Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Radial spoke vs spiral

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Radial spoke vs spiral

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-17, 03:59 PM
  #1  
THorner
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Radial spoke vs spiral

This might be a sort of esoteric question, but I'm really curious to know if using a 'spiral' lacing pattern is sacrificing strength/rigidity vs a standard radial pattern. Normally, when I lace a front wheel, I cross spokes, but I happen to have a front hub with straight pull format, which doesn't lend itself to crossed spoking. I'm skeptical of radial wheels generally, but this is a front wheel that I won't be too hard on. The reason for my question is that I'm thinking of lacing this hub to a rim of a slightly different ERD and out of pure stinginess, I want to reuse the decent spokes that I already have. This would require me to compensate the length a little by angling the spokes to an adjacent hole. I think the effect looks kind of cool, but appears to my eye as though it wouldn't be as strong or stiff as straight radial. Anyone have some engineering perspective on this? Is the angle sacrificing anything? I'm wondering if I should just buy some correct length spokes.
THorner is offline  
Old 12-27-17, 04:03 PM
  #2  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,065
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 1,562 Times in 1,025 Posts
I don't know what you mean by "spiral". If the spokes aren't radial they have to be in opposing pairs. The minimum way to offset the spokes is a one cross wheel.

Crossed spokes are less rigid than radial, but make the wheel tougher - able to absorb more shock. I've built 1x front wheels for that reason.
Kontact is offline  
Old 12-27-17, 04:16 PM
  #3  
Jiggle
Senior Member
 
Jiggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,266

Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Ask around the bike shops. One of them may have a spoke cutter.
Jiggle is offline  
Old 12-27-17, 04:32 PM
  #4  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
If one side of the hub is pulling one direction,

& the other pulling the opposite direction,

It sounds like a short-lived experiment.
woodcraft is offline  
Old 12-27-17, 05:08 PM
  #5  
dabac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times in 222 Posts
It’s entirely possible to build a tangential laced wheel w/o crosses.
You’ll have all spokes on one side leaning clockwise and all on the other side leaning counter-clockwise.
You can even use the same spoke calculations as for a regular crossed pattern.
It will expose the hub shell to a twisting force, so don’t do 3x on hubs with narrow hub shells/spindles.
I’ve got a pic somewhere of a hub that twisted during final tensioning on such a build.
For 1x and/or hubs with wide shells it’s no problem.
On a rim brake front wheel there are no particular concerns for use.
But I wouldn’t want to use one for a torque-carrying hub.
One whole side going floppy simultaneously from torque is an experience I’ll happily leave to others...
dabac is offline  
Old 12-27-17, 09:55 PM
  #6  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
I built a lot of wheels. Hundreds. But all alloy. I am not certain, but of the opinion the rim material - and profile matters.

A thinner "weaker" rim might work better with more crosses.

For a fewer spoked wheel a 2X is more significant an angel than a 3X on a higher spoked wheel.
Doge is offline  
Old 12-28-17, 05:46 AM
  #7  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2483 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times in 1,678 Posts
Originally Posted by dabac
It’s entirely possible to build a tangential laced wheel w/o crosses.
You’ll have all spokes on one side leaning clockwise and all on the other side leaning counter-clockwise.
You can even use the same spoke calculations as for a regular crossed pattern.
It will expose the hub shell to a twisting force, so don’t do 3x on hubs with narrow hub shells/spindles.
I’ve got a pic somewhere of a hub that twisted during final tensioning on such a build.
For 1x and/or hubs with wide shells it’s no problem.
On a rim brake front wheel there are no particular concerns for use.
But I wouldn’t want to use one for a torque-carrying hub.
One whole side going floppy simultaneously from torque is an experience I’ll happily leave to others...
All true. An engineering student who worked in a bike shop with me in the 1970s used to amuse himself by building his front wheels with a one-side-clockwise/other-side-counterclockwise no-cross spoking pattern.

On the other hand, a Campy rep once mentioned that they occasionally had to turn down warranty claims for hubs that had been twisted as a result of incorrect spoking. "Campy hubs don't come out of the box with oval oil holes," he said.
Trakhak is online now  
Old 12-28-17, 08:30 AM
  #8  
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Just do it right and be done with it. Straight pull spokes can be crossed if the hub is set up for that. If the hub is set up for the straight pull spokes to be radial, then that is what you have to do. Don't screw around. If you have to buy new spokes, so buy new spokes.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 12-29-17, 12:31 PM
  #9  
THorner
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for all the feedback. I probably should have been clearer in saying that this front hub I'm considering is intended for straight pull radial spoking, and that what I mean by 'spiral lacing' is to lace each side at roughly a 20deg tangent, uncrossed. I've seen it done enough times to feel like it might not be a disaster. It's usually on BMX or street freestyle single speeds, which often put aesthetics above sound function, though. Obviously you'd never want to do this to a drive wheel, but for a front wheel, it might not be much worse than radial. I didn't feel like the angle of tangent I'm considering would be a detriment to the hub flange, and I was sort of curious to see how the spiral lacing would perform. I think the main stress would be from converting and redistributing the vertical forces around the circumference of the rim, which would seem intuitively to work ok. Ultimately though, I think a straight pull radial hub is the wrong thing to try this on, so I'm just going to do what I know to be optimal.
THorner is offline  
Old 12-29-17, 03:18 PM
  #10  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,065
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 1,562 Times in 1,025 Posts
Originally Posted by THorner
Thanks for all the feedback. I probably should have been clearer in saying that this front hub I'm considering is intended for straight pull radial spoking, and that what I mean by 'spiral lacing' is to lace each side at roughly a 20deg tangent, uncrossed. I've seen it done enough times to feel like it might not be a disaster. It's usually on BMX or street freestyle single speeds, which often put aesthetics above sound function, though. Obviously you'd never want to do this to a drive wheel, but for a front wheel, it might not be much worse than radial. I didn't feel like the angle of tangent I'm considering would be a detriment to the hub flange, and I was sort of curious to see how the spiral lacing would perform. I think the main stress would be from converting and redistributing the vertical forces around the circumference of the rim, which would seem intuitively to work ok. Ultimately though, I think a straight pull radial hub is the wrong thing to try this on, so I'm just going to do what I know to be optimal.
I still have no idea what you are describing. Do the spokes cross?
Kontact is offline  
Old 12-29-17, 03:42 PM
  #11  
THorner
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What I refer to as spiral lacing is an uncrossed pattern laced at opposing tangents for each flange. I'll try to attach an example:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
spiral lacing.jpg (32.6 KB, 105 views)
THorner is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 10:17 AM
  #12  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Go to DAN'S COMP - Bmx Bikes, Bmx Parts, Bmx Clothing, Bmx Shoes and Bmx Accessories!, find their phone number and call them, and have brand new Sapim spokes of the proper length delivered in a few days for <$20.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 10:31 AM
  #13  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,724

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5790 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times in 1,431 Posts
The only issue with spiral patterns on front wheels, is that they impose a torque between the flanges which want to twist in opposite directions. Some hubs can take it, some can't.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 03:54 PM
  #14  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,065
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 1,562 Times in 1,025 Posts
I've heard of twisted Dura Ace hubs doing something like this.
Kontact is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 04:15 PM
  #15  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,724

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5790 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times in 1,431 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
I've heard of twisted Dura Ace hubs doing something like this.
Yes, this is what I was referring to.

It's relatively easy to twist the barrel (section of the shell holding the flanges apart) on hubs where it's in the 15-20mm range. Many others, mostly of the machined from billet type with barrels in the 30mm range can take this build OK.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 04:43 PM
  #16  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,065
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 1,562 Times in 1,025 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Yes, this is what I was referring to.

It's relatively easy to twist the barrel (section of the shell holding the flanges apart) on hubs where it's in the 15-20mm range. Many others, mostly of the machined from billet type with barrels in the 30mm range can take this build OK.
I think it is going to depend on the spiral angle and the number of spokes. 36 spokes at normal tension is an enormous amount of torque compared to 24 spokes.
Kontact is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 05:52 PM
  #17  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times in 3,354 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
I think it is going to depend on the spiral angle and the number of spokes. 36 spokes at normal tension is an enormous amount of torque compared to 24 spokes.
Plus, with every bump, each side will try to untwist in opposite directions.

Such a lacing pattern may be aesthetically pleasing, but wouldn't be my choice.

The vintage hubs had a relatively small diameter center barrel sections, and would be a poor choice. More modern ones may have a larger diameter center section, but may also use thinner walls. There are a few offroad hubs with enormous barrels, and perhaps would be OK, but there would be no benefit of such lacing.

Radial front seems to be increasingly popular (with rim brake front wheels), and makes some sense with the hub hanging directly below the rim.
CliffordK is online now  
Old 12-30-17, 07:14 PM
  #18  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,065
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 1,562 Times in 1,025 Posts
Bumps shouldn't affect the wheel as a whole, just the section that is right around the impact.
Kontact is offline  
Old 01-01-18, 05:56 AM
  #19  
seedsbelize 
smelling the roses
 
seedsbelize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México
Posts: 15,320

Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5

Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7081 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times in 612 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Just do it right and be done with it. Straight pull spokes can be crossed if the hub is set up for that. If the hub is set up for the straight pull spokes to be radial, then that is what you have to do. Don't screw around. If you have to buy new spokes, so buy new spokes.
Just take one dip and end it!
__________________
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
Auto-pause is a honey-tongued devil whispering sweet lies in your ear.


seedsbelize is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Retro Grouch
General Cycling Discussion
11
02-21-15 05:03 PM
bikeboy100
Bicycle Mechanics
15
06-01-14 06:48 PM
senseamp
Folding Bikes
6
11-13-13 05:17 PM
FastJake
Bicycle Mechanics
9
08-08-11 12:56 AM
walterz54
Bicycle Mechanics
13
03-20-10 12:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.