Baja Divide
#101
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,923
Bikes: Nature Boy 853 Disc, Pugsley SS
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Ditto. The 3.8" Surly Knard tire makes a fantastic touring tire... it's cheap for a fatbike tire, it has a fast-rolling tread, it's wide and fat, and the profile is great for those annoying paved sections. On a 65mm rim, it's fat but it's not "unreasonable."
#102
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have they done it? I did it. I measured it. I ride the bike every day. With 175mm cranks, I would have hit my pedals on the ground every time I cornered. I rock strike a lot with 26x3.8" tires, 27.5x2.8" is even shorter.
I've said this like three times, it's not a very good idea.
I've said this like three times, it's not a very good idea.
So a Pugs has a BB drop of 55mm. The "perfect" bike for the BD according to the route originators is the Advocate Hayduke, with a BB drop of 60mm. So if all else were assumed equal (same tires, same PSI), there is no geometric argument that a Pugs will suffer more pedal strikes than the holy Hayduke. In fact, its 5mm less likely.
If @willibrord is prepared/capable of riding the BD (and most of the evidence on this thread suggests otherwise) but faces the sole obstacle of lacking a suitable bike, there are multiple sub-$1000 options out there that would likely see him through just fine. The Growler Charlie at Performancebike.com for example: $799 w/ 27.5x3 and a Rockshox suspension fork. Needs some tweaks before embarking (tubeless conversion) but would probably last the trip. Or the Charge Cooker Midi series. Or leftover Marin Pine Mountain 1 models.
#103
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Also worth noting that Surly's dedicated 27.5+ bike, the new 2017 Karate Monkey, has the exact same 55mm BB drop as the Pugsley.
The 2017 KM would be a good inexpensive choice for the BD but unfortunately not available until early February in shops.
The 2017 KM would be a good inexpensive choice for the BD but unfortunately not available until early February in shops.
#104
Senior Member
I'm not advocating that our dear friend @willibrord pursue a Pugsley for the BD, but I think this subjective debate over the "fit" of 27.5x3 wheels on a Pugs is unnecessary and misleading. The math is pretty objective. Its simply a matter of BB drop, no?
So a Pugs has a BB drop of 55mm. The "perfect" bike for the BD according to the route originators is the Advocate Hayduke, with a BB drop of 60mm. So if all else were assumed equal (same tires, same PSI), there is no geometric argument that a Pugs will suffer more pedal strikes than the holy Hayduke. In fact, its 5mm less likely.
If @willibrord is prepared/capable of riding the BD (and most of the evidence on this thread suggests otherwise) but faces the sole obstacle of lacking a suitable bike, there are multiple sub-$1000 options out there that would likely see him through just fine. The Growler Charlie at Performancebike.com for example: $799 w/ 27.5x3 and a Rockshox suspension fork. Needs some tweaks before embarking (tubeless conversion) but would probably last the trip. Or the Charge Cooker Midi series. Or leftover Marin Pine Mountain 1 models.
So a Pugs has a BB drop of 55mm. The "perfect" bike for the BD according to the route originators is the Advocate Hayduke, with a BB drop of 60mm. So if all else were assumed equal (same tires, same PSI), there is no geometric argument that a Pugs will suffer more pedal strikes than the holy Hayduke. In fact, its 5mm less likely.
If @willibrord is prepared/capable of riding the BD (and most of the evidence on this thread suggests otherwise) but faces the sole obstacle of lacking a suitable bike, there are multiple sub-$1000 options out there that would likely see him through just fine. The Growler Charlie at Performancebike.com for example: $799 w/ 27.5x3 and a Rockshox suspension fork. Needs some tweaks before embarking (tubeless conversion) but would probably last the trip. Or the Charge Cooker Midi series. Or leftover Marin Pine Mountain 1 models.
Also, 55mm is fairly high, even for MTB. The new Cannondale mtb's are 62mm FWIW.
#105
Senior Member
The 26 x4" and a 27.5 x 3" rim/tires are similar in diameter.
#106
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pugsley is 26" yes, but 26x4 not 26x2.4, so a lower BB than typical 26" bikes due to larger effective wheel diameter. If you look at something like a Surly 1x1 (nominally for 26x2.4) it has 40mm BB drop.
#107
Senior Member
I'm not advocating that our dear friend @willibrord Its simply a matter of BB drop, no?
So a Pugs has a BB drop of 55mm. The "perfect" bike for the BD according to the route originators is the Advocate Hayduke, with a BB drop of 60mm. So if all else were assumed equal (same tires, same PSI), there is no geometric argument that a Pugs will suffer more pedal strikes than the holy Hayduke. In fact, its 5mm less likely.
So a Pugs has a BB drop of 55mm. The "perfect" bike for the BD according to the route originators is the Advocate Hayduke, with a BB drop of 60mm. So if all else were assumed equal (same tires, same PSI), there is no geometric argument that a Pugs will suffer more pedal strikes than the holy Hayduke. In fact, its 5mm less likely.
UPS tracker shows my new tires out for delivery. My measurements say I can fit a 2.8 ranger on the front. They were out. So I ordered a 3.0 ranger and a 2.4 ardent. One tire or the other I am out of here. I have a 2.3 on the back. It is not the perfect Baja bike, I will make it anyway.
For our dear old friend @willibrord. Go for it. It is not a good adventure unless a guy in a funny hat tells you to turn back.
#108
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How high is the top of the tire from the ground? If a 27.5 tire stands 27.5 inches tall, and a 29 inch tire stands 29 inchs tall, than switching wheel size makes the tire bottom bracket closer to the ground. The bb still has a 55 mm drop. That drop is from axle to axle. Draw a straight line from the front axle to the back axle, measure the distance from the center of the bb to the line, and get the bb drop. Put on taller tires the bb gets higher off the ground. Put on shorter tires the bb and the pedals get closer to the ground. BB drop remains the same, distance from the ground changes with the tires. Google Baja 1,000 on youtube. How much clearance do you need down there. Why is the Baja 1,000 the place where they test the latest and greatest shocks?
UPS tracker shows my new tires out for delivery. My measurements say I can fit a 2.8 ranger on the front. They were out. So I ordered a 3.0 ranger and a 2.4 ardent. One tire or the other I am out of here. I have a 2.3 on the back. It is not the perfect Baja bike, I will make it anyway.
For our dear old friend @willibrord. Go for it. It is not a good adventure unless a guy in a funny hat tells you to turn back.
UPS tracker shows my new tires out for delivery. My measurements say I can fit a 2.8 ranger on the front. They were out. So I ordered a 3.0 ranger and a 2.4 ardent. One tire or the other I am out of here. I have a 2.3 on the back. It is not the perfect Baja bike, I will make it anyway.
For our dear old friend @willibrord. Go for it. It is not a good adventure unless a guy in a funny hat tells you to turn back.
27.5 wheels aren't necessarily 27.5 in diameter. The tire cross section has a substantial impact. 27.5 is the approx. diameter of a nominal 27.5x2.1-ish tire. But on this thread we are primarily talking about 27.5x3 tires, which coincidentally are pretty close to 29x2.2 in outside diameter. So switching the wheels as you note above may not impact BB height at all. Indeed, this is the premise behind the wave of new bikes that are "27.5+/29 compatible."
For reference, some radius figures (approx. dimensions, as exact dims depend on specific tire brand/model and pressures):
-29x3 is ~385mm radius
-29x2.3 is ~365mm radius
-27.5x3 is ~ 360mm radius
-26x4 is ~ 365mm radius
My main point was to quantify the discussion of viability of 27.5x3 wheels/tires on a frame originally intended for 26x4 wheels/tires. As you can see from the dimensions above, the radius is nearly the same, so effective BB height is essentially unchanged. The slightly larger radius of 26x4 is typically cancelled by the slightly lower pressures typical of 4" tires (and hence higher compression of the tire cross section) such that the effective outer diameters are, for practical purposes, equal. Practically speaking, differences in specific tires and pressures will yield more distinctions than the generic dimensions will.
What BB height is "needed" in Baja? Now that is a subjective discussion. My point is that the BB height of a Pugsley with 27.5x3 is objectively 5mm higher than an Advocate Hayduke with the same wheels/tires. So categorically dismissing the viability of a Pugsley running 27.5x3 is subjective hyperbole contradicted by the objective math.
#110
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My main point was to quantify the discussion of viability of 27.5x3 wheels/tires on a frame originally intended for 26x4 wheels/tires. As you can see from the dimensions above, the radius is nearly the same, so effective BB height is essentially unchanged. The slightly larger radius of 26x4 is typically cancelled by the slightly lower pressures typical of 4" tires (and hence higher compression of the tire cross section) such that the effective outer diameters are, for practical purposes, equal. Practically speaking, differences in specific tires and pressures will yield more distinctions than the generic dimensions will.
The resident bike forum experts were wrong?
Will wonders never cease?
#111
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
I havent figured out if you are just trolling or are overly opinionated while also being ignorant. I think its the second, but will enjoy figuring it out if you keep posting. Your posts are entertaining for sure.
#112
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I might be opinionated but I don't attack the motives of those who presume to give me advice. Really I appreciate most of it but it is hard to sort through the contradictions.
#113
Senior Member
Baja is the place to excape all opinionated contradictions.
I am attempting to sort out a few last details. I found a slit in my stan´s rim tape, and need to find a new roll of it. My etrex is acting funny, or I did not press the right button, something. Maybe read the instructions.
Tubeless is important. With tubes I get about 4 punctures a day in Baja. Tubeless I get about 0 punctures a month down there. My 3.0 tire did not fit the fork. 2.8 would fit, but they are out of sock. So I am going 2.4 on the front and 2.3 on the back. I will be much happier when I get on the road, and away from the opinionated contradictions.
music from mexicali baja californis norte
Last edited by chrisx; 12-14-16 at 02:22 AM.
#114
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,923
Bikes: Nature Boy 853 Disc, Pugsley SS
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Since we're all at a place called bike forums, I hope most of us already understand how BB drop is defined.
27.5 wheels aren't necessarily 27.5 in diameter. The tire cross section has a substantial impact. 27.5 is the approx. diameter of a nominal 27.5x2.1-ish tire. But on this thread we are primarily talking about 27.5x3 tires, which coincidentally are pretty close to 29x2.2 in outside diameter. So switching the wheels as you note above may not impact BB height at all. Indeed, this is the premise behind the wave of new bikes that are "27.5+/29 compatible."
For reference, some radius figures (approx. dimensions, as exact dims depend on specific tire brand/model and pressures):
-29x3 is ~385mm radius
-29x2.3 is ~365mm radius
-27.5x3 is ~ 360mm radius
-26x4 is ~ 365mm radius
My main point was to quantify the discussion of viability of 27.5x3 wheels/tires on a frame originally intended for 26x4 wheels/tires. As you can see from the dimensions above, the radius is nearly the same, so effective BB height is essentially unchanged. The slightly larger radius of 26x4 is typically cancelled by the slightly lower pressures typical of 4" tires (and hence higher compression of the tire cross section) such that the effective outer diameters are, for practical purposes, equal. Practically speaking, differences in specific tires and pressures will yield more distinctions than the generic dimensions will.
What BB height is "needed" in Baja? Now that is a subjective discussion. My point is that the BB height of a Pugsley with 27.5x3 is objectively 5mm higher than an Advocate Hayduke with the same wheels/tires. So categorically dismissing the viability of a Pugsley running 27.5x3 is subjective hyperbole contradicted by the objective math.
27.5 wheels aren't necessarily 27.5 in diameter. The tire cross section has a substantial impact. 27.5 is the approx. diameter of a nominal 27.5x2.1-ish tire. But on this thread we are primarily talking about 27.5x3 tires, which coincidentally are pretty close to 29x2.2 in outside diameter. So switching the wheels as you note above may not impact BB height at all. Indeed, this is the premise behind the wave of new bikes that are "27.5+/29 compatible."
For reference, some radius figures (approx. dimensions, as exact dims depend on specific tire brand/model and pressures):
-29x3 is ~385mm radius
-29x2.3 is ~365mm radius
-27.5x3 is ~ 360mm radius
-26x4 is ~ 365mm radius
My main point was to quantify the discussion of viability of 27.5x3 wheels/tires on a frame originally intended for 26x4 wheels/tires. As you can see from the dimensions above, the radius is nearly the same, so effective BB height is essentially unchanged. The slightly larger radius of 26x4 is typically cancelled by the slightly lower pressures typical of 4" tires (and hence higher compression of the tire cross section) such that the effective outer diameters are, for practical purposes, equal. Practically speaking, differences in specific tires and pressures will yield more distinctions than the generic dimensions will.
What BB height is "needed" in Baja? Now that is a subjective discussion. My point is that the BB height of a Pugsley with 27.5x3 is objectively 5mm higher than an Advocate Hayduke with the same wheels/tires. So categorically dismissing the viability of a Pugsley running 27.5x3 is subjective hyperbole contradicted by the objective math.
So, yes, the math works. Whether this translates to a practical bike is not something I am convinced of, since the 27.5+ topic came up three times in the last year and a half on MTBR.com and all three times, people were not happy with the conversion.
Maybe the strongest evidence is the utter lack of examples of anyone running a Pugsley like this.
I'll also concede that maybe I'm wrong, and maybe willibrod will be the first person to successfully drill a 27.5+ rim for the Pugsley offset, lace it up, successfully manage the BB height through tire choice and roll 2,000 miles to the end of the Baja Divide. I honestly hope this is the outcome if he wants to do that.
I don't have any agenda here other than to offer my best advice, and since I own a Pugsley, I can tell you my plans do not include 27.5+ conversions.
Last edited by mdilthey; 12-14-16 at 02:28 AM.
#115
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'll buy that, but math and tires are two words that never go together. The sidewall height of many of the 27.5+ tires is not all that high, and width and volume are similarly all over the map. There are 3.25 tires that measure out to 2.7 (I'm looking at you, Vee Rubber).
So, yes, the math works. Whether this translates to a practical bike is not something I am convinced of, since the 27.5+ topic came up three times in the last year and a half on MTBR.com and all three times, people were not happy with the conversion.
Maybe the strongest evidence is the utter lack of examples of anyone running a Pugsley like this.
I'll also concede that maybe I'm wrong, and maybe willibrod will be the first person to successfully drill a 27.5+ rim for the Pugsley offset, lace it up, successfully manage the BB height through tire choice and roll 2,000 miles to the end of the Baja Divide. I honestly hope this is the outcome if he wants to do that.
I don't have any agenda here other than to offer my best advice, and since I own a Pugsley, I can tell you my plans do not include 27.5+ conversions.
So, yes, the math works. Whether this translates to a practical bike is not something I am convinced of, since the 27.5+ topic came up three times in the last year and a half on MTBR.com and all three times, people were not happy with the conversion.
Maybe the strongest evidence is the utter lack of examples of anyone running a Pugsley like this.
I'll also concede that maybe I'm wrong, and maybe willibrod will be the first person to successfully drill a 27.5+ rim for the Pugsley offset, lace it up, successfully manage the BB height through tire choice and roll 2,000 miles to the end of the Baja Divide. I honestly hope this is the outcome if he wants to do that.
I don't have any agenda here other than to offer my best advice, and since I own a Pugsley, I can tell you my plans do not include 27.5+ conversions.
I also made a disclaimer in my follow-up post that specific rim/tire combos will vary from the general radius figures I noted.
But you seem to be ignoring (or missing?) my main point, which is that the BB height is objectively *not* among the many reasons that willibord should avoid the 27.5+ Pugsley "solution", as you suggested in your earlier post. I'm simply pointing out that the BB drop on a Pugsley is identical to Surly's dedicated 27.5+ trail bike (2017 Karate Monkey), and actually 5mm higher than a widely well reviewed Hayduke, so the Pugsley BB height is not unsuited to 27.5+. This "math" is not influenced by the variability of real world tires sizes: for any given 27.5+ rim/tire, the Pugs BB will be identical in height to a 2017 KM with the same wheels.
Increased rock strike on a Pugsley may be due, in part, to the wider stance of the pedals given the wider BB and larger Q factor.
#116
Senior Member
Thread Starter
As I stated in my original post, I'm not advocating that willibrod pursue the Pugsley. There is a long list of reasons not to, the offset/asym challenge among them, and more generally its sort of putting good money after bad. Better ways to spend money toward the objective.
I also made a disclaimer in my follow-up post that specific rim/tire combos will vary from the general radius figures I noted.
But you seem to be ignoring (or missing?) my main point, which is that the BB height is objectively *not* among the many reasons that willibord should avoid the 27.5+ Pugsley "solution", as you suggested in your earlier post. I'm simply pointing out that the BB drop on a Pugsley is identical to Surly's dedicated 27.5+ trail bike (2017 Karate Monkey), and actually 5mm higher than a widely well reviewed Hayduke, so the Pugsley BB height is not unsuited to 27.5+. This "math" is not influenced by the variability of real world tires sizes: for any given 27.5+ rim/tire, the Pugs BB will be identical in height to a 2017 KM with the same wheels.
Increased rock strike on a Pugsley may be due, in part, to the wider stance of the pedals given the wider BB and larger Q factor.
I also made a disclaimer in my follow-up post that specific rim/tire combos will vary from the general radius figures I noted.
But you seem to be ignoring (or missing?) my main point, which is that the BB height is objectively *not* among the many reasons that willibord should avoid the 27.5+ Pugsley "solution", as you suggested in your earlier post. I'm simply pointing out that the BB drop on a Pugsley is identical to Surly's dedicated 27.5+ trail bike (2017 Karate Monkey), and actually 5mm higher than a widely well reviewed Hayduke, so the Pugsley BB height is not unsuited to 27.5+. This "math" is not influenced by the variability of real world tires sizes: for any given 27.5+ rim/tire, the Pugs BB will be identical in height to a 2017 KM with the same wheels.
Increased rock strike on a Pugsley may be due, in part, to the wider stance of the pedals given the wider BB and larger Q factor.
#117
Senior Member
I'll buy that, but math and tires are two words that never go together. The sidewall height of many of the 27.5+ tires is not all that high, and width and volume are similarly all over the map. There are 3.25 tires that measure out to 2.7 (I'm looking at you, Vee Rubber).
willibrod will be the first person to successfully drill a 27.5+ rim for the Pugsley offset, lace it up, successfully manage the BB height through tire choice and roll 2,000 miles to the end of the Baja Divide.
willibrod will be the first person to successfully drill a 27.5+ rim for the Pugsley offset, lace it up, successfully manage the BB height through tire choice and roll 2,000 miles to the end of the Baja Divide.
I will take on the ground experience.
The Katy trail is to frozen cold this time of year. That is why people are headed for Baja.
#120
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
43 Posts
Perhaps though I'd reckon that folks stout enough to take on the Baja Divide trip probably can handle handle some cold temps too. BTW just now I'm a bit surprised to see that current sunlight length in Baja is only ~10% more than mid-latitude USA. Do riders use lights?
#122
Senior Member
How were you going to recharge the lights?
Daylight Hours Explorer
baja california january 2009
nov 2014
Perhaps though I'd reckon that folks stout enough to take on the Baja Divide trip probably can handle handle some cold temps too. BTW just now I'm a bit surprised to see that current sunlight length in Baja is only ~10% more than mid-latitude USA. Do riders use lights?
baja california january 2009
nov 2014
#123
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Perhaps though I'd reckon that folks stout enough to take on the Baja Divide trip probably can handle handle some cold temps too. BTW just now I'm a bit surprised to see that current sunlight length in Baja is only ~10% more than mid-latitude USA. Do riders use lights?
#124
Senior Member
katy in January is colder than baja, much colder.
Above photos are at higher elevation than the offical route. I neglected to read the rules about finding my own route.
BCS is warm in winter
closer to the route
Above photos are at higher elevation than the offical route. I neglected to read the rules about finding my own route.
BCS is warm in winter
closer to the route
Last edited by chrisx; 12-15-16 at 10:04 PM.
#125
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
43 Posts
Wow, didn't know it snowed in Baja. But for folks who can't manage a big trip down south, winter might be a good time to do local region trails if they don't have snow/ice. No worries about car traffic & more scenic/distant rides can be saved for warmer months.