Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Classic Bike vs Bike Question

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Classic Bike vs Bike Question

Old 03-26-18, 05:00 PM
  #1  
Kahrpistols
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 120

Bikes: Fuji Cross 2.0 LE

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Classic Bike vs Bike Question

Hi guys! I've been doing a lot of research recently and, at least on paper, I'm quite torn between a few bikes and was hoping y'all could help out. I'm not sure whether to go aluminum (CAAD 12 or Specialized Allez Sprint) or carbon, Canyon Aeroad or Ultimate. I currently have an aluminum frame / carbon fork bike already, which is making me lean towards a full carbon bike, but I have heard so many good things about the CAAD & Sprint that it makes me reconsider going full carbon.

Canyon offers crazy good deals on their bikes - Ultegra, disc brake, with Mavic Cosmic Pro Carbon SL disc wheels, $3,600 for the Ultimate SL & same spec except with Reynolds Strike SLG disc wheels for $3,800 for the Aeroad SLX. I'm looking at a similar amount if I get the Sprint & put some upgraded wheels on it & a bit less on the CAAD 12.

For a little more, I can get full carbon from Canyon. Has anyone else come across a similar dilemma and what did you do? I am currently traveling, and therefore unable to take any of these for a test ride, but plan to ride at least the CAAD & Sprint when I get back. But, as I'm sure you know, Canyon is only online in the US so I have no choice there....
Kahrpistols is offline  
Old 03-27-18, 08:18 AM
  #2  
SDF15
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: France
Posts: 29

Bikes: Vintage Camille Dardenne

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Been There, Seen That, Done That

Had similar problem one year ago- got an excellent deal on a used carbon frame for same or even less the price of a good alloy one. I went for the carbon frame because I wanted to see how it feels to own one.


it will always depend what you will intend to do with the bike:

Performance: For training or amateur level racing performance wise there will be no difference,
Comfort wise: there are better and cheaper options to improve comfort other than frame material choice .
Durability:Carbon feels fragile and you always have to handle it like porcelain. But carbon is repairable.

If you ask me now I would always go for the alloy and put the price difference into better wheels, larger tires >= 25mm, better saddle, a bikefit or a powermeter.
SDF15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
arod
Mountain Biking
28
07-11-19 07:01 PM
bfs2
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
14
01-30-16 06:52 AM
Sceadu498
Road Cycling
10
04-08-15 09:58 AM
99Klein
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
34
12-07-12 11:41 AM
akaelicash
Road Cycling
1
10-13-10 04:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.