Gear change progression?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Gear change progression?
How do you figure out what your gear change progression, for possible lack of a better term, should be on a given bike? What I mean is, how do you figure out exactly which gear combinatiions that you should use as you progress upwards, so that you do not choose redundant gears, or maybe even drop down while shifting up?
Thanks,
Danny
Thanks,
Danny
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
How do you figure out what your gear change progression, for possible lack of a better term, should be on a given bike? What I mean is, how do you figure out exactly which gear combinatiions that you should use as you progress upwards, so that you do not choose redundant gears, or maybe even drop down while shifting up?
Thanks,
Danny
Thanks,
Danny
Bicycle Gear Calculator
plug in your own setup and it’ll show you how the various combinations stack up
#3
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
I generally shift 1 at a time, harder or easier as terrain changes.
The front chainrings are like "High" and "Low" range.
Lots of short hills near me, so I am in the small chainring most of the time.
i shift to the large ring if I have extended time on flat roads or longer downhills.
I have no idea which gears overlap, not really relevant when riding.
Whichever gear keeps my RPM in the 85 - 95 range
The front chainrings are like "High" and "Low" range.
Lots of short hills near me, so I am in the small chainring most of the time.
i shift to the large ring if I have extended time on flat roads or longer downhills.
I have no idea which gears overlap, not really relevant when riding.
Whichever gear keeps my RPM in the 85 - 95 range
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#4
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,958
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10424 Post(s)
Liked 11,886 Times
in
6,090 Posts
I generally shift 1 at a time, harder or easier as terrain changes.
The front chainrings are like "High" and "Low" range.
Lots of short hills near me, so I am in the small chainring most of the time.
i shift to the large ring if I have extended time on flat roads or longer downhills.
I have no idea which gears overlap, not really relevant when riding.
Whichever gear keeps my RPM in the 85 - 95 range
The front chainrings are like "High" and "Low" range.
Lots of short hills near me, so I am in the small chainring most of the time.
i shift to the large ring if I have extended time on flat roads or longer downhills.
I have no idea which gears overlap, not really relevant when riding.
Whichever gear keeps my RPM in the 85 - 95 range
Over time, you'll get a feeling for how far to go up or down when the grade changes, so you'll shift into bigger gears (meaning smaller cogs) as you summit, or shift into smaller gears (meaning bigger cogs) as you lose momentum going up a hill. You'll also figure out how many cogs you need to go up or down when you change from one chainring to another in the front. Some of my bikes, with 53/39, it's two. The 50/34 and 52/36, it's 3.
The key is not overthinking. I generally couldn't tell you what gear I'm in, till I'm in either the largest or smallest and can't go any further.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#5
Senior Member
When deciding what pornography was, a justice on the Supreme Court stated “you know it when you see it”, so in this case “you know it when you feel it”.
Likes For Mulberry20:
#6
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Back in the days of the 10 speeds, a rider had to do a few double shifts to get progression. That meant he had to shift both the derailer and the chain rings. Really dumb IMO.
As I have posted before especially if you have a front triple, look at it this way. Granny for hills, center ring for most riding, and the big ring for down hills or with the wind. Pick one of the three and simply shift across the rear cluster. That may not work well on some short chain stay DF bikes but it does work well on bents.
As I have posted before especially if you have a front triple, look at it this way. Granny for hills, center ring for most riding, and the big ring for down hills or with the wind. Pick one of the three and simply shift across the rear cluster. That may not work well on some short chain stay DF bikes but it does work well on bents.
Likes For rydabent:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Back in the days of the 10 speeds, a rider had to do a few double shifts to get progression. That meant he had to shift both the derailer and the chain rings. Really dumb IMO.
As I have posted before especially if you have a front triple, look at it this way. Granny for hills, center ring for most riding, and the big ring for down hills or with the wind. Pick one of the three and simply shift across the rear cluster. That may not work well on some short chain stay DF bikes but it does work well on bents.
As I have posted before especially if you have a front triple, look at it this way. Granny for hills, center ring for most riding, and the big ring for down hills or with the wind. Pick one of the three and simply shift across the rear cluster. That may not work well on some short chain stay DF bikes but it does work well on bents.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#8
Banned
Internal gear hubs do the ratio sequencing for you.
Hence I found them Ideal in the heavy rain, as I wear a cycling rain cape , blocking my view of looking down,
to see what gear ratio combination I'm in..
Sheldon gears is another calculating program ... chain-wheel & cog combinations determine the IGH range Low & High..
That Option is offered on that site.
...
Hence I found them Ideal in the heavy rain, as I wear a cycling rain cape , blocking my view of looking down,
to see what gear ratio combination I'm in..
Sheldon gears is another calculating program ... chain-wheel & cog combinations determine the IGH range Low & High..
That Option is offered on that site.
...
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I probably view things a bit differently than some. My road bike as a triple and mountain bike as a double. My goal is to shift chainrings as little as possible.
I ride in 48 or 38 on my road bike and only use the 30 chainring when I really have to.
Mountain bike 34/24 and depending on the terrain, I’ll run in one or the other; mostly climbing 24, mostly flat or downhill 34.
I like my cassettes to be wide enough to let me stay in one ring as much as I can. This is not quite like having multiple 1x setups because I use fewer cogs
Years ago half step gearing was used with 5 speed freewheels, but 1x10, 11, 12 have eliminated the need.
I ride in 48 or 38 on my road bike and only use the 30 chainring when I really have to.
Mountain bike 34/24 and depending on the terrain, I’ll run in one or the other; mostly climbing 24, mostly flat or downhill 34.
I like my cassettes to be wide enough to let me stay in one ring as much as I can. This is not quite like having multiple 1x setups because I use fewer cogs
Years ago half step gearing was used with 5 speed freewheels, but 1x10, 11, 12 have eliminated the need.
#10
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,532
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3665 Post(s)
Liked 5,413 Times
in
2,751 Posts
I don't believe I've ever done much pondering about this. I shift up and down the cassette as needed, shift the front when I spin out or something rubs. Admittedly not very thoughtful. Maybe there are subconscious choices being made?
Likes For shelbyfv:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I try not to overthink it. As long as I’m not cross chaining, it’s not supercritical.
#12
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
Only if you're OCD enough to insist on always following a strict, linear progression. I don't, anymore. If I need a little change, I shift the rear derailleur. If I need a bigger change, I shift the front. I don't much care if the gear I land in is the next one in the sequence.
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#13
Banned
basic Math
front T number turns cog T number in a ratio.. eg 44:22 - 2:1
. multiply that by diameter of wheel typically inches,
optionally calculate circumference
gives you how far you go every crank rotation,
. multiply that by diameter of wheel typically inches,
optionally calculate circumference
gives you how far you go every crank rotation,
#14
Senior Member
The big ring is used until the next to largest sprocket is used. If you need a lower/slower gear change to the little ring, usually followed by shifting 1 to 3 sprockets smaller. I always shift 2 and then adjust from there. If you get too bogged down before shifting to the little ring, no sprocket shifts may be needed.
Likes For DaveSSS:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,396
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 74 Times
in
54 Posts
I have a touring with a 50-45-28 triple. That one needs a bit of thinking as there are so many equivalent (or close to) ratios. But on a 53-39, or 50-34 in my old age it doesn't take me long to have a feel for what ring I should be in and then the cassette just follows naturally. I think the bigger question is more personal -- get a wider ratio cassette so you spend all your time except climbing in the big ring, or a close ratio cassette and get a feel for when it's best to change rings. I do use big big sometimes just to get over a hump.
scott s.
.
scott s.
.
#16
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
This is a pretty silly thread.
#17
Senior Member
Use the Popeye method: 53x11 and a can of Spinach
Likes For roth rothar:
#18
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times
in
527 Posts
Make it easy on yourself and go to a 1x setup. If you insist on multiple chain rings in the front, half-step gearing is marvelous. Yes, you have to overcome a distaste for shifting with your left hand, but half-step eliminates a lot of redundant combinations and also allows a logical progression through the gears.
#19
Senior Member
But seriously, with my triple chainring I just pick the one that I anticipate I might need soon if its important, Like climbing or for quick acceleration.
This works best if the cassette cogs are spaced correctly. For me, that's a 10- 13% increase with each up tick
My 1'st derailleur bike was a 10 speed racer with a 2 x 5 speed drivetrain. Because the 5 rear cogs were spaced widely apart, The engineer who designed the bike chose to use chainrings that would put a step between each rear cog. So while the single shift was a bit higher then ideal, If it bothered me, I could always find the next gear up or down. With just 2 chainring's it's easy to do.
#20
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I can never seriously give people gearing advice because I'm a genetic freak who cruises best at level in 53X11 or 53x12. I'm also a huge fan of the 1930s-1940s Popeye cartoons, but I'm really not that into spinach.
My basic method is ride in highest gear then gear down for hills, headwinds, and sometimes heat. This will not work for most people, and I've had to listen with amusement to people telling me it can't possibly be working for me. Apparently, if I do it another 50 years, I WILL blow out my knees.
#21
Junior Member
Small chainring, 1 2 3, middle chainring 3 4 5 6, large chaining 6 7 8.
Pretty simple
Pretty simple
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Only if you're OCD enough to insist on always following a strict, linear progression. I don't, anymore. If I need a little change, I shift the rear derailleur. If I need a bigger change, I shift the front. I don't much care if the gear I land in is the next one in the sequence.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#23
Senior Member
In front, I use the large chainring about 95% of the time. The smaller one only gets used for steep climbs, riding slowly (on sidewalks, for example), getting started across a busy street after a stop, etc. Once I get going I'm right back into the big ring and I shift from gear to gear (large to small) in the back as I increase speed. Pretty simple really. I am sure most people do similar.
Some day I should try a triple-chainring bike. That extra sprocket will probably blow my mind!
Some day I should try a triple-chainring bike. That extra sprocket will probably blow my mind!
Last edited by Reflector Guy; 08-10-20 at 09:23 AM.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Along the Rivers of Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,255
Bikes: 2011 Novara Forza Hybrid, 2005 Trek 820, 1989 Cannondale SR500 Black Lightning, 1975 Mundo Cycles Caloi Racer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
157 Posts
I'm in the middle chainring of my triple about 95% of the time. I shift the rear to get to the "that feels right" gear as terrain, wind, and my general attitude dictate.
Likes For Altair 4: