Anybody know the history of Ross bikes?
#451
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
I just read through that thread. A lot of it looks the same, except for the colors. One of the posts said the 87s went to the pastel colors. Mine was definitely red, whte, and blue. I wonder if it's a different year or model. I hope to get it back on the stand on Friday, so maybe I can find the serial number. Although I'm not sure where to look, anymore. That's how I proved it was mine when I recovered it, so I'm sure it's there!
Edited to say I found a page from a 1987 catalog that seems to show my bike. Only contradiction is the brakes, which the catalog describes as "Ross alloy power brakes."
Edited to say I found a page from a 1987 catalog that seems to show my bike. Only contradiction is the brakes, which the catalog describes as "Ross alloy power brakes."
#452
rls
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 12
Bikes: KHS Easton Aero Turbo -1993
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This Ross is for sale; what model is it?
Hi all your Ross fans!
I could purchase this Ross for $120. I road it and it rides well and does not feel like it is 32 pounds for sure. Everything has been tuned up. It has 27 inch tires/rims.
Let me know what you can tell me about what year/model it might be.
Thanks, Robert
I could purchase this Ross for $120. I road it and it rides well and does not feel like it is 32 pounds for sure. Everything has been tuned up. It has 27 inch tires/rims.
Let me know what you can tell me about what year/model it might be.
Thanks, Robert
#453
Senior Member
Hi all your Ross fans!
I could purchase this Ross for $120. I road it and it rides well and does not feel like it is 32 pounds for sure. Everything has been tuned up. It has 27 inch tires/rims.
Let me know what you can tell me about what year/model it might be.
Thanks, Robert
I could purchase this Ross for $120. I road it and it rides well and does not feel like it is 32 pounds for sure. Everything has been tuned up. It has 27 inch tires/rims.
Let me know what you can tell me about what year/model it might be.
Thanks, Robert
Saying this as a guy who is planning on some small upgrades to a 1980's Ross MTB with the same decals when I visit my family not too far from Allentown this fall, I think $120 is too much. You can probably find a better bike for less money if you have the patience to look.
#454
Senior Member
I would say that is double what it's worth, but really not worth spending the money on anyway. There are MUCH better bikes out there for that price if you look around.,,,,BD
#455
Senior Member
I would have to agree with others. I paid $160 for a Signature 294S and it came with Record hub/MA40 wheels. Maybe that was a lucky deal but all the same, if it were me, I would hold out for a better frame.
#456
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
I paid the same for the same bike about five years ago. All Campy Triomphe. Lucky you with the Record/MA40s. Knowing what I know now, $160 in either of our cases is a truly great deal. I still have the bike, and it serves as a stellar winter/rain bike.
#457
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
Can anyone ID this bike? I think it may be a Mt. McKinley? Fillet brazed triple butted Tange? I can get it for $45 but it appears to have some serious seat post issues.
It looks like this one except for the top tube decal:
https://budgetbicyclectr.com/1987-ro...n-bicycle.html
It looks like this one except for the top tube decal:
https://budgetbicyclectr.com/1987-ro...n-bicycle.html
#458
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southeastern,VA
Posts: 310
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times
in
22 Posts
Seems like the one McKinley. Rear wheel appears to have been replaced unfortunately.
For $45 I don't think you can go wrong. That's a pretty cool frame. The seat post will require some patience.
For $45 I don't think you can go wrong. That's a pretty cool frame. The seat post will require some patience.
#459
Senior Member
I agree; for $45 I would buy it and do battle with the post. If you have to bail on it you can likely recoup your outlay on parts. The shifters alone would probably get you at least half way there.
#460
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 187
Bikes: 1973 Schwinn World Voyageur | Francesco Moser SL | 1984 Ross Utopian | St. Etienne 531 | 1981 Peugeot PK10 | 2015 Cannondale SuperSix | 2012 Felt F65X
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times
in
18 Posts
Auchen, I am curious if you or others know if the Paragon / Aristocrat / Utopian were built in Allentown or overseas? I see your frame has a Ross Allentown head badge. My Utopian head badge does not include "Allentown" but I am led to believe they are all the same Ishiwata 024 frameset. I understood from other posts these were from 83-84, anyone have any certainty? Wanted to understand the history and whether this frame was truly made in my back yard in PA.
#461
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Auchen, I am curious if you or others know if the Paragon / Aristocrat / Utopian were built in Allentown or overseas? I see your frame has a Ross Allentown head badge. My Utopian head badge does not include "Allentown" but I am led to believe they are all the same Ishiwata 024 frameset. I understood from other posts these were from 83-84, anyone have any certainty? Wanted to understand the history and whether this frame was truly made in my back yard in PA.
#462
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 187
Bikes: 1973 Schwinn World Voyageur | Francesco Moser SL | 1984 Ross Utopian | St. Etienne 531 | 1981 Peugeot PK10 | 2015 Cannondale SuperSix | 2012 Felt F65X
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times
in
18 Posts
T-Mar, thanks for the response. Attached is a pic of the bottom showing ROSS 290 and a serial of 0883113147. Guessing that is a 1983, but curious to know what indicates the production facility?
#463
Fish Out of Water
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Milwaukee, U.S.A.
Posts: 44
Bikes: 1992 Cannondale 2.8, 1993 Trek 930, 2012 Trek Marlin, 2018 Raleigh Back Alley
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am in the process of saving an old, ugly Ross 4130 frame from an unpleasant fate in eBay purgatory. Its a 66cm and will be a SS/FG ride for me. I had the "Ross" decals made and found a foil headbadge sticker on eBay. Paint by Rustoleum.
#464
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Regarding the source, the known Allentown manufactured models from the mid-1980s all have an 'R' prefix to the serial number. Yours doesn't have one but there appears to be an isolated 'R' stamped into the drive side of the shell. If this was just sloppy workmanship and meant to be part of the serial number, then it could be an Allentown bicycle but I can't make a definitve statement.
#465
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
My '85 Signature 294S had a serial number of 0485100816. I believe, somewhere on the internet, somebody decoded the SNs for them, and 04 = month, 85 = year, and 100816 = sequence number during that year.
#466
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 187
Bikes: 1973 Schwinn World Voyageur | Francesco Moser SL | 1984 Ross Utopian | St. Etienne 531 | 1981 Peugeot PK10 | 2015 Cannondale SuperSix | 2012 Felt F65X
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times
in
18 Posts
Thank T-Mar, but I for some reason am failing to see the R on the drive side in the picture. My eyes aren't what they once were though.
#467
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
ROS' post adds further value, given that his serial number is from 1985 and matches your format (i.e. mmyyxxxxx). I have a handful of other 1985 serial numbers and they are format RAyymmxxxx. Besides the RA prefix (Ross Allentown?), the year and month positions are reversed and there is one less 'x' character. A couple of the samples have one and two places holding zeroes at the start of the 'x' character string, so it would appear that this portions of the serial number was a maximum of four characters, for this format.
#468
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
Clever, and perhaps fitting, except for their Signature line (290/292/294 plus a unicorn or two above that) in the '80s (at the very least). A bit 'too little too late' but nevertheless very good frames built by skilled craftsmen.
- former Signature 294S owner.
- former Signature 294S owner.
#469
Old Boy
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,127
Bikes: Mostly 1st-generation, top-of-the-line, non-unicrown MTBs/ATBs: All 1984 models: Dawes Ranger, Peugeot Canyon Express, Ross Mt. Whitney (chrome), Schwinn High Sierra, and a 1983 Trek 850.
Mentioned: 134 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 1,715 Times
in
611 Posts
Here's my condensed history of Ross bicycles:
"Ross Bicycles provided good value but otherwise were mediocre. That's why they went out of business."
I should know. I owned a Mount Hood that I purchased new. Beautiful to behold (it was solid chrome) but rode like a pig.
"Ross Bicycles provided good value but otherwise were mediocre. That's why they went out of business."
I should know. I owned a Mount Hood that I purchased new. Beautiful to behold (it was solid chrome) but rode like a pig.
To expand on what the honorable RiddleOfSteel said, they certainly did have at least two master framebuilders in Tom Kellogg and Jim Redcay. They were responsible for the Signature series of roadbikes, and I suspect they had a hand in the design/build of the Aristocrat, Paragon, and Utopian as well. These were all built with Ishiwata tubesets, either 022 or 024, and are widely recognized as high quality bicycles. I know my Aristocrat is one of my favorite rides.
Of course, the Ross bikes that were sold through department stores or as the low-end "economy" models in bike shops certainly were mediocre. On that we can definitely agree.
__________________
Roulez pour la joie, jamais pour la douleur.
USMC 1981-1991 Semper Fi!
Roulez pour la joie, jamais pour la douleur.
USMC 1981-1991 Semper Fi!
Last edited by DQRider; 04-12-18 at 01:37 PM.
#471
Senior Member
You have the bicycle in front o fyou, soI'm likely mistaken.
ROS' post adds further value, given that his serial number is from 1985 and matches your format (i.e. mmyyxxxxx). I have a handful of other 1985 serial numbers and they are format RAyymmxxxx. Besides the RA prefix (Ross Allentown?), the year and month positions are reversed and there is one less 'x' character. A couple of the samples have one and two places holding zeroes at the start of the 'x' character string, so it would appear that this portions of the serial number was a maximum of four characters, for this format.
ROS' post adds further value, given that his serial number is from 1985 and matches your format (i.e. mmyyxxxxx). I have a handful of other 1985 serial numbers and they are format RAyymmxxxx. Besides the RA prefix (Ross Allentown?), the year and month positions are reversed and there is one less 'x' character. A couple of the samples have one and two places holding zeroes at the start of the 'x' character string, so it would appear that this portions of the serial number was a maximum of four characters, for this format.
When I bought the bike it had a mix of parts, but enough Campy Victory/Triomphe still there that it looked like a pretty good match with the 1985 catalog page.
The other marking reads “Ross 200” fwiw.
#472
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
@T-Mar, here is another SN for you, from my Signature 294s. I have been calling it 1985. Just uncovered the SN and now I don’t know what to think. Looks to me like two different numbers struck one over the other, with a second cable guide hole drilled in the middle for good measure.
When I bought the bike it had a mix of parts, but enough Campy Victory/Triomphe still there that it looked like a pretty good match with the 1985 catalog page.
The other marking reads “Ross 200” fwiw.
When I bought the bike it had a mix of parts, but enough Campy Victory/Triomphe still there that it looked like a pretty good match with the 1985 catalog page.
The other marking reads “Ross 200” fwiw.
#473
Senior Member
Umm, thxs, I think. The original S/N appears to be from April 1983 and at that time, the 200 model was the Paragon. The Paragon and 294S frames are quite similar, with the main difference being 27" versus 700C wheels. My only suggestion is that the frame got caught up in some sort of rework process, though why it would take that long is a mystery. Regardless, it's final configuration certainly sounds like a 1985 Ross 294S and the overstruck S/N looks like it could be from November 1984, which would be appropriate for a 1985 model.
I am also wondering if the frame specs of the Signature bikes changed as production was handed off from Kellogg to Redcay etc etc, or if they were all made as Kellogg originally designed them. Anyone know about that?
#474
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Thanks. I can’t decide what the first digit of the top serial number looks like. If it’s a 1 as you suggest, that makes sense. My first thought was 0 (Jan ‘84). Do you know if the 1984 bikes were Victory/Triomphe-equipped like the 1985’s? I think I have only seen a 1985 catalog. Not that it makes a lot of difference to me.
I am also wondering if the frame specs of the Signature bikes changed as production was handed off from Kellogg to Redcay etc etc, or if they were all made as Kellogg originally designed them. Anyone know about that?
I am also wondering if the frame specs of the Signature bikes changed as production was handed off from Kellogg to Redcay etc etc, or if they were all made as Kellogg originally designed them. Anyone know about that?
#475
Senior Member
Triomphe and Victory were introduced in late 1984 for the 1985 model year, which is why I assumed the lead character was a '1'. The 1984 version of the 294 (model name Gran Tour) was equipped with Shimano Altus derailleurs, Shimano Tourney crankset, Dia-Compe 500Q brakeset and Maillard hubs laced to 27" Weinmann 718 rims. My understanding is that the Triathlon/Triad and the 29x series Signature models were all new Redcay designs.