Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

"Looks like your fork is bent."

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

"Looks like your fork is bent."

Old 09-19-20, 05:54 PM
  #26  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,672

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,743 Times in 934 Posts
But seriously - suppose I was a seller and wanted to prove with pictures my frame/fork weren't bent, how would I do that?
A good question.

In my case, I eyeball the fork from both sides and square on from the front. A center line, drawn through the head tube and extended down the fork blade will help to determine bent or unbent. Hard to explain how to do this but easy enough to do. If the center line of the head tube extends down the center line of the fork, you are OK for that part of the gauging.


Looking directly square on at the front, does the wheel evenly split the distance between fork blades? If you, that is another positive suggesting no fork damage. If the wheel does not evenly split the distance, the problem could be either a bent fork or an out of true wheel (just turn the wheel around and install to see if the even split thing changes - if not, the wheel is probably OK...


Cracks in the paint are an immediate indicator of frame or fork trauma. When you see these cracks, you better know what you are doing to make them go away and get everything true and good to go.

Riding the bike will also help to indicate a bent something or other. If the bike pulls to one side or the other, suspect head set issues or a bent frame or fork.

Other than that, just ask us and we will all tell you what we think. In my case, I suggest a problem only if I really see something that raises red flags. Often times, it is picture distortion. Those other times - pooey stinko!
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Likes For randyjawa:
Old 09-19-20, 05:58 PM
  #27  
jethin
Senior Member
 
jethin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,108
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 314 Times in 155 Posts
I have come to the conclusion that a straight fork/head tube looks slightly bent backwards to the eye/in photos. I don’t know why this is the case. It often seems more pronounced in larger frames.

I don’t think most people would notice if they were riding a bike with a mildly bent fork.

The fork on the Miyata looks slightly bent to me. Perhaps it was built slightly off. I’ll bet it rides fine.

In any case, if you bend the fork on a Miyata slightly backwards you just get a Colnago. The seller should this quadruple his asking price.

Last edited by jethin; 09-21-20 at 08:15 AM.
jethin is offline  
Old 09-19-20, 06:04 PM
  #28  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 14,101

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4493 Post(s)
Liked 6,299 Times in 3,633 Posts
Originally Posted by dunkleosteus
Are you saying if I can tell pink from purple then I'm not straight?

But seriously - suppose I was a seller and wanted to prove with pictures my frame/fork weren't bent, how would I do that?
You would have to figure out how to vet a buyer which may or may not be easier than proving the fork is or is not bent.
merziac is offline  
Old 09-19-20, 06:47 PM
  #29  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,496

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2401 Post(s)
Liked 4,350 Times in 2,075 Posts
Originally Posted by robertj298
I'm just talking about people that post photos of their bikes. It even happens on Facebook
Learned it from here?

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 09-19-20, 07:42 PM
  #30  
chainwhip
Senior Member
 
chainwhip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 564
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
Liked 135 Times in 84 Posts
Originally Posted by dunkleosteus
But seriously - suppose I was a seller and wanted to prove with pictures my frame/fork weren't bent, how would I do that?
With several non-trivial caveats, namely:

1) "Proof" would require in-person inspection(not limited to buckled tubes/lugs/paint or steerer) , disassembly/reassembly, and test riding.
2) Photos commonly have distortion, and an accurate in-plane side or frontal shot can be difficult to achieve.

That said., overlaid traces to mark out the geometry can give a starting point.

Apologies for the rough qualty of the drawing using a cheap photo editor on a tablet with my finger for a stylus.
But I think you can get the idea:


The lines could be finer, as well as extended longer so that they cross (or align).
chainwhip is offline  
Likes For chainwhip:
Old 09-19-20, 08:52 PM
  #31  
davester
Senior Member
 
davester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,531

Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 926 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times in 482 Posts
I think this thread is bent.
davester is offline  
Likes For davester:
Old 09-19-20, 10:27 PM
  #32  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,522

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,798 Times in 1,798 Posts
Originally Posted by randyjawa
A good question.

In my case, I eyeball the fork from both sides and square on from the front. A center line, drawn through the head tube and extended down the fork blade will help to determine bent or unbent. Hard to explain how to do this but easy enough to do. If the center line of the head tube extends down the center line of the fork, you are OK for that part of the gauging.


Looking directly square on at the front, does the wheel evenly split the distance between fork blades? If you, that is another positive suggesting no fork damage. If the wheel does not evenly split the distance, the problem could be either a bent fork or an out of true wheel (just turn the wheel around and install to see if the even split thing changes - if not, the wheel is probably OK...
Nice bike. Too bad the dork disc is bent.
canklecat is offline  
Likes For canklecat:
Old 09-19-20, 10:37 PM
  #33  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,932

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26249 Post(s)
Liked 10,231 Times in 7,100 Posts
Originally Posted by Johnny Cochrane
...if the fork is bent, you must repent !
Originally Posted by Mike Tyson
...everyone thinks his fork is straight, until he gets punched in the face.
...I tried to bring to bring a little science and optics to this topic in this other thread. But the Bent Forkers shouted me down. Now I just .
3alarmer is offline  
Likes For 3alarmer:
Old 09-19-20, 10:42 PM
  #34  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,932

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26249 Post(s)
Liked 10,231 Times in 7,100 Posts
The lowrider guys here do it on purpose...

3alarmer is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 12:44 AM
  #35  
Lascauxcaveman 
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 8,016

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times in 355 Posts
Originally Posted by robertj298
Why do so many people on here say it looks like your fork is bent when they see a photo of your bike on here and most of the time it's not.
Because in the photo, it actually looks like the fork is bent? Like that blue and pink Miyata in post #11 . Or is it blue and purple? Hell, I can't tell
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●


Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 09-20-20 at 12:57 AM.
Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Likes For Lascauxcaveman:
Old 09-20-20, 06:14 AM
  #36  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by Lascauxcaveman
Because in the photo, it actually looks like the fork is bent? Like that blue and pink Miyata in post #11 . Or is it blue and purple? Hell, I can't tell
Yup. At least, rhat's my assessment of the situation.

Some years ago i bought a frame from a seller who is, I think, generally well regarded. He sells a lot of good old bike parts at reasonable prices, well described, good photos. It was not a cheap frame, and shipping was not cheap either. Total cost to me was around $400 IIRC. The frame turned out to be bent. Once it was pointed out to the seller, he argued the damage was very slight. He also suggested the frame was bent in shipping, or I'd bent it myself. Seriously? It had the kind of damage that can only happen in a head-on crash.
​​​​​
Well, that was a pain in the ass to resolve, and an expensive lesson, namely that it's easy to miss a bent frame or fork, even for someone with a lot of experience. So, on these forums, when i see someone making what might be an expensive mistake, i try to point it out.

Sure, it's a meme. And sometimes a joke, about as funny as "send it to me for proper disposal," which we also see every day or two. But most often, if someone suggests a fork might be bent, it's because it looks bent. And in some cases it will turn out to be bent.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Likes For rhm:
Old 09-20-20, 07:31 AM
  #37  
Narhay
Senior Member
 
Narhay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,731
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 956 Post(s)
Liked 568 Times in 314 Posts
40-50+ years is a long time for someone to potentially ride into a curb, especially considering the condition most of our bikes show up in.
Narhay is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 08:09 AM
  #38  
Homebrew01
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,845

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 924 Times in 610 Posts
I should post a picture of my bike. I think the fork is bent. I raced and crashed a few times it decades ago, and have massive wheel-toe overlap.
Although, I built it to be a tight criterium racer, so overlap was expected.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 12:54 PM
  #39  
conspiratemus1
Used to be Conspiratemus
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 163 Posts
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
Sure looks bent. Is it?
“Most of the time it isn’t,” according to the OP....
conspiratemus1 is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 01:08 PM
  #40  
branko_76 
Senior Member
 
branko_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 701 Post(s)
Liked 667 Times in 417 Posts
Originally Posted by robertj298
Why do so many people on here say it looks like your fork is bent when they see a photo of your bike on here and most of the time it's not.
I recall you starting numerous threads earlier this year asking some very newbie type questions. Many here have years and years of experience riding and working on bikes and have seen much more than I and much, much more than you apparently have. I'm not a pro mechanic, but have been restoring vintage bikes for quite a while but when someone points something out that I have not noticed, I take a closer look. Even if they are wrong, I usually learn something anyway.

Be humble my friend, and keep learning.




......................

Last edited by branko_76; 09-20-20 at 01:11 PM.
branko_76 is offline  
Likes For branko_76:
Old 09-20-20, 01:14 PM
  #41  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 14,101

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4493 Post(s)
Liked 6,299 Times in 3,633 Posts
Originally Posted by branko_76
I recall you starting numerous threads earlier this year asking some very newbie type questions. Many here have years and years of experience riding and working on bikes and have seen much more than I and much, much more than you apparently have. I'm not a pro mechanic, but have been restoring vintage bikes for quite a while but when someone points something out that I have not noticed, I take a closer look. Even if they are wrong, I usually learn something anyway.

Be humble my friend, and keep learning.




......................
Exactly this, if you're not learning, you're not paying attention or capitalizing on the opportunity to do so.
merziac is offline  
Likes For merziac:
Old 09-20-20, 01:30 PM
  #42  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 14,101

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4493 Post(s)
Liked 6,299 Times in 3,633 Posts
Originally Posted by robertj298
Wasn't really referring to sales this I can understand if you're buying a bike. I'm just talking about people that post photos of their bikes. It even happens on Facebook
Even in regular photos if we see something suspect, we call it out as someone could be in grave danger.

And while it doesn't happen very often we don't want you or anybody else to be the one that eventually sells a bike that hurts or kills someone.

There have been instances where something was pointed out, many others say "I don't see it", it gets taken apart to find a cracked steerer tube, stem, crown or some other anomaly that could have been catastrophic had it been undiscovered.

Like the majority of what we do, we have best interests at heart albeit sometimes very spiritedly if not annoyingly, sometimes.
merziac is offline  
Likes For merziac:
Old 09-20-20, 01:43 PM
  #43  
conspiratemus1
Used to be Conspiratemus
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 163 Posts
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
...I tried to bring to bring a little science and optics to this topic in this other thread. But the Bent Forkers shouted me down. Now I just .
I read your optical reference. As you say, the difficulty in determining if a photo of a structure shows straight lines or curves as they really are lies in the fact that we don’t know the relationship between the focal plane of the image-gathering surface and the plane of the structure being photographed. If the two planes are not parallel there will be distortion that no amount of fiddling with rulers on the monitor or paper photographic print will correct.

This effect is immediately apparent to anyone who has tried to photograph anything like a building taller than one story or a statue of a general on horseback. When you tilt the camera back “to get it all in”, you invariably find that the building or statue looks like it is falling over backwards in your picture (maybe that is the point with the statue...). Vertical parallel lines no longer look parallel and measuring with a ruler on the print will show them to be not parallel. But we know the building is standing perfectly vertically: the photo of it is not a true image. This effect, and measures to adjust for it, are described in introductory photography texts. The optical characteristics of different lenses are added to this, especially at large apertures.

Curved, raked structures like forks are even more difficult to assess in casual photographs. Perspective of curved things like a bend in the road or the graceful ellipse of a Spitfire’s wing are challenging to draw properly from an oblique view.

Last edited by conspiratemus1; 09-20-20 at 01:56 PM.
conspiratemus1 is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 03:55 PM
  #44  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 14,101

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4493 Post(s)
Liked 6,299 Times in 3,633 Posts
Originally Posted by branko_76
I recall you starting numerous threads earlier this year asking some very newbie type questions. Many here have years and years of experience riding and working on bikes and have seen much more than I and much, much more than you apparently have. I'm not a pro mechanic, but have been restoring vintage bikes for quite a while but when someone points something out that I have not noticed, I take a closer look. Even if they are wrong, I usually learn something anyway.

Be humble my friend, and keep learning.




......................

Also should have noted that the newbie questions are a cornerstone of what goes on here, if they ever stop, we're all in big trouble, keep em coming.
merziac is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 05:16 PM
  #45  
branko_76 
Senior Member
 
branko_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 701 Post(s)
Liked 667 Times in 417 Posts
Originally Posted by merziac
Also should have noted that the newbie questions are a cornerstone of what goes on here, if they ever stop, we're all in big trouble, keep em coming.
I totally agree, I learn quite a bit from newbie threads, not only from other more experienced members, but when I respond to a question, I often double check my answer before hitting "enter"
branko_76 is offline  
Likes For branko_76:
Old 09-20-20, 05:53 PM
  #46  
Reynolds 
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,586

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 711 Times in 392 Posts
If there isn't an app to check fork straightness on a photo already, I'm sure it will come out soon.
Reynolds is online now  
Likes For Reynolds:
Old 09-20-20, 06:03 PM
  #47  
branko_76 
Senior Member
 
branko_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 701 Post(s)
Liked 667 Times in 417 Posts
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
Sometimes it's just a friendly, passing remark.
yes, kind of like when you run into an old aquaintance..."hey man, good to see you, are you gaining weight or are you just losing your hair?"
branko_76 is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 10:52 PM
  #48  
conspiratemus1
Used to be Conspiratemus
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 163 Posts
^^^ Do people really say things like that to acquaintances? If I did, I would probably conclude it was the explanation for why I don’t have many friends. It sounds gratuitously hurtful. I do have an acquaintance whom I run into every few years. He went through a period where he would say, “You’re looking great! Have you lost weight?” I knew he was being glib and insincere but at least not hurtful.

”Fork is bent,” as a supposedly good-natured jibe seems particularly malicious if said publicly and indelibly when the fork’s owner is trying honestly to sell an undamaged bike.
conspiratemus1 is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 11:52 PM
  #49  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,338
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2429 Post(s)
Liked 2,888 Times in 1,646 Posts
Complaining about someone pointing out that a fork is bent is called "killing the messenger."
Trakhak is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 12:07 AM
  #50  
conspiratemus1
Used to be Conspiratemus
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 163 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
Complaining about someone pointing out that a fork is bent is called "killing the messenger."
If the messenger brought news to the King that he knew was false, or was recklessly careless about its veracity, and knew the King was not in a position to be sure about the true state of affairs, the King probably would kill that messenger.
conspiratemus1 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.