View Poll Results: Fx 2 for 560 or fx 3 for 900
Fx 2 disc
5
45.45%
Fx 3 disc
6
54.55%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll
Trek fx 2 disc vs trek fx3 disc advise please
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Trek fx 2 disc vs trek fx3 disc advise please
Hi, I currently have fx 7.2 , good bike cant complain, but just want an upgrade, had my heart set on trek fx 3 disc black (900 euro) but cant be got for love nor money at moment.
I was looking at trek fx 2 disc ( 560) euro , and to my ignorant eyes seems pretty much the same bike except for carbon fork , would very much welcome any advice you can give of the pros and cons of the 2 bikes as i really know nothing about drive train, group sets etc.
Fx 2 has 24 gears 3x8 which appeals to me as I do a lot of hills , fx 3 has 18 9x2
I was looking at trek fx 2 disc ( 560) euro , and to my ignorant eyes seems pretty much the same bike except for carbon fork , would very much welcome any advice you can give of the pros and cons of the 2 bikes as i really know nothing about drive train, group sets etc.
Fx 2 has 24 gears 3x8 which appeals to me as I do a lot of hills , fx 3 has 18 9x2
Last edited by Masonchat; 01-27-21 at 06:26 PM.
#2
Senior Member
You mentioned the gearing and hills...
At the lower end of the gearing, the FX3 would be a little better for climbing:
Besides the extremes, you also want to consider whether you could camp out on one chain ring for a lot of your riding. For example, maybe the triple would let you stay on the middle ring most of the the time and just go down or up for the extreme up/downhill stretches. Whereas the transition between the two chain rings on the double might not be in a place that is conducive for that. I'm not saying that it would happen - that of course depends on your specific riding. I'm just saying it's something to consider. A test ride over your normal terrain would be very helpful in that regard.
Both non-suspension bikes I've owned have had carbon forks, so I can't compare them to aluminum. I'm told carbon makes a difference, but just how much of a difference I can't really say.
One way to look at your choice would be to ask how similar the FX2 is to your current bike. If it's not very different, then what's the point of getting the new bike? If it's just a matter of getting something now vs. waiting to get what you really want, I'd say wait. A year from now, what will you be happier with?
At the lower end of the gearing, the FX3 would be a little better for climbing:
- The FX3's 30/36 is 0.833
- The FX2's 28/32 is 0.875
- The FX3's 46/11 is 4.182
- The FX2's 48/11 is 4.363
Besides the extremes, you also want to consider whether you could camp out on one chain ring for a lot of your riding. For example, maybe the triple would let you stay on the middle ring most of the the time and just go down or up for the extreme up/downhill stretches. Whereas the transition between the two chain rings on the double might not be in a place that is conducive for that. I'm not saying that it would happen - that of course depends on your specific riding. I'm just saying it's something to consider. A test ride over your normal terrain would be very helpful in that regard.
Both non-suspension bikes I've owned have had carbon forks, so I can't compare them to aluminum. I'm told carbon makes a difference, but just how much of a difference I can't really say.
One way to look at your choice would be to ask how similar the FX2 is to your current bike. If it's not very different, then what's the point of getting the new bike? If it's just a matter of getting something now vs. waiting to get what you really want, I'd say wait. A year from now, what will you be happier with?
Last edited by AU Tiger; 02-02-21 at 05:25 PM.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks Tiger for such a detailed informative reply, I got the Fx 2 yesterday , before I saw your post, haven't tried it out yet, but I have feeling you were 100% right and should have waited, we have a saying here in Ireland, never buy a pig in a poke 😁 , which is what I did
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,601
Bikes: 06 Lemond Reno, 98 GT Timberline mtn.bike
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 700 Times
in
436 Posts
Thanks Tiger for such a detailed informative reply, I got the Fx 2 yesterday , before I saw your post, haven't tried it out yet, but I have feeling you were 100% right and should have waited, we have a saying here in Ireland, never buy a pig in a poke 😁 , which is what I did
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Freeranger you are right, I didn't mean fx 2 is a bad bike, it's a good bike, but having tried it, it doesn't feel like an upgrade on my current fx 7.2 , the fx 7.2 feels like a smoother more responsive ride
, plus I had the handle bars customized for a very upright position due to neck problems, I had hoped getting a large frame on fx 2 would help ,but I've learned now that any bike I buy would need to have handle bars customized, which means getting all the cables redone .
but you are also right at least it's a good time to sell bikes so hopefully I wont lose too much
, plus I had the handle bars customized for a very upright position due to neck problems, I had hoped getting a large frame on fx 2 would help ,but I've learned now that any bike I buy would need to have handle bars customized, which means getting all the cables redone .
but you are also right at least it's a good time to sell bikes so hopefully I wont lose too much
#6
Senior Member
Thanks Tiger for such a detailed informative reply, I got the Fx 2 yesterday , before I saw your post, haven't tried it out yet, but I have feeling you were 100% right and should have waited, we have a saying here in Ireland, never buy a pig in a poke 😁 , which is what I did
Likes For AU Tiger:
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Very true tiger, been out on it again , its definitely growing on me , handle bar is a problem for me but would be same problem with any bike, that's what I get for crashing a motorcycle and landing on my head 😁, it's the one drawback on these bikes , if I could raise handlebars 3 inches think I'd be very happy with it
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
You can! You can get riser handlebars so your grip area is 3" higher than what you have now. You can also just get a stem extender, which will raise the entire bar up. You can also get an adjustable angle stem, which will allow you to experiment with different heights. Some of these solutions may require longer brake hoses or shift cables, but that's a one-time fix for something that may work better for you in the long run.
Likes For hokiefyd:
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
You can! You can get riser handlebars so your grip area is 3" higher than what you have now. You can also just get a stem extender, which will raise the entire bar up. You can also get an adjustable angle stem, which will allow you to experiment with different heights. Some of these solutions may require longer brake hoses or shift cables, but that's a one-time fix for something that may work better for you in the long run.
Likes For Masonchat:
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
You can! You can get riser handlebars so your grip area is 3" higher than what you have now. You can also just get a stem extender, which will raise the entire bar up. You can also get an adjustable angle stem, which will allow you to experiment with different heights. Some of these solutions may require longer brake hoses or shift cables, but that's a one-time fix for something that may work better for you in the long run.