"Best" frame material and why.........
#1
Humvee of bikes =Worksman
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
"Best" frame material and why.........
I prefer steel but there are other frame materials than steel.
This story talks about these materials..........
What is the greenest type of bike frame? | Grist
This story talks about these materials..........
What is the greenest type of bike frame? | Grist
__________________
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.
Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.
Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
I have two vintage racers. One is aluminum and one is 531c steel. I could not care less how "green" it is.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Keeping it realistic, consider both the manufacturing and usage impacts if a bicycle is bought and used in lieu of a car.
I'm not being anti car here, but if just a small percentage of the multi-car households in the USA gave up one car, and planned their tirps better using a bicycle instead for short errands where possible, there's tremendous potential for improvement.
I'm not being anti car here, but if just a small percentage of the multi-car households in the USA gave up one car, and planned their tirps better using a bicycle instead for short errands where possible, there's tremendous potential for improvement.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Then there are the steel bikes, which are durable workhorses but also kinda heavy. On the plus side, they’re also very recyclable, and old steel can be endlessly recycled into new bikes (though good luck tracing the source of the steel on any particular bike). And in general, producing steel emits less carbon than producing aluminum — 1.8 tons of CO2 per ton of steel to 2.2 tons of CO2 per ton of aluminum — though I couldn’t find a bike-to-bike analysis for those two.
And a 20 lb bike will require about 40 lbs of carbon/fuel.
A pint a pound... and it is equivalent to about 5 gallons of fuel to produce one bicycle. WHEW.
I'm not quite sure how many mile I've put on my primary bike, but it is in the range of 25,000 to 50,000 miles.
So that works out to be 5,000 to 10,000 miles to the gallon. Not too bad. And the bike's not worn out yet.
I suppose one should also apply the same formula to a car, so a 3,000 pound car ==> 6,000 pounds of "carbon" ==> 750 gallons of fuel to produce it before it even gets out the dealership door.
What I see as the "greenest" thing of a bicycle is just getting people outside on the bicycle. Everything else is just icing on the cake.
====================
Note, depending on how one calculates, it may be 2-3 tons of CO[sub]2[/sub] per ton of petroleum, so that actual fuel usage may be lower. However, there is a lot of additional machining and welding work on the bike, as well as transportation of the bike and components. Plus "consumables".
Last edited by CliffordK; 03-28-15 at 09:14 PM.
#5
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
I prefer steel but there are other frame materials than steel.
This story talks about these materials..........
What is the greenest type of bike frame? | Grist
This story talks about these materials..........
What is the greenest type of bike frame? | Grist
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,763
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
Oh god this question has been debated ad-nauseum. The best, as is well known and undisputed, is carsteelimum, with the specific forumulas depending on which tube.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,532
Bikes: Working on replacing my stolen Soma Buena Vista Mixte
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Liked 95 Times
in
44 Posts
Not all steel bikes are "heavy." The frame is only a small portion of weight. Some people find that steel provides a smoother ride. Light is not always better, depending on how you use yor bike.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times
in
44 Posts
Steel bikes that are "light" are far more delicate then even the most overblown claims of the anti carbon luddites in regards to CF bikes. Steel may provide a smoother ride than aluminum, but not than CF. When is lighter not better? Take two touring bikes, both with all the necessary accoutrements, both equally strong. The lighter one is better. That's just a fact.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
This "best frame material" discussion is headed the same way as all others. People rehashing their predetermined preferences and prejudices with no serious discussion or the various considerations that may make one better for some people, and another better for others. In the end, nobody changes his mind.
I, own bikes made of brazed steel, bonded (not welded) aluminum, and welded Ti, and each is comparable to the other though there are differences. I don't own a CF frame, but the Ti bike has a CF fork, and that too is serving well.
All materials are great if used well, and terrible if used badly.
I, own bikes made of brazed steel, bonded (not welded) aluminum, and welded Ti, and each is comparable to the other though there are differences. I don't own a CF frame, but the Ti bike has a CF fork, and that too is serving well.
All materials are great if used well, and terrible if used badly.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#11
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,118
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
371 Posts
The list overlooks the greenest material, bamboo.
EDIT: Oops, went back and read it all the way through. Bamboo did get a mention.
EDIT: Oops, went back and read it all the way through. Bamboo did get a mention.
Last edited by Dan Burkhart; 03-29-15 at 01:11 PM.
#12
Banned.
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Driftlessburg, WI
Posts: 144
Bikes: 1989 Greg LeMond Le Vanquer, 2005 LeMond Zurich, 2010 LHT, Marlboro Fuji Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,532
Bikes: Working on replacing my stolen Soma Buena Vista Mixte
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Liked 95 Times
in
44 Posts
When i am biking 2 miles downtown, or 5 miles to a play in the next town, material is pretty irrelevant. The most important thing is to have tires wide enough to deal with potholes and poorly maintained roads. A forever "townie" bike is good enough for me!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times
in
44 Posts
If the question is "best", which is how this question was posed, than I'm afraid "greatest" does matter. Pretty much to the exclusion of all other considerations.
#15
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Steel and aluminium bikes can take a lot more abuse and beating then carbon bikes. Carbon bikes require torque wrench just to install and tighten a seat post or to install another carbon component. Dings and scratches can weaken carbon and make it crack. I don't want to deal with such fragile material.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
If I had the disposable income, I'd buy another carbon fiber bike. Always nice to have options & they do(the right one!) have a certain appeal. But, so do many Frame materials. I really enjoyed my Klein aluminum frame. Though the ride was a little stiff, it was responsive & ate up corners with the best of them. Given my druthers, I'll take a steel bike from the 80's, with high end steel & racing geometry. To me, that's where it's at. No better riding experience.
#17
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Carbon frames/components may have their place in racing where every gram of weight counts and where performance is of greatest importance...For daily commuting and utility riding steel or aluminium is a much better material.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I don't think its a racing bike issue. Any material can be built into a competitive weight. The steel frame I built ended up at 17lbs, built up. & there was plenty of room to cut weight from that. I'm loud & proud with my opinion that steel frames are still quite relevant. However, there is one area where carbon fibre has an edge. It can be shaped into any thing the mind can imagine. You can put all of the frame weight into very specific areas. With that Said, a steel frame with a great set of wheels isn't far enough off to make it a losing proposition.
#20
Banned.
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Driftlessburg, WI
Posts: 144
Bikes: 1989 Greg LeMond Le Vanquer, 2005 LeMond Zurich, 2010 LHT, Marlboro Fuji Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
either way it's a subjective determination driven by market forces with no precise definition as the responses to this thread continue to prove
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times
in
44 Posts
Except that all the anti carbon folks are basing their opinion on the nebulous facts that steel is real, aesthetics, and imaginary dangers involving failure modes. The quantifiable best material is CF. Lighter, stronger, more versatile.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Steel is tougher than carbon/epoxy and more resistant to scratch, score and impact damage.
Threaded eyelets for rack and fenders can be permanently brazed on. Few carbon bikes have eyelets; they are fine for racing but no-one makes a decent carbon production tourer or utility/commuter. Parlee is perhaps the only outfit making a custom [light-duty] tourer. See prices. $8000 frame only.
Workshops for small-production runs and one-off custom bikes are easier to setup for steel so you see more novel designs and sizes. Most carbon bikes are racebikes, all UCI compliant, medium sizes (S/M/L)
#23
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Magnesium won't dent or buckle and is much more comfortable than even steel due to its inherent vibration dampening characteristics.
Having ridden steel, carbon, and aluminum in multiple permutations, I can say for certain magnesium is the most comfortable by far no even close. Does not make it the best. Best for what? Best aerodynamic road bike? Cervelo S5 of Felt AR. Best for a mountain TT would suggest the lightest weight= carbon. Best for long distance endurance events? Certainly not carbon. Best for touring with fenders and racks? Again, not carbon. Wide tires for touring? Not carbon.
If there was a best, N + 1 would not exist.
Paketa Custom Magnesium Bicycles :: Stronger Than Carbon Fiber and Aluminum
Having ridden steel, carbon, and aluminum in multiple permutations, I can say for certain magnesium is the most comfortable by far no even close. Does not make it the best. Best for what? Best aerodynamic road bike? Cervelo S5 of Felt AR. Best for a mountain TT would suggest the lightest weight= carbon. Best for long distance endurance events? Certainly not carbon. Best for touring with fenders and racks? Again, not carbon. Wide tires for touring? Not carbon.
If there was a best, N + 1 would not exist.
Paketa Custom Magnesium Bicycles :: Stronger Than Carbon Fiber and Aluminum
#24
Senior Member
Magnesium won't dent or buckle and is much more comfortable than even steel due to its inherent vibration dampening characteristics.
Having ridden steel, carbon, and aluminum in multiple permutations, I can say for certain magnesium is the most comfortable by far no even close. Does not make it the best. Best for what? Best aerodynamic road bike? Cervelo S5 of Felt AR. Best for a mountain TT would suggest the lightest weight= carbon. Best for long distance endurance events? Certainly not carbon. Best for touring with fenders and racks? Again, not carbon. Wide tires for touring? Not carbon.
If there was a best, N + 1 would not exist.
Paketa Custom Magnesium Bicycles :: Stronger Than Carbon Fiber and Aluminum
Having ridden steel, carbon, and aluminum in multiple permutations, I can say for certain magnesium is the most comfortable by far no even close. Does not make it the best. Best for what? Best aerodynamic road bike? Cervelo S5 of Felt AR. Best for a mountain TT would suggest the lightest weight= carbon. Best for long distance endurance events? Certainly not carbon. Best for touring with fenders and racks? Again, not carbon. Wide tires for touring? Not carbon.
If there was a best, N + 1 would not exist.
Paketa Custom Magnesium Bicycles :: Stronger Than Carbon Fiber and Aluminum
I have never been on a carbon bike. I rode a Titanium bike up and down the parking lot once. so I can not comment on those, of steel and aluminum I just can't find any love for aluminum . ( I have tried) I ride for health and enjoyment I don't care about bike weight I have a 50 lb mongoose brutus that I ride around the neighborhood
Roy
#25
tcarl
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 561
Bikes: Roark, Waterford 1100, 1987 Schwinn Paramount, Nishiki Professional, Bottecchia, 2 Scattantes, 3 Cannondale touring bikes, mtn. bike, cyclocross, hybrid, 1940's era Schwinn
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts