Better gear ratio for climbs
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Better gear ratio for climbs
I am looking for a new used road bike, and I want to find something with a lower gear ratio for the steeper climbs where I ride here in the Bronx and upper Manhattan.
I have an older Bianchi, with DA 7800 groupset. Cassette is 12/27 and chainring is 39/53.
My aging joints need something a little gentler to allow me to spin a little more up those hills. What groupsets should I be looking for to best accomplish this?
thanks all
I have an older Bianchi, with DA 7800 groupset. Cassette is 12/27 and chainring is 39/53.
My aging joints need something a little gentler to allow me to spin a little more up those hills. What groupsets should I be looking for to best accomplish this?
thanks all
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Do you want to buy a new bike or would changing out some of the drivetrain be sufficient? You might be able to find a compatible long cage 10-speed derailleur, new cassette and compact crankset if you want to stick with the Bianchi.
If you want to buy a new bike, rear derailleurs with larger capacity are getting to be pretty common, as are compact cranksets. If you really want some capacity, some of the gravel oriented groups (GRX in Shimano) can handle pie plate cassettes.
If you want to buy a new bike, rear derailleurs with larger capacity are getting to be pretty common, as are compact cranksets. If you really want some capacity, some of the gravel oriented groups (GRX in Shimano) can handle pie plate cassettes.
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Do you want to buy a new bike or would changing out some of the drivetrain be sufficient? You might be able to find a compatible long cage 10-speed derailleur, new cassette and compact crankset if you want to stick with the Bianchi.
If you want to buy a new bike, rear derailleurs with larger capacity are getting to be pretty common, as are compact cranksets. If you really want some capacity, some of the gravel oriented groups (GRX in Shimano) can handle pie plate cassettes.
If you want to buy a new bike, rear derailleurs with larger capacity are getting to be pretty common, as are compact cranksets. If you really want some capacity, some of the gravel oriented groups (GRX in Shimano) can handle pie plate cassettes.
So should I be looking for something in a 105? Ultegra? Anyone have a good setup they love for getting a little more spin on a steep hill?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Either. Shouldn't be too hard to find something with a 50/34 crankset and a 32-tooth or so cassette. If you can't find that stock, replace the derailleur (with a long cage version) and/or cassette.
Likes For WhyFi:
#5
Senior Member
Do you have the RD-R7800-GS or RD-7800-SS on the bike?
If you have the RD-R7800-GS, then you should be able to just change out your chainrings and/or cassette for something wider-range/lower.
If you have the RD-7800-SS, you may need to swap it for something more tolerant to wider and lower gearing. Any Shimano 8-speed or 9-speed rear derailleur will be compatible with your shifters, so something like a Sora RD-R3000-GS should work fine.
If you have the RD-R7800-GS, then you should be able to just change out your chainrings and/or cassette for something wider-range/lower.
If you have the RD-7800-SS, you may need to swap it for something more tolerant to wider and lower gearing. Any Shimano 8-speed or 9-speed rear derailleur will be compatible with your shifters, so something like a Sora RD-R3000-GS should work fine.
#6
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,940
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 974 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
352 Posts
A low gear of 34F - 32R would be 26% easier. That's a lot, maybe three more shifts easier.
I put on a 11-32 for some vacation mountain riding, and kept it on for the smaller local hills. I can stay seated on a 10% grade, and even on a 12% grade. Much better than having to stand up. And it's very nice to be able to keep a high cadence on easier hills.
I've put the 32 cassette on a bike that had 28 as the low gear. It's outside the recommended range, but it shifts fine. So if you find a bike with a 28, you could try it with a 32. Just make sure it shifts okay on a bike stand, and that the chain is long enough for the cross-chained big chainring-biggest cog. On the stand, shift to a middle cog. Shift to the big chainring. Now, cranking by hand, shift into the biggest cog. Is there a at least a small gap between the top pulley and the cog? The derailleur arm can't be extended so far that the chain has no angles at the pulleys--if so, a longer chain will likely fix it.
I'm guessing that 5 year old bikes are in short supply again this year.
Gear ratios:
39/27 = 1.444
34/32 = 1.0625
Then divide the two to compare: 1.0625/1.444 = 0.736 so it's about 74% easier.
I put on a 11-32 for some vacation mountain riding, and kept it on for the smaller local hills. I can stay seated on a 10% grade, and even on a 12% grade. Much better than having to stand up. And it's very nice to be able to keep a high cadence on easier hills.
I've put the 32 cassette on a bike that had 28 as the low gear. It's outside the recommended range, but it shifts fine. So if you find a bike with a 28, you could try it with a 32. Just make sure it shifts okay on a bike stand, and that the chain is long enough for the cross-chained big chainring-biggest cog. On the stand, shift to a middle cog. Shift to the big chainring. Now, cranking by hand, shift into the biggest cog. Is there a at least a small gap between the top pulley and the cog? The derailleur arm can't be extended so far that the chain has no angles at the pulleys--if so, a longer chain will likely fix it.
I'm guessing that 5 year old bikes are in short supply again this year.
Gear ratios:
39/27 = 1.444
34/32 = 1.0625
Then divide the two to compare: 1.0625/1.444 = 0.736 so it's about 74% easier.
Last edited by rm -rf; 04-06-21 at 04:54 PM.
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
Do you have the RD-R7800-GS or RD-7800-SS on the bike?
If you have the RD-R7800-GS, then you should be able to just change out your chainrings and/or cassette for something wider-range/lower.
If you have the RD-7800-SS, you may need to swap it for something more tolerant to wider and lower gearing. Any Shimano 8-speed or 9-speed rear derailleur will be compatible with your shifters, so something like a Sora RD-R3000-GS should work fine.
If you have the RD-R7800-GS, then you should be able to just change out your chainrings and/or cassette for something wider-range/lower.
If you have the RD-7800-SS, you may need to swap it for something more tolerant to wider and lower gearing. Any Shimano 8-speed or 9-speed rear derailleur will be compatible with your shifters, so something like a Sora RD-R3000-GS should work fine.
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
A low gear of 34F - 32R would be 26% easier. That's a lot, maybe three more shifts easier.
I put on a 11-32 for some vacation mountain riding, and kept it on for the smaller local hills. I can stay seated on a 10% grade, and even on a 12% grade.
Gear ratios:
39/27 = 1.444
34/32 = 1.0625
Then divide the two to compare: 1.0625/1.444 = 0.736 so it's about 74% easier.
I put on a 11-32 for some vacation mountain riding, and kept it on for the smaller local hills. I can stay seated on a 10% grade, and even on a 12% grade.
Gear ratios:
39/27 = 1.444
34/32 = 1.0625
Then divide the two to compare: 1.0625/1.444 = 0.736 so it's about 74% easier.
Yes! that's the idea. Spot on.
So my question is, what groupsets should I be looking for in a 5-8 year old used bike, that lend themselves to that kind of ratio?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
This has been answered already - both Ultegra and 105 have derailleurs and cassettes that cover these ranges. If the installed derailleur/cassette doesn't cover the desired range, you can swap them out relatively inexpensively.
#10
Newbie
Thread Starter
Well I was hoping for a little more specific info than just "ultegra or 105," anyone can kind of figure that out on their own. I was thinking maybe someone with a similar objective was using a specific model they liked, that i could look out for. but thanks man, much appreciated.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Well I was hoping for a little more specific info than just "ultegra or 105," anyone can kind of figure that out on their own. I was thinking maybe someone with a similar objective was using a specific model they liked, that i could look out for. but thanks man, much appreciated.
#12
Newbie
Thread Starter
See now was that so hard?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6971 Post(s)
Liked 10,967 Times
in
4,692 Posts
#17
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,940
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 974 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
352 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm -rf View Post
Then divide the two to compare: 1.0625/1.444 = 0.736 so it's about 74% easier.
yes. oops. 74% of the original, 26% easier.
If you need 74% easier, that's a 34 front, 91 rear (or a "custom" 12 front, 32 rear, if you want to keep the cassette)
At 100 rpm, that's 2.89 mph. Gotta keep spinning.
Originally Posted by rm -rf View Post
Then divide the two to compare: 1.0625/1.444 = 0.736 so it's about 74% easier.
yes. oops. 74% of the original, 26% easier.
If you need 74% easier, that's a 34 front, 91 rear (or a "custom" 12 front, 32 rear, if you want to keep the cassette)
At 100 rpm, that's 2.89 mph. Gotta keep spinning.