Sante vs 600 Tricolor hubs
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Sante vs 600 Tricolor hubs
Is there a qualitative difference, or should I make a decision based solely on aesthetics?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,393
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,123 Times
in
746 Posts
Sante was a midrange group that had (has) a cult following due to its finish
By midrange - I mean roughly Shimano 105 level bits n pieces ------ in my personal experience, I do not believe Sante is up to the level of 600 or 600 tri color
although the functional differences are not enough to argue about
In the end, Dura Ace still reigns supreme
Sante' if in good shape though, would be a really cool group to build an 80's type build out on ---- but if the parts are scuffed up r worn even a bit, they really look tattered ---- the lighter gray colored Shimano 105SC from '91 - '96 ish or so suffered from that same problem ---- the slightest bit of wear left the painted finish looking really shabby (mostly crankarms)
By midrange - I mean roughly Shimano 105 level bits n pieces ------ in my personal experience, I do not believe Sante is up to the level of 600 or 600 tri color
although the functional differences are not enough to argue about
In the end, Dura Ace still reigns supreme
Sante' if in good shape though, would be a really cool group to build an 80's type build out on ---- but if the parts are scuffed up r worn even a bit, they really look tattered ---- the lighter gray colored Shimano 105SC from '91 - '96 ish or so suffered from that same problem ---- the slightest bit of wear left the painted finish looking really shabby (mostly crankarms)
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks. I will probably go with the Tricolor hubs then. The Sante ones do feel smooth; I will give them that, but I’m not in love with the look and don’t have the whole group anyway.
#5
Chainstay Brake Mafia
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Posts: 6,007
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Sante was a midrange group that had (has) a cult following due to its finish
By midrange - I mean roughly Shimano 105 level bits n pieces ------ in my personal experience, I do not believe Sante is up to the level of 600 or 600 tri color
although the functional differences are not enough to argue about
In the end, Dura Ace still reigns supreme
By midrange - I mean roughly Shimano 105 level bits n pieces ------ in my personal experience, I do not believe Sante is up to the level of 600 or 600 tri color
although the functional differences are not enough to argue about
In the end, Dura Ace still reigns supreme
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
For that era of Shimano hubs, 600EX/6400 "Tricolor" is a workhorse, but Dura Ace is absolutely the sweetest honey out there. I've had Sante wheels and honestly couldn't tell you where they fall.
This. A prime set of 7700 hubs, properly packed and adjusted, can be built to compliment almost any bike. And that's 20 years later.
Around here, the price differences, though, are still substantial.
This. A prime set of 7700 hubs, properly packed and adjusted, can be built to compliment almost any bike. And that's 20 years later.
Around here, the price differences, though, are still substantial.
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 11-28-17 at 07:31 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
#12
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 269 Times
in
153 Posts
I've got bikes with both and 600 is better quality IMO. The Sante was priced between 600 and Dura Ace, but Ultegra Tricolor was better IMO. I remember Shimano used Ultegra to test some ideas like SLR and one iteration was even slightly better than that year's Dura Ace.
Sante had the quick-release in the brake lever which is novel, but not as robust as the nob on the caliper.
Sante had the quick-release in the brake lever which is novel, but not as robust as the nob on the caliper.
#13
Senior Member
Sante? It was products like this that made me think the component makers had lost their way. Buy something for the look not the function ? Sheer madness.
#14
Full Member
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
I've got bikes with both and 600 is better quality IMO. The Sante was priced between 600 and Dura Ace, but Ultegra Tricolor was better IMO. I remember Shimano used Ultegra to test some ideas like SLR and one iteration was even slightly better than that year's Dura Ace.
Sante had the quick-release in the brake lever which is novel, but not as robust as the nob on the caliper.
Sante had the quick-release in the brake lever which is novel, but not as robust as the nob on the caliper.
#16
Senior Member
The first ad I saw for them came out in 87 with fd,rd, and shifters. By 1988 they were advertising hubs,crankset,brake calipers and levers, and headset. It was a "three -coat baked acrylic enamel finish." Although the levers were SLR the calipers didn't have quick release. One of their selling points was "you're looking at the difference between riding style and riding with style".
I saw alot of the second tier shimano sponsored pro triathletes using some form of them.
I saw alot of the second tier shimano sponsored pro triathletes using some form of them.
#17
Partially Sane.
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sunny Sacramento.
Posts: 3,559
Bikes: Soma Saga, pre-disc
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 972 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 643 Times
in
468 Posts
That '88 C'dale I recently acquired has a lot of Tri-Color, including the SLR brake levers. These ones have some road rash, but function really nicely. 😎 Don't have any Sante experience, but I'm loving these Tri hubs.
#18
Senior Member
Shimano 600 (6400 era) and Sante were built to about the same level of quality.
I've owned and ran both. I still use a 600 rear hub on my main bike.
I would highly recommend against Sante or 7400-era Dura-Ace. First, despite being high-quality gear, 7 and 8-speed Dura-Ace is filled with incompatibilities with everything else in the Shimano lineup, before or since. Hence the reason these parts perpetually clutter up Ebay.
Sante is also high-quality, notwithstanding the white-paint cosmetics that looks terrible in no time. Here are some of the other problems with Sante:
Sante: just say no. Later 600: yes.
I've owned and ran both. I still use a 600 rear hub on my main bike.
I would highly recommend against Sante or 7400-era Dura-Ace. First, despite being high-quality gear, 7 and 8-speed Dura-Ace is filled with incompatibilities with everything else in the Shimano lineup, before or since. Hence the reason these parts perpetually clutter up Ebay.
Sante is also high-quality, notwithstanding the white-paint cosmetics that looks terrible in no time. Here are some of the other problems with Sante:
- The rear hubs came in freewheel and 7-speed Uniglide freehub versions. Not very useful. I know you can replace the freehub for a 8/9/10 speed Hyperglide version, but why not buy the 600 hubs that are ready to go.
- The Sante brakes were skimpy single-pivots with no quick-releases. The 600 dual pivots are far better in every respect. Or for that matter, any dual pivot brakes are better than any single pivots.
- The Sante cranksets were Biopace. 'Nuff said. They also took a weird custom (narrow) bottom bracket spindle size.
- The Sante rear derailleur was a little work of art. Unfortunately, it had the smallest cog and cog range capacity of any derailleur that I'm aware of. You'll be lucky to run a cogset with 26 teeth. Run a wide range crankset such as a compact? Nope: Not enough chain wrap capacity..
Sante: just say no. Later 600: yes.
#19
Senior Member
Sante was placed between 600 and DA. The Bicycle Info Project: Shimano Sante
#20
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,402
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
Shimano 600 (6400 era) and Sante were built to about the same level of quality.
I've owned and ran both. I still use a 600 rear hub on my main bike.
I would highly recommend against Sante or 7400-era Dura-Ace. First, despite being high-quality gear, 7 and 8-speed Dura-Ace is filled with incompatibilities with everything else in the Shimano lineup, before or since. Hence the reason these parts perpetually clutter up Ebay.
Sante is also high-quality, notwithstanding the white-paint cosmetics that looks terrible in no time. Here are some of the other problems with Sante:
Sante: just say no. Later 600: yes.
I've owned and ran both. I still use a 600 rear hub on my main bike.
I would highly recommend against Sante or 7400-era Dura-Ace. First, despite being high-quality gear, 7 and 8-speed Dura-Ace is filled with incompatibilities with everything else in the Shimano lineup, before or since. Hence the reason these parts perpetually clutter up Ebay.
Sante is also high-quality, notwithstanding the white-paint cosmetics that looks terrible in no time. Here are some of the other problems with Sante:
- The rear hubs came in freewheel and 7-speed Uniglide freehub versions. Not very useful. I know you can replace the freehub for a 8/9/10 speed Hyperglide version, but why not buy the 600 hubs that are ready to go.
- The Sante brakes were skimpy single-pivots with no quick-releases. The 600 dual pivots are far better in every respect. Or for that matter, any dual pivot brakes are better than any single pivots.
- The Sante cranksets were Biopace. 'Nuff said. They also took a weird custom (narrow) bottom bracket spindle size.
- The Sante rear derailleur was a little work of art. Unfortunately, it had the smallest cog and cog range capacity of any derailleur that I'm aware of. You'll be lucky to run a cogset with 26 teeth. Run a wide range crankset such as a compact? Nope: Not enough chain wrap capacity..
Sante: just say no. Later 600: yes.
#21
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,537
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1523 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times
in
508 Posts
A RD-7400 can be used with a 7s cassette / 8s shifter, 8s cassette / 9s shifter, and so on. I once upgraded a 7400 bike with dt shifters to 9s with a set of ST-5800s.
#22
Senior Member
I can interchange between DA 7400 and 600,105 quite easily. I don't get any kind of interchangeable issues.
#24
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,237 Times
in
653 Posts
Sante Time Line
Shimano introduced the Sante gruppo in 1987, the same year as the new 105 gruppo. It was aimed at the "Sports Cyclist" as opposed to the racing set. As mentioned in posts above it was between the 600 and Dura-Ace products in Shimano's lineup.
What was going in in US pop culture at that time? MIAMI VICE! Flashy colors were the hot ticket!
Unfortunately sports cyclists weren't particularly into the color of little things like components.
Also not that many bikes came OEM with Sante gruppos. 105 components were dirt cheap and 600 parts were a lot less than Sante.
The Sante line quietly disappeared in 1990.
In 1988 Shimano came out with the 600 Ultegra line which were transition products to add some consumer appeal below Dura-Ace.
In 2010 I picked up an almost new 1988 Peugeot Biarritz, all original except for the high rise Nitto Technomics stem and tires. It has a Shimano 600 Integra Tricolor gruppo with BioPace chainrings.
eBay pictures except last one with a normal stem
What was going in in US pop culture at that time? MIAMI VICE! Flashy colors were the hot ticket!
Unfortunately sports cyclists weren't particularly into the color of little things like components.
Also not that many bikes came OEM with Sante gruppos. 105 components were dirt cheap and 600 parts were a lot less than Sante.
The Sante line quietly disappeared in 1990.
In 1988 Shimano came out with the 600 Ultegra line which were transition products to add some consumer appeal below Dura-Ace.
In 2010 I picked up an almost new 1988 Peugeot Biarritz, all original except for the high rise Nitto Technomics stem and tires. It has a Shimano 600 Integra Tricolor gruppo with BioPace chainrings.
eBay pictures except last one with a normal stem
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
#25
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southeastern,VA
Posts: 310
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times
in
22 Posts
A likely improvement to either hubset would be to replace the originals with grade 25 ball bearings.
Last edited by 4funbikes; 11-29-17 at 07:00 AM.