Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Six13 - Do you ride a size 50cm ?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Six13 - Do you ride a size 50cm ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-06, 02:38 PM
  #1  
Corsaire
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
 
Corsaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Six13 - Do you ride a size 50cm ?

If so, how tall are you and what's your inseam measurements?

I'm trying to see if either 50 or 52 would fit me better. I'm 5'8", 30 inch inseam, 22 inch arm reach.

Thanks for the feedback, hopefully it'll help me get a good perspective.

Corsaire
Corsaire is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 02:52 PM
  #2  
ROJA
Pepperoni Power
 
ROJA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oaklandish
Posts: 1,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You need to get measured, but at a glance you are more in the range for a 54. I just ordered a Six13 in a 56cm frame and I'm 5'9" with a 30" inseam (pants) or 33" inseam (measured for bike fit).

Good luck.
ROJA is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 02:58 PM
  #3  
Corsaire
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
 
Corsaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ROJA
You need to get measured, but at a glance you are more in the range for a 54. I just ordered a Six13 in a 56cm frame and I'm 5'9" with a 30" inseam (pants) or 33" inseam (measured for bike fit).

Good luck.
I want the smallest size frame I can get away with. 54 would be too big.

Corsaire
Corsaire is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 03:23 PM
  #4  
ROJA
Pepperoni Power
 
ROJA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oaklandish
Posts: 1,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Just curious, if you are spending $2500+ on a bike, why don't you get the size that fits you best? I'm almost positive that it won't be a 50cm bike unless you have very unusual proportions.
ROJA is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 03:27 PM
  #5  
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Depends on how the frame is measured, c-t or c-c. Makes a huge difference.

Al
Al1943 is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 03:34 PM
  #6  
ROJA
Pepperoni Power
 
ROJA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oaklandish
Posts: 1,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A 50 cm Six13 is 48 cm from the center of the bottom bracket to the top of the seat tube, measured along the seat tube. Is that c-t???

ROJA is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 03:35 PM
  #7  
voltman
It is fantastic.
 
voltman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC
Posts: 7,977

Bikes: 05 Specialized Allez Elite; 06 Fuji Team Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Assuming 30" is your cycling inseam and your arms are 22 inches long, you'd probably want a 52 with a shorter stem.
voltman is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 03:45 PM
  #8  
Corsaire
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
 
Corsaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by voltman
Assuming 30" is your cycling inseam and your arms are 22 inches long, you'd probably want a 52 with a shorter stem.
I just went to the LBS and took some actual measurements off the 50 & 52 sizes. On the 52 (equivalent to the 53cm semi sloping frame of the Bianchi I currently have) I'd need a 110 or 120mm stem, and the 50 would fit me also but I'd need a 130mm stem.
Which would handle better and be more efficient as well as lighter for the climbson fast pace club rides? This Cannondale would my "kick arse" bike, not necessarily for long haul rides.

Corsaire
Corsaire is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 03:50 PM
  #9  
nitropowered
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens, Ohio
Posts: 5,104

Bikes: Custom Custom Custom

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The smaller frame would give you more saddle to bar drop and would be stiffer and more nimble since the frame is smaller. You may also get toe overlap.

I would get the 50
nitropowered is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 03:52 PM
  #10  
voltman
It is fantastic.
 
voltman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC
Posts: 7,977

Bikes: 05 Specialized Allez Elite; 06 Fuji Team Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Corsaire
I just went to the LBS and took some actual measurements off the 50 & 52 sizes. On the 52 (equivalent to the 53cm semi sloping frame of the Bianchi I currently have) I'd need a 110 or 120mm stem, and the 50 would fit me also but I'd need a 130mm stem.
Which would handle better and be more efficient as well as lighter for the climbson fast pace club rides? This Cannondale would my "kick arse" bike, not necessarily for long haul rides.

Corsaire
How flexible are you?
voltman is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 03:57 PM
  #11  
Corsaire
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
 
Corsaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by voltman
How flexible are you?
I stretch a lot, so I'm flexible (not like a gymnast of course) but I can easily put my hands flat on the floor w/o bending my knees.

Corsaire
Corsaire is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 04:00 PM
  #12  
ROJA
Pepperoni Power
 
ROJA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oaklandish
Posts: 1,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
In general, does less flexibility argue in favor of the bigger frame because it would result in less drop (assuming stand-over height is sufficient)?
ROJA is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 05:10 PM
  #13  
Corsaire
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
 
Corsaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nitropowered
The smaller frame would give you more saddle to bar drop and would be stiffer and more nimble since the frame is smaller. You may also get toe overlap.

I would get the 50

Is getting a bit of toe overlap a bad thing ?

Corsaire
Corsaire is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 05:38 PM
  #14  
Dubbayoo
Senior Member
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You want the 50, 52cm in a sloping tube is too big. I got a 50cm Flyte but I could have gone 52.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 06:01 PM
  #15  
Corsaire
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
 
Corsaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dial_tone
You want the 50, 52cm in a sloping tube is too big. I got a 50cm Flyte but I could have gone 52.
No, you got it wrong. We're talking Cannondales here, and theyare full size frames, not slopings. The sloping I was referring to is my current steel Bianchi.

Corsaire
Corsaire is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 07:08 PM
  #16  
miked528
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Union County N.J.
Posts: 106

Bikes: 07 Fuji Roubaix Pro, 02 Fuji Sunfire MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Corsaire
If so, how tall are you and what's your inseam measurements?

I'm trying to see if either 50 or 52 would fit me better. I'm 5'8", 30 inch inseam, 22 inch arm reach.

Thanks for the feedback, hopefully it'll help me get a good perspective.

Corsaire
I'm 5'7 1/2 with 23' arms and 30 inch inseam. My Fuji is a 52 and is perfect for me. Here's a web site that will be very helpful in picking a peerfect size bike.

www.competitivecyclist.com
miked528 is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 08:01 PM
  #17  
woodcycl
Cycle for life...
 
woodcycl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,338

Bikes: Trek 5200 | Cannondale Six13 TeamOne | Cannondale Road Tandem | Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I am 5' 6.5" tall with a 28" inseam. I ride a 53cm Six13 TeamOne. However, I would've been fine on a 52cm as well.
__________________
-\Brian
18' Landshark Tandem - Custom
15' Wabi Special Single-Speed Road
06' Cannondale Six13 TeamOne
06' Cannondale Prophet 3 "Lefty"
92' Trek 5200
woodcycl is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 08:12 PM
  #18  
Corsaire
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
 
Corsaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by woodcycl
I am 5' 6.5" tall with a 28" inseam. I ride a 53cm Six13 TeamOne. However, I would've been fine on a 52cm as well.
Sxi13 has not 53cm size, only the ones below, perhaps you meant 54cm, but could've fit a 52 also

Six13 sizes: 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 63 cm

I could fit a 54 also, but I'm starting to realize I could got ideally 52, but aggressively a 50.

Corsaire
Corsaire is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 08:50 PM
  #19  
FIVE ONE SIX
SpIn SpIn SuGaR!
 
FIVE ONE SIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,078
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i would go with the 50. i'm 5'7" with a 29.3" inseam, and after a few fittings i was going to go with the CAAD8 in a 50 last year, and the CAAD8's and Six13's have the exact same frame measurements...
FIVE ONE SIX is offline  
Old 10-24-06, 11:55 PM
  #20  
LA_Rider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 647

Bikes: Cannondale R5000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I’m 5’9” with a 32” cycling inseam and ride a 54 CAAD8.

I’m going to be changing to a 52cm for the shorter head tube / lower drop.

I also think stems of 110 and up handle better than a long TT and a short stem.

Toe overlap really only happens when going in small circles, not in actual riding.

fwiw; Igor Astarloa of Barloworld is 5’7” and rides a 50cm.
LA_Rider is offline  
Old 10-25-06, 12:05 AM
  #21  
LA_Rider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 647

Bikes: Cannondale R5000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
PS: Ryan Cox (Barloworld) is 5'11" and rides a 54.

This is his bike.

LA_Rider is offline  
Old 10-25-06, 02:51 AM
  #22  
roadwarrior
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664

Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Corsaire
No, you got it wrong. We're talking Cannondales here, and theyare full size frames, not slopings. The sloping I was referring to is my current steel Bianchi.

Corsaire
There's a 2cm top tube drop which is why they (see the measuring chart) measure like they do.

Besides, I was told in another thread not to worry about it....just stand over the frame and if you have an inch or so, that's it...then just fiddle with the seat until it feels right...

Go with the 52...the 50 will be too small on a Cannondale. Based on what you said. I added an inch as the measurement should be from the bottom of your foot to where you'd hit the seat...not your inseam, like you'd buy pants.
roadwarrior is offline  
Old 10-25-06, 02:52 AM
  #23  
roadwarrior
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664

Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by LA_Rider
PS: Ryan Cox (Barloworld) is 5'11" and rides a 54.

This is his bike.

Somehow, I think that he goes away from the carbon SI cranks to the Hollowgram SI cranks for races...Hollograms are lighter.
roadwarrior is offline  
Old 10-25-06, 05:34 AM
  #24  
Corsaire
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
 
Corsaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roadwarrior
There's a 2cm top tube drop which is why they (see the measuring chart) measure like they do.

Besides, I was told in another thread not to worry about it....just stand over the frame and if you have an inch or so, that's it...then just fiddle with the seat until it feels right...

Go with the 52...the 50 will be too small on a Cannondale. Based on what you said. I added an inch as the measurement should be from the bottom of your foot to where you'd hit the seat...not your inseam, like you'd buy pants.

The difference between the 50 & 52 is exactly 0.375 inch, being the 52 "bigger" by that much (barely 1cm) all around

Corsaire
Corsaire is offline  
Old 10-25-06, 12:56 PM
  #25  
corny
Senior Member
 
corny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 222

Bikes: Cannondale R1000 Compact Drive '05

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would say 52, I am 5 feet 7 inches, 30" inseam and have flipped the stem with a fairly high seat but found an ace fit.
corny is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.