because I don't want tubes.)
The best way to test this stuff is going to be road aero testing. Which is coming, it will be the next thing in aero testing.
Of course I have wheels for climbing too. They are only lightish wheels because I prefer an alloy braking surface. No deep profile on my climbing wheels because I don't want to get hit by the crazy canyon crosswinds while on a high speed descent.
And of course if I was doing mass start races, I'd consider a set of wheels for that. Maybe full carbon but maybe not. There's an argument to be made for race wheels that aren't too expensive to replace, at least until you get to pretty advanced levels.
Hmm. Maybe the real answer is that there are pros and cons to different wheel types? And those pros and cons apply differently to each of us, based on whether we're riding recreationally vs racing, our weight, terrain, budget, and personal preferences? And that therefore it makes little difference to second guess or judge the other guys wheel choices? Cause maybe his decisions were made based on factors that are not immediately evident to you, looking at his situation from the outside?