shelf life for aluminum frames?
#1
Amferny
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 142
Bikes: 88 Cannondale M500 SS, 86 C'dale R300, 96 C'dale R400, 1966 Hercules 3spd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
shelf life for aluminum frames?
It was brought to my attention that aluminum frames have a shelf life. Anybody know about this? I'm on a 20 year old aluminum frame, been riding aluminum frames for the last 15 years. And I have never considered this "shelf life" thing.
Fill me in please.
Fill me in please.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 2,369
Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm guessing that's crap. And if it's not, I wouldn't recommend flying if 15 years is the limit.
#3
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 43
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 2,369
Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can't speak to the reliability of any frame in particular, but I don't think aluminum non-moving parts "expire".
#5
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Metals do fatigue, and the long-term performance of aluminum is such that it will eventually break if it is used... "eventually" meaning 5 or 10 or 20 or 50 or 100 years of use. But this only applies if the metal is stressed. "Shelf Life" generally refers to a product that can only be stored (not used) for a certain time before it is no longer useful... I do not believe aluminum frames have a finite "shelf life"
#6
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Any bicycle frame made of any material, if used long enough will fail.
As with any frame, when you clean it, look for signs of problems like small cracks, bubbles in the paint, or anything else unusual... I understand these are the same signs they look for on airplanes when performing maintenance.
If you don't see anything unusual, there are still no guarantees, as even brand new frames (of all materials) will rarely fail, but you have done all that you can to ensure that you are riding a safe frame.
As with any frame, when you clean it, look for signs of problems like small cracks, bubbles in the paint, or anything else unusual... I understand these are the same signs they look for on airplanes when performing maintenance.
If you don't see anything unusual, there are still no guarantees, as even brand new frames (of all materials) will rarely fail, but you have done all that you can to ensure that you are riding a safe frame.
#8
Uber Goober
Aluminum fatigues, steel may or may not fatigue, carbon fiber breaks. In each case, it's a design issue of dealing with the material, not just some material flaw. I sure wouldn't worry about a "shelf life".
Bare aluminum will develop little pockmarks of corrosion, just like bare steel will rust, and maybe somebody is deducing a shelf life from the bare material or something flaky like that. But that's an issue of how long it'll loook pretty enough to sell, not related to be useable.
Bit of trivia: I was scanning a book at the library on the Tour de France. It showed one guy fixing a flat, and mentioned that he had been thrown out of the TdeF two years in a row by broken forks. That was back in the 1920's.
Bare aluminum will develop little pockmarks of corrosion, just like bare steel will rust, and maybe somebody is deducing a shelf life from the bare material or something flaky like that. But that's an issue of how long it'll loook pretty enough to sell, not related to be useable.
Bit of trivia: I was scanning a book at the library on the Tour de France. It showed one guy fixing a flat, and mentioned that he had been thrown out of the TdeF two years in a row by broken forks. That was back in the 1920's.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#9
Flying Under the Radar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 4,116
Bikes: 10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I am sure the halflife of Aluminum though it may be less than steel is not affected in a humans lifespan to make a difference. Besides that the bike is covered in paint and is not expose to oxygen. If it were, unlike steel bikes that rust, aluminum would be far less affected by it. Most likely that means that in a humans lifespan, aluminum is a better choice in metal deterioration. All of this is trumped with the fact that there are way to many variables to even put this to the test properly. Riders weight, riding style, conditions, terrain, maintainence, etc...
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S.E. Mi.
Posts: 287
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Shelf life no, fatigue life is what you should be aware.
Useful life span for an aluminum frame can range from 50+ years for a sturdy, overbuilt frame to 2 or less for a 2.5 lb. race frame that's ridden hard.
Design and execution of the construction and how it is used all come into play.
Useful life span for an aluminum frame can range from 50+ years for a sturdy, overbuilt frame to 2 or less for a 2.5 lb. race frame that's ridden hard.
Design and execution of the construction and how it is used all come into play.
#11
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,470 Posts
Shelf life no, fatigue life is what you should be aware.
Useful life span for an aluminum frame can range from 50+ years for a sturdy, overbuilt frame to 2 or less for a 2.5 lb. race frame that's ridden hard.
Design and execution of the construction and how it is used all come into play.
Useful life span for an aluminum frame can range from 50+ years for a sturdy, overbuilt frame to 2 or less for a 2.5 lb. race frame that's ridden hard.
Design and execution of the construction and how it is used all come into play.
#12
Flying Under the Radar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 4,116
Bikes: 10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I dont think we are comparing quality here. the OP strictly asks the difference in the metal. Like if you took the exact same frame made by the same person with the same care exactly the same way, just one is steel and one is aluminum? The only thing you would notice in a lifespan is how different you rode the thing.
The fact that you fall alot or hit a curb on multiple occasions in a bikes lifespan has WAY more to due with how long it is going to last. It is Easier to make a more durable HEAVY ass frame because it is cheap. But if aluminum and carbon and compsite were THAT bad to reduce it's lifespan to 5 years or less because it is light, there is no way that they would sell them like they do. Most likely, they probably would not be the primary selling frames in the world.
The fact that you fall alot or hit a curb on multiple occasions in a bikes lifespan has WAY more to due with how long it is going to last. It is Easier to make a more durable HEAVY ass frame because it is cheap. But if aluminum and carbon and compsite were THAT bad to reduce it's lifespan to 5 years or less because it is light, there is no way that they would sell them like they do. Most likely, they probably would not be the primary selling frames in the world.
#14
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
It won't be the aluminum as much as the quality of the construction.
#16
Flying Under the Radar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 4,116
Bikes: 10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
+1 but why would the quality be different? You can not compare the two if there are not at least using the basic principles to the experiment. If the quality is not the same, the experiment is at "Need Input" status.
Johnny Five Alive!
Johnny Five Alive!
#17
Senior Member
That concern and my race bike's 800 dollar rims; one of the reasons I leave my Sunday bike for Sundays.... Besides weekday rides are often commute rides and I carry weighty stuff. During the week, steel is real.
__________________
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living
^ Since January 1, 2012
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living
^ Since January 1, 2012
#18
Flying Under the Radar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 4,116
Bikes: 10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Pretty sure my Le Tour will be there after the bombs are done going off, I know how you feel. I just like my Aluminum FCR too much not to ride it the most.
#19
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,982 Times
in
1,618 Posts
the more correct definition would be the time it would take half of all frames of a given manufacture date to disintegrate. So if you have 128 new frames on the shelf, after one half-life you'd still have 64 good ones, then after another half life you'd have 32... etc. So for any particular frame, there'd be a 50-50 chance of it decaying in one half life period.
Last edited by DiabloScott; 03-13-09 at 04:56 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
...but that assumes that the probability of a frame failing at any moment is proportional to the number of the original batch still remaining at that moment. Radioactivity behaves this way (which is why the term "half-life" has crept into the popular vernacular. I suspect Diabloscott was slyly referring to this with his/her reference to "disintegrate" and "decaying".) So do some drugs (roughly, for a while) as the liver and kidneys metabolize and excrete them. Unless you know that the system obeys "first-order" kinetics, it is not meaningful to talk about a half-life.
A term that requires no assumptions about the system, just simple counting, is the "median" survival: the time by which the first half of the frames in the original batch will have failed. If quality control was really sloppy, but some frames were built very well, you could have half of them failing in the first year, but the ones that didn't fail might last nearly forever, i.e., you couldn't predict that half of the survivors would fail in the second year just because half of the originals failed in the first year. Conversely, if the factory produced mediocre frames of nearly constant quality, none might fail for, say, 5 years, then they would start failing all around the same time.
A term that requires no assumptions about the system, just simple counting, is the "median" survival: the time by which the first half of the frames in the original batch will have failed. If quality control was really sloppy, but some frames were built very well, you could have half of them failing in the first year, but the ones that didn't fail might last nearly forever, i.e., you couldn't predict that half of the survivors would fail in the second year just because half of the originals failed in the first year. Conversely, if the factory produced mediocre frames of nearly constant quality, none might fail for, say, 5 years, then they would start failing all around the same time.
#23
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
The failure, though, is often at a joint or lug where the manufactuing process has presumably weakened the material.
#25
Senior Member
I know some lbs will use this idea to make more sales. if your frame or bike is 4 & plus years old they will tell you it do to stress of time and must be replace . by the way my cannondale is 14 yrs and at this point show none . my lbs even try to tell me at the time cannondale would buy it back if i buy a new bike. i believe the shop owner was giving me a line of bull at the time.